Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and Rescission in Part; 2020-2022
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that Fujian Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd./Fujian Province Youxi City Mangrove Wood Machining Co., Ltd. (Yinfeng/ Mangrove), and 29 non-individually examined exporters of wood mouldings and millwork products (WMMP) from the People's Republic of China (China) sold subject merchandise to the United States at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), August 12, 2020, through January 31, 2022. Commerce also preliminarily determines that Fujian Jinquan Trade Co., Ltd./Baiyuan Wood Machining Co., Ltd. (Jinquan/Baiyuan) did not sell subject merchandise to the United States at prices below NV during the POR. We further preliminarily find that Fujian Shunchang Shengsheng Wood Industry Limited Company (Shunchang Shengsheng), Xiamen Jinxi Building Material Co., Ltd. (Xiamen Jinxi), and Zhangzhou Green Wood Industry and Trade Co., Ltd. (Green Wood) had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR and that Gaomi Hongtai Home Furniture Co., Ltd. is part of the China-wide entity. Additionally, we are rescinding this administrative review with respect to 33 companies because the requests for review of these companies were timely withdrawn. Finally, we preliminarily intend to rescind this administrative review with respect to three companies.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 88 Issue 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 2023)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14139-14143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2023-04609]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-117]
Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products From the People's Republic
of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and Rescission in
Part; 2020-2022
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that Fujian Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd./Fujian
Province Youxi City Mangrove Wood Machining Co., Ltd. (Yinfeng/
Mangrove), and 29 non-individually examined exporters of wood mouldings
and millwork products (WMMP) from the People's Republic of China
(China) sold subject merchandise to the United States at prices below
normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), August 12, 2020,
through January 31, 2022. Commerce also preliminarily determines that
Fujian Jinquan Trade Co., Ltd./Baiyuan Wood Machining Co., Ltd.
(Jinquan/Baiyuan) did not sell subject merchandise to the United States
at prices below NV during the POR. We further preliminarily find that
Fujian Shunchang Shengsheng
[[Page 14140]]
Wood Industry Limited Company (Shunchang Shengsheng), Xiamen Jinxi
Building Material Co., Ltd. (Xiamen Jinxi), and Zhangzhou Green Wood
Industry and Trade Co., Ltd. (Green Wood) had no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR and that Gaomi Hongtai Home Furniture Co.,
Ltd. is part of the China-wide entity. Additionally, we are rescinding
this administrative review with respect to 33 companies because the
requests for review of these companies were timely withdrawn. Finally,
we preliminarily intend to rescind this administrative review with
respect to three companies.
DATES: Applicable March 7, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Smith or Samantha Kinney, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1766 and (202) 482-2285,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This administrative review is being conducted in accordance with
section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The
review covers 73 companies, including mandatory respondents Jinquan/
Baiyuan and Yinfeng/Mangrove.\1\ For a complete description of the
events that followed the initiation of this administrative review, see
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly
at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>. A list of
topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as
Appendix I to this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ We have determined that it is appropriate to treat
affiliates Yinfeng and Mangrove, and affiliates Jinquan and Baiyan,
as a single entity for purposes of this administrative review. For
further discussion, see Memorandum, ``Wood Mouldings and Millwork
Products from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Administrative Review; 2020-2022,'' dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products from the People's
Republic of China: Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination and
Antidumping Duty Order, 86 FR 9486 (February 16, 2021) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The merchandise covered by the Order is wood mouldings and millwork
products, which are primarily classifiable under subheadings
4409.10.0500, 4409.10.1020, 4409.10.1040, 4409.10.1060, 4409.10.1080,
4409.10.4010, 4409.10.4090, 4409.10.4500, 4409.10.5000, 4409.10.9020,
4409.10.9040, 4409.22.0590, 4409.22.1000, 4409.22.4000, 4409.22.5000,
4409.22.5020, 4409.22.5040, 4409.22.5060, 4409.22.5090, 4409.22.9000,
4409.22.9020, 4409.22.9030, 4409.22.9045, 4409.22.9060, 4409.22.9090,
4409.29.0665, 4409.29.1100, 4409.29.4100, 4409.29.5100, 4409.29.9100,
4412.99.5115, 4412.99.9500, 4418.91.9095, and 4421.91.9780 of the of
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). WMMP may
also enter under HTSUS numbers 4409.10.6000, 4409.10.6500,
4409.22.6000, 4409.22.6500, 4409.29.6100, 4409.29.6600, 4412.41.0000,
4412.42.0000, 4412.49.0000, 4412.91.5115, 4412.92.5215, 4412.99.9700,
4418.20.4000, 4418.20.8030, 4418.20.8060, 4418.91.9195, 4418.99.9095,
4418.99.9195, 4421.91.9880, 4421.99.9780, and 4421.99.9880. While the
HTSUS subheading and ASTM specification are provided for convenience
and for customs purposes, the written description of the subject
