Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2017-18- 05, which applied to all The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes. AD 2017-18-05 required repetitive replacement or inspection of certain fuse pins, and applicable on-condition actions. This AD was prompted by a report of damage found at the lower trailing edge panels of the left wing and a broken fuse pin of the landing gear beam end fitting. This AD was further prompted by the need for new inspections for cracking of the fuse pin, and the determination that additional airplanes are subject to the unsafe condition. This AD continues to require the actions in AD 2017-18-05 and also requires repetitive replacement of certain fuse pins, repetitive inspections for cracking of the fuse pin, and applicable on-condition actions. This AD also revises the applicability by adding airplanes. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 245 (Thursday, December 22, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 245 (Thursday, December 22, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78515-78518]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-27803]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2022-1054; Project Identifier AD-2022-00278-T;
Amendment 39-22255; AD 2022-24-15]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2017-18-
05, which applied to all The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B,
747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D,
747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes. AD 2017-18-05 required
repetitive replacement or inspection of certain fuse pins, and
applicable on-condition actions. This AD was prompted by a report of
damage found at the lower trailing edge panels
[[Page 78516]]
of the left wing and a broken fuse pin of the landing gear beam end
fitting. This AD was further prompted by the need for new inspections
for cracking of the fuse pin, and the determination that additional
airplanes are subject to the unsafe condition. This AD continues to
require the actions in AD 2017-18-05 and also requires repetitive
replacement of certain fuse pins, repetitive inspections for cracking
of the fuse pin, and applicable on-condition actions. This AD also
revises the applicability by adding airplanes. The FAA is issuing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective January 26, 2023.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of January 26,
2023.
ADDRESSES:
AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at <a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a> under
Docket No. FAA-2022-1054; or in person at Docket Operations between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this final rule, any comments received, and other
information. The address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
<bullet> For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone 562-797-1717; website <a href="http://myboeingfleet.com">myboeingfleet.com</a>.
<bullet> You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. It is also available at
<a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a> under Docket No. FAA-2022-1054.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stefanie Roesli, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone: 206-231-3964; email:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f8ab8c9d9e9996919dd6b6d6aa979d8b9491b89e9999d69f978e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6f5d2c3c0c7c8cfc388e888f4c9c3d5cacfe6c0c7c788c1c9d0">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2017-18-05, Amendment 39-19014 (82 FR
41331, August 31, 2017) (AD 2017-18-05). AD 2017-18-05 applied to all
Boeing Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-
200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP airplanes.
The NPRM published in the Federal Register on September 19, 2022 (87 FR
57155). The NPRM was prompted by a report of damage at the lower
trailing edge panels of the left wing and a broken fuse pin of the
landing gear beam end fitting. The NPRM was further prompted by the
need for new ultrasonic testing (UT) inspections for cracking of the
fuse pin, and the determination that additional airplanes are subject
to the unsafe condition. In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to continue to
require repetitive replacement, or repetitive magnetic particle or
surface high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections, of certain fuse
pins, and applicable on-condition actions. The NPRM also proposed the
option for repetitive replacement of certain corrosion-resistant
(stainless) steel (CRES) and steel alloy fuse pins at the wing landing
gear beam end fitting; and repetitive magnetic particle inspections, or
repetitive HFEC and UT inspections, for cracking of the fuse pin, and
applicable on-condition actions. The NPRM also proposed to revise the
applicability by adding Model 747-8F and 747-8 series airplanes.
The FAA is issuing this AD to address cracking in the fuse pin of
the wing landing gear beam end fitting. A broken fuse pin will not
support the wing landing gear beam, causing damage to the surrounding
structure, including flight control cables and hydraulic systems, which
could result in loss of controllability of the airplane.
Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive
Comments
The FAA received a comment from Air Line Pilots Association,
International, who supported the NPRM without change.
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered any comments
received, and determined that air safety requires adopting this AD as
proposed. Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products. Except for minor editorial changes, this
AD is adopted as proposed in the NPRM. None of the changes will
increase the economic burden on any operator.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-57A2360,
Revision 1, dated February 9, 2022. This service information specifies
procedures for, depending on airplane configuration, the optional
repetitive replacement of certain steel alloy fuse pins or CRES fuse
pins with new or serviceable fuse pins at the wing landing gear beam
end fitting; and repetitive magnetic particle inspections, or
repetitive surface HFEC and UT inspections, for cracking and corrosion
of the fuse pin of the wing landing gear beam end fitting, and
applicable on-condition actions. On-condition actions include
replacement with steel alloy or CRES fuse pins; and magnetic particle,
surface HFEC, and UT testing inspections for cracks; and replacement of
cracked fuse pins. This service information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means identified in ADDRESSES.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD affects 207 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fuse pin replacement \1\ Up to 46 work- Up to $15,150........ Up to $19,060 per Up to $3,945,420
(retained actions from AD 2017- hours x $85 per replacement per replacement
18-05). hour = Up to cycle. cycle.
$3,910 per
replacement cycle.
