Notice2022-21319
Clinch River Nuclear Site Advanced Nuclear Reactor Technology Park Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
October 3, 2022
Issuing agencies
Tennessee Valley Authority
Abstract
This notice is provided in accordance with the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations and Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA's) procedures for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). TVA has selected the Preferred Alternative identified in the Clinch River Nuclear (CRN) Site Advanced Nuclear Reactor Technology Park Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS). The Notice of Availability of the Final PEIS for the Clinch River Nuclear Site Advanced Nuclear Reactor Technology Park was published in the Federal Register on July 29, 2022. The Preferred Alternative, Alternative D--Nuclear Technology Park at Area 1 and Area 2 with Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and/or Advanced Non-Light Water Reactors (Non-LWRs), provides the necessary flexibility in achieving the purpose and need of the project to support TVA's goal of demonstrating the feasibility of deploying advanced nuclear reactor technologies at the CRN Site capable of incrementally supplying clean, secure, and reliable power that is less vulnerable to disruption. As defined in the PEIS, advanced reactors can include non-LWRs and LWRs. SMRs are a type of advanced LWR reactor with an electrical output of generally no more than 300 megawatts electric (MWe).
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 190 (Monday, October 3, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 190 (Monday, October 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59860-59863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-21319]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Clinch River Nuclear Site Advanced Nuclear Reactor Technology
Park Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement
AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority.
ACTION: Record of decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice is provided in accordance with the Council on
Environmental Quality's regulations and Tennessee Valley Authority's
(TVA's) procedures for implementing the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA). TVA has selected the Preferred Alternative identified in
the Clinch River Nuclear (CRN) Site Advanced Nuclear Reactor Technology
Park Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS). The
Notice of Availability of the Final PEIS for the Clinch River Nuclear
Site Advanced Nuclear Reactor Technology Park was published in the
Federal Register on July 29, 2022. The Preferred Alternative,
Alternative D--Nuclear Technology Park at Area 1 and Area 2 with Small
Modular Reactors (SMRs) and/or Advanced Non-Light Water Reactors
[[Page 59861]]
(Non-LWRs), provides the necessary flexibility in achieving the purpose
and need of the project to support TVA's goal of demonstrating the
feasibility of deploying advanced nuclear reactor technologies at the
CRN Site capable of incrementally supplying clean, secure, and reliable
power that is less vulnerable to disruption. As defined in the PEIS,
advanced reactors can include non-LWRs and LWRs. SMRs are a type of
advanced LWR reactor with an electrical output of generally no more
than 300 megawatts electric (MWe).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J. Taylor Johnson, NEPA Compliance
Specialist, Tennessee Valley Authority, 1101 Market Street, BR 2C-C,
Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402; by telephone (423) 751-2732, or email at
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3b514f585a4f5e487b4f4d5a155c544d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="147e607775607167546062753a737b62">[email protected]</span></a>. The Final PEIS, this Record of Decision (ROD) and
other project documents are available on TVA's website <a href="https://www.tva.gov/nepa">https://www.tva.gov/nepa</a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: TVA is a corporate agency of the United
States that provides electricity for business customers and local power
distributors serving 10 million people in the Tennessee Valley--an
80,000-square-mile region comprised of Tennessee and parts of Virginia,
North Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and Kentucky. TVA
receives no taxpayer funding and derives virtually all revenues from
the sale of electricity. In addition to operating and investing
revenues in its power system, TVA provides flood control, navigation,
and land management for the Tennessee Valley watershed and provides
economic development and job creation assistance within the Service
area.
In May 2016, TVA submitted an application to the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) for an Early Site Permit (ESP) at the CRN Site for two
or more new nuclear power units demonstrating small modular reactor
(SMR) technology, with a total combined nuclear generating capacity not
to exceed 800 MWe. The NRC prepared and released a Final Environmental
Impact Statement (NRC ESP FEIS) to assess the environmental impacts of
the action proposed in the TVA ESP application (ESPA). The NRC ESP FEIS
identified issuance of an ESP for the CRN Site as the preferred
alternative.
