Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Lava Ridge Wind Project in Jerome, Lincoln, and Minidoka Counties, ID
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA), and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, as amended (FLPMA), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announces the availability of the draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed Lava Ridge Wind Project in Jerome, Lincoln, and Minidoka Counties, Idaho.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 88 Issue 13 (Friday, January 20, 2023)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 13 (Friday, January 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3759-3760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2023-00646]
[[Page 3759]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[BLM_ID_FRN_MO4500168247]
Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact
Statement for the Proposed Lava Ridge Wind Project in Jerome, Lincoln,
and Minidoka Counties, ID
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act
of 1976, as amended (FLPMA), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
announces the availability of the draft Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for the proposed Lava Ridge Wind Project in Jerome, Lincoln, and
Minidoka Counties, Idaho.
DATES: To afford the BLM the opportunity to consider comments in the
final EIS, please ensure that the BLM receives your comments within 60
days following the date the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
publishes its Notice of Availability (NOA) of the draft EIS in the
Federal Register. The EPA usually publishes its NOAs on Fridays.
ADDRESSES: The draft EIS is available for review on the BLM ePlanning
project website at <a href="https://bit.ly/3uu3BuV">https://bit.ly/3uu3BuV</a>.
Written comments related to the Lava Ridge Wind Project may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
<bullet> ePlanning Website: <a href="https://bit.ly/3uu3BuV">https://bit.ly/3uu3BuV</a>.
<bullet> Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f7b5bbbaa8beb3a8bb968196a59e939092b7959b9ad9909881"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0f4d434250464b50436e796e5d666b686a4f6d636221686079">[email protected]</span></a>.
<bullet> Mail: Lava Ridge Wind Project EIS, BLM Shoshone Field
Office, Attn: Kasey Prestwich, 400 West F Street, Shoshone, ID 83352.
Documents pertinent to this proposal may be examined online at:
<a href="https://bit.ly/3uu3BuV">https://bit.ly/3uu3BuV</a> and at the BLM Shoshone Field Office, 400 West F
Street, Shoshone, ID 83352.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kasey Prestwich, project manager,
telephone 208-732-7204; address BLM Shoshone Field Office, 400 West F
Street, Shoshone, ID 83352; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a3c8d3d1c6d0d7d4cac0cbe3c1cfce8dc4ccd5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cca7bcbea9bfb8bba5afa48caea0a1e2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a>. Individuals in
the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a
speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services for contacting Mr. Prestwich.
Individuals outside the United States should use the relay services
offered within their country to make international calls to the point-
of-contact in the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need
Magic Valley Energy, LLC (MVE) has applied for a right-of-way (ROW)
grant to construct, operate, maintain, and decommission the Lava Ridge
Wind Project (the project), a wind energy facility and ancillary
facilities primarily on BLM-administered public lands in Jerome,
Lincoln, and Minidoka counties, Idaho. The BLM's purpose is to respond
to the ROW application submitted by MVE in compliance with the FLPMA,
BLM ROW regulations, and other applicable Federal laws and policies.
The need for the BLM's Proposed Action arises from Title V of the
FLPMA, which establishes a multiple use mandate for management of
Federal lands, including ``systems for generation, transmission, and
distribution of electric energy'' (43 U.S.C 1761).
Proposed Action and Alternatives
The project, as described by the Proposed Action (Alternative B),
would be located primarily on public lands administered by the BLM
Shoshone Field Office, approximately 25 miles northeast of Twin Falls,
Idaho. The project would consist of up to 400 wind turbines and
associated infrastructure, including new and improved roads, powerlines
for collection and transmission of electricity, substations, operation
and maintenance facilities, and a battery storage facility. The
project's 500-kilovolt generation intertie transmission line would
interconnect at Idaho Power Company's existing Midpoint Substation or
at a new substation within the ROW corridor of the northern portion of
the Southwest Intertie Project. The project's estimated generation
capacity is 1,000 megawatts or more.
The project area spans 197,474 acres and all project components
would be sited within a series of corridors. These corridors are
approximately one-half mile wide and cover approximately 84,385 acres,
of which 75,760 acres are located on public lands managed by the BLM,
2,910 acres are on State lands managed by the Idaho Department of
Lands, 5,417 acres are on private lands, and 288 acres are on lands
managed by the Bureau of Reclamation. All wind turbines, powerlines,
and associated infrastructure would be located on lands managed by the
BLM and the Idaho Department of Lands. The Bureau of Reclamation and
private lands would include the use of existing public access roads,
but no other project related infrastructure. The project infrastructure
proposed within the corridors is estimated to have a 2,374-acre
footprint and a total disturbance area of 9,114 acres.
Under the No Action Alternative, the Lava Ridge Wind Project would
not be authorized and would not be constructed.
The project area of Alternative C would span 146,389 acres and the
maximum number of turbines would be 378. Alternative C removes some
siting corridors in the southwestern and northern portions of the
project area to avoid or minimize potential impacts to Wilson Butte
Cave, the Minidoka National Historic Site, and associated impacts to
the Native American and Japanese American communities. Alternative C
also removes siting corridors in the northern portion of the project
area to reduce the potential for fragmenting wildlife habitat.
