Notice2023-00460
Agency Information Collection Activities; Notice and Request for Comment; Older Driver Rearview Video Systems
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
January 12, 2023
Issuing agencies
Transportation DepartmentNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Abstract
NHTSA invites public comments about our intention to request approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for a reinstatement with modification of a previously approved information collection. Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from the public, it must receive approval from OMB. Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit public comment on proposed collections of information, including extensions and reinstatement of previously approved collections. This document describes a collection of information for which NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval on Older Driver Rearview Video Systems.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 88 Issue 8 (Thursday, January 12, 2023)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2168-2170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2023-00460]
[[Page 2168]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2022-0108]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Notice and Request for
Comment; Older Driver Rearview Video Systems
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice and request for comments on a reinstatement of
previously approved information collection.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NHTSA invites public comments about our intention to request
approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for a
reinstatement with modification of a previously approved information
collection. Before a Federal agency can collect certain information
from the public, it must receive approval from OMB. Under procedures
established by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, before seeking OMB
approval, Federal agencies must solicit public comment on proposed
collections of information, including extensions and reinstatement of
previously approved collections. This document describes a collection
of information for which NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval on Older
Driver Rearview Video Systems.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before March 13, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by the Docket No. NHTSA-
2022-0108 through any of the following methods:
<bullet> Electronic submissions: Go to the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>. Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments.
<bullet> Fax: (202) 493-2251.
<bullet> Mail or Hand Delivery: Docket Management, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building, Room W12-
140, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except on Federal holidays. To be sure someone is there to help
you, please call (202) 366-9322 before coming.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>, including any
personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit <a href="https://www.transportation.gov/privacy">https://www.transportation.gov/privacy</a>.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> or the street
address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets via internet.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or access
to background documents, contact Kathy Sifrit, Ph.D., Contracting
Officer's Representative, Office of Behavioral Safety Research (NPD-
320), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, W46-470, Washington, DC 20590. Dr. Sifrit's phone number is
202-366-0868, and her email address is <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7c371d081405522f151a0e15083c181308521b130a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="efa48e9b8796c1bc86899d869baf8b809bc1888099">[email protected]</span></a>. Please
identify the relevant collection of information by referring to its OMB
Control Number (2127-0731).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for approval, it must first publish a
document in the Federal Register providing a 60-day comment period and
otherwise consult with members of the public and affected agencies
concerning each proposed collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB's regulation (at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must
ask for public comment on the following: (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) how to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
and (d) how to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA
asks for public comments on the following proposed collection of
information for which the agency is seeking approval from OMB.
Title: Older Driver Rearview Video Systems.
OMB Control Number: 2127-0731.
Form Number(s): Forms 1398 and 1399.
Type of Request: Reinstatement with modification of a previously
approved information collection (OMB Control No. 2127-0731).
Type of Review Requested: Regular.
Requested Expiration Date of Approval: 3 years from date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of Information: The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation
is seeking approval to reinstate an information collection to recruit
120 older licensed drivers, 60 between ages 60 and 69 and 60 age 70 and
older, for a one-time voluntary research study to assess whether
training on the use of Rear Video Systems (RVS) improves the ability of
older drivers to back safely. NHTSA expects 180 volunteers will
complete screening over the telephone or in-person to determine their
eligibility for the study. Recruiting participants for the reinstated
collection has an estimated burden of 15 hours (five minutes per
respondent). NHTSA expects that among the 180 who are screened, 120
will be eligible and willing to participate in the study. These 120
participants will complete informed consent forms (15 minutes per
participant or 30 burden hours), participate in either RVS training or
an equal-time placebo group (30 minutes per participant or 60 burden
hours), and complete a series of backing tacks on a closed test-track
(60 minutes per participant or 120 burden hours). The overall expected
burden for screening (15 hours) and the experiment (210 hours) is 225
hours.
NHTSA previously obtained clearance from OMB to conduct the
information collections for Parts 1 and 2 of this one-time study.
