Proposed Rule2023-10071

Special Conditions: The Boeing Company Model 777 Series Airplanes; Passenger Seats With Pretensioner Restraint Systems

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
May 11, 2023

Issuing agencies

Transportation DepartmentFederal Aviation Administration

Abstract

This action proposes special conditions for Boeing Company (Boeing) Model 777 series airplanes. These airplanes will have a novel or unusual design feature when compared to the state of technology envisioned in the airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes. This design feature is pretensioner restraint systems installed on passenger seats. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These proposed special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 88 Issue 91 (Thursday, May 11, 2023)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30262-30264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2023-10071]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. FAA-2022-1740; Notice No. 25-23-01-SC]


Special Conditions: The Boeing Company Model 777 Series 
Airplanes; Passenger Seats With Pretensioner Restraint Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes special conditions for Boeing Company 
(Boeing) Model 777 series airplanes. These airplanes will have a novel 
or unusual design feature when compared to the state of technology 
envisioned in the airworthiness standards for transport category 
airplanes. This design feature is pretensioner restraint systems 
installed on passenger seats. The applicable airworthiness regulations 
do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design 
feature. These proposed special conditions contain the additional 
safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to 
establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the 
existing airworthiness standards.

DATES: Send comments on or before June 26, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by Docket No. FAA-2022-1740 using 
any of the following methods:
    <bullet> Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov/">https://www.regulations.gov/</a> and follow the online instructions for sending 
your comments electronically.
    <bullet> Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S. 
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room 
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    <bullet> Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket 
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    <bullet> Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
    <bullet> Docket: Background documents or comments received may be 
read at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov/">https://www.regulations.gov/</a> at any time. Follow the online 
instructions for accessing the docket or go to Docket Operations in 
Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey 
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shannon Lennon, Cabin Safety, AIR-624, 
Technical Policy Branch, Policy and Standards Division, Aircraft 
Certification Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 2200 South 
216th Street, Des Moines, Washington 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-
3209; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#116279707f7f7e7f3f7d747f7f7e7f517770703f767e67"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a9dac1c8c7c7c6c787c5ccc7c7c6c7e9cfc8c887cec6df">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites interested people to take part in this rulemaking 
by sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments 
reference a specific portion of the proposed special conditions, 
explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting 
data.
    The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date for 
comments, and will consider comments filed late if it is possible to do 
so without incurring delay. The FAA may change these special conditions 
based on the comments received.

Privacy

    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in 
the following paragraph, and other information as described in title 
14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 11.35, the FAA will post all 
comments received without change to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov/">https://www.regulations.gov/</a>, 
including any personal information you provide. The FAA will also post 
a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact received about 
these special conditions.

Confidential Business Information

    Confidential Business Information (CBI) is commercial or financial 
information that is both customarily and actually treated as private by 
its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), 
CBI is exempt from public disclosure. If your comments responsive to 
these special conditions contain commercial or financial information 
that is customarily treated as private, that you actually treat as 
private, and that is relevant or responsive to these special 
conditions, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted 
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing 
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as 
confidential under the FOIA, and the indicated comments will not be 
placed in the public docket of these special conditions. Send 
submissions containing CBI to the individual listed in the For Further 
Information Contact section below. Comments the FAA receives, which are 
not specifically designated as CBI, will be placed in the public docket 
for these special conditions.

Background

    On September 30, 2021, Boeing applied for an amendment to Type 
Certificate No. T00001SE for Boeing Model 777 series airplanes. These 
airplanes, currently approved under Type Certificate No. T00001SE, are 
twin-engine, transport-category airplanes with maximum seating for 495

[[Page 30263]]

passengers and a maximum takeoff weight of 775,000 pounds.

