Notice2022-22767
Community Development Financial Institutions Fund; CDFI Target Market Assessment Methodologies
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
October 20, 2022
Issuing agencies
Treasury Department
Abstract
The Community Development Financial Institutions Fund (CDFI Fund), Department of the Treasury, requests comments from the public regarding the pre-approved Target Market assessment methodologies that entities applying for Certification as a Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI) may use to assess whether the recipients of an entity's Financial Products or Financial Services are members of a pre-approved Target Market. Capitalized terms found in this notice are defined in the regulations that govern the CDFI Program.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 202 (Thursday, October 20, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 202 (Thursday, October 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63852-63854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-22767]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Community Development Financial Institutions Fund; CDFI Target
Market Assessment Methodologies
ACTION: Notice and Request for Comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Community Development Financial Institutions Fund (CDFI
Fund), Department of the Treasury, requests comments from the public
regarding the pre-approved Target Market assessment methodologies that
entities applying for Certification as a Community Development
Financial Institution (CDFI) may use to assess whether the recipients
of an entity's Financial Products or Financial Services are members of
a pre-approved Target Market. Capitalized terms found in this notice
are defined in the regulations that govern the CDFI Program.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before December 19, 2022
to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal:
<a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>. Follow the instructions on the website for
submitting comments. In general, all comments will be available for
inspection at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>. Comments, including attachments and
other supporting materials, are part of the public record. Do not
submit any information in your comments or supporting materials that
you consider confidential or inappropriate for public disclosure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Dickens, Program Manager,
Office of Certification Policy and Evaluation, CDFI Fund, U.S.
Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC
20220 or by phone at (202) 653-0300. Other information regarding the
CDFI Fund and its programs may be obtained through the CDFI Fund's
website at <a href="http://www.cdfifund.gov">http://www.cdfifund.gov</a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: To be a Certified CDFI, an entity must
demonstrate that it serves at least one eligible Target Market (either
an Investment Area or a Targeted Population). In addition, it must
direct at least 60% of both the number and dollar volume of arm's-
length, on-
[[Page 63853]]
balance sheet Financial Products to one or more eligible Target Market
components. Under the current policies and CDFI Certification
Application, Applicants must describe and seek approval for each
assessment methodology they have used and intend to use to confirm
financing activity to their identified Target Market(s). Only those
Target Market assessment methodologies that have been approved by the
CDFI Fund may be used when compiling Target Market data.
In an effort to increase transparency and reduce burden through a
revised CDFI Certification Application, <a href="https://www.cdfifund.gov/sites/cdfi/files/2022-10/CDFI_Certification_Application_Preview_Final_10322.pdf">https://www.cdfifund.gov/sites/cdfi/files/2022-10/CDFI_Certification_Application_Preview_Final_10322.pdf</a>, the CDFI Fund
intends to publish a list of pre-approved Target Market assessment
methodologies that Applicants and Certified CDFIs may use and rely upon
to demonstrate that they are serving their identified Target Market(s).
Through the revised application and Annual Certification and Data
Collection Report (ACR), Applicants and Certified CDFIs will select
from a drop-down menu the options in the methodology list that they
used for each of their Target Market components (i.e., Investment Area
(IA), Low Income Targeted Population (LITP), or Other Targeted
Population (OTP).
The proposed list of pre-approved Target Market assessment
methodologies, which may be found on the CDFI Fund website
(<a href="http://www.cdfifund.gov">www.cdfifund.gov</a>), reflects the primary assessment methods that have
been approved by the CDFI Fund and are most commonly used by a majority
of currently Certified CDFIs, but may not be a comprehensive list of
all the assessment methodologies previously approved by the CDFI Fund.
Because the CDFI Fund, to this point, has not specifically tracked
approved Target Market assessment methodologies (and in part as a
result of documentation system changes), the CDFI Fund may previously
have considered and even approved a Target Market assessment method
unique to a specific Applicant or Certified CDFI that does not appear
on the proposed list.
Applicants that use one of the pre-approved options will no longer
be required to describe the assessment process used to confirm
financing activity to their Target Market(s) as part of the
Certification Application or a Target Market modification. If an
Applicant or Certified CDFI seeks to use an alternative or modified
Target Market assessment method, it will be permitted to submit a
service request through AMIS for consideration of that process to the
CDFI Fund. If new assessment methodologies are approved, the CDFI Fund
intends to update the list of pre-approved methodologies as
appropriate, so that any newly approved methodologies may be available
to other Applicants and Certified CDFIs as well.