Magnetic particle inspection Up to 48 $0................... Up to $4,080 per Up to $844,560
\1\ (retained actions from AD work[dash]hours x inspection cycle. per inspection
2017-18-05). $85 per hour = Up cycle.
to $4,080 per
inspection cycle.
Surface inspection \1\ Up to 10 $0................... Up to $850 per Up to $175,950
(retained actions from AD 2017- work[dash]hours x inspection cycle. per inspection
18-05). $85 per hour = Up cycle.
to $850 per
inspection cycle.
[[Page 78517]]
CRES fuse pin replacement \1\ Up to 46 $9,007............... Up to $12,917 per Up to $2,673,819
(new action). work[dash]hours x replacement per replacement
$85 per hour = Up cycle. cycle.
to $3,910 per
replacement cycle.
Steel alloy fuse pin Up to 46 $9,693............... Up to $13,603 per Up to $2,815,821
replacement \1\ (new action). work[dash]hours x replacement per replacement
$85 per hour = Up cycle. cycle.
to $3,910 per
replacement cycle.
Surface HFEC and UT Up to 11 $0................... Up to $935 per Up to $193,545
inspections\1\ (new action). work[dash]hours x inspection cycle. per inspection
$85 per hour = Up cycle.
to $935 per
inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Operators may choose which action they want to use.
The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary
replacements and inspections that would be required based on the
results of the required inspections. The FAA has no way of determining
the number of aircraft that might need these replacements and
inspections:
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CRES fuse pin replacement..................... 46 work-hours x $85 per hour = $9,007 $12,917
$3,910.
Steel alloy fuse pin replacement.............. 46 work-hours x $85 per hour = 9,693 13,603
$3,910.
Magnetic particle inspection.................. 48 work-hours x $85 per hour = 0 4,080
$4,080.
Surface HFEC and UT inspections............... 11 work-hours x $85 per hour = 0 35
$935.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2017-18-05; Amendment 39-19014
(82 FR 41331, August 31, 2017); and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:
2022-24-15 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-22255; Docket No. FAA-
2022-1054; Project Identifier AD-2022-00278-T.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective January 26, 2023.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2017-18-05; Amendment 39-19014 (82 FR 41331,
August 31, 2017) (AD 2017-18-05).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-
100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400,
747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, 747SP, 747-8F, and 747-8 series
airplanes, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report of damage found at the lower
trailing edge panels of the left wing and a broken fuse pin of the
landing gear beam end fitting, and the determination that repetitive
ultrasonic testing inspections of the fuse pin for cracking and
optional repetitive replacement of certain corrosion-resistant
(stainless) steel (CRES) and steel alloy fuse pins are necessary to
address the unsafe condition. The FAA is issuing this AD to detect
and correct cracking in the fuse pin of the wing landing gear beam
end fitting. A broken fuse pin will not support the wing landing
gear beam, causing damage to the surrounding structure, including
flight control cables and hydraulic systems, which could result in
loss of controllability of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Required Actions
Except as specified by paragraph (h) of this AD: At the
applicable times specified in
[[Page 78518]]
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-57A2360, Revision 1, dated February 9, 2022, do all applicable
actions identified as ``RC'' (required for compliance) in, and in
accordance with, the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-57A2360, Revision 1, dated February 9, 2022.
(h) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications
(1) Where the Compliance Time columns of the tables in the
``Compliance'' paragraph of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
57A2360, Revision 1, dated February 9, 2022, use the phrase ``the
original issue date of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires
using the date of October 5, 2017 (the effective date of AD 2017-18-
05).
(2) Where the Compliance Time columns of the tables in the
``Compliance'' paragraph of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
57A2360, Revision 1, dated February 9, 2022, use the phrase ``the
Revision 1 date of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires using
``the effective date of this AD.''
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office,
as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of
the certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (j) of this AD. Information may be emailed
to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#96afbbd7d8dbbbc5f3f7e2e2faf3bbd7d5d9bbd7dbd9d5bbc4f3e7e3f3e5e2e5d6f0f7f7b8f1f9e0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="99a0b4d8d7d4b4cafcf8ededf5fcb4d8dad6b4d8d4d6dab4cbfce8ecfceaedead9fff8f8b7fef6ef">[email protected]</span></a>.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(4) Except as specified by paragraph (h) of this AD: For service
information that contains steps that are labeled as Required for
Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs (i)(4)(i) and (ii) of
this AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Stefanie Roesli,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone: 206-231-3964; email:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#faa98e9f9c9b94939fd4b4d4a8959f899693ba9c9b9bd49d958c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d083a4b5b6b1beb9b5fe9efe82bfb5a3bcb990b6b1b1feb7bfa6">[email protected]</span></a>.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-57A2360, Revision 1, dated
February 9, 2022.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone 562-797-1717; website <a href="http://myboeingfleet.com">myboeingfleet.com</a>.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4026326e292e3330252334292f2e002e2132216e272f36"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c9afbbe7a0a7bab9acaabda0a6a789a7a8bba8e7aea6bf">[email protected]</span></a>, or go to <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html">www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html</a>.
Issued on November 18, 2022.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-27803 Filed 12-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.