Following the NRC ESP FEIS publication in April 2019, the NRC
issued an ESP to TVA on December 19, 2019, which is valid for up to 20
years. The ESP represents NRC's approval of the CRN Site as suitable
for the future demonstration of the construction and operation of two
or more SMRs with characteristics presented in the ESPA, but it does
not authorize TVA to construct or operate a nuclear facility. Prior to
construction or operation of advanced nuclear reactors at the CRN Site,
TVA must apply for and receive additional permits and licenses from the
NRC.
In June 2019, TVA released the agency's Integrated Resource Plan
(IRP) Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and the Final 2019
IRP. The IRP identified the various generating resources that TVA
intends to pursue to meet the energy needs of the Tennessee River
Valley over a 20-year planning period. The 2019 IRP recommended that
TVA continue to evaluate emerging nuclear technologies, including SMRs,
as part of technology innovation efforts aimed at developing future
electricity generation capabilities. In December 2021, the TVA Board of
Directors authorized the implementation of a New Nuclear Program to
advance SMR planning efforts at the CRN Site, and to explore plans for
potential additional reactors at other locations on the TVA system to
support TVA's 2050 decarbonization aspiration. The Final PEIS for the
Clinch River Nuclear Site Advanced Nuclear Reactor Technology Park is
TVA's next step in exploring the potential for new nuclear generation
on the TVA system, to pursue the recommendations of the IRP.
Nuclear Reactor Designs Considered
Nuclear technology alternatives considered by TVA for the CRN Site
include both SMRs and advanced non-LWRs, both further defined in the
PEIS. Potential SMR reactor designs analyzed in the PEIS include low-
or high-power pressurized water reactors and boiling water reactors.
Potential advanced non-LWR reactor designs analyzed in the PEIS include
thermal, molten salt graphite-moderated; thermal, fluoride salt
coolant, graphite-moderated; high temperature gas, graphite-moderated,
helium-cooled; molten chloride fast reactors; and micro reactors.
Alternatives Considered
TVA considered four alternatives in the Draft PEIS and Final PEIS
located in two different areas (Area 1 and Area 2) on the site
identified as suitable for Nuclear Technology Park development. Area 1
includes lands previously disturbed by the Clinch River Breeder Reactor
Project that were evaluated in the ESPA Environmental Report (ER). A
portion of Area 2 was also evaluated in the ESPA ER for a proposed
temporary laydown area.
The four alternatives considered by TVA in the PEIS are:
Alternative A--No Action. Under this alternative, TVA would not
seek additional approvals from the NRC for the CRN Site, and a Nuclear
Technology Park and advanced nuclear reactors would not be further
explored, constructed, operated, and therefore not decommissioned at
the CRN Site. The CRN Site would continue to be managed in accordance
with the Watts Bar Reservoir Land Management Plan, and TVA would
continue routine maintenance and clearing associated with the
transmission lines that currently traverse the CRN Site. As this
alternative would not support TVA's nuclear technology innovation
efforts aimed at developing future generation capabilities, the No
Action Alternative would not meet the purpose and need for the proposed
action. It does, however, represent current conditions and provides a
benchmark for comparing the environmental impacts of implementation of
Alternatives B, C, and D.
Alternative B--Nuclear Technology Park at Area 1 with SMRs and/or
Advanced Non-LWRs. Under Alternative B, potential project activities
would include site preparation, construction, operation, and
decommissioning of one or more advanced nuclear reactor(s) at Area 1 of
the CRN Site. This alternative consists of two options for development
of Area 1: Alternative B1--Construction of one or more SMRs or
Alternative B2--Construction of one or more SMRs and/or advanced non-
LWRs.
Alternative C--Nuclear Technology Park at Area 2 with Advanced Non-
LWRs. Under this alternative, potential project activities would
include site preparation, construction, operation, and potential
decommissioning of one or more advanced non-LWRs at Area 2 on the CRN
Site.
