Notice2022-28301
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Modify Equity 4, Rule 3100 to Establish Common Criteria and Procedures for Halting and Resuming Trading in Equity Securities in the Event of Regulatory or Operational Issues
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
December 29, 2022
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 249 (Thursday, December 29, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 249 (Thursday, December 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80213-80219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-28301]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-96574; File No. SR-Phlx-2022-49]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Modify Equity 4,
Rule 3100 to Establish Common Criteria and Procedures for Halting and
Resuming Trading in Equity Securities in the Event of Regulatory or
Operational Issues
December 22, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 15, 2022, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below,
which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed
Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify Equity 4, Rule 3100 to establish
common criteria and procedures for halting and resuming trading in
equity securities in the event of regulatory or operational issues,
reorganize the text of the rule, and make conforming changes to related
rules. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's website at <a href="https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/phlx/rules">https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/phlx/rules</a>, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
In conjunction with adoption of an amended Nasdaq UTP Plan proposed
by its participants (``Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan''),\3\ the Exchange is
amending Rule 3100 \4\ to integrate several definitions and concepts
from the Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan and to reorganize the rule in light of
the Exchange's experience with applying the rule over many years as a
national securities exchange.\5\ The Exchange proposes to reorganize
and amend Rule 3100, entitled Limit Up-Limit Down Plan and Trading
Halts on PSX. The rule sets forth the Exchange's authority to halt
trading under various circumstances. The Exchange is a participant of
the transaction reporting plan governing Tape C Securities (``Nasdaq
UTP Plan'').\6\ As part of these changes, the Exchange will amend
categories of regulatory and operational halts, improve the rule's
clarity, adopt defined terms from the Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan and
delete parts of the rule that are no longer needed. Last, the Exchange
is updating cross references in other rules that are affected by the
proposed changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ On February 11, 2021, the Nasdaq UTP Plan participants filed
Amendment 50 to the Plan, to revise provisions governing regulatory
and operational halts. See Letter from Robert Brooks, Chairman, UTP
Operating Committee, Nasdaq UTP Plan, to Vanessa Countryman,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, dated February 11,
2021. The Nasdaq UTP Plan subsequently filed two partial amendments
to the 50th Amendment, on March 31, 2021 and on April 7, 2021. The
SEC approved the amendments on May 28, 2021. See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 34-92071 (May 28, 2021), 86 FR 29846 (June 3, 2021)
(S7-24-89). The Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan includes provisions
requiring participant self-regulatory organizations (``SROs'') to
honor a Regulatory Halt declared by the Primary Listing Market. The
provisions in the Nasdaq UTP Plan, and the plan for consolidation of
data for non-Nasdaq-listed securities, the Consolidated Tape System
and Consolidated Quotations System (collectively, the ``CTA/CQS
Plan''), include provisions similar to the changes proposed by the
Exchange in this filing.
\4\ References herein to Nasdaq PHLX Rules in the 3000 Series
shall mean Rules in Nasdaq PHLX Equity 4.
\5\ The Exchange notes that its sister exchange, The Nasdaq
Stock Market, LLC (``Nasdaq''), filed a similar proposed rule change
with the Commission. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94370
(March 7, 2022), 87 FR 14071 (March 11, 2022); Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 94838 (May 3, 2022), 87 FR 27683 (May 9, 2022). The
Commission approved the proposed rule change on June 8, 2022. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95069 (June 8, 2022), 87 FR
36018 (June 14, 2022). Nasdaq BX, Inc. plans to file a similar
proposed rule change. The Exchange's proposal provides the Exchange
with less authority to declare halts in the event of regulatory or
operational issues than under Nasdaq's proposal because the
Exchange, unlike Nasdaq, is not a Primary Listing Market. Given the
Exchange's status as a non-Primary Listing Market, certain
definitions and concepts from the Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan,
integrated in Nasdaq's proposal, are not included herein.
\6\ Each transaction reporting plan has a securities information
processor (``SIP'') responsible for consolidation of information for
the plan's securities, pursuant to Rule 603 of Regulation NMS. The
transaction reporting plan for Nasdaq-listed securities is known as
The Joint Self-Regulatory Organization Plan Governing the
Collection, Consolidation and Dissemination of Quotation and
Transaction Information for Nasdaq-Listed Securities Traded on
Exchanges on an Unlisted Trading Privilege Basis or the ``Nasdaq UTP
Plan.'' Pursuant to the Nasdaq UTP Plan, the UTP SIP, which is
Nasdaq, consolidates order and trade data from all markets trading
Nasdaq-listed securities. The Exchange uses the term ``UTP SIP''
herein when referring specifically to the SIP responsible for
consolidation of information in Nasdaq-listed securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 80214]]
Background
The Exchange has been working with other SROs to establish common
criteria and procedures for halting and resuming trading in equity
securities in the event of regulatory or operational issues. These
common standards are designed to ensure that events which might impact
multiple exchanges are handled in a consistent manner that is
transparent. The Exchange believes that implementation of these common
standards will assist the SROs in maintaining fair and orderly markets.
