Nordwind Airlines, Leningradskaya Str., Building 25, Office 27. 28, Moscow Region, Khimki City, 141402, Russia; Pegas Touristik, a/k/a Pegas Touristik OOO, 5 Building 1 Volokolamsk Highway, Moscow, Russian Federation, 125080, and Yenigöl, Nergiz Sk. No:94/1, Muratpaşa/Antalya, Türkiye, 07230; Order Renewing Temporary Denial of Export Privileges

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published

June 21, 2023

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentIndustry and Security Bureau

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 88 Issue 118 (Wednesday, June 21, 2023)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 118 (Wednesday, June 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40202-40205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2023-13160]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

Nordwind Airlines, Leningradskaya Str., Building 25, Office 27.
28, Moscow Region, Khimki City, 141402, Russia; Pegas Touristik, a/k/a
Pegas Touristik OOO, 5 Building 1 Volokolamsk Highway, Moscow, Russian
Federation, 125080, and Yenig[ouml]l, Nergiz Sk. No:94/1,
Muratpa[scedil]a/Antalya, T[uuml]rkiye, 07230; Order Renewing Temporary
Denial of Export Privileges

Pursuant to Section 766.24 of the Export Administration
Regulations, 15 CFR parts 730-774 (2021) (``EAR'' or ``the
Regulations''),\1\ I hereby grant the request of the Office of Export
Enforcement (``OEE'') to renew the temporary denial order (``TDO'')
issued in this matter on December 20, 2022. I find that renewal of this
order, along with the addition of Pegas Touristik a/k/a Pegas Touristik
OOO (``Pegas Touristik'') as a related person, is necessary in the
public interest to prevent an imminent violation of the Regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ On August 13, 2018, the President signed into law the John
S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019,
which includes the Export Control Reform Act of 2018, 50 U.S.C.
4801-4852 (``ECRA''). While Section 1766 of ECRA repeals the
provisions of the Export Administration Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2401 et
seq. (``EAA''), (except for three sections which are inapplicable
here), Section 1768 of ECRA provides, in pertinent part, that all
orders, rules, regulations, and other forms of administrative action
that were made or issued under the EAA, including as continued in
effect pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act,
50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq. (``IEEPA''), and were in effect as of ECRA's
date of enactment (August 13, 2018), shall continue in effect
according to their terms until modified, superseded, set aside, or
revoked through action undertaken pursuant to the authority provided
under ECRA. Moreover, Section 1761(a)(5) of ECRA authorizes the
issuance of temporary denial orders. 50 U.S.C. 4820(a)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Procedural History

On June 24, 2022, I signed an order denying the export privileges
of Nordwind Airlines (``Nordwind'') for a period of 180 days on the
ground that issuance of the order was necessary in the public interest
to prevent an imminent violation of the Regulations. The order was
issued ex parte pursuant to Section 766.24(a) of the Regulations and
was effective upon issuance.\2\ This temporary denial order was
subsequently renewed in accordance with Section 766.24(d) of the
Regulations.\3\ The renewal order issued on December 20, 2022 and was
effective upon issuance.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\2\ The TDO was published in the Federal Register on June 29,
2022 (87 FR 38704).
\3\ Section 766.24(d) provides that BIS may seek renewal of a
temporary denial order for additional 180-day renewal periods, if it
believes that renewal is necessary in the public interest to prevent
an imminent violation. Renewal requests are to be made in writing no
later than 20 days before the scheduled expiration date of a
temporary denial order. Renewal requests may include discussion of
any additional or changed circumstances, and may seek appropriate
modifications to the order, including the addition of parties as
respondents or related persons.
\4\ The December 20, 2022 renewal order was published in the
Federal Register on December 27, 2022 (87 FR 79725).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

On May 18, 2023, BIS, through OEE, submitted a written request for
renewal of the Nordwind TDO that issued on December 20, 2022. The
written request was made more than 20 days before the TDO's scheduled
expiration. A copy of the renewal request was sent to Nordwind in
accordance with Sections 766.5 and 766.24(d) of the Regulations. No
opposition to the renewal of the TDO has been received. OEE submitted a
separate written request that Pegas Touristik be added to the TDO as a
related person to Nordwind in accordance with Section 766.23 of the
Regulations.

