Forged Steel Fittings From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
On September 13, 2022, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in Bothwell (Taizhou) Steel Fittings, Co., Ltd. v. United States, Consol. Court no. 21-00166, sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce's (Commerce) remand results pertaining to the administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on forged steel fittings (FSF) from the People's Republic of China (China) covering the period March 14, 2018, through December 31, 2018. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's final results of the administrative review, and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the countervailable subsidy rate assigned to Both-Well (Taizhou) Steel Fittings, Co., Ltd. (Both-Well).
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 186 (Tuesday, September 27, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58484-58485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-20979]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-068]
Forged Steel Fittings From the People's Republic of China: Notice
of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 13, 2022, the U.S. Court of International Trade
(CIT) issued its final judgment in Bothwell (Taizhou) Steel Fittings,
Co., Ltd. v. United States, Consol. Court no. 21-00166, sustaining the
U.S. Department of Commerce's (Commerce) remand results pertaining to
the administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on
forged steel fittings (FSF) from the People's Republic of China (China)
covering the period March 14, 2018, through December 31, 2018. Commerce
is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony
with Commerce's final results of the administrative review, and that
Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the
countervailable subsidy rate assigned to Both-Well (Taizhou) Steel
Fittings, Co., Ltd. (Both-Well).
DATES: Applicable September 23, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Horn and Zachariah Hall, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4868 or (202)
482-6261, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 58485]]
Background
On March 18, 2021, Commerce published its Final Results in the 2018
CVD administrative review of FSF from China.\1\ In the Final Results,
Commerce determined that the use of adverse facts available (AFA) under
sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), was warranted in determining the countervailability of the Export
Buyer's Credit (EBC) program, because the Government of China (GOC) had
failed to provide the necessary information Commerce required to
analyze the program.\2\ Commerce also determined that it could not rely
on statements of non-use provided by Both-Well and its customers
because of the GOC's failure to provide the necessary information with
respect to the operation of the program.\3\ Consistent with Commerce's
CVD AFA hierarchy, Commerce selected the highest calculated rate for
the same or similar program as the AFA rate for this program, 10.54
percent, in accordance with section 776(d) of the Act and Commerce's
established practice.\4\ Commerce calculated a total net subsidy rate
of 25.90 percent for Both-Well.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Forged Steel Fittings from the People's Republic of
China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review;
2018, 86 FR 14722 (March 18, 2021) (Final Results), and accompanying
Issues and Decisions Memorandum.
\2\ Id. at Comment 1.
\3\ Id.
\4\ Id. at Comment 2.
\5\ See Final Results, 86 FR at 14723.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Both-Well appealed Commerce's Final Results. On February 8, 2022,
the CIT remanded the Final Results to Commerce and ordered either: (1)
that Commerce must attempt to verify the EBC program non-use
certifications provided by Both-Well's U.S. customers or; (2) that if,
after attempting verification, Commerce determines verification is not
possible without the missing information from the GOC, then Commerce
must explain, in detail, the specific ways in which Commerce attempted
verification of the non-use certifications.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Bothwell (Taizhou) Steel Fittings, Co., Ltd. v. United
States, Consol. Court No. 21-00166 (CIT February 8, 2022), at 20-21.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In its final remand redetermination, issued in July 2022, Commerce
found, after issuing supplemental questionnaires to Both-Well, that
there was no use of the EBC program with respect to Both-Well in this
review and removed the subsidy rate for the EBC program from Both-
Well's final CVD subsidy rate, resulting in a 15.36 percent rate for
Both-Well.\7\ On September 13, 2022, the CIT sustained Commerce's final
redetermination.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Final Results of Remand Redetermination Pursuant to
Court Remand, Bothwell (Taizhou) Steel Fittings, Co., Ltd. v. United
States, Consol. Court No. 21-00166, dated July 7, 2022, available at
<a href="https://access.trade.gov/resources/remands/22-10.pdf">https://access.trade.gov/resources/remands/22-10.pdf</a>, at 7-8.
\8\ See Both-Well (Taizhou) Steel Fittings, Co., Ltd., v. United
States, Court No. 21-00166, Slip Op. 22-105 (CIT September 13,
2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,\9\ as clarified by Diamond
Sawblades,\10\ the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held
that, pursuant to section 516A(c) and (e) of the Act, Commerce must
publish a notice of court decision that is not ``in harmony'' with a
Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending
a ``conclusive'' court decision. The CIT's September 13, 2022, judgment
constitutes a final decision of the CIT that is not in harmony with
Commerce's Final Results. Thus, this notice is published in fulfillment
of the publication requirements of Timken.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir.
1990) (Timken).
\10\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United
States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended Final Results
Because there is now a final court judgment, Commerce is amending
its Final Results with respect to Both-Well as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy rate
Exporter (percent ad
valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Both-Well (Taizhou) Steel Fittings, Co., Ltd.............. 15.36
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
Because Both-Well has a superseding cash deposit rate, i.e., there
have been final results published in a subsequent administrative
review, we will not issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP). This notice will not affect the
current cash deposit rate.
Liquidation of Suspended Entries
At this time, Commerce remains enjoined by CIT order from
liquidating entries that were produced and/or exported by Both-Well,
and were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during
the period March 14, 2018, through December 31, 2018. These entries
will remain enjoined pursuant to the terms of the injunction during the
pendency of any appeals process.
In the event the CIT's ruling is not appealed, or, if appealed,
upheld by a final and conclusive court decision, Commerce intends to
instruct CBP to assess countervailing duties on unliquidated entries of
subject merchandise produced and/or exported by Both-Well in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b). We will instruct CBP to assess countervailing
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the ad
valorem rate is not zero or de minimis. Where an ad valorem subsidy
rate is zero or de minimis,\11\ we will instruct CBP to liquidate the
appropriate entries without regard to countervailing duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: September 22, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022-20979 Filed 9-23-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.