Pipeline Safety: Information Collection Activities

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published

October 31, 2022

Issuing agencies

Transportation Department

Abstract

In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice announces that the information collection requests abstracted below are being forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. A Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting comments on the information collection was published on March 11, 2022.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 209 (Monday, October 31, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 209 (Monday, October 31, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65642-65646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-23627]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

[Docket No. PHMSA-2021-0054]

Pipeline Safety: Information Collection Activities

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces that the information collection requests abstracted
below are being forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for

[[Page 65643]]

review and comment. A Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments on the information collection was published
on March 11, 2022.

DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before
November 30, 2022.

ADDRESSES: The public is invited to submit comments regarding this
information collection request, including suggestions for reducing the
burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer
for the Office of the Secretary of Transportation, 725 17th Street NW,
Washington, DC 20503. Comments can also be submitted electronically at
<a href="http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain">www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain</a>.

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angela Hill by telephone at 202-680-2034,
by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f6e61686a636e21676663634f6b607b21686079"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="afcec1c8cac3ce81c7c6c3c3efcbc0db81c8c0d9">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

Title 5, Code of Regulations (CFR) section 1320.8(d), requires
PHMSA to provide interested members of the public and affected agencies
the opportunity to comment on information collection and recordkeeping
requests before they are submitted to OMB for approval. In accordance
with this regulation, on March 11, 2022, PHMSA published a Federal
Register notice (87 FR 14092) with a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments on its plan to request revisions to the following forms: Form
PHMSA F 7000-1, ``Accident Report--Hazardous Liquid and Carbon Dioxide
Pipeline Systems,'' under Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control
No. 2137-0047; Form PHMSA F 7100.2-1, ``Annual Report for Natural and
Other Gas Transmission and Gathering Pipeline Systems,'' under OMB
Control No. 2137-0522; Form PHMSA F 7000-1.1, ``Annual Report for
Hazardous Liquid and Carbon Dioxide Pipeline Systems,'' under OMB
Control No. 2137-0614; Form PHMSA F 7100.1-1, ``Annual Report for Gas
Distribution Systems,'' under OMB Control No. 2137-0629; and Forms
PHMSA F 7100.1, ``Incident Report--Gas Distribution Systems,'' PHMSA F
7100.2, ``Incident Report--Gas Transmission and Gathering Systems,''
and PHMSA F 7100.3, ``Incident Report--Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)
Facilities,'' each under OMB Control No. 2137-0635.
PHMSA proposed to revise the annual reports to collect data on
excavation damage events to align with the Common Ground Alliance's
(CGA's) Damage Information Reporting Tool (DIRT) root causes. PHMSA
proposed to revise its incident and accident reports, to update the
excavation damage questions to match the 2018 version of DIRT and
collect state one-call law exemption data when any sub-cause is
selected under excavation damage. In the hazardous liquid accident
report, PHMSA proposed requiring the collection of tank data in Parts
C3u and C3v for all reports where A14, ``Part of system involved in the
Accident,'' is ``Onshore Breakout Tank or Storage Vessel.'' In all
three gas incident reports, PHMSA proposed adding the local time and
date of ``confirmed discovery'' to better assess operator compliance
with PHMSA's reporting regulations. Finally, PHMSA proposed removing
Part E of the gas distribution annual report pertaining to the number
of excess flow valves (EFVs) and manual service line shut-off valves
installed or in the system.
During the 60-day comment period, PHMSA received comments from
Sander Resources, the GPA Midstream Association (GPA Midstream), the
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA), and a joint
comment from the American Petroleum Institute and the Association of
Oil Pipe Lines (API/AOPL). The comments, organized by topic area, are
summarized and addressed below.