Type Certification Basis

    Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.101, Boeing must show that Model 
777 series airplanes meet the applicable provisions of the regulations 
listed in Type Certificate No. T00001SE, or the applicable regulations 
in effect on the date of application for the change, except for earlier 
amendments as agreed upon by the FAA.
    If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness 
regulations (e.g., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or 
appropriate safety standards for Boeing Model 777 series airplanes 
because of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are 
prescribed under the provisions of Sec.  21.16.
    Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which 
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended 
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or 
unusual design feature, or should any other model already included on 
the same type certificate be modified to incorporate the same novel or 
unusual design feature, these special conditions would also apply to 
the other model under Sec.  21.101.
    In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special 
conditions, Boeing Model 777 series airplanes must comply with the 
fuel-vent and exhaust-emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the 
noise-certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
    The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in 
accordance with Sec.  11.38, and they become part of the type 
certification basis under Sec.  21.101.

Novel or Unusual Design Features

    Boeing Model 777 series airplanes will incorporate the following 
novel or unusual design feature:
    Forward-facing seats incorporating a shoulder harness with 
pretensioner device, otherwise known as a pretensioner restraint 
system, which is intended to protect the occupants from head injuries.

Discussion

    Boeing will install, in Model 777 series airplanes, forward-facing 
seats that incorporate a shoulder harness with a pretensioner system, 
for head-injury protection, at each seat place.
    Shoulder harnesses have been widely used on flight-attendant seats, 
flight-deck seats, in business jets, and in general-aviation airplanes 
to reduce occupant head injury in the event of an emergency landing. 
Special conditions, pertinent regulations, and published guidance 
relate to other restraint systems. However, the use of pretensioners in 
the restraint system on transport-airplane seats is a novel design.
    The pretensioner restraint system utilizes a retractor that 
eliminates slack in the shoulder harness and pulls the occupant back 
into the seat prior to impact. This has the effect of reducing forward 
translation of the occupant, reducing head arc, and reducing loads in 
the shoulder harness.
    Pretensioner technology involves a step-change in loading 
experienced by the occupant for impacts below and above that at which 
the device deploys, because activation of the shoulder harness, at the 
point at which the pretensioner engages, interrupts upper-torso 
excursion. Such excursion could result in the head-injury criteria 
(HIC) being higher at an intermediate impact condition than that 
resulting from the maximum impact condition corresponding to the test 
conditions specified in Sec.  25.562. See condition 1 in these special 
conditions.
    The ideal triangular maximum-severity pulse is defined in Advisory 
Circular (AC) 25.562-1B, ``Dynamic Evaluation of Seat Restraint Systems 
and Occupant Protection on Transport Airplanes.'' For the evaluation 
and testing of less-severe pulses for purposes of assessing the 
effectiveness of the pretensioner setting, a similar triangular pulse 
should be used with acceleration, rise time, and velocity change scaled 
accordingly. The magnitude of the required pulse should not deviate 
below the ideal pulse by more than 0.5g until 1.33 t1 is reached, where 
t1 represents the time interval between 0 and t1 on the referenced 
pulse shape, as shown in AC 25.562-1B. This is an acceptable method of 
compliance to the test requirements of the special conditions.
    Additionally, the pretensioner might not provide protection, after 
actuation, during secondary impacts. Therefore, the case where a small 
impact is followed by a large impact should be addressed. If the 
minimum deceleration severity at which the pretensioner is set to 
deploy is unnecessarily low, the protection offered by the pretensioner 
may be lost by the time a second, larger impact occurs.
    Conditions 1 through 4 ensure that the pretensioner system 
activates when intended, to provide the necessary protection of 
occupants. This includes protection of a range of occupants under 
various accident conditions. Conditions 5 through 10 address 
maintenance and reliability of the pretensioner system, including any 
outside influences on the mechanism, to ensure it functions as 
intended.
    The proposed special conditions contain the additional safety 
standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a 
level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing 
airworthiness standards.

Applicability

    As discussed above, these proposed special conditions are 
applicable to the model for which they are issued. Should the type 
certificate for that model be amended later to include any other model 
that incorporates the same novel or unusual design feature, or should 
any other model already included on the same type certificate be 
modified to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature, these 
special conditions would apply to the other model as well.