Notwithstanding the development of these common standards, the Exchange
will retain discretion in certain instances as to whether and how to
handle halts, as is discussed below.
Every U.S.-listed equity security has its primary listing on a
specific stock exchange that is responsible for a number of regulatory
functions.\7\ These include confirming that the security continues to
meet the exchange's listing standards, monitoring trading in that
security and taking action to halt trading in the security when
necessary to protect investors and to ensure a fair and orderly market.
While these core responsibilities remain with the primary listing
venue, trading in the security can occur on multiple exchanges that
have unlisted trading privileges for the security \8\ or in the over-
the-counter market, regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc. (``FINRA''). The exchanges and FINRA are responsible
for monitoring activity on the markets over which they have oversight,
but also must abide by the regulatory decisions made by the Primary
Listing Market. For example, a venue trading a security pursuant to
unlisted trading privileges must halt trading in that security during a
Regulatory Halt, which is a defined term under the proposed rules,\9\
and may only trade the security once the Primary Listing Market has
cleared the security to resume trading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The Exchange is proposing to adopt Primary Listing Market as
a new term, defined in Nasdaq UTP Plan, Section X.A.8, as follows:
``[T]he national securities exchange on which an Eligible Security
is listed. If an Eligible Security is listed on more than one
national securities exchange, Primary Listing Market means the
exchange on which the security has been listed the longest.''
\8\ In addition, securities may be listed on The Nasdaq Global
Market or The Nasdaq Global Select Market, and also listed on the
New York Stock Exchange (``dually-listed''). See The Nasdaq Stock
Market, LLC Rules 5005(a)(11), 5220 and IM-5220.
\9\ See proposed Rule 3100(a)(9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While the Exchange and the other SROs intend to harmonize certain
aspects of their trading halt rules, other elements of the rules will
continue to be unique to each market. The Exchange believes that this
is appropriate to reflect different products listed or traded on each
market.
In addition to establishing common criteria and procedures for
halting and resuming trading in equity securities in the event of
regulatory or operational issues, the Exchange is deleting provisions
that are no longer needed and reorganizing the rule to improve its
clarity. The Exchange is also making a handful of non-substantive
changes to rule text to improve its clarity. The Exchange will
implement all of the changes proposed herein in conjunction with other
SROs implementing the necessary rule changes. The Exchange will publish
an Equity Trader alert at least 30 business days prior to implementing
the proposed changes.
Definitions
The Exchange proposes adding a definitions section as Rule 3100(a)
to consolidate the various definitions that will be used in the Rule,
some of which are taken from the Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan. The Exchange
is adopting the following terms from the Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan:
``Operating Committee,'' ``Operational Halt,'' ``Primary Listing
Market,'' ``Processor,'' \10\ ``Regulatory Halt,'' ``Regular Trading
Hours,'' \11\ ``SIP Halt,'' and ``SIP Halt Resume Time.'' The Exchange
is adopting a modified form of the term ``Extraordinary Market
Activity'' from the Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan, as described below. The
definitions of ``UTP Exchange Traded Product'' and ``Pre-Market
Session'' have been moved into the definitions section from elsewhere
in the current rule without change.\12\ The definitions of ``Trust
Shares,'' ``Index Fund Shares,'' ``Managed Fund Shares,'' and ``Trust
Issues Receipts'' have been moved into the definitions section as
subcategories to the defined term ``UTP Exchange Traded Product'' from
elsewhere in the current rule without changes in the definitions.\13\
The definition of ``Post-Market Session'' has been moved from elsewhere
in the rule \14\ with a minor change deleting the alternative closing
time of 4:15 p.m. as all securities traded on the Exchange commence
their closing cross process at 4:00 p.m.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The Exchange proposes to also define the term ``SIP'' to
have the same meaning as the term ``Processor'' as set forth in the
Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan. Because the terms ``Processor'' and ``SIP''
are also used throughout the Rules, at times, to apply to processors
of information furnished pursuant to the Consolidated Tape
Association Plan (``CTA Plan''), the term ``Processor'' may, in
those applicable circumstances, refer to the processor of
transactions in Tape A and B securities, as set forth in the CTA
Plan.
\11\ The Exchange notes that pursuant to existing Rule
3100(b)(3) and 3100(b)(4), the Regular Market Session occurs until
4:00 p.m. or 4:15 p.m., and the Post-Market Session begins at 4:00
p.m. or 4:15 p.m.
\12\ ``UTP Exchange Traded Product'' is currently defined in
Rule 3100(f). ``Pre-Market Session'' is currently defined in Rule
3100(b)(2).
\13\ ``Trust Shares,'' ``Index Fund Shares,'' ``Managed Fund
Shares,'' and ``Trust Issues Receipts'' are currently defined in
Rule 3100(b)(1)(A)-(D).
\14\ ``Post-Market Session'' is currently defined in Rule
3100(b)(3).