However, NHTSA was unable to complete Part 2 of the study as a result
of the public health emergency in 2020 and 2021. The requested
reinstatement is 135 fewer burden hours than the previous information
collection request because the requested reinstatement is for Part 2
only (120 participants and 225 hours) rather than Parts 1 and 2 (200
participants and 360 hours). The reinstatement requests fewer burden
hours because NHTSA previously completed the first part of this
collection by observing older drivers
[[Page 2169]]
while backing for the development of training. NHTSA is now requesting
a reinstatement to allow it to complete the second part, which assesses
the effects of the training. NHTSA will use the information to produce
a technical report containing summary statistics and tables and will
not report identifying information or individual responses. NHTSA will
make the technical report available to a variety of audiences
interested in improving highway safety through the agency website and
the National Transportation Library. This project involves approval by
an institutional review board, which the contractor will obtain before
contacting potential participants. This collection will inform the
development of behavioral safety countermeasures to improve older
driver safety, particularly older driver training.
Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the
Information: Older adults comprise an increasing proportion of the
driving population.\1\ The independent mobility that driving confers
improves older adults' access to the goods and services they need and
enhances their ability to take part in community and family activities
that support quality of life. New vehicle technologies, like RVS, may
help compensate for some age-related deficits and keep older adults
driving safely.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2022, July).
2020 older population fact sheet. (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No.
DOT HS 813 341). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Available at <a href="https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812372">https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812372</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The theory underpinning the assumption that older drivers have an
elevated safety risk associated with backing crashes is based upon
known age-related deficits. Many older drivers have musculoskeletal
difficulties that limit their ability to turn and scan behind the
vehicle. For example, Chen et al. (2015) found that older drivers had
less neck and trunk rotation and were less successful in detecting
targets requiring body rotation in a driving simulator.\2\ Aging also
diminishes the visual search, visual information processing, and
divided attention capabilities needed to be alert to possible conflicts
from cross traffic when backing from a driveway or parking space.
Deficits in visual scanning among older drivers have been reported in
numerous studies. For example, Pollatsek et al. (2012) found that older
drivers were less likely to focus their visual attention on areas with
potential hazards than younger experienced drivers at intersections in
a simulator and on-the-road.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Chen, K.B., Xu, X., Lin J.H., & Radwin, R.G. (2015).
``Evaluation of older driver head functional range of motion using
portable immersive virtual reality.'' Experimental gerontology, 70,
150-156. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2015.08.010">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2015.08.010</a>.
\3\ Pollatsek, A., Romoser, M.R., & Fisher, D.L. (2012).
``Identifying and remediating failures of selective attention in
older drivers.'' Current directions in psychological science, 21(1),
3-7. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429459">https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429459</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An analysis of NHTSA's Non-Traffic Surveillance from 2012 through
2014 indicated that older drivers were involved in an estimated 19,000
backing crashes a year that resulted in death or injury. This
represented 22% of all non-traffic backing crashes. Older drivers
represented 17% of all licensed drivers but accounted for 22% of all
non-traffic backing crashes during this period, indicating an over-
representation in non-traffic backing crashes per licensed driver.