merchandise is dispositive. For a complete description of the scope of
the Order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. We calculated export prices
in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Because China is a non-
market economy (NME) country within the meaning of section 771(18) of
the Act, NV has been calculated in accordance with section 773(c) of
the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Partial Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party who requested
the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. On
July 11, 2022, Sanming Lingtong Trading Co., Ltd. (Sanming) timely
withdrew its request for review of itself and the petitioner timely
withdrew its requests for review of 58 companies.\3\ Because no other
parties requested a review of Sanming or 32 of the companies listed in
the petitioner's withdrawal of review request, Commerce is rescinding
the administrative review with respect to these companies.\4\ See the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum for further discussion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Sanming's Letter, ``Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review and Request for Extension of Time to File
Request,'' dated July 11, 2022; see also Petitioner's Letter,
``Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,'' dated July 11,
2022.
\4\ See Appendix III.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Intent To Rescind Administrative Review, in Part
We preliminary determine that China Cornici Co., Ltd. (China
Cornici) had no suspended entries of subject merchandise during the
POR. Absent any evidence of a reviewable entry, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(3), we intend to rescind the administrative review of this
company in the final results of review. We also intend to rescind this
review with respect two companies, Aventra and TL Wood, because the
record evidence indicates that they are U.S. resellers not eligible for
review pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1). For further information, see
``Preliminary Intent to Rescind Administrative Review, in Part'' in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
Based on an analysis of information from U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP), no-shipment certifications and other record
information, we preliminarily determine that Shunchang Shengsheng,
Xiamen Jinxi, and Green Wood had no shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR.\5\ Consistent with our practice in NME cases, we will
not rescind the review with respect to these companies, but, rather, we
intend to complete the review and issue appropriate instructions to CBP
based on the final results of the review.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See the Preliminary Decision Memorandum for further
discussion.
\6\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand;
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,
Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments; 2012-2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged
in Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No
Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR at
51306 (August 28, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 14141]]
Separate Rates
Commerce preliminarily finds that, in addition to Yinfeng/Mangrove
and Jinquan/Baiyuan, the information placed on the record by 29
companies not individually examined in this review demonstrates that
these companies are eligible for a separate rate.\7\ The statute and
Commerce's regulations do not address what dumping margin to apply to
respondents not selected for individual examination when Commerce
limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section
777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5)
of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others
rate in an investigation, for guidance when calculating the dumping
margin for respondents that are not selected for individual examination
in an administrative review. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act states
that the all-others rate should be calculated by averaging the
weighted-average dumping margins calculated for individually-examined
respondents, excluding dumping margins that are zero, de minimis, or
based entirely on facts available. Because we calculated a preliminary
dumping margin of zero for Jinquan/Baiyuan, and a preliminary dumping
margin that is not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts
available for Yinfeng/Mangrove, we assigned the separate rate
recipients a dumping margin equal to Yinfeng/Mangrove's preliminary
dumping margin consistent with Commerce's practice and section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Appendix II for a list of these companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The China-Wide Entity
Commerce's policy regarding conditional review of the China-wide
entity applies to this administrative review.\8\ Under this policy, the
China-wide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically
requests and Commerce initiates, or Commerce self-initiates, a review
of the China-wide entity.\9\ Because no party requested a review of the
China-wide entity and no review was initiated for this POR, the China-
wide entity is not under review and the China-wide entity's rate (i.e.,
220.87 percent) is not subject to change.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
\9\ Id.
\10\ See Order, 86 FR 9488.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce preliminarily finds that Gaomi Hongtai Home Furniture Co.,
Ltd. did not establish its eligibility for a separate rate because it
failed to provide a separate rate application or a separate rate
certification. As such, we preliminarily determine that this company is
part of the China-wide entity.