\15\ As noted above, the Exchange is adopting several new terms
that have the same meaning as those terms are defined in the Amended
Nasdaq UTP Plan. Each of the national market system plans governing
the single plan processors has identical definitions of these terms,
thus there will be uniformity in the meaning of the terms among such
plans as well as among the rules of the SROs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
First, the Exchange proposes to add the definition of ``Primary
Listing Market'' \16\ to Rule 3100, which will have the same meaning as
in the Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan, Section X.A.8. As is currently the case
under Rule 3100 and under the Nasdaq UTP Plan, all Regulatory Halt
decisions are made by the market on which the security has its primary
listing. This reflects the regulatory responsibility that the Primary
Listing Market has for fair and orderly trading in the securities that
list on its market and its direct access to its listed companies, which
are required to advise it of certain events and maintain lines of
communication with the Primary Listing Market. The proposed definition
makes clear that if a security is listed on more than one market (a
dually-listed security), the Primary Listing Market means the exchange
on which the security has been listed the longest. This provision
matches language used in the definition of ``Primary Listing Exchange''
in the Limit-Up Limit-Down Plan and will avoid conflict in the event of
dually-listed securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See proposed Rule 3100(a)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, the Exchange proposes to add the definition of
``Extraordinary Market Activity'' to Rule 3100,\17\ which would
represent a modified version of the term defined in the Amended Nasdaq
UTP Plan, Section X.A.1.\18\ Specifically, the
[[Page 80215]]
Exchange proposes to remove the concept of a ``market-wide basis'' from
the Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan's definition of Extraordinary Market
Activity for purposes of the Exchange's Rules because the term
``Extraordinary Market Activity'' would only be used in the Exchange's
Rules as a basis for the Exchange to initiate an Operational Halt,
which would only occur on the market declaring the halt (i.e., the
Exchange).\19\ The current rule does not include a definition for
Extraordinary Market Activity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See proposed Rule 3100(a)(2).
\18\ In the Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan, ``Extraordinary Market
Activity'' means a disruption or malfunction of any electronic
quotation, communication, reporting, or execution system operated
by, or linked to, the Processor or a Trading Center or a member of
such Trading Center that has a severe and continuing negative
impact, on a market-wide basis, on quoting, order, or trading
activity or on the availability of market information necessary to
maintain a fair and orderly market. For purposes of this definition,
a severe and continuing negative impact on quoting, order, or
trading activity includes (i) a series of quotes, orders, or
transactions at prices substantially unrelated to the current market
for the security or securities; (ii) duplicative or erroneous
quoting, order, trade reporting, or other related message traffic
between one or more Trading Centers or their members; or (iii) the
unavailability of quoting, order, or transaction information for a
sustained period.
\19\ The Exchange proposes to define ``Extraordinary Market
Activity'' to mean a disruption or malfunction of any electronic
quotation, communication, reporting, or execution system operated
by, or linked to, the Processor or a Trading Center or a member of
such Trading Center that has a severe and continuing negative impact
on quoting, order, or trading activity or on the availability of
market information necessary to maintain a fair and orderly market.
For purposes of this definition, a severe and continuing negative
impact on quoting, order, or trading activity includes (i) a series
of quotes, orders, or transactions at prices substantially unrelated
to the current market for the security or securities; (ii)
duplicative or erroneous quoting, order, trade reporting, or other
related message traffic between one or more Trading Centers or their
members; or (iii) the unavailability of quoting, order, or
transaction information for a sustained period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The third set of new proposed definitions would be specific to
events involving the SIP. While the Exchange recognizes that many
events involving the SIP would also meet the definition of
``Extraordinary Market Activity'' (as defined in the Amended Nasdaq UTP
Plan), the Exchange believes that the critical role of the SIPs in
market infrastructure factors in favor of additional guidance on how
such events will be handled. The definitions of ``SIP Halt Resume
Time'' and ``SIP Halt'' are intended to provide additional guidance to
address this subset of potential market issues.\20\ In addition, the
Exchange is proposing to define terms related to SIP governance needed
in order to understand these definitions:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ The Exchange proposes to define the terms ``SIP Halt Resume
Time'' and ``SIP Halt'' to have the same meaning as in the Amended
Nasdaq UTP Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> ``Processor'' or ``SIP'' \21\ have the same meaning as the
term ``Processor'' set forth in the Nasdaq UTP Plan, namely the entity
selected by the Participants to perform the processing functions set
forth in the Plan. Because the terms ``Processor'' and ``SIP'' are also
used throughout the Rules, at times, to apply to processors of
information furnished pursuant to the CTA Plan, the term ``Processor''
and ``SIP'' may, in those applicable circumstances, refer to the
processor of transactions in Tape A and B securities, as set forth in
the CTA Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See proposed Rule 3100(a)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> ``SIP Plan'' \22\ is defined as the national market system
plan governing the SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See proposed Rule 3100(a)(14).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> ``Operating Committee'' \23\ is defined as having the same
meaning as in the Nasdaq UTP Plan, namely the committee charged with
administering the Nasdaq UTP Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See proposed Rule 3100(a)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange is proposing to adopt a category of Regulatory Halt,
called a ``SIP Halt,'' \24\ which will have the same meaning as that
term is defined in Section X.A.11. of the Nasdaq UTP Plan, namely ``a
Regulatory Halt to trading in one or more securities that a Primary
Listing Market declares in the event of a SIP Outage or Material SIP
Latency.'' This new category of Regulatory Halt will address situations
where the Primary Listing Market declares a Regulatory Halt in one or
more securities as a result of a SIP outage \25\ or material SIP
latency.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See proposed Rule 3100(a)(12).