Studies have found that the most frequent error among older drivers
involved in crashes is failure to yield the right-of-way. For example,
Cicchino and McCartt (2015) found that ``the most frequent error made
by crash-involved drivers ages 70 and older was inadequate
surveillance, which included looking but not seeing and failing to
look.'' \4\ The fact that older drivers are at elevated risk of crashes
due to inadequate surveillance compared to younger drivers may explain
their over-representation in backing crashes per licensed driver.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Cicchino, J.B. and McCartt, A.T. (2015). ``Critical older
driver errors in a sample of serious U.S. crashes.'' Accident
analysis and prevention, 80, 211-219. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.015">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.015</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
RVS is expected to offer more potential benefits to older drivers
than younger drivers because older drivers have more room for
improvement due to the age-related decline in the ability to rotate
one's body. It may also compensate for the fact that older drivers are
more likely to have inadequate surveillance or scanning than younger
drivers. One published article addressed this question. Cichino (2017)
found that RVS reduced backing crash involvement among drivers 70 and
older by 36% compared to 16% for drivers younger than 70, but the
difference was not statistically significant. The study also found that
backing sensors reduced backing crash involvement for drivers 70 and
older by 38% compared to no effectiveness for drivers younger than 70,
which was a statistically significant difference.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Cichino, J.B. (2017). ``Effects of rearview cameras and rear
parking sensors on police-reported backing crashes.'' Traffic injury
prevention, 18(8), 859-865. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2017.1317758">https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2017.1317758</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Affected Public: The potential respondent universe is comprised of
all residents of the New River Valley and Roanoke Valley regions in
Virginia who are age 60 and older. From this universe, the new data
collection screening questionnaire will be administered to an estimated
180 potential participants to qualify a total sample of 120 volunteer
drivers, 60 between ages 60 and 69 and 60 who are 70 and older.
Estimated Number of Respondents: The study anticipates screening
180 potential participants to obtain 120 older drivers who meet study
inclusion criteria. NHTSA expects to collect information either over
the telephone or in-person from up to 180 potential participants to
determine their eligibility for the study. Based upon previous research
experience in the study area, an estimated 120 potential participants
(65% of those who respond to screener questions) will be eligible and
interested. The 120 participants are expected to consent and complete
the study.
Frequency: This study is a one-time information collection, and
there will be no recurrence.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 225 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost: $6,057.
The contractor will use a screening questionnaire (Form 1398) to
identify 120 drivers (60 between ages 60 and 69 and 60 age 70 and
older) who are properly qualified and choose to participate in the
study. Participants will answer the screening questionnaire items
either over the phone or in person to determine if they qualify for the
study. Respondents are expected to take an estimated average of 5
minutes to complete the initial screening resulting in 15 burden hours
for screening up to 180 potential participants. It is estimated that
65% of those who begin the screening process will be eligible and
interested in participating. As such, we anticipate screening up to 180
individuals to recruit an estimated 120 potential participants for the
consenting process. The consenting process includes an overview of the
study and an explanation of the form (Form 1399). Respondents are
expected to take an average of 15 minutes for the consenting process
including reviewing and completing the form resulting in 30 burden
hours. The 120 participants will complete study activities with an
estimated burden of 90 minutes per participant for a total estimated
burden of 180 hours.
Table 1 describes the calculation of the estimated burden hours for
a total of 225 annual hours. To calculate the opportunity cost to
participants in this study, NHTSA used the average (mean)
[[Page 2170]]
hourly earnings from employers in all industry sectors in the State of
Virginia, which the Bureau of Labor Statistics lists at $28.92.\6\
NHTSA estimated the opportunity cost for each form (and associated
study activities) and arrived at a total opportunity cost of $6,057.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ May 2021. See <a href="https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_va.htm#00-0000">https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_va.htm#00-0000</a>.
Table 1--Burden Estimates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burden Respondents Total burden hours Total labor costs
(minutes) per (reinstated (reinstated (reinstated
respondent collection) collection) collection)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Form 1398:
Telephone Screening............. 5 180 15 $434
Form 1399:
Informed Consent................ 15 .............. 30 868
Backing Performance Evaluation.. 60 120 120 3,470
Training Protocol/Placebo....... 30 120 60 1,735
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Form 1399:............ .............. 120 210 6,073
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total estimated burden .............. .............. 225 6,057
hours and labor costs..
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspects of
this information collection, including (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Department, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Department's estimate
of the burden of the proposed information collection; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35, as amended; 49 CFR 1.49; and DOT Order 1351.29A.
Nanda Narayanan Srinivasan,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2023-00460 Filed 1-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on January 12, 2023.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.