Approved CDFI Fund Target Market assessment methodologies must be
used exactly as approved unless and until modification of the method is
authorized by the CDFI Fund. To use an alternative or modified Target
Market assessment method when compiling Target Market data for the CDFI
Certification Application, the new method must be approved by the CDFI
Fund prior to submission of the application. Failure to use an approved
assessment methodology (or maintain required documentation, as noted in
the list) may result in the termination of a Certified CDFI's
certification.
Through this Request for Comment (RFC), the CDFI Fund seeks
feedback from the public on the proposed list of pre-approved Target
Market assessment methodologies. The CDFI Fund also seeks any
additional information beyond the questions below that members of the
public believe would assist in establishing policies and procedures
related to the Target Market assessment methodology. The CDFI Fund
intends to consider the feedback received through this RFC prior to
establishing a final list of pre-approved Target Market assessment
methodologies.
I. Pre-Approved Target Market Assessment Methodologies
a. Do each of the listed Target Market assessment methodologies, if
used, provide sufficient confidence as to the level at which an
Applicant or Certified CDFI is serving an Investment Area, LITP, or
OTP? If no, please identify the methodology, the reason it may
inaccurately capture the level of service to an Applicant's or CDFI's
Target Market, and how the methodology could be strengthened.
b. Are there assessment methodologies the CDFI Fund previously
allowed but that do not appear in the proposed list of pre-approved
Target Market assessment methodologies? If yes, please describe any
such methodology and indicate the date on which the methodology was
approved by the CDFI Fund.
c. Are there additional assessment methodologies the CDFI Fund
should consider that it may not have previously approved, but that
would serve to provide sufficient confidence as to the level at which
an Applicant or Certified CDFI is serving a Target Market? If yes,
please provide the following information for each proposed methodology:
<bullet> The applicable Target Market type (IA/LITP/OTP)
<bullet> Data Collected (e.g. data fields, time period, reporting
level)
<bullet> Model/Method design (e.g. mathematical equations,
relationship between data fields, etc.)
<bullet> Documents reviewed (e.g. contracts, agreements, white
paper, etc.)
<bullet> The step by step process used to collect the data and
review any documents or run the model and process its results
<bullet> If proposing a programmatic proxy, the step by step
process used to compare programmatic data to CDFI Fund definitions
(e.g. income sources, income thresholds, etc.)
<bullet> Any record keeping process
<bullet> The process for updating any methodology dependent on
underlying data changes.
d. What standards should the CDFI Fund use in its decision making
to approve or disapprove a proposed assessment methodology?
e. The CDFI Fund also will continue to allow, in the absence of
documentation of an individual's actual income, an organization's use
of assessment methodologies that treat a Financial Product recipient's
participation in an income-based program as a proxy to determine that
individual's status as a member of a Low-Income Targeted Population.
For a program to be an eligible proxy, the income limits of the program
must align with the CDFI Fund's definition of Low-Income.
In addition, the use of any programmatic proxy as an assessment
methodology that is not previously pre-approved by the CDFI Fund must
be submitted to and approved by the CDFI Fund prior to submission of an
application for CDFI Certification.
Because the CDFI Fund has not historically tracked all approved
programmatic proxy assessment methodologies, the CDFI Fund requests
organizations that currently use, or seek to use, a programmatic proxy
not listed among the proposed assessment methodologies, submit as part
of this Request for Comment information on the programmatic proxy.
Doing so will enable the CDFI Fund to make a determination on the
eligibility of that programmatic proxy prior to the finalization of the
pre-approved methodologies. In addition to the information requested
above, please also provide the step by step process the organization
used to compare programmatic data to CDFI Fund
[[Page 63854]]
definitions (e.g. income sources, income thresholds, etc.).
f. The CDFI Fund also is considering whether to include as a pre-
approved assessment methodology the use of a geography-based proxy to
identify members of a Low-Income Targeted Population in the absence of
documentation of an individual's actual income. One such approach would
be to identify eligible areas based on the share of households in the
area that earn less than 80 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI),
such that for a Financial Product or Financial Service delivered to a
resident of the area there would be a reasonably high likelihood that
the resident would be determined to be low-income.