[[Page 40203]]

II. Renewal of the TDO

A. Legal Standard

Pursuant to Section 766.24, BIS may issue an order temporarily
denying a respondent's export privileges upon a showing that the order
is necessary in the public interest to prevent an ``imminent
violation'' of the Regulations, or any order, license or authorization
issued thereunder. 15 CFR 766.24(b)(1) and 766.24(d). ``A violation may
be `imminent' either in time or degree of likelihood.'' 15 CFR
766.24(b)(3). BIS may show ``either that a violation is about to occur,
or that the general circumstances of the matter under investigation or
case under criminal or administrative charges demonstrate a likelihood
of future violations.'' Id. As to the likelihood of future violations,
BIS may show that the violation under investigation or charge ``is
significant, deliberate, covert and/or likely to occur again, rather
than technical or negligent[.]'' Id. A ``lack of information
establishing the precise time a violation may occur does not preclude a
finding that a violation is imminent, so long as there is sufficient
reason to believe the likelihood of a violation.'' Id.
Pursuant to Sections 766.23 and 766.24, a TDO may also be made
applicable to other persons if BIS has reason to believe that they are
related to a respondent and that applying the order to them is
necessary to prevent its evasion. 15 CFR 766.23(a)-(b) and 766.24(c). A
``related person'' is a person, either at the time the TDO's issuance
or thereafter, who is related to a respondent ``by ownership, control,
position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the
conduct of trade or business.'' 15 CFR 766.23(a). Related persons may
be added to a TDO on an ex-parte basis in accordance with Section
766.23(b) of the Regulations. 15 CFR 766.23(b).

B. The TDO and BIS's Request for Renewal

The U.S. Commerce Department, through BIS, responded to the Russian
Federation's (``Russia's'') further invasion of Ukraine by implementing
a sweeping series of stringent export controls that severely restrict
Russia's access to technologies and other items that it needs to
sustain its aggressive military capabilities. These controls primarily
target Russia's defense, aerospace, and maritime sectors and are
intended to cut off Russia's access to vital technological inputs,
atrophy key sectors of its industrial base, and undercut Russia's
strategic ambitions to exert influence on the world stage. Effective
February 24, 2022, BIS imposed expansive controls on aviation-related
(e.g., Commerce Control List Categories 7 and 9) items to Russia,
including a license requirement for the export, reexport or transfer
(in-country) to Russia of any aircraft or aircraft parts specified in
Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 9A991 (Section 746.8(a)(1)
of the EAR).\5\ BIS will review any export or reexport license
applications for such items under a policy of denial. See Section
746.8(b). Effective March 2, 2022, BIS excluded any aircraft registered
in, owned, or controlled by, or under charter or lease by Russia or a
national of Russia from being eligible for license exception Aircraft,
Vessels, and Spacecraft (AVS) (Section 740.15 of the EAR).\6\
Accordingly, any U.S.-origin aircraft or foreign aircraft that includes
more than 25% controlled U.S.-origin content, and that is registered
in, owned, or controlled by, or under charter or lease by Russia or a
national of Russia, is subject to a license requirement before it can
travel to Russia.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\5\ 87 FR 12226 (Mar. 3, 2022). Additionally, BIS published a
final rule effective April 8, 2022, which imposed licensing
requirements on items controlled on the Commerce Control List
(``CCL'') under Categories 0-2 that are destined for Russia or
Belarus. Accordingly, now all CCL items require export, reexport,
and transfer (in-country) licenses if destined for or within Russia
or Belarus. 87 FR 22130 (Apr. 14, 2022).
\6\ 87 FR 13048 (Mar. 8, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

OEE's request for renewal is based upon the facts underlying the
issuance of the initial TDO, the renewal order subsequently issued in
this matter on December 20, 2022, and the evidence developed over the
course of this investigation, which indicate a blatant disregard for
U.S. export controls, as well as the TDO. Specifically, the initial
TDO, issued on June 24, 2022, was based on evidence that Nordwind
engaged in conduct prohibited by the Regulations by operating multiple
aircraft subject to the EAR and classified under ECCN 9A991.b on
flights into Russia after March 2, 2022 from destinations including,
but not limited to, Yerevan, Armenia, Istanbul, Turkey, and Sharm el-
Sheikh, Egypt, without the required BIS authorization.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\7\ Publicly available flight tracking information shows, for
example, that on March 7, 2022, serial number (``SN'') 40874 flew
from Yerevan, Armenia to Kazan, Russia; SN 40233 flew from Istanbul,
Turkey to Kazan, Russia; and SN 40236 flew from Sharm el-Sheikh,
Egypt to Moscow, Russia.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