Alternative D--Nuclear Technology Park at Area 1 and Area 2 with
SMRs and/or Advanced Non-LWRs, potential activities would include site
preparation, construction, operation, and decommissioning of one or
more advanced nuclear reactor(s) at Area 1 and Area 2 on the CRN Site.
One or more SMRs and/or advanced non-LWRs could be constructed at Area
1 and one or more advanced non-LWRs could be constructed at Area 2.
Environmentally Preferred Alternative
The PEIS includes baseline information for understanding the
potential environmental and socioeconomic impacts associated with the
alternatives considered by TVA.
[[Page 59862]]
TVA considered 20 resource areas related to the human and natural
environments and the impacts on these resources associated with each
Nuclear Technology Park alternative. Alternative A--No Action would
result in the lowest level of environmental impacts as the
construction- and operation-related impacts resulting from Alternatives
B through D on Areas 1 and 2 would be avoided. However, Alternative A--
No Action does not meet the purpose and need for the project.
Implementation of Alternative D, TVA's preferred alternative, would
result in minor to moderate unmitigated impacts to the environment.
These impacts would be related to stormwater discharge into local
surface waters and groundwater; alteration of stream habitat; loss of
vegetated land cover; impacts to wetlands; and increased noise, dust,
traffic, and air emissions. Minor to moderate adverse impacts during
construction would result from soil disturbance and erosion; impacts to
onsite streams; and shoreline alteration. Moderate impacts would
include loss of upland plant and animal communities; loss of habitat
for listed bat species; disruption of views from adjacent properties;
removal of low-quality forest and herbaceous habitat; impacts to three
small areas of native cedar glades; and traffic increases at selected
intersections within the local transportation network.
Potential impacts to two state-listed plant species--rigid sedge
and pale green orchid--could occur from the proposed development of the
161-kV offsite transmission line. These impacts would be mitigated to
the extent possible through minimization measures and TVA's planned
efforts to expand the Grassy Creek Habitat Protection Area (HPA) by
about 14 acres in the area where these plants are located.
Moderate impacts to six archaeological sites determined to be
eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)
would occur due to construction disturbance from the project but would
be mitigated through a Programmatic Agreement (PA) between TVA and the
Tennessee State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). The proposed
action would also result in minor to moderate beneficial impacts
associated with increased employment, payroll, and tax revenues.
Minor impacts during operation of the Nuclear Technology Park would
include localized alteration of hydrologic patterns, limited scour
diversion from the use and discharge of cooling water from and into the
Clinch River arm of the Watts Bar Reservoir, noise, increased traffic,
and impacts associated with design basis accidents, severe accidents,
and plant security. The combined environmental impacts from the uranium
fuel cycle, the storage of spent fuel onsite, radioactive waste
management, and the transportation of unirradiated fuel and radioactive
waste would be minor.
The environmentally preferred action alternative that meets the
project purpose and need is Alternative B--Nuclear Technology Park at
Area 1 with SMRs and/or advanced non-LWRs. Alternative B would meet the
purpose and need of the project and would have less impacts than
Alternative D as Area 2 would not be disturbed. However, as the project
would be limited to only the use of Area 1, there would be less
flexibility for project activities and less opportunity for exploring
technologies that could assist in meeting the project goals.
Impacts associated with Alternative C would be somewhat reduced
relative to Alternative D, as the majority of Area 1 would not be
disturbed. However, as the project would be limited to only the use of
Area 2, and the advanced non-LWR technologies are less mature and
further from commercialization than SMRs, there is limited flexibility
to meet the purpose and need of the project.
