Notice2023-10111
Reports Analysis Division Legal Question Resolution Program
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
May 12, 2023
Issuing agencies
Federal Election Commission
Abstract
The Federal Election Commission ("Commission") adopted a program in 2011, which was last revised in 2019, providing for a means by which persons may have a legal question considered by the Commission earlier in both the report review process and the audit process. Because the Commission is separately adopting a new audit process, it is revising the policy for the legal question program to narrow its scope to encompass only legal questions arising from requests for corrective action made by the Commission's Reports Analysis Division.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 88 Issue 92 (Friday, May 12, 2023)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30741-30742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2023-10111]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
[Notice 2023-07]
Reports Analysis Division Legal Question Resolution Program
AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.
ACTION: Agency procedure.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Election Commission (``Commission'') adopted a
program in 2011, which was last revised in 2019, providing for a means
by which persons may have a legal question considered by the Commission
earlier in both the report review process and the audit process.
Because the Commission is separately adopting a new audit process, it
is revising the policy for the legal question program to narrow its
scope to encompass only legal questions arising from requests for
corrective action made by the Commission's Reports Analysis Division.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Selinkoff, Assistant General
Counsel, Policy Division, or Joshua Blume, Attorney, 1050 First Street
NE, Washington, DC 20463, (202) 694-1650 or (800) 424-9530.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 1, 2011, the Commission adopted a
program providing for a means by which persons may have a legal
question considered by the Commission earlier in both the report review
process and the audit process (``Legal Question Resolution
Program'').\1\ Because the Commission is separately adopting a new
audit process for committees that do not receive public funds,
effective June 1, 2024, for audits that begin after that date, the
Commission will be terminating the Legal Question Resolution Program
for legal questions arising in the course of audits. The Legal Question
Resolution Program will remain in full effect with respect to audits
commenced before June 1, 2024. At the conclusion of the last audit to
be commenced before June 1, 2024, the Legal Question Resolution Program
will no longer apply for any purpose. The program announced here and
set forth below (``RAD Legal Question Resolution Program'') will take
effect on June 1, 2024, and will apply only to legal questions arising
from the Reports Analysis Division's (``RAD'') review process.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 76 FR 45798 (Aug. 1, 2011). The Commission has revised the
program three times since 2011, as explained in the last revision.
See Policy Statement Regarding a Program for Requesting
Consideration of Legal Questions by the Commission, 84 FR 36602
(July 29, 2019).
\2\ This superseding RAD Legal Request Program will not be
available in the course of audits of committees that receive public
funding. Audits of such committees are governed by extensive
regulations set forth in 11 CFR, subchapters E and F that, in the
Commission's judgment, provide sufficient opportunity to present
legal questions to the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Procedures
Within 15 business days of a determination by RAD that a person
remains obligated to take corrective action to resolve an issue that
has arisen during the report review process, the person may seek
Commission consideration if a material dispute on a question of law
exists with respect to the recommended corrective action.\3\ A
``determination'' for purposes of triggering the 15 business days is
the notification to the person of legal guidance prepared by the Office
of General Counsel (``OGC'') at the request of RAD recommending the
corrective action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Many disputes involving corrective action requests hinge on
questions of fact rather than questions of law, and thus are not
appropriate for this procedure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any request for consideration by a person during the report review
process shall be limited to questions of law on material issues, when:
(1) the legal issue is novel, complex, or pertains to an unsettled
question of law; (2) there has been intervening legislation,
rulemaking, or litigation since the Commission last considered the
issue; or (3) the request to take corrective action is contrary to or
otherwise inconsistent with prior Commission matters dealing with the
same issue. The request must specify the question of law at issue and
why it is subject to Commission consideration. It should discuss, when
appropriate, prior Commission matters raising the same issue, relevant
court decisions, and any other analysis of the issue that may assist
the Commission in its decision making. The Commission will not consider
factual disputes under this procedure, and any requests for
consideration other than on questions of law on material issues will
not be granted.
All requests, including any extension requests, must be received by
the Commission within 15 business days of the determination of
corrective action. All requests must be directed to the attention of
the Commission Secretary via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eaa68f8d8b86b88f9b9f8f999eba98858d988b87aa8c8f89c48d859c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ad6fffdfbf6c8ffebefffe9eecae8f5fde8fbf7dafcfff9b4fdf5ec">[email protected]</span></a>.\4\
Upon receipt of a request, the Commission Secretary shall forward a
copy of any request to each Commissioner, the General Counsel, and the
Staff Director.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Requestors are advised that if they submit a request,
electronically or otherwise, to a different address than designated
in this Procedure, the processing of the request may be delayed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any request for an extension of time to file a RAD Legal Question
Resolution Program request will be considered on a case-by-case basis
and will only be granted if good cause is shown, and the Commission
approves the extension request by four or more affirmative votes within
five business days of receipt of the extension request. Within five
business days of notification to the Commissioners of a request for
consideration of a legal question, if two or more Commissioners agree
that the Commission should consider the request, OGC may, at that time,
attempt to resolve the matter informally over the course of five
business days. Within 15 business days from the date upon which RAD and
OGC conclude that the matter cannot be resolved informally, or from the
expiration of the five-business day period, whichever occurs first, OGC
will prepare and circulate a recommendation in accordance with all
applicable Commission Directives. If the matter is resolved informally,
RAD and OGC will notify the Commission that the matter has been
resolved and notify the
[[Page 30742]]
Requestor in writing of the notification to the Commission. Informal
resolution of a matter does not prevent the Requestor from seeking
Commission consideration, in an additional or subsequent determination,
subject to the requirements of this program.
After the recommendation is circulated for a Commission vote, in
the event of an objection, the matter shall be automatically placed on
the next meeting agenda consistent with the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C.
552b(g), and applicable Commission regulations in 11 CFR part 2.
However, if within 60 business days of the filing of a request for
consideration, the Commission has not resolved the issue or provided
guidance on how to proceed with the matter by the affirmative vote of
four or more Commissioners, RAD may proceed with the matter. After the
60 business days have elapsed, any requestor will be provided a copy of
OGC's recommendation memorandum and an accompanying vote certification,
or if no such certification exists, a cover page stating the
disposition of the memorandum. Confidential information will be
redacted as necessary.
After the request review process has concluded, a copy of the
request for consideration, as well as the recommendation memorandum and
accompanying vote certification or disposition memorandum, will be
placed with the Committee's filings on the Commission's website within
30 days. These materials will also be placed on the Commission's web
page dedicated to legal questions considered by the Commission under
this program.
This procedure is not intended to circumvent or supplant the
Advisory Opinion process provided under 52 U.S.C. 30108 and 11 CFR part
112. Accordingly, any legal issues that qualify for consideration under
the Advisory Opinion process are not appropriate for consideration
under this procedure.
II. Annual Review
No later than July 1 of each year, the Office of Compliance and OGC
shall jointly prepare and distribute to the Commission a written report
containing a summary of the requests made under the program over the
previous year and a summary of the Commission's consideration of those
requests and any action taken thereon. The annual report shall also
include the Chief Compliance Officer's and the General Counsel's
assessment of whether, and to what extent, the program has promoted
efficiency and fairness in both the Commission's report review process,
as well as their recommendations, if any, for modifications to the
program.
On behalf of the Commission.
Dara S. Lindenbaum,
Chair, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-10111 Filed 5-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on May 12, 2023.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.