As discussed in the December 20, 2022 renewal order, evidence
presented by BIS indicated that, after the initial order issued,
Nordwind continued to operate aircraft subject to the EAR and
classified under ECCN 9A991.b on flights both into and out of Russia,
in violation of the Regulations and the TDO itself.\8\ Specifically,
the December 20, 2022 renewal order detailed Nordwind's continued
operation of aircraft subject to the EAR, including, but not limited
to, on flights into and out of Russia from/to Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt,
Hurghada, Egypt, and Bokhtar, Tajikistan.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\8\ Engaging in conduct prohibited by a denial order violates
the Regulations. 15 CFR 764.2(a) and (k).
\9\ Publicly available flight tracking information shows that on
December 3, 2022, SN 42059 flew from Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt to
Orenberg, Russia and on December 2, 2022, SN 40874 flew from
Hurghada, Egypt to Moscow, Russia. In addition, on November 29,
2022, SN 35700 flew from Bokhtar, Tajikistan to Moscow, Russia.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In its May 18, 2023 request for renewal of the TDO, BIS has
submitted evidence that Nordwind continues to operate in violation of
the December 20, 2022 TDO and/or the Regulations by operating aircraft
subject to the EAR and classified under ECCN 9A991.b. Specifically,
BIS's evidence and related investigation demonstrates that Nordwind has
continued to operate aircraft subject to the EAR, including, but not
limited to, on flights into and out of Russia from/to Bokhtar,
Tajikistan, Tehran, Iran, and Osh, Kyrgyzstan. Information about those
flights includes, but is not limited to, the following:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Departure/arrival
Tail No. Serial No. Aircraft type cities Dates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RA-73313......................... 35700 737-82R (B738) Bokhtar, TJ/Orsk, RU June 2, 2023.
RA-73313......................... 35700 737-82R (B738) Bokhtar, TJ/Orsk, RU June 3, 2023.
RA-73313......................... 35700 737-82R (B738) Bokhtar, TJ/Orsk, RU June 4, 2023.
RA-73313......................... 35700 737-82R (B738) Bokhtar, TJ/Orsk, RU June 11, 2023.
RA-73317......................... 40874 737-82R (B738) Tehran, IR/Moscow, May 16, 2023.
RU.
RA-73317......................... 40874 737-82R (B738) Dushanbe, TJ/UFA, RU June 8, 2023.

[[Page 40204]]

RA-73317......................... 40874 737-82R (B738) Osh, KG/Samara, RU.. June 11, 2023.
RA-73314......................... 42233 737-8KN (B738) Dushanbe, TJ/Kazan, June 4, 2023.
RU.
RA-73314......................... 42233 737-8KN (B738) Osh, KG/Tyumen, RU.. June 10, 2023.
RA-73314......................... 42233 737-8KN (B738) Dushanbe, TJ/Kazan, June 11, 2023.
RU.
RA-73314......................... 42233 737-8KN (B738) Bokhtar, TJ/Orsk, RU June 12, 2023.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Pegas Touristik as a Related Person

OEE's investigation and open source documents establish that
Russia-based Pegas Touristik is related to Nordwind ``by ownership,
control, position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection
in the conduct of trade or business.'' Multiple press reports,
including from Russian outlets, identify Pegas Touristik, a tour
company headquartered in Moscow, as Nordwind's owner.\10\ A May 2023
Russian corporate profile for Pegas Touristik lists as its founder an
individual who is also reported to be Nordwind's founder (``Person
A''). Additionally, a February 3, 2022 article in Kommersant, a
national distributed daily newspaper in Russia, states in part that
``in addition to [controlling] NordWind and Pegas Fly, Person A is also
the founder of the tour operator Pegas Touristik.'' The same article
also indicates that the general director of Pegas Touristik is the wife
of Person A. OEE's on-going investigation and corporate registration
documents reveal additional overlap in personnel, addresses, and
management with Pegas Touristik.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\10\ <a href="https://seatguru.com/airlines/Nordwind_Airlines/information.php">https://seatguru.com/airlines/Nordwind_Airlines/information.php</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Moreover, OEE has reason to believe that Pegas Touristik has made
additional efforts to evade export controls on Russia in part by
entering into charter agreements with a Turkish airline that started
shortly after the imposition of stringent Russia-related export
controls described, supra, for international flights into Russia on
U.S-origin aircraft without the required BIS authorization. As noted,
supra, aircraft registered in, owned, or controlled by, or under
charter or lease by Russia or a national of Russia are ineligible for
license exception AVS.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\11\ 15 CFR 746.8(c)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Findings

Under the applicable standard set forth in Section 766.24 of the
Regulations and my review of the entire record, I find that the
evidence presented by BIS convincingly demonstrates that Nordwind has
acted in violation of the Regulations and the TDO; that such violations
have been significant, deliberate and covert; and that given the
foregoing and the nature of the matters under investigation, there is a
likelihood of imminent violations. Therefore, renewal of the TDO is
necessary in the public interest to prevent imminent violation of the
Regulations and to give notice to companies and individuals in the
United States and abroad that they should avoid dealing with Nordwind,
in connection with export and reexport transactions involving items
subject to the Regulations and in connection with any other activity
subject to the Regulations. Additionally, I find that Pegas Touristik
meets the criteria set out in Section 766.23 and should be added to the
TDO as a related person.