Decision
Informed by the summary of the submitted alternatives, information,
and analyses in the Final PEIS, TVA certifies it has considered all of
the alternatives, information, analyses, and objections submitted by
State, Tribal, and local governments and public commenters for
consideration in developing the PEIS. TVA has selected the preferred
alternative identified in the Final PEIS, Alternative D--Nuclear
Technology Park at Area 1 and Area 2 with SMRs and/or advanced Non-
LWRs. This alternative was selected over Alternative B--Nuclear
Technology Park at Area 1 with SMRs and/or advanced non-LWRs and
Alternative C--Nuclear Technology Park at Area 2 with advanced Non-
LWRs, as it would best achieve the purpose and need of the project by
providing the greatest flexibility to support TVA's goal of
demonstrating the feasibility of deploying advanced nuclear reactor
technologies at the CRN Site.
Public Involvement
On February 2, 2021, TVA published a Notice of Intent (NOI) in the
Federal Register announcing that it planned to prepare a PEIS to
address future actions at the CRN Site relating to construction and
operation of a Nuclear Technology Park. The NOI initiated a public
scoping period, which concluded on March 19, 2021. In addition to the
NOI in the Federal Register, TVA contacted local, state, and federal
agencies, local power companies, and directly served customers, and
sent a media advisory to news outlets across the TVA service area. A
public notice advertisement was also placed in the Roane County News,
Knoxville News Sentinel, News-Herald, Oak Ridger, Courier News, and on
the TVA website. As part of Scoping, TVA hosted a live virtual scoping
webinar on March 1, 2021, to gather input from the public and
stakeholders. A total of 98 individuals, including members of the
general public and representatives of a variety of organizations as
well as TVA, registered for the meeting, and 58 attended the question-
and-answer session following the presentation. During the scoping
period, TVA received 45 comment submissions from members of the pubic,
local government, and state and federal agencies. Comment submissions
were carefully reviewed and summarized in a Scoping Report included in
Appendix C of the PEIS.
The Draft PEIS was released to the public on February 18, 2022, and
a Notice of Availability including a request for comments on the Draft
PEIS was published in the Federal Register on February 18, 2022. The
Draft PEIS was posted on TVA's website and hard copies were available
by request. Additionally, TVA held a virtual public open house on March
10, 2022. Approximately 160 individuals registered for the event which
was attended by 75 individuals at the event's peak attendance.
Attendees included individuals from the general public, NRC, EPA, TVA,
and local media. TVA accepted and answered questions from the attendees
following the presentation. TVA's public and agency involvement for the
Draft PEIS included a 45-day public comment period, which closed on
April 4, 2022.
TVA received 18 comment submissions, which included emails and
submissions through the project website and virtual meeting room.
Comment submissions were carefully reviewed and consisted of 72
individual comment statements. The most frequently mentioned topics
from the public comments were related to support for the project, the
impact from site development on threatened and endangered species,
concern for habitat loss, impacts to water quality of the Clinch River
arm of the Watts Bar Reservoir from general site development and
runoff, as well as concern about fuel leaks and spent fuel storage. TVA
[[Page 59863]]
provided responses to these comments, made appropriate minor revisions
to the Draft PEIS, and issued the Final PEIS.
The Notice of Availability for the Final PEIS was published in the
Federal Register on July 29, 2022.
Mitigation Measures
TVA will use the following means to avoid or minimize environmental
harm: Appropriate best management practices during any site
preparation, construction, operation, and decommissioning of advanced
nuclear reactors, including those described in A Guide for
Environmental Protection and Best Management Practices for Tennessee
Valley Authority, the Tennessee Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook,
the project-specific stormwater pollution prevention plan, and those
associated with a site-specific Integrated Pollution Prevention Plan.
In addition, TVA will:
<bullet> Conduct additional site-specific investigations to
evaluate the presence of karst features in areas proposed for structure
development.
<bullet> Ensure that any disturbance of contaminated sediments
within the Clinch River arm of the Watts Bar Reservoir would be subject
to the terms of the Watts Bar Interagency Agreement that includes the
USACE, U.S. Department of Energy, TDEC, and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, to coordinate review of permitting and
authorization.
<bullet> Minimize the noise effects of blasting by requiring the
construction contractor to develop a blasting plan to include
notifications to local officials, emergency departments, and
neighboring businesses and residents.