Preliminary Results of Review
Commerce preliminarily determines that the following weighted-
average dumping margins exist for the POR:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fujian Jinquan Trade Co., Ltd./Baiyuan Wood Machining 0.00
Co., Ltd...............................................
Fuijian Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd./Fujian 9.03
Province Youxi City Mangrove Wood Machining Co., Ltd...
Non-Selected Companies Under Review Receiving a Separate 9.03
Rate \11\..............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed for these
preliminary results to the parties under administrative protective
order within five days of the date of publication of this notice in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
A schedule for the submission of case briefs and written comments
will be provided to interested parties at a later date. Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in case briefs, may be submitted no
later than seven days after the deadline date for case briefs.\12\
Parties who submit a case brief or a rebuttal brief in this proceeding
are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) a statement of the
issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of
authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Temporary Rule Modifying
AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID-19, 85 FR 17006, 17007
(March 26, 2020) (``To provide adequate time for release of case
briefs via ACCESS, E&C intends to schedule the due date for all
rebuttal briefs to be 7 days after case briefs are filed (while
these modifications remain in effect.'')).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days of the date of
publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) the party's
name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; (3)
whether any participant is a foreign national; and (4) a list of issues
parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited
to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs.\13\ If a
request for a hearing is made, Commerce will announce the date and time
of the hearing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative
review, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised
in any briefs, within 120 days of the date of publication of these
preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h), unless this deadline is extended.
Verification
As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the Act, Commerce intends to
verify the information relied upon for its final results.
Assessment Rates
In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final
results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by this review.
Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce will determine, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by
this review.\14\ Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to
CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final
results of this
[[Page 14142]]
review. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International
Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate
relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If a mandatory respondent's ad valorem weighted-average dumping
margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in the
final results of this review, Commerce will calculate importer-specific
assessment rates for that respondent, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1).\15\ Because both respondents did not report entered
value, we will calculate importer-specific per-unit duty assessment
rates based on the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties
calculated for the examined sales to the total quantity of those
sales.\16\ To determine whether an importer-specific, per-unit
assessment rate is de minimis, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2),
we also will calculate an importer-specific ad valorem ratio based on
estimated entered values.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ In these preliminary results, Commerce applied the
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
\16\ We received comments concerning entered value from U.S.
importers. We have issued supplemental questionnaires and the
responses are not due until after the preliminary results.
Therefore, we will take these comments and the responses to these
questionnaires into consideration for the final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If, in the final results, a mandatory respondent's weighted-average
dumping margin is zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent),
Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries for
that respondent without regard to antidumping duties.\17\ For entries
that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by each
mandatory respondent during this review, and for the companies that do
not qualify for a separate rate, Commerce will instruct CBP to
liquidate such entries at the China-wide rate (i.e., 220.87
percent).\18\ For the respondents that were not selected for individual
examination in this administrative review but qualified for a separate
rate, the assessment rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping
margin determined in the final results of this review. Additionally, if
Commerce continues to find in the final results that Shunchang
Shengsheng, Xiamen Jinxi, and Green Wood had no shipments of the
subject merchandise, any suspended entries of subject merchandise
associated with those companies will be liquidated at the China-wide
rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
\18\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the companies for which we have rescinded this review, Commerce
intends to instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit rate of estimated
antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i).
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP for the
rescinded companies no earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the preliminary results in the Federal Register.
If Commerce rescinds this review with respect to Aventra, TL Wood,
and China Cornici in the final results, we intend to instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries at a rate equal to
the cash deposit rate of estimated antidumping duties required at the
time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). We will issue such
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results in the Federal Register.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for
shipments of the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for companies listed
above that have established their eligibility for a separate rate, the
cash deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is
de minimis, then the cash deposit rate will be zero); (2) for
previously examined Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not listed above
that received a separate rate in a prior completed segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing
exporter-specific cash deposit rate; (3) for all Chinese exporters of
subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the China-
wide entity (i.e., 220.87 percent); and (4) for all non-Chinese
exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the
Chinese exporter that supplied that non-Chinese exporter. These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure
to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred
and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties, and/or an
increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the amount of the
countervailing duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
This administrative review and notice are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4), and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: February 28, 2023.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Period of Review