II. Response to Public Comments

A. Common Ground Alliance Damage Information Reporting Tool

Sander Resources opines that aligning PHMSA data with the CGA DIRT
Report does not increase pipeline safety and does little to improve the
quality or completeness of the data currently being collected by CGA.
Sander Resources believes the noticed information collection will
result in increased cost and greater administrative burden with no
benefit to operators, regulators, or other stakeholders within the
damage prevention space. Also, Sander Resources opines there is a
greater burden on operators since states require different reporting
information on excavation damage. Sanders Resources states this comes
at a time where many operators are already under pressure due to the
new and pending regulatory changes.
PHMSA's proposed revisions for the three annual report forms is
limited to collecting the total number of one-call tickets and the
total number of excavation damage events in each of 26 CGA DIRT root
cause categories on an annual basis. The current gas distribution
annual report includes only four root cause categories, and the other
annual reports currently do not collect data regarding excavation
damage. PHMSA recognizes an increased burden on operators for all three
annual reports to provide the expanded root cause data. While the
collection of data does not immediately impact pipeline safety,
reporting events under the 26 root cause categories allows PHMSA and
stakeholders, including operators, to better understand how or why
excavation damage events have occurred, and thus identify potential
gaps in damage prevention programs. Over the past twenty years, the
leading cause of incidents and accidents resulting in fatality or
injury has been excavation damage. Having 26 root cause values could
allow stakeholders to identify more specific corrective measures than
could be identified with only four root causes. A better understanding
of gaps and the implementation of corrective measures could reduce the
number of incidents and accidents caused by excavation damage.\1\
Finally, states may implement different reporting requirements to
support unique state processes such as excavation damage enforcement.
Regardless of the government agency collecting data, the operator only
needs to determine the root cause once and reporting which category the
cause falls under is a minimal additional burden.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ PHMSA provides the currently collected excavation damage
data on its website at <a href="https://portal.phmsa.dot.gov/PDMPublicReport/?url=https://portal.phmsa.dot.gov/analytics/saw.dll?Portalpages&PortalPath=%2Fshared%2FPDM%20Public%20website%2F_portal%2FExcavation%20Damage">https://portal.phmsa.dot.gov/PDMPublicReport/?url=https://portal.phmsa.dot.gov/analytics/saw.dll?Portalpages&PortalPath=%2Fshared%2FPDM%20Public%20website%2F_portal%2FExcavation%20Damage</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sander Resources also claims that the 26 new damage root cause
categories are overwhelmingly excavator-focused and excavators will be
found responsible for inaccurately high numbers of events reported.
PHMSA notes that 11 of the 26 root cause categories are excavator-
focused. The categories are designed to capture most of the causes of
excavation damage and are based on years of CGA experience in
evaluating the causes of excavation damage events. Again, the
additional categories are intended to better understand potential gaps
in pipeline damage prevention programs.
Sander Resources also expresses concern that the new data
collection may result in duplicate reporting, that PHMSA has not
clarified whether the data will be ``normalized,'' and that reporting
to PHMSA eliminates the anonymity inherent in DIRT.
Although Sander Resources stated their comments applied to the
annual report, PHMSA suspects that this comment is intended for the
incident and accident reports. On the incident

[[Page 65644]]

and accident reports, operators can indicate whether they want PHMSA to
submit the data to CGA DIRT. Within CGA DIRT, processes are currently
in place to minimize duplicate reporting. If more than one stakeholder
reports a damage event to DIRT, the data is ``normalized'' to provide
the most accurate record for the event. PHMSA collects excavation
damage data only from the operator and makes no changes to the data.
The incident and accident report changes proposed by PHMSA have no
impact on the potential for duplicate reporting in DIRT. Further, since
CGA DIRT is voluntary, a degree of anonymity is maintained. However,
PHMSA has never collected incident and accident reports anonymously.
Visibility of each operator's data is essential for PHMSA and
stakeholders to better understand gaps in pipeline damage prevention
programs.
Sander Resources states that PHMSA only requires excavation damage
data when the reporting thresholds for incidents or accidents are met
and suggests that PHMSA adjust the reporting threshold downward
significantly. They also suggest that PHMSA capture information on
first- and second-party damage in addition to third party damage.
PHMSA is proposing the collection of the number of excavation
damage events in each of 26 root causes on the annual reports. Most of
the excavation damage events included in the annual reports would not
be associated with reportable incidents or accidents so collection of
the data on annual reports is a more streamlined approach to collecting
this information. Regarding the party causing the damage, neither CGA
DIRT nor PHMSA's annual, incident, and accident reports, limit the data
collection to damage events caused by a third party.