<bullet> Minimize noise impacts based on further analysis and/or
modeling to determine offsite operational noise impacts when designs
for specific reactor and cooling technologies are developed.
<bullet> Minimize the effect of construction dewatering on
groundwater levels in the areas surrounding any potential excavation
and reduce the need for dewatering by appropriately blocking or
grouting fractures and cavities transmitting large amounts of water. As
appropriate, TVA will assess the effects of dewatering by monitoring
groundwater levels surrounding the excavation and water levels in
potentially affected surface waterbodies.
<bullet> Limit any new rail line construction to the north side of
the rail spur, thereby avoiding 100- and 500-year floodplains.
<bullet> Minimize permanent and temporary impacts to wetlands and
other sensitive resources during the design phase of any reactor to be
constructed on site. If impacts to wetlands are not avoidable, CWA
permitting with the USACE and TDEC will be conducted as appropriate.
<bullet> Establish a buffer around forested wetland W019, which is
rated as having exceptional value, such that it would not be impacted
by project activities.
<bullet> Design the diffuser ports that are part of the discharge
system to direct effluent upwards into the water column so that limited
physical alteration or scouring occurs, thereby minimizing impacts to
benthic habitats.
<bullet> Work to minimize and avoid impacts in native cedar glade
areas during design, construction, and operation.
<bullet> Time any proposed actions within 660 feet of active osprey
nests to avoid nesting seasons, or coordinate with the U.S. Department
of Agriculture Wildlife Services for guidance to ensure compliance
under Executive Order 13186.
<bullet> When feasible, remove trees within the Project Area in
winter (October 15-March 31) when most species of migratory birds would
not be nesting and/or would be away from the region.
<bullet> Review any proposed tree removal plans once site-specific
designs are completed to determine if impacts to potentially suitable
Indiana bat and northern long-eared bat habitat may occur. Consultation
under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act will occur, as
appropriate, when specific designs have been selected, the scope of
each project has been refined, and impacts to federally listed bats can
be properly assessed.
<bullet> Ensure that state-listed plant species including the rigid
sedge and pale green orchid are not significantly impacted by designing
the proposed offsite transmission line to avoid the species and their
habitat to the greatest extent possible. TVA transmission engineers
will consult with the TVA botanist during design to ensure the location
of the habitat is considered early in the process.
<bullet> Pursue expansion of the Grassy Creek HPA by about 14 acres
to provide additional protection to the state-listed rigid sedge and
pale green orchid.
<bullet> Use site design to minimize and avoid impacts to streams
and wetlands where feasible to lessen potential impacts to suitable
habitat for the southeastern shrew and other riparian dependent rare
species.
<bullet> Take steps to address localized traffic congestion by
staggering work shifts to avoid localized delays at key intersections,
installing traffic lights and stop signs, and adding turning lanes as
appropriate to the level of traffic present.
<bullet> Equip mechanical draft cooling towers with efficient drift
eliminators and/or other design attributes to reduce particulate matter
emissions.
<bullet> Maintain the grounds of the Hensley Cemetery and avoid the
cemetery during construction, operation and maintenance activities. The
cemetery would remain accessible to those individuals with familial
connection to individuals buried at Hensley Cemetery.
<bullet> Per the stipulations of the Programmatic Agreement (PA)
executed between TVA, and the Tennessee State Historic Preservation
Officer with concurring parties of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians
and the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma, TVA will
seek ways to avoid or minimize adverse project impacts on NRHP-eligible
archaeological sites, and if avoidance or sufficient minimization are
not possible, TVA will mitigate the adverse effects in accordance with
the stipulations of the PA. TVA will consult with the Tennessee SHPO
and federally recognized tribes throughout the process.
Robert M. Deacy, Sr.,
Senior Vice President, Clinch River Project, Tennessee Valley
Authority.
[FR Doc. 2022-21319 Filed 9-30-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on October 3, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.