IV. Order

It is therefore ordered:
First, Nordwind Airlines, with an address at Leningradskaya str.,
building 25, office 27. 28, Moscow region, Khimki city, 141402, Russia;
Pegas Touristik a/k/a Pegas Touristik OOO, with addresses at 5 building
1 Volokolamsk Highway, Moscow, Russian Federation, 125080, and
Yenig[ouml]l, Nergiz Sk. No:94/1, Muratpa[scedil]a/Antalya,
T[uuml]rkiye, 07230, when acting for or on their behalf, any successors
or assigns, agents, or employees (each a ``Denied Person'' and
collectively the ``Denied Persons'') may not, directly or indirectly,
participate in any way in any transaction involving any commodity,
software or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to as
``item'') exported or to be exported from the United States that is
subject to the EAR, or in any other activity subject to the EAR
including, but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license (except directly
related to safety of flight), license exception, or export control
document;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the EAR except directly related to
safety of flight and authorized by BIS pursuant to Section 764.3(a)(2)
of the Regulations, or engaging in any other activity subject to the
EAR except directly related to safety of flight and authorized by BIS
pursuant to Section 764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the EAR, or from any other activity subject to the EAR except directly
related to safety of flight and authorized by BIS pursuant to Section
764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations.
Second, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the
following:
A. Export, reexport, or transfer (in-country) to or on behalf of a
Denied Person any item subject to the EAR except directly related to
safety of flight and authorized by BIS pursuant to Section 764.3(a)(2)
of the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by a Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or control
of any item subject to the EAR that has been or will be exported from
the United States, including financing or other support activities
related to a transaction whereby a Denied Person acquires or attempts
to acquire such ownership, possession or control except directly
related to safety of flight and authorized by BIS pursuant to Section
764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from a Denied Person of any item subject to
the EAR that has been exported from the United States except directly
related to safety of flight and authorized by BIS pursuant to Section
764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations;
D. Obtain from a Denied Person in the United States any item
subject to the EAR with knowledge or reason to know that the item will
be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States except
directly related to safety of flight and authorized by BIS pursuant to
Section 764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the EAR
that has been or will be exported from the United States and which is
owned, possessed or controlled by a Denied Person, or service any item,
of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or controlled by a Denied
Person if such service involves the use of any item subject to the EAR
that has been or will be exported from the United States

[[Page 40205]]

except directly related to safety of flight and authorized by BIS
pursuant to Section 764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations. For purposes of
this paragraph, servicing means installation, maintenance, repair,
modification, or testing.
Third, that, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided
in section 766.23 of the EAR, any other person, firm, corporation, or
business organization related to Nordwind by ownership, control,
position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the
conduct of trade or business may also be made subject to the provisions
of this Order.
In accordance with the provisions of Sections 766.24(e) of the EAR,
Nordwind may, at any time, appeal this Order by filing a full written
statement in support of the appeal with the Office of the
Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40
South Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202-4022.
In accordance with the provisions of Sections 766.23(c)(2) and
766.24(e)(3) of the EAR, Pegas Touristik may, at any time, appeal their
inclusion as a related person by filing a full written statement in
support of the appeal with the Office of the Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40 South Gay Street, Baltimore,
Maryland 21202-4022.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 766.24(d) of the EAR,
BIS may seek renewal of this Order by filing a written request not
later than 20 days before the expiration date. A renewal request may be
opposed by Nordwind as provided in Section 766.24(d), by filing a
written submission with the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export
Enforcement, which must be received not later than seven days before
the expiration date of the Order.
A copy of this Order shall be provided to Nordwind and Pegas
Touristik and shall be published in the Federal Register.
This Order is effective immediately and shall remain in effect for
180 days.

Dated: June 15, 2023.
Matthew S. Axelrod,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2023-13160 Filed 6-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-P

</pre></body>
</html>

View on FederalRegister.gov →Plain-text source

Indexed from Federal Register on June 21, 2023.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.