Conclusion

    This action affects only a certain novel or unusual design feature 
on one model series of airplanes. It is not a rule of general 
applicability.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25

    Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

Authority Citation

    The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, and 
44704.

The Proposed Special Conditions

    Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes the 
following special conditions as part of the type certification basis 
for Boeing Model 777 series airplanes.
    In addition to the requirements of Sec.  25.562, forward-facing 
passenger seats with pretensioner restraint systems must meet the 
following:

(1) Head Injury Criteria (HIC)

    The HIC value must not exceed 1000 at any condition at which the 
pretensioner does or does not deploy, up to the maximum severity pulse 
that corresponds to the test conditions specified in Sec.  25.562. 
Tests must be performed to demonstrate this, taking into account any 
necessary tolerances for deployment.
    When an airbag device is present in addition to the pretensioner 
restraint system, and the anthropomorphic test device (ATD) has no 
apparent contact with the seat/structure but has contact with an 
airbag, a HIC unlimited scored

[[Page 30264]]

in excess of 1000 is acceptable, provided the HIC15 score (calculated 
in accordance with 49 CFR 571.208) for that contact is less than 700.
    ATD head contact with the seat or other structure, through the 
airbag, or contact subsequent to contact with the airbag, requires a 
HIC value that does not exceed 1000.

(2) Protection During Secondary Impacts

    The pretensioner activation setting must be demonstrated to 
maximize the probability of the protection being available when needed, 
considering secondary impacts.

(3) Protection of Occupants Other Than 50th Percentile

    Protection of occupants for a range of stature from a 2-year-old 
child to a 95th percentile male must be shown. For shoulder harnesses 
that include pretensioners, protection of occupants other than a 50th 
percentile male may be shown by test or analysis. In addition, the 
pretensioner must not introduce a hazard to passengers due to the 
following seating configurations:
    (a) The seat occupant is holding an infant.
    (b) The seat occupant is a child in a child-restraint device.
    (c) The seat occupant is a pregnant woman.

(4) Occupants Adopting the Brace Position

    Occupants in the traditional brace position when the pretensioner 
activates must not experience adverse effects from the pretensioner 
activation.

(5) Inadvertent Pretensioner Actuation

    (a) The probability of inadvertent pretensioner actuation must be 
shown to be extremely remote (i.e., average probability per flight hour 
of less than 10<SUP>-7</SUP>).
    (b) The system must be shown not to be susceptible to inadvertent 
pretensioner actuation as a result of wear and tear, nor inertia loads 
resulting from in-flight or ground maneuvers likely to be experienced 
in service.
    (c) The seated occupant must not be seriously injured as a result 
of inadvertent pretensioner actuation.
    (d) Inadvertent pretensioner actuation must not cause a hazard to 
the airplane, nor cause serious injury to anyone who may be positioned 
close to the retractor or belt (e.g., seated in an adjacent seat or 
standing adjacent to the seat).

(6) Availability of the Pretensioner Function Prior to Flight

    The design must provide means for a crewmember to verify the 
availability of the pretensioner function prior to each flight, or the 
probability of failure of the pretensioner function must be 
demonstrated to be extremely remote (i.e., average probability per 
flight hour of less than 10<SUP>-7</SUP>) between inspection intervals.

(7) Incorrect Seat Belt Orientation

    The system design must ensure that any incorrect orientation 
(twisting) of the seat belt does not compromise the pretensioner 
protection function.

(8) Contamination Protection

    The pretensioner mechanisms and controls must be protected from 
external contamination associated with that which could occur on or 
around passenger seating.

(9) Prevention of Hazards

    The pretensioner system must not induce a hazard to passengers in 
case of fire, nor create a fire hazard, if activated.

(10) Functionality After Loss of Power

    The system must function properly after loss of normal airplane 
electrical power and after a transverse separation in the fuselage at 
the most critical location. A separation at the location of the system 
does not have to be considered.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington on May 5, 2023.
Suzanne A. Masterson,
Acting Manager, Technical Policy Branch, Policy and Standards Division, 
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-10071 Filed 5-10-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on May 11, 2023.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.