Rule2022-23793
Paroling, Recommitting, and Supervising Federal Prisoners: Prisoners Serving Sentences Under the United States and District of Columbia Codes
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
November 4, 2022
Effective
November 4, 2022
Issuing agencies
Justice DepartmentParole Commission
Abstract
The U.S. Parole Commission is modifying a rule that permits it to reopen a case and rescind a parole date when the prisoner has committed a violation of institutional rules. This modification will permit findings by a Residential Reentry Center's Disciplinary Committee, as well as findings by the Disciplinary Hearing Officer, as conclusive evidence of misconduct for the United States Parole Commission to rescind an established parole date.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 213 (Friday, November 4, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 213 (Friday, November 4, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66549-66550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-23793]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Parole Commission
28 CFR Part 2
[Docket No. USPC-2020-04]
RIN 1104-AA09
Paroling, Recommitting, and Supervising Federal Prisoners:
Prisoners Serving Sentences Under the United States and District of
Columbia Codes
AGENCY: United States Parole Commission, Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Parole Commission is modifying a rule that permits it
to reopen a case and rescind a parole date when the prisoner has
committed a violation of institutional rules. This modification will
permit findings by a Residential Reentry Center's Disciplinary
Committee, as well as findings by the Disciplinary Hearing Officer, as
conclusive evidence of misconduct for the United States Parole
Commission to rescind an established parole date.
DATES: This regulation is effective November 4, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helen H. Krapels, General Counsel,
U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE, Third Floor, Washington, DC
20530, telephone (202) 346-7000. Questions about this publication are
welcome, but inquiries concerning individual cases cannot be answered
over the telephone.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 2021, the United States Parole Commission
issued an interim rule revising 28 CFR 2.34(a) (86 FR 51271, September
15, 2021). The comment period expired on November 15, 2021, and the
Parole Commission did not receive any comments on the change. On
October 13, 2022, the Parole Commission voted to
After the U.S. Parole Commission has granted a prisoner a parole
effective date, but before the prisoner has signed the parole
certificate, if the prisoner violates the rules of the institution, the
Parole Commission may reopen the case and schedule a rescission
hearing. 28 CFR 2.34(a). At that hearing, the Parole Commission may
consider the report of the Bureau of Prisons (``BOP'') Disciplinary
Hearing Officer (``DHO'') following a disciplinary hearing, that a
prisoner has violated disciplinary rules as ``conclusive evidence of
institutional misconduct,'' and does not need to conduct a full hearing
to consider witnesses and evidence. 28 CFR 2.34(c). The disciplinary
hearing conducted by the DHO complies with the procedural due process
requirements established by the Supreme Court in Wolff v. McDonnell,
i.e., the prisoner has notice of the alleged violations at least 24
hours in advance of hearing, a statement of factfinding, the right to
call witnesses and present documentary evidence. Thus, the Parole
Commission may rely on the findings and conclusions of the DHO to take
action in response to the information.
For prisoners who are housed at a Residential Reentry Center
(``RRC'') prior to their release and violate the rules, the in-person
disciplinary hearing is conducted before the RRC's Center Disciplinary
Committee (``CDC''). Under the BOP's Program Statement 7300.09, the CDC
then refers its findings to the DHO for review, final action, and
sanctions. Every court which has examined the procedures established by
Program Statement 7300.09 has held that hearing procedures used by the
CDC satisfy the procedural due process requirements established by the
Supreme Court in Wolff v. McDonnell.
This rule permits the U.S. Parole Commission to rely on the CDC's
findings to promote the smooth transition to the community or to return
a prisoner who has demonstrated that he or she is not ready to be
released to the community without requiring a second hearing by the DHO
or a fully contested disciplinary hearing conducted by the U.S. Parole
Commission.
The Parole Commission has added a phrase to clarify that parole may
also be rescinded without a hearing for DC Code prisoners for up to 120
days. The interim rule only referenced the 90-day rescission of parole
that pertains to US Code prisoners and the rule will apply
correspondingly to US Code prisoner and DC Code prisoners under the
Parole Commission's jurisdiction. The Parole Commission is publishing
the revised rule at Sec. 2.34(a) as a final rule without seeking
public comment because this does not create a substantive change to
parole decision-making.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
This regulation has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulation Planning and Review,'' section
1(b), Principles of Regulation, and in accordance with Executive Order
13565, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' section 1(b),
General Principles of Regulation. The Commission has determined that
this rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review, and
accordingly this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Under Executive Order 13132, this rule does not
have sufficient federalism implications requiring a federalism
assessment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant economic impact upon a
substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not cause State, local, or tribal governments, or
the private sector, to spend $100,000,000 or more in any one year, and
will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. No action
under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 is necessary.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Subtitle
E--Congressional Review Act)
This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by Section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 Subtitle E--
Congressional Review Act, now codified at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule
will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on the ability
[[Page 66550]]
of United States-based companies to compete with foreign-based
companies. Moreover, this is a rule of agency practice or procedure
that does not substantially affect the rights or obligations of non-
agency parties, and does not come within the meaning of the term
``rule'' as used in Section 804(3)(C), now codified at 5 U.S.C.
804(3)(C). Therefore, the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does
not apply.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 2
Administrative practice and procedure, Prisoners, Probation and
Parole.
The Interim Rule
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 28 CFR part 2 which was
published at 86 FR 51271 on September 15, 2021, is adopted as final
with the following change:
PART 2--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 28 CFR part 2 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 4203(a)(1) and 4204(a)(6).
0
2. Section 2.34 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (c) to read
as follows:
Sec. 2.34 Rescission of parole.
(a) When an effective date of parole has been set by the
Commission, release on that date is conditioned upon continued
satisfactory conduct by the prisoner. If a prisoner granted such a date
has been found in violation of institution rules by a Discipline
Hearing Officer, or the Center Disciplinary Committee, or is alleged to
have committed a new criminal act at any time prior to the delivery of
the certificate of parole, the Commissioner shall be advised promptly
of such information. The prisoner shall not be released until the
institution has been notified that no change has been made in the
Commission's order to parole. Following receipt of such information,
the Commissioner may reopen the case and retard the parole date for up
to 90 days without a hearing, or 120 days for a DC Code sentenced
prisoner, or schedule a rescission hearing under this section on the
next available docket at the institution or on the first docket
following return to a federal institution from a community corrections
center or a state or local halfway house.
* * * * *
(c) A hearing before a Discipline Hearing Officer, or the Center
Disciplinary Committee, resulting in a finding that the prisoner has
committed a violation of disciplinary rules may be relied upon by the
Commission as conclusive evidence of institutional misconduct. However,
the prisoner will be afforded an opportunity to explain any mitigating
circumstances, and to present documentary evidence in mitigation of the
misconduct at the rescission hearing.
* * * * *
Patricia K. Cushwa,
Chairman (Acting), U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-23793 Filed 11-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on November 4, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.