\25\ SIP outage means a situation in which the Processor has
ceased, or anticipates being unable, to provide updated and/or
accurate quotation or last sale price information in one or more
securities for a material period that exceeds the time thresholds
for an orderly failover to backup facilities established by mutual
agreement among the Processor, the Primary Listing Market for the
affected securities, and the Operating Committee unless the Primary
Listing Market, in consultation with the Processor and the Operating
Committee, determines that resumption of accurate data is expected
in the near future. See Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan, Section X.A.13.
\26\ Material SIP latency means a delay of quotation or last
sale price information in one or more securities between the time
data is received by the Processor and the time the Processor
disseminates the data over the Processor's vendor lines, which delay
the Primary Listing Market determines, in consultation with, and in
accordance with, publicly disclosed guidelines established by the
Operating Committee, to be (a) material and (b) unlikely to be
resolved in the near future. See Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan, Section
X.A.5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to add a definition of ``Regulatory Halt''
\27\ as having the same meaning as in Section X.A.10 of the Amended
Nasdaq UTP Plan. Specifically, the Exchange has proposed to define
Regulatory Halt to mean a halt declared by the Primary Listing Market
in trading in one or more securities on all Trading Centers for
regulatory purposes, including for the dissemination of material news,
news pending, suspensions, or where otherwise necessary to maintain a
fair and orderly market. A Regulatory Halt includes a trading pause
triggered by Limit Up Limit Down, a halt based on Extraordinary Market
Activity (as defined in the Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan), a trading halt
triggered by a Market-Wide Circuit Breaker, and a SIP Halt.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ See proposed Rule 3100(a)(9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to add a definition of ``Operational Halt,''
\28\ which is defined as having the same meaning as in Section X.A.7 of
the Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan. Specifically, the Exchange is proposing to
define Operational Halt to mean a halt in trading in one or more
securities only on the market declaring the halt and is not a
Regulatory Halt. An Operational Halt is effective only on the Exchange;
other markets are not required to halt trading in the impacted
securities. In practice, the Exchange has always had the capacity to
implement operational halts in specified circumstances.\29\ The
proposed change would provide greater clarity on when an Operational
Halt may be implemented and the process for halting and resuming
trading in the event of an Operational Halt. An Operational Halt is not
a Regulatory Halt.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See proposed Rule 3100(a)(4).
\29\ See By-Laws of Nasdaq PHLX LLC, Section 7-5 (``Authority to
Take Action Under Emergency or Extraordinary Market Conditions''),
available at <a href="https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/assets/rulebook/phlx/rules/Phlx_By-Laws.pdf">https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/assets/rulebook/phlx/rules/Phlx_By-Laws.pdf</a>.
\30\ The Exchange notes that it proposes to amend the existing
definition of the term ``Post-Market Session'' to clarify that it is
a trading session that begins after ``Regular Trading Hours''--a
term that, in turn, is defined in the Nasdaq UTP Plan--and that such
session begins at ``approximately'' 4:00 p.m. See Proposed Rule
3100(a)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange proposes to delete the defined terms of
``Derivative Securities Product,'' ``UTP Listing Market,'' ``UTP
Regulatory Halt,'' and ``UTP Security'' as the definitions are obsolete
and not utilized within the Exchange's Rules with the proposed changes
herein.
Regulatory Halt
Proposed Rule 3100(b)(1)(A)(i)-(ii) includes two situations in
which the Exchange must halt trading pursuant to a Regulatory Halt:
under the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan or pursuant to extraordinary market
volatility (market-wide circuit breakers). Proposed Rule
3100(b)(1)(A)(i) retains without substantive modification the existing
rule with respect to the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan (current Rule
3100(a)(2)-(5)). The Exchange, as a non-Primary Listing Market, does
not itself declare trading pauses pursuant to the Limit Up-Limit Down
Plan, but rather implements such pauses declared by Primary Listing
Markets. The Exchange proposes to make clear in Rule 3100(b)(1)(A)(ii)
that
[[Page 80216]]
a trading halt pursuant to extraordinary market volatility (market-wide
circuit breakers), as is described in Rule 3101, constitutes a
Regulatory Halt.
The Exchange would also consolidate subsections concerning a
Regulatory Halt declared by Primary Listing Markets in Rule
3100(b)(1)(A)(iii). The Exchange believes this consolidation would add
clarity to the rule. As is the case under the current rule, the
Exchange would honor a Regulatory Halt.
