Notice2022-24947

Certain High-Density Fiber Optic Equipment and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Enforcement Proceeding Based on a Settlement Agreement; Termination of the Enforcement Proceeding

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
November 16, 2022

Issuing agencies

International Trade Commission

Abstract

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 46) of the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ"), granting a joint motion to terminate the enforcement proceeding based on settlement. The enforcement proceeding is terminated in its entirety.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 220 (Wednesday, November 16, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 220 (Wednesday, November 16, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68726-68727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-24947]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1194 (Enforcement Proceeding)]


Certain High-Density Fiber Optic Equipment and Components 
Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial 
Determination Terminating the Enforcement Proceeding Based on a 
Settlement Agreement; Termination of the Enforcement Proceeding

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 46) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ''), granting a joint motion to terminate the enforcement 
proceeding based on settlement. The enforcement proceeding is 
terminated in its entirety.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2392. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may 
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at <a href="https://edis.usitc.gov">https://edis.usitc.gov</a>. For help accessing EDIS, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a4f4e435939426f667a4a7f79637e69246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="581d1c110b6b103d3428182d2b312c3b763f372e">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. General information concerning the Commission may 
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at <a href="https://www.usitc.gov">https://www.usitc.gov</a>. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on 
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted the original 
investigation on March 24, 2020, based on a complaint filed on behalf 
of Corning Optical Communications LLC (``Corning'') of Charlotte, North 
Carolina. 85 FR 16653 (Mar. 24, 2020). The complaint, as supplemented, 
alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the 
sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after 
importation of certain high-density fiber optic equipment and 
components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. 
Patent Nos. 9,020,320 (``the '320 patent''); 10,120,153 (``the '153 
patent''); 8,712,206; 10,094,996; and 10,444,456 (``the '456 patent''). 
Id. The Commission's notice of investigation named numerous respondents 
including Panduit Corporation of Tinley, Illinois (``Panduit''). Id. 
The notice of investigation also named the Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations (``OUII'') as a party. Id. at 16654. The full 
investigation background is in the final termination notice. 86 FR 
43564-65 (Aug. 9, 2021).
    On August 3, 2021, the Commission found, inter alia, that Panduit 
violated section 337 with respect to claims 1 and 3 of the '320 patent; 
claims 11, 12, 14-16, 19, 21, 27, and 28 of the '456 patent; and claims 
9, 16, 23, and 26 of the '153 patent. Id. at 43565. Specifically, the

[[Page 68727]]

Commission found that Panduit's imported articles were used by 
customers to directly infringe the asserted claims of the '320, '456, 
and '153 patents at Panduit's inducement. Id. The Commission issued, 
inter alia, a general exclusion order (``GEO'') and a cease and desist 
order (``CDO'') against Panduit and determined that a bond as set forth 
in the Orders was required during the period of Presidential review. 19 
U.S.C. 1337(j)(3).
    On November 24, 2021, Corning filed a complaint requesting that the 
Commission institute an enforcement proceeding under Commission Rule 
210.75, 19 CFR 210.75, to investigate alleged violations of the GEO and 
CDO by Panduit.
    The Commission instituted an enforcement proceeding on January 3, 
2022. 87 FR 112 (Jan. 3, 2022). The original presiding ALJ set a 12-
month target date of January 3, 2023, making the enforcement initial 
determination due on October 3, 2022. On June 21, 2022, the proceeding 
was reassigned to the Chief ALJ.
    On September 30, 2022, Corning and Panduit filed a joint motion to 
terminate based on a Settlement Agreement and Non-Exclusive Patent 
License.
    On October 17, 2022, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 46), 
granting the joint motion pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21(b), 19 CFR 
210.21(b). The ALJ found that the motion to terminate complies with the 
Commission's rules, and there is no evidence that terminating the 
enforcement proceeding by settlement would be contrary to the public 
interest. No petitions for review of the ID were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The 
enforcement proceeding is terminated based on settlement.
    The Commission vote for this determination took place on November 
9, 2022.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 
part 210.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: November 10, 2022.
Katherine Hiner,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-24947 Filed 11-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on November 16, 2022.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.