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Selection of Respondents
VI. Partial Rescission of Review
VII. Single Entity Determinations
VIII. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
IX. Discussion of the Methodology
X. Recommendation
Appendix II--Non-Selected Companies Under Review Receiving a Separate
Rate
1. Anji Huaxin Bamboo & Wood Products Co., Ltd.
2. Baixing Import and Export Trading Co., Ltd Youxi Fujian
3. Bel Trade Wood Industrial Co., Ltd Youxi Fujian
4. Fotiou Frames Limited
5. Fujian Hongjia Craft Products Co., Ltd.
6. Fujian Sanming City Donglai Wood Co., Ltd
7. Fujian Wangbin Decorative Material Co., Ltd
8. Fujian Youxi Best Arts & Crafts Co. Ltd
9. Fujian Zhangping Kimura Forestry Products Co., Ltd.
10. Homebuild Industries Co., Ltd.
11. Jiangsu Chen Sheng Forestry Development Co., Ltd./Jiangsu Space
Axis Wood Technology Co., Ltd
12. Jiangsu Wenfeng Wood Co., Ltd.
13. Jim Fine Wooden Products Co., Ltd.
14. Longquan Jiefeng Trade Co., Ltd.
15. Nanping Huatai Wood & Bamboo Co., Ltd
[[Page 14143]]
16. Omni One, Co., Limited
17. Putian Yihong Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
18. Raoping HongRong Handicrafts, Co., Ltd.
19. Shandong Miting Household Co., Ltd.
20. Shaxian Hengtong Wood Industry Co., Ltd
21. Shaxian Shiyiwood, Ltd
22. Shenzhen Xinjintai Industrial Co., Ltd.
23. Shuyang Kevin International Co., Ltd
24. Sun Valley Shade Co., Ltd.
25. Suqian Sulu Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd
26. Tim Feng Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
27. Wuxi Boda Bamboo & Wood Industrial Co., Ltd.
28. Zhangzhou Wangjiamei Industry & Trade Co., Ltd.
29. Zhangzhou Yihong Industrial Co., Ltd.
Appendix III--Companies for Which the Review Is Rescinded
1. Anji Golden Elephant Bamboo Wooden Industry Co., Ltd
2. Cao County Hengda Wood Products Co., Ltd
3. Evermark (Yantai) Co., Ltd
4. Fujian Nanping Yuanqiao Wood Industry Co., Ltd
5. Fujian Province Youxi County Chang Sheng Wood Machining Co., Ltd
6. Fujian Ruisen International Industrial Co., Ltd
7. Heze Huasheng Wooden Co., Ltd
8. Huaan Longda Wood Industry Co., Ltd
9. Lanzhou Xinyoulian Industrial Co., Ltd
10. Lianyungang Tianke New Energy Technology Co., Ltd
11. Nanping Qiangmei Import & Export Co., Ltd
12. Oppein Home Group Inc
13. Pucheng County Qiangmei Wood Company, Ltd
14. Qimen Jianxing Bamboo and Wood Goods Co., Ltd
15. Qingdao Sanhe Dacheng International Trade Co., Ltd
16. Rizhao Duli Trade Co., Ltd
17. Rizhao Forest International Trading Co., Ltd.
18. Rizhao Guantong Woodworking Co., Ltd
19. Rizhao Jiayue Industry & Trading Co., Ltd
20. Sanming Lingtong Trading Co., Ltd/Sanming Lintong Trading Co.,
Ltd
21. Sanming Shitong Wood Industry Co., Ltd
22. Shandong Jicheng Decorative Material Co., Ltd
23. Shouguang Luli Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
24. Shuyang Zhongding Decoration Materials Co., Ltd
25. The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd
26. Xiamen Oubai Industry & Trade Co., Ltd
27. Xuzhou Goodwill Resource Co., Ltd
28. Xuzhou Hexi Wood Co., Ltd
29. Yongan Tenlong Bamboo & Wood Products Co., Ltd
30. Zhangping San Chuan Industrial & Trade Co., Ltd
31. Zhangzhou Fukangyuan Industry and Trade Co., Ltd
32. Zhangzhou City Jinxi Building Material Co., Ltd
33. Zhejiang Senya Board Industry Co., Ltd
[FR Doc. 2023-04609 Filed 3-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.