B. Time/Date Incident Reporting Criteria Met

GPA Midstream recommends that PHMSA clarify that property damage
amounts in section A4 on the incident and accident report forms are
estimates only. If PHMSA chooses to retain section A4 and add time/date
of confirmed discovery to section A19, INGAA recommends that PHMSA
acknowledge that property damage amounts in section A4 are often
estimated. GPA Midstream and INGAA also recommend that PHMSA remove A4
from the Gas Transmission and Gathering Incident Report since PHMSA is
proposing to add time/date of confirmed discovery to section A19 of
those reports, and the commenters believe the inputs are duplicative.
PHMSA understands that property damage values are typically
estimates. PHMSA has traditionally used section A4 of the incident and
accident report forms to collect the time/date of the incident or
accident. The report text and instructions have been changed over the
past ten years in response to the wide variety of incident and accident
timelines. PHMSA's proposed changes to the instructions for A4 were
made in response to apparent confusion on the part of operators and
other stakeholders who believed that the A4 value should be the time/
date when the operator first finishes estimating property damage or the
time/date when an injured person is admitted to the hospital. In A4,
PHMSA intends to collect the time/date that consequences began
occurring. In response to the comments, PHMSA proposes to make it clear
in the instructions that it expects the operator to report the time/
date the incident/accident occurred or began, not the time/date the
property damage estimates were generated by the operator (i.e., not the
time/date the operator believed the criteria were met). PHMSA will also
change the name of A4 in the incident and accident reports from
``Earliest local time and date an incident (accident) reporting
criteria was met'' to ``Incident (Accident) local time and date.'' In
the instructions, PHMSA maintains the underlying proposal to report the
time/date that consequences began occurring.
As discussed above, PHMSA proposes maintaining A4 to collect the
earliest time/date that consequences began occurring. In 49 CFR 191.3,
confirmed discovery means ``when it can be reasonably determined, based
on information available to the operator at the time a reportable event
has occurred, even if only based on a preliminary evaluation.'' The
regulatory requirement associated with confirmed discovery is in
section 191.5, which requires notice to the National Response Center at
the earliest practicable moment following discovery, but no later than
one hour after confirmed discovery. Confirmed discovery is related to
the time required for the operator to conduct a preliminary evaluation
after the operator became aware that consequences were occurring. In
many instances, the actual time/date of the event reported in A4 and
confirmed discovery reported in A19 will be very close together. In
other cases, there may be significant time between the first occurrence
of consequences (reported in A4) and confirmed discovery by the
operator (reported in A19). Both of these time/date values are
important and provide PHMSA and stakeholders with an indication of the
time required for the operator to become aware of consequences and
conduct its preliminary evaluation.