The Exchange proposes to add proposed Rule
3100(b)(1)(A)(iii)(a)(1), which makes clear that the start time of a
Regulatory Halt is the time the Primary Listing Market declares the
Regulatory Halt, regardless of whether communications issues impact the
dissemination of notice of the Halt.\31\ This proposal would provide
market participants with certainty on the official start time of the
Regulatory Halt. Under the proposed rule, the start time is fixed by
the Primary Listing Market; it is not dependent on whether notice is
disseminated immediately. This will avoid possible disagreement if the
Regulatory Halt time were tied to dissemination or receipt of
notification, which may occur at different times. The Exchange
recognizes that in situations where communication is interrupted,
trades may continue to occur until news of the Regulatory Halt reaches
all trading centers. However, a fixed ``official'' Regulatory Halt time
will allow SROs to revisit trades after the fact and determine in a
consistent manner whether specific trades should stand.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ This is consistent with the Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan. See
Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan, Section X.D.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current Rule 3100(d), states, in part, that if the UTP Listing
Market declares a UTP Regulatory Halt, the Exchange will halt trading
in that security. This would become proposed Rule
3100(b)(1)(A)(iii)(a)(2). Consistent with Section X.G of the Nasdaq UTP
Plan, the proposed Rule will more broadly require the Exchange to halt
trading of a UTP security if the Primary Listing Market declares a
Regulatory Halt in that security.
Current Rule 3100(f)(1)-(3), which governs trading halts in certain
Exchange Traded Products traded on the Exchange pursuant to unlisted
trading privileges during pre-market, regular market, and post-market
sessions, would become proposed Rule 3100(b)(1)(A)(iii)(a)(3), without
any substantive changes. Subsection (b)(1)(A)(iii)(a)(3) would replace
the term ``Regular Market Session'' with the term ``Regular Trading
Hours'' to stay consistent with other portions of the proposed rule.
The change is non-substantive and would still refer to the period
between 9:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time on days when the Exchange
is open for trading. No other changes have been made to this
subsection.
Resumption of Trading After a Regulatory Halt
The SROs have jointly developed processes to govern the resumption
of trading in the event of a Regulatory Halt. While the actual process
of re-launching trading will remain unique to each exchange, the
proposed rule would harmonize certain common elements of the reopening
process that would benefit from consistency across markets. These
common elements include the primacy of the Primary Listing Market in
resumption decisions, the requirement that the Primary Listing Market
make its determination to resume trading in good faith,\32\ and certain
parts of the complex process of reopening trading after a SIP Halt.
With respect to a SIP Halt, common elements of the reopening process
include the interaction among SROs (including the Primary Listing
Market with the SIP), the requirement that the Primary Listing Market
terminate a SIP Halt with a notification that specifies a SIP Halt
Resume Time, the minimum quoting times before resumption of trading,
the cutoff time after which trading would not resume during Regular
Trading Hours, and the time when trading may resume if the Primary
Listing Market does not open a security within the amount of time
specified in its rules after the SIP Halt Resume Time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ See Partial Amendment No. 1 of Trading Halt Amendments to
the UTP Plan, dated March 31, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule 3100(b)(2) provides the process to be followed when
resuming trading upon the conclusion of a Regulatory Halt. The new
rule, which incorporates Section X.E.1 and X.F.3 of the Amended Nasdaq
UTP Plan, is divided into the following two subsections concerning
resumption of trading: (A) after a Regulatory Halt other than a SIP
Halt; and (B) after a SIP Halt. Proposed Rule 3100(b)(2)(A)(i) provides
that, for a Regulatory Halt other than a SIP Halt, the Exchange may
resume trading subject to the Regulatory Halt after the Exchange
receives notification from the Primary Listing Market that the
Regulatory Halt has been terminated. The Exchange does not conduct halt
crosses and, therefore, the resumption of trading in these securities
will occur once notice from the Primary Listing Market is received.
Proposed Rule 3100(b)(2)(B)(i) provides that, for securities
subject to a SIP Halt initiated by another exchange that is the Primary
Listing Market, during Regular Trading Hours, the Exchange may resume
trading after trading has resumed on the Primary Listing Market or
notice has been received from the Primary Listing Market that trading
may resume. During Regular Trading Hours, if the Primary Listing Market
does not open a security within the amount of time specified by the
rules of the Primary Listing Market after the SIP Halt Resume Time, the
Exchange may resume trading in that security. Outside Regular Trading
Hours, the Exchange may resume trading immediately after the SIP Halt
Resume Time.\33\ Proposed Rule 3100(b)(2) is consistent with current
practice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ See Partial Amendment No. 2 of Trading Halt Amendments to
the UTP Plan, dated April 7, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule 3100(b)(3) retains without substantive modification
existing Rule 3100(e). Proposed Rule 3100(b)(3) states that the
Exchange will not conduct a halt cross or re-opening cross and will
process new and existing orders during a Regulatory Halt as follows:
(1) any unexecuted portion of Midpoint Peg and Midpoint Peg Post-Only
Orders will be cancelled,\34\ (2) all other resting Orders in the
Exchange Book will be maintained at their last ranked price and
displayed price, (3) the Exchange will accept and process all
cancellations, and (4) Orders, including Order modifications, entered
during the Regulatory Halt will not be accepted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ Proposed Rule 3100(b)(3) applies to Regulatory Halts.
