Notice2023-06222
Certain Robotic Floor Cleaning Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
March 27, 2023
Issuing agencies
International Trade Commission
Abstract
Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has found a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission has issued a limited exclusion order ("LEO") prohibiting the importation of certain robotic floor cleaning devices and components thereof that are imported by or on behalf of SharkNinja Operating LLC, SharkNinja Management LLC, SharkNinja Management Co., SharkNinja Sales Co., EP Midco LLC, and SharkNinja Hong Kong Co. Ltd., and that infringe claims 1 and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 10,813,517 ("the '517 patent"). The Commission has also issued cease and desist orders ("CDOs") against each Respondent. The investigation is terminated.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 88 Issue 58 (Monday, March 27, 2023)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18177-18179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2023-06222]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1252]
Certain Robotic Floor Cleaning Devices and Components Thereof;
Notice of Commission Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section
337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders;
Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has found a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission
has issued a limited exclusion order (``LEO'') prohibiting the
importation of certain robotic floor cleaning devices and components
thereof that are imported by or on behalf of SharkNinja Operating LLC,
SharkNinja Management LLC, SharkNinja Management Co., SharkNinja Sales
Co., EP Midco LLC, and SharkNinja Hong Kong Co. Ltd., and that infringe
claims 1 and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 10,813,517 (``the '517 patent''). The
Commission has also issued cease and desist orders (``CDOs'') against
each Respondent. The investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Houda Morad, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
[[Page 18178]]
Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-
4716. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with
this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS) at <a href="https://edis.usitc.gov">https://edis.usitc.gov</a>. For help accessing EDIS, please email
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cd8889849efe85a8a1bd8db8bea4b9aee3aaa2bb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d297969b81e19ab7bea292a7a1bba6b1fcb5bda4">[email protected]</span></a>. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at <a href="https://www.usitc.gov">https://www.usitc.gov</a>. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on March 2, 2021, based on a complaint filed on behalf of iRobot
Corporation (``iRobot'' or ``Complainant'') of Bedford, Massachusetts.
See 86 FR 12206-07 (Mar. 2, 2021). The complaint alleged violations of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337,
based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of
certain robotic floor cleaning devices and components thereof based on
the infringement of certain claims of the '517 patent; as well as U.S.
Patent Nos. 9,884,423 (``the '423 patent''); 7,571,511 (``the '511
patent''); 10,835,096 (``the '096 patent''); and 10,296,007 (``the '007
patent''). See id. The Commission's notice of investigation named as
respondents SharkNinja Operating LLC, SharkNinja Management LLC,
SharkNinja Management Co., SharkNinja Sales Co., and EP Midco LLC, all
of Needham, Massachusetts; and SharkNinja Hong Kong Co. Ltd. of Hong
Kong Island, Hong Kong (collectively, ``SharkNinja'' or
``Respondents''). See id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is
not participating in the investigation. See id.
The '007 patent has been terminated from the investigation. See
Order No. 23 (Sept. 13, 2021), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Oct. 5,
2021); Order No. 38 (Jan. 4, 2022), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Jan.
25, 2022). Accordingly, claims 9, 12, and 23 of the '423 patent; claims
12 and 23 of the '511 patent; claims 1 and 9 of the '517 patent; and
claims 17 and 26 of the '096 patent were still pending before the
Administrative Law Judge (``ALJ'').
On December 30, 2021, the ALJ issued a Markman Order (Order No. 37)
construing the claim terms in dispute for all asserted patents.
On October 7, 2022, the ALJ issued a final initial determination
(``FID'') finding: (1) a violation of section 337 based on infringement
of claims 9 and 12 of the '423 patent and claims 1 and 9 of the '517
patent; (2) no infringement of claim 23 of the '423 patent; (3) no
violation as to claims 17 and 26 of the '096 patent; and (4) no
violation as to claims 12 and 23 of the '511 patent. The ALJ
recommended, should the Commission find a violation, issuing a limited
exclusion order directed to SharkNinja's infringing products and a
cease and desist order directed to each SharkNinja entity and setting a
bond in the amount of twenty percent (20%) for importation of
infringing articles during the period of Presidential review.
On October 24, 2022, SharkNinja and iRobot each petitioned for
review of certain aspects of the FID. On November 1, 2022, SharkNinja
and iRobot each filed a response in opposition to each other's petition
for review.
The Commission received no public interest comments from the public
in response to the Commission's Federal Register notice seeking
comments on the public interest. See 87 FR 62451-52 (Oct. 14, 2022).
iRobot submitted public interest comments pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(a)(4) (19 CFR 210.50(a)(4)) on November 9, 2022.
On January 4, 2023, the Commission determined to review certain
aspects of the FID and requested submissions from the parties on
certain issues under review. See 88 FR 1405-07 (Jan. 10, 2023). The
Commission also requested written submissions from the parties,
interested government agencies, and other interested persons on the
issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. See id.
