Notice2022-19918
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Schedule of Credits at Equity 7, Section 118 and Clarify Its Port-related Fees at Options 7, Section 3
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
September 15, 2022
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 178 (Thursday, September 15, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 178 (Thursday, September 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56721-56724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-19918]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-95718; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2022-050]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Its Schedule of Credits at Equity 7, Section 118 and Clarify Its
Port-related Fees at Options 7, Section 3
September 9, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on September 1, 2022, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend: (i) the Exchange's transaction
credits at Equity 7, Section 118(a), and (ii) the Exchange's port-
related fees at Options 7, Section 3, as described further below. The
text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website
at <a href="https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/nasdaq/rules">https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/nasdaq/rules</a>, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
[[Page 56722]]
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the Exchange's
transaction credits at Equity 7, Section 118(a) and amend the
Exchange's port-related fees at Options 7, Section 3. Specifically, the
Exchange proposes to (1) modify the volume requirement to achieve an
existing credit for displayed quotes/orders that provide liquidity and
(2) amend the options Rules to clarify that Nasdaq Testing Facility
(``NTF'') ports are provided at no cost.
Change to Credit for Displayed Quotes/Orders
Currently, the Exchange provides a $0.0029 per share executed
credit for a member with shares of liquidity provided in all securities
through one or more of its Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs that represent
0.625% or more of Consolidated Volume during the month, including
shares of liquidity provided with respect to securities that are listed
on exchanges other than Nasdaq or NYSE that represent 0.15% or more of
Consolidated Volume. The Exchange proposes to amend the requirement for
a member to have shares of liquidity that represent 0.625% or more of
Consolidated Volume during the month by increasing this requirement
from 0.625% to 0.75%. The proposed change would be applicable to Tape
A, Tape B and Tape C. The Exchange hopes that this change will
incentivize members to increase their liquidity providing activity on
the Exchange, which will improve market quality.
NTF Port Fee Clarification
The Exchange also proposes to add language to Options 7, Section
3(iv) to clarify the Exchange's existing practice that NTF Ports are
provided at no cost. The NTF provides subscribers with a virtual System
test environment that closely approximates the production environment
on which they may test their automated systems that integrate with the
Exchange. For example, the NTF provides subscribers a virtual System
environment for testing upcoming releases and product enhancements, as
well as testing firm software prior to implementation. The Exchange
proposes adding express language in the options Rules to provide
increased clarity to market participants.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\3\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\4\ in particular, in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and issuers and other persons using any facility, and is
not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's proposed changes to its fee schedule are reasonable
in several respects. As a threshold matter, the Exchange is subject to
significant competitive forces in the market for equity securities
transaction services that constrain its pricing determinations in that
market. The fact that this market is competitive has long been
recognized by the courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange
Commission, the D.C. Circuit stated as follows: ``[n]o one disputes
that competition for order flow is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC
explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market system, buyers and sellers of
securities, and the broker-dealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders for
execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to take its market share
percentages for granted' because `no exchange possesses a monopoly,
regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker
dealers' . . . .'' \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010)
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation
NMS, while adopting a series of steps to improve the current market
model, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most
important to investors and listed companies.'' \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 70
FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (``Regulation NMS Adopting
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Numerous indicia demonstrate the competitive nature of this market.
For example, clear substitutes to the Exchange exist in the market for
equity security transaction services. The Exchange is only one of
several equity venues to which market participants may direct their
order flow. Competing equity exchanges offer similar tiered pricing
structures to that of the Exchange, including schedules of rebates and
fees that apply based upon members achieving certain volume thresholds.
Within this environment, market participants can freely and often
do shift their order flow among the Exchange and competing venues in
response to changes in their respective pricing schedules. As such, the
proposal represents a reasonable attempt by the Exchange to increase
its liquidity and market share relative to its competitors.
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to require a member to
provide shares of liquidity in all securities through one or more of
its Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs that represent 0.75% (rather than
0.625%) or more of Consolidated Volume during the month, including
shares of liquidity provided with respect to securities that are listed
on exchanges other than Nasdaq or NYSE that represent 0.15% or more of
Consolidated Volume in order to qualify for the existing $0.0029 per
share executed credit. The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to
create a stricter qualification for the credit to ensure that this
credit remains relevant to current levels of liquidity providing
activity on the Exchange and continues to incentivize liquidity adding
activity. To the extent that this proposal results in an increase in
liquidity adding and quoting activity on the Exchange, this will
improve the quality of the Nasdaq market and increase its
attractiveness to existing and prospective participants.
