Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Large Vertical Shaft Engines Between 225cc and 999cc, and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review; Correction
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published a notice in the Federal Register of August 24, 2022, in which Commerce announced the final results of the changed circumstances review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain large vertical shaft engines between 225cc and 999cc, and parts thereof (vertical shaft engines) from the People's Republic of China (China). In this notice, Commerce inadvertently failed to apply the finding to subject merchandise produced and exported by Jialing-Honda Motors Co., Ltd (Jialing) or produced and exported by Honda Power Products (China) Co., Ltd. (Honda). In addition, Commerce did not include the term "large" in the heading of the notice.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 188 (Thursday, September 29, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 188 (Thursday, September 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 59050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-21128]
[[Page 59050]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-119]
Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Large Vertical Shaft Engines
Between 225cc and 999cc, and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic
of China: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review; Correction
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published a notice
in the Federal Register of August 24, 2022, in which Commerce announced
the final results of the changed circumstances review of the
antidumping duty (AD) order on certain large vertical shaft engines
between 225cc and 999cc, and parts thereof (vertical shaft engines)
from the People's Republic of China (China). In this notice, Commerce
inadvertently failed to apply the finding to subject merchandise
produced and exported by Jialing-Honda Motors Co., Ltd (Jialing) or
produced and exported by Honda Power Products (China) Co., Ltd.
(Honda). In addition, Commerce did not include the term ``large'' in
the heading of the notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leo Ayala, AD/CVD Operations, Office
VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3945.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 4, 2021, Commerce published an amended final determination
and antidumping duty order on vertical shaft engines from China.\1\ In
the Order, Commerce specified an estimated weighted-average dumping
margin and cash deposit rate for merchandise produced and exported by
Jialing-Honda Motors Co., Ltd (Jialing).\2\ This cash deposit rate, a
producer-exporter combination rate, is currently imposed for entries of
subject merchandise produced and exported by Jialing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Large Vertical Shaft Engines Between 225cc and
999cc, and Parts Thereof, from the People's Republic of China:
Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty
Order, 86 FR 12623 (March 4, 2021) (Order).
\2\ Id., 86 FR at 12624.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 24, 2022, Commerce published in the Federal Register the
final results of the changed circumstances review of the Order on
vertical shaft engines from China.\3\ In the Final CCR Results,
Commerce found that Honda is the successor-in-interest to Jialing.
However, Commerce incorrectly referenced the cash deposit rate for
subject merchandise ``exported by Honda'' \4\ instead of subject
merchandise ``produced and exported by Honda.'' In addition, Commerce
did not specify that the cash deposit rate for Jialing applied to
subject merchandise produced and exported by Jialing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Vertical Shaft Engines
Between 225cc and 999cc, and Parts Thereof from the People's
Republic of China: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review, 87
FR 51966 (August 24, 2022) (Final CCR Results).
\4\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Correction
In the Federal Register of August 24, 2022, in FR Doc 2022-18210 on
page 51966, correct the heading of the notice to:
Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Large Vertical Shaft Engines
Between 225cc and 999cc, and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic
of China: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review; Correction.
On page 51966 in the third column, correct the first sentence of
the second paragraph under the caption ``Final Results of Changed
Circumstances Review'' to:
Consequently, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection to suspend liquidation of all shipments of subject
merchandise produced and exported by Honda and entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of
this notice in the Federal Register at the AD cash deposit rate in
effect for merchandise produced and exported by Jialing.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
751(b)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR
351.216(e).
Dated: September 22, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022-21128 Filed 9-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.