Consistent with current practice, Midpoint Pegged Orders are only
cancelled during Regulatory Halts. In contrast, during an
Operational Halt, Midpoint Pegged Orders are not cancelled. The
Exchange notes that its sister exchange, Nasdaq, intends to file a
proposed rule change to reflect this concept.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to delete current Rule 3100(c), which
provides procedures for initiating and terminating a trading halt. The
Exchange would not initiate a Regulatory Halt given its status as a
non-Primary Listing Market, rendering language in the current rule
inapplicable. In addition, the procedures for terminating a trading
halt in current Rule 3100(c) would be deleted. Proposed procedures for
terminating Regulatory Halts and resuming trading are included in
proposed Rule 3100(b)(2), as discussed above.
[[Page 80217]]
Operational Halt
The Exchange proposes in Rule 3100(c) to address Operational Halts,
which are non-regulatory in nature and apply only to the exchange that
calls the halt. The ability to call an Operational Halt has existed for
a long time, although in the Exchange's experience, such halts have
rarely been initiated. As part of the Exchange's assessment with the
other SROs of the halting and resumption of trading, the Exchange
believes that the markets would benefit from greater clarity regarding
when an Operational Halt may be appropriate.\35\ In part, the proposed
change is designed to cover situations similar to those that might
constitute a Regulatory Halt, but where the impact is limited to a
single market. For example, just as a market disruption might trigger a
Regulatory Halt for Extraordinary Market Activity (as defined in the
Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan) if it affects multiple markets, so a
disruption at the Exchange, such as a technical issue affecting trading
in one or more securities, could impact trading on the Exchange so
significantly that an Operational Halt is appropriate in one or more
securities. In such an instance, it would be in the public interest to
institute an Operational Halt to minimize the impact of a disruption
that, if trading were allowed to continue, might negatively affect a
greater number of market participants. An Operational Halt does not
implicate other trading centers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ Differences between Nasdaq and the Exchange's proposals as
it relates to Operational Halts stem from Nasdaq's status as a
Primary Listing Market, unlike the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule 3100(c) would authorize the Exchange to implement an
Operational Halt for any security trading on the Exchange:
<bullet> if it is experiencing Extraordinary Market Activity \36\
on the Exchange; or
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ ``Extraordinary Market Activity'' in proposed Rule 3100(c)
would have the meaning proposed by the Exchange, which is a modified
form of the term from the Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan, as described
above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> when otherwise necessary to maintain a fair and orderly
market or in the public interest.
The Exchange is proposing to delete Rule 3100(a)(1) that authorizes
the Exchange to institute an ``operational trading halt'' in a security
listed on another exchange when that exchange imposes a trading halt
because of an order imbalance or influx. The Exchange believes this
language could restrict its ability to follow an Operational Halt
imposed by another market to a limited set of fact patterns. The
Exchange believes that the broader language provided by the definition
of Extraordinary Market Activity and the ability to initiate an
Operational Halt when necessary to maintain a fair and orderly market
will better serve the interests of investors by allowing the Exchange
to act where appropriate.
Proposed Rule 3100(c)(2) provides the process for initiating an
Operational Halt. Under the proposed rule, the Exchange must notify the
SIP if it has concerns about its ability to collect and transmit
Quotation Information or Transaction Reports, or if it has declared an
Operational Halt or suspension of trading in one or more Eligible
Securities, pursuant to the procedures adopted by the Operating
Committee.
Proposed Rule 3100(c)(3) will clarify how the Exchange resumes
trading after an Operational Halt. Proposed Rule 3100(c)(3)(A) provides
that the Exchange would resume trading when it determines that trading
may resume in a fair and orderly manner consistent with the Exchange's
rules. Proposed Rule 3100(c)(3)(B) provides that orders entered during
the Operational Halt will not be accepted, unless subject to
instructions that the order will be directed to another exchange.
Proposed Rule 3100(c)(3)(C) provides that trading in a halted security
shall resume at the time specified by the Exchange in a notice.
Proposed Rule 3100(c)(3)(C) also specifies that Exchange will notify
all other Plan participants and the SIP using such protocols and other
emergency procedures as may be mutually agreed to between the Operating
Committee and the Exchange. If the SIP is unable to disseminate notice
of an Operational Halt or the Exchange is not open for trading, the
Exchange will take reasonable steps to provide notice of an Operational
Halt, which shall include both the type and start time of the
Operational Halt. Each Plan participant shall continuously monitor
communication protocols established by the Operating Committee and the
Processor during market hours to disseminate notice of an Operational
Halt, and the failure of a participant to do so shall not prevent the
Exchange from initiating an Operational Halt.
Conforming Changes to Other Rules
The Exchange is proposing to modify Rule 3301A that cross
references Rule 3100 in light of the reorganization of Rule 3100. Rule
3301A (Order Types) will be modified to update a cross reference to the
Rule that governs Limit-Up-Limit-Down procedures.