For example, setting a 70 percent threshold for Low-Income
households in a census tract block group (as determined by Low to
Moderate Income Population by Block Group <a href="https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/HUD::low-to-moderate-income-population-by-block-group/about">https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/HUD::low-to-moderate-income-population-by-block-group/about</a> data from the Department of Housing and
Urban Development) as the proxy would capture approximately 34 million
of the 134 million Low-Income persons residing in the United States. In
addition, approximately 8 million higher-income individuals also live
in such block groups and effectively would be treated as Low-Income by
such a proxy. There is, however, a significant overlap of block groups
with high levels of Low-Income households and block groups located
within an Investment Area (where an investment delivered to a higher-
income resident is already an eligible Target Market Financial
Product). Approximately 32 million Low-Income individuals captured by a
70-percent threshold proxy are also located within an Investment Area,
along with 7.5 million higher-income individuals. By contrast,
approximately 1.6 million Low-Income individuals captured by such a
proxy as well as 478 thousand higher-income individuals are located
outside of an Investment Area.
Setting a lower threshold for the proxy would capture a higher
share of the nation's Low-Income population, but similarly would
effectively treat as members of an LITP a larger number of individuals
who would not otherwise be considered Low-Income. Setting a higher
threshold, on the other hand, would increase the likelihood that a
resident of the geographic proxy is actually Low-Income, but would
further limit the utility of the proxy by capturing an even smaller
share of the total U.S. Low-Income population.
Based on a 70 percent threshold, a list of all qualifying block
groups can be found on the CDFI Fund website, here <a href="https://www.cdfifund.gov/programs-training/certification/cdfi/certification-pra">https://www.cdfifund.gov/programs-training/certification/cdfi/certification-pra</a>. Note that the income status of these block groups is based on data
from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey (ACS). If the CDFI Fund
determines that residence in an eligible geography is an acceptable
proxy for assessing an individual's Low-Income status, the data upon
which the CDFI Fund will rely for this purpose will be updated
periodically based upon the most recent data available from the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development.
i. Should the CDFI Fund establish a geographic proxy for Low-Income
status as an approved Target Market assessment methodology, such that a
Financial Product or Financial Service delivered to a resident of a
qualifying block group would be deemed delivered to an LITP, even if
the proxy might overestimate the share of LITP borrowers served by an
Applicant or Certified CDFI?
ii. Alternatively, should the CDFI Fund accept the use of such a
proxy only when other methodologies are unavailable (e.g.,
documentation of actual income or borrower participation in another
program with income-based eligibility restrictions)?
iii. If the share of Low-Income households in a census tract block
group is an acceptable proxy for LITP status, is 70 percent an
appropriate qualifying threshold to maintain the integrity of the CDFI
Certification? If no, what is an appropriate threshold?
iv. Are there guardrails the CDFI Fund could place on such a proxy
to limit opportunities for abuse of the proxy, e.g., an entity that
chooses to use the proxy because it will allow it to represent more
activity as directed to an LITP than would otherwise qualify? If yes,
describe those guardrails? If the CDFI Fund allows the use of a
geographic LITP proxy, should it also require users of the proxy to
obtain an attestation from a Financial Product or Financial Services
recipient that their income is below 80 percent of the area median
family income?
g. Should a Financial Product delivered to a business, not owned by
a member of a Targeted Population or located in an Investment Area,
that is providing jobs, products, or services to a Targeted Population
or Investment Area, be deemed delivered to a Target Market? If yes, are
there assessment methodologies for end users, other than those already
included in the list that the CDFI Fund should consider? What are those
assessment methodologies? Should approval of any such methodology
associated with jobs to a Targeted Population or located in an
Investment Area be dependent on standards for a livable wage or other
quality job metrics?
h. Current standards for identifying members of a Native American
and Native Alaskan OTP include an assessment that an individual has
``maintained Tribal affiliation or community attachment.'' The CDFI
Fund's proposed assessment methodologies state that a financing entity
may assess a recipient's Tribal affiliation or community attachment via
the collection of a government-issued or tribal government-issued photo
identification. Are there other methods the CDFI Fund should deem
entities can use to assess such status, and in particular an
individual's ``community attachment'' to a Native population? What are
those methods and describe them?
II. General Target Market Verification Questions for Public Comment
a. Is there additional information that the CDFI Fund should
consider related to Target Market assessment methodologies? If so,
please describe.
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 4701 et seq.; 12 CFR 1805; Public Law 116-260.
Jodie L. Harris,
Director, Community Development Financial Institutions Fund.
[FR Doc. 2022-22767 Filed 10-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-70-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on October 20, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.