The Exchange believes its proposal will allocate its charges and
credits fairly among its market participants. The Exchange believes
that it is an equitable allocation to increase the volume threshold to
qualify for an existing $0.0029 transaction credit because the proposal
will encourage members to add displayed liquidity to the Exchange. To
the extent that the
[[Page 56723]]
Exchange succeeds in increasing the levels of liquidity and activity on
the Exchange, then the Exchange will experience improvements in its
market quality, which stands to benefit all market participants.
The Exchange believes that its proposal is not unfairly
discriminatory. As an initial matter, the Exchange believes that
nothing about its volume-based tiered pricing model is inherently
unfair; instead, it is a rational pricing model that is well-
established and ubiquitous in today's economy among firms in various
industries--from co-branded credit cards to grocery stores to cellular
telephone data plans--that use it to reward the loyalty of their best
customers that provide high levels of business activity and incent
other customers to increase the extent of their business activity. It
is also a pricing model that the Exchange and its competitors have long
employed with the assent of the Commission. It is fair because it
enhances price discovery and improves the overall quality of the equity
markets.
The Exchange believes that its proposal to increase the volume
threshold to qualify for an existing $0.0029 transaction credit is not
unfairly discriminatory because the credit is available to all members.
Moreover, the proposal stands to improve the overall market quality of
the Exchange, to the benefit of all market participants, by
incentivizing members to increase their liquidity adding activity on
the Exchange.
The Exchange also believes that it is just and equitable, and in
the interests of market participants, for the Exchange to clarify the
Exchange's existing practice to provide NTF ports at no cost in Options
7, Section 3(iv), codifying existing practice where it is not expressly
stated in the Rule. The Exchange believes that market participants will
benefit from increased clarity, which will help limit any potential
confusion in the future.
Any Participant that is dissatisfied with the proposal is free to
shift their order flow to competing venues that provide more generous
pricing or less stringent qualifying criteria.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Intramarket Competition
The Exchange does not believe that its proposal will place any
category of Exchange participant at a competitive disadvantage.
As noted above, the Exchange's proposal to increase the volume
threshold to qualify for an existing $0.0029 transaction credit is
intended to have market-improving effects, to the benefit of all
members. Any member may elect to achieve the levels of liquidity
required in order to qualify for the credit. In addition, the proposed
language to the options Rules that NTF ports are provided at no cost
merely codifies and clarifies an existing practice of the Exchange.
The Exchange notes that its members are free to trade on other
venues to the extent they believe that the credits are not attractive.
As one can observe by looking at any market share chart, price
competition between exchanges is fierce, with liquidity and market
share moving freely between exchanges in reaction to fee and credit
changes.
Intermarket Competition
In terms of inter-market competition, the Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants
can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities available at
other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange
must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other
exchanges and with alternative trading systems that have been exempted
from compliance with the statutory standards applicable to exchanges.
Because competitors are free to modify their own fees in response, and
because market participants may readily adjust their order routing
practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to which fee changes
in this market may impose any burden on competition is extremely
limited.
The proposed change to the qualifying criteria for an existing
credit is reflective of this competition because, as a threshold issue,
the Exchange is a relatively small market so its ability to burden
intermarket competition is limited. In this regard, even the largest
U.S. equities exchange by volume only has 17-18% market share, which in
most markets could hardly be categorized as having enough market power
to burden competition. Moreover, as noted above, price competition
between exchanges is fierce, with liquidity and market share moving
freely between exchanges in reaction to fee and credit changes. This is
in addition to free flow of order flow to and among off-exchange venues
which comprises more than 40% of industry volume in recent months.
The Exchange's proposal to modify the qualifying criteria for an
existing credit is pro-competitive in that the Exchange intends for the
change to increase liquidity addition activity on the Exchange, thereby
rendering the Exchange a more attractive and vibrant venue to market
participants.
In addition, the proposed change to the options Rules to clarify
that NTF ports are provided at no cost is designed to expressly state
existing practice without changing its operation and, therefore, the
Exchange believes that the proposed change will not impose a burden on
competition.
If the changes proposed herein are unattractive to market
participants, it is likely that the Exchange will lose market share as
a result. Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed
changes will impair the ability of members or competing order execution
venues to maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \8\
thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
[[Page 56724]]
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3f4d4a535a125c5052525a514b4c7f4c5a5c11585049"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c2b0b7aea7efa1adafafa7acb6b182b1a7a1eca5adb4">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2022-050 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2022-050. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2022-050 and should be submitted
on or before October 6, 2022.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-19918 Filed 9-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on September 15, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.