In addition, the Exchange is proposing to amend several rules that
rely on the definition of ``Regular Market Session'' in current Rule
3100(b)(4). Regular Market Session is defined as ``the trading session
from 9:30 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. or 4:15 p.m.'' The Exchange is proposing
to replace the references to Regular Market Session in Rule 3301A
(Order Types) and 3312 (Clearly Erroneous Transactions) with references
to Regular Trading Hours as proposed in Rule 3100(a)(10). The term
``Regular Trading Hours'' would be consistent with the existing
application of the definition of ``Regular Market Session'' and obviate
the need for multiple definitions for the regular trading day. No
securities traded on the Exchange currently close at 4:15 p.m. and,
therefore, the alternative closing time in the current Regular Market
Session definition is not needed.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that
are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular,
with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\37\ Specifically, the
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \38\ because it
would promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove
impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in general, protect investors and
the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\38\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As described above, the Exchange and other SROs are seeking to
adopt harmonized rules related to halting and resuming trading in U.S.-
listed equity securities. The Exchange believes that the proposed rules
will provide greater transparency and clarity with respect to the
situations in which trading will be halted and the process through
which that halt will be implemented and terminated. Particularly, the
proposed changes seek to achieve consistent results for participants
across U.S. equities exchanges while maintaining a fair and orderly
market, protecting investors and protecting the public interest. Based
on the foregoing, the Exchange believes that the proposed rules are
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \39\ because they will
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating
and facilitating transactions in securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\39\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed previously, the Exchange believes that the various
provisions of the proposed rules that will apply to all SROs are
focused on the type of cross-market event where a consistent approach
will assist market
[[Page 80218]]
participants and reduce confusion during a crisis. Because market
participants often trade the same security across multiple venues and
trade securities listed on different exchanges as part of a common
strategy, the Exchange believes that the proposed rules will lessen the
risk that market participants holding a basket of securities will have
to deal with divergent outcomes depending on where the securities are
listed or traded. Conversely, the proposed rules would still allow
individual SROs to react differently to events that impact various
securities or markets in different ways. This avoids the ``brittle
market'' risk where an isolated event at a single market forces all
markets trading equities securities to halt or halts trading in all
securities where the issue impacted only a subset of securities. By
addressing both concerns, the Exchange believes that the proposed rules
further the Act's goal of maintaining fair and orderly markets.
The Exchange believes that the proposed rules' focus of
responsibility on the Primary Listing Market for decisions related to a
Regulatory Halt and the resumption of trading is consistent with the
Act, which itself imposes obligations on exchanges with respect to
issuers that are listed. As is currently the case, the Primary Listing
Market would be responsible for the many regulatory functions related
to its listings, including the determination of when to declare a
Regulatory Halt. While these core responsibilities remain with the
Primary Listing Market, trading in the security can occur on multiple
exchanges that have unlisted trading privileges for the security, such
as on the Exchange, or in the over-the-counter market, regulated by
FINRA. The Exchange is responsible for monitoring activity on its own
markets, but also must honor a Regulatory Halt.
The proposed changes relating to Regulatory Halts would ensure that
all SROs handle the situations covered therein in a consistent manner
that would prevent conflicting outcomes in cross-market events and
ensure that all trading centers recognize a Regulatory Halt declared by
the Primary Listing Market. The changes are consistent with and
implement the Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan.
The Exchange believes that the definitions in the proposed rules
are also consistent with the Act. The Exchange proposes adding a
definitions section as Rule 3100(a) to consolidate the various
definitions that will be used in the Rule, some of which are taken from
the Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan. The Exchange is adopting a modified form
of the term ``Extraordinary Market Activity'' from the Amended Nasdaq
UTP Plan, as described above. In addition, several other definitions
have been moved into the definitions section from elsewhere in the
current rule without changes in the definitions. As noted, certain
definitions are consistent with the definitions in the Amended Nasdaq
UTP Plan, furthering the Act's goal of promoting fair and orderly
markets. For example, the Exchange is proposing to adopt a definition
of ``SIP Halt,'' to explicitly address a situation that may disrupt the
markets, and this definition is identical to the definition in the
Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan. In addition to ``SIP Halt,'' the Exchange is
adopting the following terms from the Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan:
``Operating Committee,'' ``Operational Halt,'' ``Primary Listing
Market,'' ``Processor,'' ``Regulatory Halt,'' ``Regular Trading
Hours,'' and ``SIP Halt Resume Time,'' as discussed above.
The Exchange believes that the proposed rules, which make halts
more consistent across exchange rules, are consistent with the Act in
that they will foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating the equities markets. In particular, the Exchange
believes it is important for SROs to coordinate when there is a
widespread and significant event, as multiple trading centers are
impacted in such an event. Further, while the Exchange recognizes that
the proposed rule will not guarantee a consistent result on every
market in all situations, the Exchange does believe that it will assist
in that outcome. While the proposed rules relating to Regulatory Halts
focuses primarily on the kinds of cross-market events that would likely
impact multiple markets, individual SROs will still retain flexibility
to deal with unique products or smaller situations confined to a
particular market.