The project area of Alternative D would be the smallest of all
action alternatives at 110,315 acres and the maximum number of turbines
would be 280. Alternative D builds on the proposed changes in
Alternative C that avoid and minimize potential impacts to Wilson Butte
Cave, the Minidoka National Historic Site, and wildlife habitat.
Alternative D further reduces potential impacts within wildlife habitat
by removing siting corridors located in the eastern portion of the
project area that have higher sagebrush cover that provide functional
Greater sage-grouse habitat. Also, Alternative D would have
substantially fewer wind turbines and less infrastructure than
Alternatives B and C. It therefore would reduce the potential for bat
and avian mortality and potential conflicts with livestock grazing
operations.
The project area of Alternative E would span 122,444 acres and the
maximum number of turbines would be 269. Alternative E builds off the
proposed changes in Alternative C that avoid or minimize potential
impacts to Wilson Butte Cave, the Minidoka National Historic Site, and
wildlife habitat. Alternative E would remove siting corridors that are
directly east of the Minidoka National Historic Site, resulting in this
alternative having the least amount of visual impacts to the historic
site. Like Alternative D, the smaller footprint and lower number of
turbines would also reduce the potential for bat and avian mortality
and potential conflicts with livestock grazing operations.
[[Page 3760]]
The BLM has identified Alternatives C and E as the agency's
preferred alternatives. In selecting preferred alternatives, the BLM
aims to consider project elements that balance energy production with
reducing the potential for adverse impacts. Identification of these as
the agency's preferred alternatives does not imply that one of these
will be selected as the BLM's final decision. Information acquired
during the public comment period could identify an alternative that
blends elements of the agency's preferred alternatives, incorporates
elements of any of the alternatives, or selects any of the five
alternatives as the proposed alternative in the final EIS.
Draft EIS Preparation Process
A Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS was published in the Federal
Register on August 20, 2021, (86 FR 46867), announcing the beginning of
the public scoping process. The scoping period closed on October 20,
2021, and 1,478 comment submissions were received; of those, 1,157 are
unique. A scoping report was prepared and is available on the project's
ePlanning website <a href="https://bit.ly/3uu3BuV">https://bit.ly/3uu3BuV</a>.
The scoping process and subsequent feedback received from agency
resource specialists, Native American Tribes, cooperating agencies,
consulting parties, and interested parties identified a range of
concerns to be included in the EIS analysis. Concerns included, but
were not limited to the following:
<bullet> Potential impacts to the Minidoka National Historic Site
and associated impacts to Japanese American communities;
<bullet> Potential impacts to Wilson Butte Cave and associated
impacts to Native American Tribes;
<bullet> Potential impacts to cultural resources associated with
Native American habitation and early European-American settlement;
<bullet> Potential impacts to the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes' treaty
rights, including the rights to hunt and harvest foods, medicines, and
materials from their homeland;
<bullet> Potential impacts to big game winter range and movement
corridors, bats, raptors, and the Greater sage-grouse general habitat
management area;
<bullet> Potential impacts to permitted livestock grazing
operations;
<bullet> Potential impacts to transportation networks needed to
access the project; and
<bullet> Potential socioeconomic impacts.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The BLM is the lead agency responsible for completing the EIS and
deciding whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny MVE's
request for a ROW grant. Cooperating agencies involved in the
development of the draft EIS include the National Park Service, the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the
State of Idaho, and the counties of Jerome, Lincoln, and Minidoka,
Idaho.
Schedule for Decision Making Process
The final EIS is tentatively scheduled to be issued in summer 2023,
with a Record of Decision in fall 2023.
Public Involvement Process
The BLM will hold virtual and in-person public meetings during the
comment period. The date(s) and location(s) of meetings will be
announced in advance through local media, email, mail, and the
ePlanning project website <a href="https://bit.ly/3uu3BuV">https://bit.ly/3uu3BuV</a>.
The purpose of public review of the draft EIS is to provide an
opportunity for meaningful collaborative public engagement and for the
public to provide substantive comments, such as identification of
factual errors, data gaps, relevant methods, or scientific studies. You
may submit comments at any time during the 60-day comment period by
using one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section of this
notice. The BLM will respond to substantive comments by making
appropriate revisions to the EIS or explaining why a comment did not
warrant a change.
The BLM will continue to consult with Indian Tribal Nations on a
government-to-government basis in accordance with Executive Order
13175, BLM MS 1780, and other Departmental policies. Tribal concerns,
including impacts on Indian trust assets and potential impacts to
cultural resources, will be given due consideration.
The BLM will use the draft EIS review process to help fulfill the
public involvement requirements under the National Historic
Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. 306108), as provided in 36 CFR 800.2(d)(3).
The information about historic and cultural resources within the area
potentially affected by the Proposed Action will assist the BLM in
identifying and evaluating impacts to such resources.
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10)
Michael C. Courtney,
BLM Twin Falls District Manager.
[FR Doc. 2023-00646 Filed 1-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4331-19-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.