Specifically, the Commission determined to review: (1) for the '511
patent, the FID's finding that estoppel applies to the Trilobite prior
art device and claims 1, 10, 12, and 23 are invalid based on the Patent
Trial and Appeal Board's (``PTAB'') finding that the claims are
unpatentable; (2) for the '423 patent, the FID's findings that: (i)
claim 9 of the '423 patent is practiced by the domestic industry
(``DI'') products; (ii) SharkNinja's accused robots with forward-
docking, i.e., the IQ, AI, and AI-WD products, do not infringe claim 23
of the '423 patent; (iii) the prior art Dottie robot does not
anticipate claim 23 of the '423 patent; (iv) the prior art combination
of Dottie and Everett and the prior art combination of Dottie and Kim
do not render claims 12 or 23, respectively, of the '423 patent obvious
under 35 U.S.C. 103; (v) iRobot presented insufficient evidence of
secondary considerations of non-obviousness with respect to claim 23;
and (vi) claim 23 of the '423 patent is directed to patent-eligible
subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101; (3) for the '517 patent, the ALJ's
construction and finding that (i) the ``receiving system'' for claims 1
and 9 is not means-plus-function; (ii) claims 1 and 9 are infringed by
SharkNinja's accused products; (iii) claims 1 and 9 are practiced by
iRobot's DI products; and (iv) claims 1 and 9 are not anticipated by
the asserted prior art (Kawakami); and (4) for all asserted patents,
i.e., the '511, '423, '517, and '096 patents, the ID's finding that
iRobot satisfied the economic prong of the domestic industry
requirement. See Comm'n Notice (Jan. 4, 2023); 88 FR 1405-07 (Jan. 10,
2023).
In response to the Commission's notice, on January 18, 2023, iRobot
and SharkNinja each filed a brief on the requested issues under review,
remedy, the public interest, and bonding. On January 25, 2023, the
parties filed reply briefs. The Commission received no other
submissions.
Having examined the record of this investigation, including the
FID, the RD, and the parties' submissions, the Commission has
determined to affirm with modification the FID's determination of a
violation of section 337 with respect to claims 1 and 9 of the '517
patent. The Commission reverses and finds no violation as to the
asserted claims of the '423 patent. Specifically, as explained in the
Commission Opinion filed concurrently herewith, the Commission has
determined to:
<bullet> vacate the FID's findings as to the '511 patent, which was
found unpatentable by the PTAB and no appeal was taken from that PTAB
determination;
<bullet> reverse the FID's finding that iRobot's DI products
practice claim 9 of the '423 patent and thus the finding that iRobot
satisfied the technical prong of the domestic industry requirement
based on a valid claim;
<bullet> reverse the FID's finding that claim 12 of the '423 patent
is not obvious over Dottie in view of Everett under 35 U.S.C. 103;
<bullet> reverse the FID's finding that certain accused products do
not infringe claim 23 of the '423 patent;
<bullet> take no position with respect to the FID's finding that
claim 23 of the '423 patent is not anticipated by Dottie under 35
U.S.C. 102;
<bullet> reverse the FID's finding that claim 23 of the '423 patent
is not obvious over Dottie in view of Kim under 35 U.S.C. 103;
<bullet> take no position with respect to the FID's finding that
claim 23 of the '423
[[Page 18179]]
patent is patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. 101;
<bullet> modify and supplement the FID's claim construction of the
term ``receiving system'';
<bullet> affirm with modification the FID's finding that
SharkNinja's accused products infringe the asserted claims of the '517
patent;
<bullet> affirm with modification the FID's finding that iRobot's
DI products practice the asserted claims of the '517 patent; and
<bullet> affirm and supplement the FID's finding that the asserted
claims of the '517 patent are not anticipated by Kawakami under 35
U.S.C. 102;
<bullet> affirm the FID's findings that iRobot satisfies the
economic prong of the domestic industry requirement with respect to the
'517 patent and take no position as to those findings with respect to
the '511,'423, or '096 patents.
All findings in the FID that are not inconsistent with the
Commission's determination are affirmed.
The Commission has determined that the appropriate remedy is an LEO
against Respondents' infringing products and a CDO against each
Respondent. The Commission has also determined that the public interest
factors enumerated in subsection 337(d)(1) and (f)(1) (19 U.S.C.
1337(d)(1), (f)(1)) do not preclude the issuance of the LEO and CDOs.
The Commission has further determined to set a bond during the period
of Presidential review in the amount of twenty percent (20%) of the
entered value of Respondents' infringing products (19 U.S.C. 1337(j)).
The Commission's orders and opinion were delivered to the President
and to the United States Trade Representative on the day of their
issuance.
The Commission's vote for this determination took place on March
21, 2023.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 21, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-06222 Filed 3-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on March 27, 2023.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.