C. Accident Report Breakout Tank Data

API/AOPL do not believe that revising Part C of the Hazardous
Liquid and Carbon Dioxide Accident Report for the scenario of a tank
weld failure will improve data quality and recommend that PHMSA clarify
specifically how tank releases should be reported as operators have
multiple options at the time.
In response to this comment, PHMSA has made several changes to its
original proposal, including amendments to the following data fields on
the form: ITEM_INVOLVED (C3), TANK_VESSEL_SUBTYPE (C3u), and CAUSE of
``Material Failure of Pipe or Weld'' (G5). For C3, PHMSA proposes a
default, unalterable value of ``Tank/Vessel'' in C3 when
SYSTEM_PART_INVOLVED (A14) is ``Onshore Breakout Tank or Storage
Vessel, Including Attached Appurtenances.'' These changes will
eliminate multiple options for reporting tank releases. PHMSA also
proposes to modify the instructions for C3u and add additional options.
The proposed instructions are to report the failure path in C3u. Based
on text submitted by operators when ``Other'' is selected in C3 or C3u,
PHMSA proposes adding ``Vent'' and ``Manway'' as additional C3u failure
path options. Currently, the G5 CAUSE is selectable only when C3 is
``Pipe'' or ``Weld.'' Since PHMSA is proposing to allow only ``Tank/
Vessel'' in C3 for tank releases and tanks have welds, we also propose
allowing the selection of the G5 CAUSE when C3 is ``Tank/Vessel.'' With
these changes, stakeholders would have a clear picture of tank releases
through a combination of the failure path in C3u and the cause of the
accident. For example, the failure of a weld in a tank shell would be
reported with ``Tank Shell'' in C3u and a ``Material Failure of Pipe or
Weld'' in G5.
Further, PHMSA will continue improving the clarity of existing
accident reports. For example, for some tank failures, operators have
entered ``Other'' for C3 when they should have selected ``Tank/Vessel''
in C3 and ``Mixer'' in C3u. PHMSA plans to ask operators to replace
``Other'' selections with specific data, which will improve the quality
and clarity of accident reports. PHMSA is committed to continually
improving the clarity of the reports to collect the best data possible
and appreciates the API/AOPL comments supporting these efforts.

[[Page 65645]]