Also consistent with the Act, and with the Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan,
is the Exchange's proposal in Rule 3100(c) to address Operational
Halts, which are non-regulatory in nature and apply only to the
exchange that calls the halt. As noted earlier, the Exchange presently
has the ability to call an Operational Halt, but does so rarely. The
Exchange believes that the markets would benefit from greater clarity
regarding when an Operational Halt may be appropriate. The proposed
change is designed to cover situations where the impact is limited to a
single market. For example, a disruption at the Exchange, such as a
technical issue affecting trading in one or more securities, could
impact trading on the Exchange so significantly that an Operational
Halt is appropriate in one or more securities. In such an instance, it
would be in the public interest to institute an Operational Halt to
minimize the impact of a disruption that, if trading were allowed to
continue, might negatively affect a greater number of market
participants. An Operational Halt does not implicate other trading
centers.
Proposed Rule 3100(c) would authorize the Exchange to implement an
Operational Halt for any security trading on the Exchange: (i) if it is
experiencing Extraordinary Market Activity on the Exchange; or (ii)
when otherwise necessary to maintain a fair and orderly market or in
the public interest.
The Exchange believes that it is consistent with the Act to delete
parts of Rule 3100 that are no longer needed, including certain
definitions, current Rule 3100(c), and Rule 3100(a)(1). The Exchange
proposes to delete certain defined terms (``Derivative Securities
Product,'' ``UTP Listing Market,'' ``UTP Regulatory Halt,'' and ``UTP
Security'') that are obsolete and would no longer be referenced under
the proposed Rules, providing increased clarity in the Rules. The
Exchange proposes to delete current Rule 3100(c), which provides
procedures for initiating and terminating a trading halt, to remove
obsolete language and harmonize procedures for terminating Regulatory
Halts and resuming trading. Current Rule 3100(a)(1) authorizes the
Exchange to institute an ``operational trading halt'' in a security
listed on another exchange when that exchange imposes a trading halt
because of an order imbalance or influx. The Exchange believes this
language could restrict its ability to follow an Operational Halt
imposed by another market to a limited set of fact patterns. The
Exchange believes that the broader language provided by the definition
of Extraordinary Market Activity in proposed Rule 3100(c) will better
serve the interests of investors by allowing the Exchange to act where
appropriate. Other sections of current Rule 3100 are reorganized and
retained without substantive modifications, as described above.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange believes the proposal is consistent with Section
6(b)(8) of the Act \40\ in that it does not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act as explained below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 80219]]
Importantly, the Exchange believes the proposal will not impose a
burden on intermarket competition but will rather alleviate any burden
on competition because it is the result of a collaborative effort by
all SROs to harmonize and improve the process related to the halting
and resumption of trading in U.S.-listed equity securities, consistent
with the Amended Nasdaq UTP Plan. In this area, the Exchange believes
that all SROs should have consistent rules to the extent possible in
order to provide additional transparency and certainty to market
participants and to avoid inconsistent outcomes that could cause
confusion and erode market confidence. The proposed changes would
ensure that all SROs handle the situations covered therein in a
consistent manner and ensure that all trading centers handle a
Regulatory Halt consistently. The Exchange understands that all other
non-Primary Listing Markets intend to file proposals that are
substantially similar to this proposal.
The Exchange does not believe that its proposals concerning
Operational Halts impose an undue burden on competition. Under the
existing Rules, the Exchange already possesses discretionary authority
to impose Operational Halts for various reasons, including because of
an order imbalance or influx that causes another national securities
exchange to impose a trading halt in a security. As described earlier,
the proposed Rule change clarifies and broadens the circumstances in
which the Exchange may impose such Halts, and specifies procedures for
both imposing and lifting them. The Exchange does not intend for these
proposals to have any competitive impact whatsoever. Indeed, the
Exchange expects that other exchanges will adopt similar rules and
procedures to govern operational halts, to the extent that they have
not done so already.
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change imposes
a burden on intramarket competition because the provisions apply to all
market participants equally. In addition, information regarding the
halting and resumption of trading will be disseminated using several
freely accessible sources to ensure broad availability of information
in addition to the SIP data and proprietary data feeds offered by the
Exchange and other SROs that are available to subscribers. In addition,
the declaration and timing of trading halts and the resumption of
trading is designed to avoid any advantage to those who can react more
quickly than other participants. The proposals encourage early and
frequent communication among the SROs, SIPs and market participants to
enable the dissemination of timely and accurate information concerning
the market to market participants.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \41\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\42\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\41\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\42\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85f7f0e9e0a8e6eae8e8e0ebf1f6c5f6e0e6abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="493b3c252c642a2624242c273d3a093a2c2a672e263f">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2022-49 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2022-49. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange.
All comments received will be posted without change. Persons
submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2022-49 and should be
submitted on or before January 19, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\43\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\43\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-28301 Filed 12-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on December 29, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.