III. Summary of Impacted Collections

This notice announces that PHMSA will submit the information
collection revision requests abstracted below to OMB for approval. The
following information is provided for these information collections:
(1) Title of the information collection; (2) OMB control number; (3)
Current expiration date; (4) Type of request; (5) Abstract of the
information collection activity; (6) Description of affected public;
(7) Estimate of total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden; and
(8) Frequency of collection.
PHMSA will request a 3-year term of approval for these information
collections. PHMSA requests comments on the following information:
1. Title: Transportation of Hazardous Liquids by Pipeline: Record
Keeping and Accident Reporting.
OMB Control Number: 2137-0047.
Current Expiration Date: 3/31/2024.
Type of Request: Revision.
Abstract: This mandatory information collection covers the
recordkeeping requirements and the collection of accident data from
operators of hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide pipelines. Part 195
requires hazardous liquid operators to file an accident report as soon
as practicable, but not later than 30 days after discovery of the
accident on form, ``PHMSA F 7000-1'' whenever there is a reportable
accident. With respect to accidents caused by excavation damage to a
pipeline, PHMSA is revising this information collection to require
state law exemption data when any sub-cause is selected within the
excavation damage causes. PHMSA believes that the current time
estimated for this information collection provides sufficient time for
affected operators to include the newly required information. PHMSA
does not expect operators to incur additional burden due to this
revision.
Affected Public: Operators of hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide
pipeline facilities.
Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden:
Estimated number of responses: 1,644.
Estimated annual burden hours: 53,504.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
2. Title: Annual and Incident Reports for Gas Pipeline Operators.
OMB Control Number: 2137-0522.
Current Expiration Date: 5/31/2024.
Type of Request: Revision.
Abstract: This mandatory information collection covers the
requirements for operators of natural gas pipelines, underground
natural gas storage facilities, and liquefied natural gas facilities to
submit annual and incident reports to PHMSA. Currently, PHMSA receives
an estimated 2,247 reports from operators in compliance with these
requirements resulting in an overall time burden of 71,801 hours
annually.
Section 191.17 requires operators of underground natural gas
storage facilities, gas transmission systems, and gas gathering systems
to submit an annual report by March 15, for the preceding calendar
year. The revision to this information collection includes changes to
the ``Annual Report for Natural and Other Gas Transmission and
Gathering Pipeline Systems'' to collect data on excavation damages.
Each year, gas transmission operators submit an estimated 1,440 annual
reports to PHMSA. The current estimated burden for each annual report
is 47 hours for an overall reporting burden of 67,680 hours [47 hours x
1,440 reports]. Because gas transmission operators are new to
collecting and submitting data on excavation damage, PHMSA estimates
that it will take the estimated 1,440 respondents a one-time effort of
18 hours, per operator, to update their systems to accommodate the new
data request. This will result in gas transmission and gathering
operators incurring a one-time burden of 25,920 hours [18 hours x 1,440
reports]. In addition, PHMSA expects that it will take gas transmission
operators an additional hour, annually, to include the newly requested
excavation damage data in their annual report submission. Therefore,
over the course of the three-year approval for the information
collection, the average time increase to the gas transmission annual
report burden will be 7 hours [(18 hours + 3 hours)/3] each year--
resulting in the annual time burden to increase from 47 hours to 54
hours per report. This will result in an overall burden increase of
10,080 hours [7 hours x 1,440 reports] due to this revision. The total
annual burden for submitting the gas transmission annual report will be
77,760 hours [54 hours x 1,440 reports]. Based on the annual burden
increase of 10,080 hours for the gas transmission annual reports, the
estimated annual burden for this entire information collection,
including the annual report burden for liquefied natural gas and
underground natural gas storage operators, and the immediate notice of
incidents for all of these operators, will increase from 71,801 hours
to 81,881 hours [71,801 hours + 10,080].
Affected Public: Operators of natural gas transmission pipelines,
underground natural gas storage facilities, and liquefied natural gas
facilities.
Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden:
Estimated number of responses: 2,247.
Estimated annual burden hours: 81,881.
Frequency of collection: Annually and on occasion.
3. Title: Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Operator Annual Report.
OMB Control Number: 2137-0614.
Current Expiration Date: 1/31/2023.
Type of Request: Revision.
Abstract: This mandatory information collection covers the
collection of annual report data from operators of hazardous liquid and
carbon dioxide pipelines. Part 195 requires these pipeline operators to
submit reports each year. This revision includes collecting excavation
damage data and changes to the report form to improve consistency. Each
year, hazardous liquid operators submit an estimated 475 annual reports
to PHMSA. The current estimated burden for operators to submit each
report is 19 hours for an overall annual reporting burden of 9,025
hours [19 hours x 475 reports]. Because hazardous liquid operators are
new to collecting and submitting data on excavation damage, PHMSA
estimates that it will take each of these 475 respondents a one-time
effort of 18 hours, per operator, to update their systems to
accommodate the new data request. This will result in a one-time burden
of 8,550 hours [475 responses x 18 hours]. PHMSA expects that it will
take hazardous liquid operators an additional hour, annually, to
include the newly requested excavation damage data in their annual
report submission. Therefore, over the course of the three-year
approval for the information collection, the average increase to the
annual report burden will be 7 hours [(18 hours + 3 hours)/3]. As a
result, the annual reporting burden will increase from 19 hours to 26
hours per report. This will result in an estimated annual reporting
burden of 12,350 hours [475 reports x 26 hours].
Affected Public: Operators of hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide
pipeline facilities.
Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden:
Estimated number of responses: 475.
Estimated annual burden hours:12,350.
Frequency of Collection: Annually.
4. Title: Annual Report for Gas Distribution Operators.
OMB Control Number: 2137-0629.
Current Expiration Date: 5/31/2024.
Type of Request: Revision.

[[Page 65646]]

Abstract: This mandatory information collection covers the
collection of data from operators of gas distribution pipeline systems
for annual reports. Section 191.17 requires operators of gas
distribution systems to submit an annual report by March 15, for the
preceding calendar year. This revision includes updating the CGA DIRT
root cause categories and removing data about manual service line shut-
off valves and excess flow valves. Each year, gas distribution
operators submit approximately 1,446 annual reports to PHMSA. The
current estimated burden for operators to submit each report is 17.5
hours for an overall annual reporting burden of 25,305 hours [17.5
hours x 1,446 reports]. Because gas distribution operators are
currently collecting and submitting data on excavation damage, PHMSA
estimates that these respondents will incur a one-time effort of nine
hours, per operator, to update their systems to accommodate the
expanded data request. This will result in a one-time burden of 13,014
hours [1,446 reports x 9 hours]. PHMSA expects that it will take gas
distribution operators an additional hour, annually, to add the newly
expanded excavation damage data to their annual report submission.
Therefore, over the course of the three-year approval for the
information collection, the average increase to the annual report
burden will be 4 hours [(9 hours + 3 hours)/3] each year. As a result,
the annual reporting burden will increase from 17.5 hours to 21.5 hours
per report. This will result in an estimated annual reporting burden of
31,089 hours [1,446 reports x 21.5 hours].
PHMSA is also revising the burden estimate to account for the
elimination of the requirement to report EFV/shut-off valve data. PHMSA
currently estimates that it takes gas distribution operators 1.5 hours,
per report, to submit the total number of EFVs and shut-off valves
installed and maintained in each calendar year. Therefore, the burden
hour for this requirement is 2,169 hours [1.5 hours x 1,446 reports).
PHMSA is proposing to eliminate this requirement which will result in a
2,169-hour burden reduction. Based on the revisions discussed above,
the burden hour estimate for the gas distribution annual report will be
20 hours [17.5 hours (current) + 4 hours (DIRT revisions)--1.5 hours
(eliminated EFV/shut-off valve data)] for a total annual burden of
28,920 hours [20 hours x 1,446 reports].
Affected Public: Operators of gas distribution pipeline systems.
Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden:
Estimated number of responses: 1,446.
Estimated annual burden hours: 28,920.
Frequency of Collection: Annually.
5. Title: Incident Reports for Natural Gas Pipeline Operators.
OMB Control Number: 2137-0635.
Current Expiration Date: 5/31/2024.
Type of Request: Revision.
Abstract: This mandatory information collection covers the
collection of incident data from operators of gas distribution systems
(form PHMSA F 7100.1, ``Incident Report--Gas Distribution Systems''),
gas transmission and gathering systems (form PHMSA F 7100.2, ``Incident
Report--Gas Transmission and Gathering Systems''), and liquefied
natural gas facilities (PHMSA F 7100.3, ``Incident Report--Liquefied
Natural Gas (LNG) Facilities,'' each under OMB Control No. 2137-0635).
Part 191 requires these operators to submit incident reports when
certain criteria are met. This revision includes changes to form PHMSA
F 7100.1, ``Incident Report--Gas Distribution Systems,'' to collect
more state one-call law exemption data and update the CGA DIRT
questions. In the ``Incident Report--Gas Transmission and Gathering
Systems'' form, this revision includes changing the name of the form,
collecting more state one-call law exemption data, and updating the CGA
DIRT questions. In all three incident reports, this revision includes
collecting the local time and date of the event as well as the
``confirmed discovery.'' PHMSA does not expect operators to incur
additional time due to these revisions. PHMSA expects the current time
estimated for this information collection to be sufficient for affected
operators to include the newly required information.
Affected Public: Gas pipeline operators, operators of underground
natural gas, and operators of liquefied natural gas facilities.
Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden:
Estimated Number of Responses: 259.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 3,108.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
Comments are invited on:
(a) The need for the renewal and revision of this collection of
information for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
(c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are required to respond, including the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter
35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1.48.

Issued in Washington, DC, on October 25, 2022, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.97.
Alan K. Mayberry,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 2022-23627 Filed 10-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>

View on FederalRegister.gov →Plain-text source

Indexed from Federal Register on October 31, 2022.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.