Notice2022-17669
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Options 7, Section 4
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 17, 2022
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 158 (Wednesday, August 17, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 17, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50652-50654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-17669]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-95479; File No. SR-Phlx-2022-33]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Options 7,
Section 4
August 11, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 1, 2022, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below,
which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Phlx's Pricing Schedule at Options
7, Section 4, ``Multiply Listed Options Fees (Includes options
overlying equities, ETFs, ETNs and indexes which are Multiply Listed)
(Excludes SPY and broad-based index options symbols listed within
Options 7, Section 5.A).''
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at <a href="https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/phlx/rules">https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/phlx/rules</a>, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Phlx proposes to amend its Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section
4, ``Multiply Listed Options Fees (Includes options overlying equities,
ETFs, ETNs and indexes which are Multiply Listed) (Excludes SPY and
broad-based index options symbols listed within Options 7, Section
5.A).'' Specifically, Phlx proposes to remove the maximum Qualified
Contingent Cross (``QCC'') rebate that will be paid by the Exchange in
a given month. The Exchange believes that removing this rebate will
permit Phlx to compete more effectively with other options exchange for
QCC Orders by incentivizing market participants to transact a greater
amount of QCC Orders on Phlx in order to receive a QCC Rebate.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Phlx will monitor the impact of this proposal on QCC Order
volumes, and may in the future impose a maximum on the amount of QCC
Rebate it would pay to members and member organizations that execute
qualifying QCC Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today, the Exchange assesses a $.20 per contract QCC Transaction
Fee for a Lead Market Maker,\4\ Market Maker,\5\ Firm \6\ and Broker-
Dealer.\7\ Customers \8\ and Professionals \9\ are not assessed a QCC
Transaction Fee. QCC Transaction Fees apply to electronic QCC Orders
\10\ and Floor QCC Orders.\11\ Rebates are paid on all qualifying
executed electronic QCC Orders and Floor QCC Orders based on the
following six tier rebate schedule:\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The term ``Lead Market Maker'' applies to transactions for
the account of a Lead Market Maker (as defined in Options 2, Section
12(a)). A Lead Market Maker is an Exchange member who is registered
as an options Lead Market Maker pursuant to Options 2, Section
12(a). An options Lead Market Maker includes a Remote Lead Market
Maker which is defined as an options Lead Market Maker in one or
more classes that does not have a physical presence on an Exchange
floor and is approved by the Exchange pursuant to Options 2, Section
11. See Options 7, Section 1(c). The term ``Floor Lead Market
Maker'' is a member who is registered as an options Lead Market
Maker pursuant to Options 2, Section 12(a) and has a physical
presence on the Exchange's trading floor. See Options 8, Section
2(a)(3).
\5\ The term ``Market Maker'' is defined in Options 1, Section
1(b)(28) as a member of the Exchange who is registered as an options
Market Maker pursuant to Options 2, Section 12(a). A Market Maker
includes SQTs and RSQTs as well as Floor Market Makers. See Options
7, Section 1(c). The term ``Floor Market Maker'' is a Market Maker
who is neither an SQT or an RSQT. A Floor Market Maker may provide a
quote in open outcry. See Options 8, Section 2(a)(4).
\6\ The term ``Firm'' applies to any transaction that is
identified by a member or member organization for clearing in the
Firm range at The Options Clearing Corporation. See Options 7,
Section 1(c).
\7\ The term ``Broker-Dealer'' applies to any transaction which
is not subject to any of the other transaction fees applicable
within a particular category. See Options 7, Section 1(c).
\8\ The term ``Customer'' applies to any transaction that is
identified by a member or member organization for clearing in the
Customer range at The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') which
is not for the account of a broker or dealer or for the account of a
``Professional'' (as that term is defined in Options 1, Section
1(b)(45)). See Options 7, Section 1(c).
\9\ The term ``Professional'' applies to transactions for the
accounts of Professionals, as defined in Options 1, Section 1(b)(45)
means any person or entity that (i) is not a broker or dealer in
securities, and (ii) places more than 390 orders in listed options
per day on average during a calendar month for its own beneficial
account(s). See Options 7, Section 1(c).
\10\ Electronic QCC Orders are described in Options 3, Section
12.
\11\ Floor QCC Orders are described in Options 8, Section 30(e).
\12\ Volume resulting from all executed electronic QCC Orders
and Floor QCC Orders, including Customer-to-Customer, Customer-to-
Professional, and Professional-to-Professional transactions and
excluding dividend, merger, short stock interest or reversal or
conversion strategy executions, is aggregated in determining the
applicable volume tier.
[[Page 50653]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rebate per
Tier Threshold contract
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tier 1............................ 0 to 99,999 $0.00
contracts in a
month.
Tier 2............................ 100,000 to 299,999 0.05
contracts in a
month.
Tier 3............................ 300,000 to 499,999 0.07
contracts in a
month.
Tier 4............................ 500,000 to 699,999 0.08
contracts in a
month.
Tier 5............................ 700,000 to 999,999 0.09
contracts in a
month.
Tier 6............................ Over 1,000,000 0.11
contracts in a
month.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange does not pay a QCC Rebate where the transaction is
either: (i) Customer-to-Customer; (ii) Customer-to-Professional; (iii)
Professional-to-Professional; or (iv) a dividend, merger, short stock
interest or reversal or conversion strategy execution (as defined in
Options 7, Section 4). The Exchange will continue to pay rebates on QCC
Orders as described above.
Today, the maximum QCC Rebate to be paid in a given month may not
exceed $750,000. The Exchange proposes to remove the limit on the
amount of QCC Rebate that will be paid in a given month. With this
proposal, members and member organizations will be paid QCC Rebates for
all qualifying executed QCC Orders without limitation.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\13\ in general, and furthers the objectives of
Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\14\ in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any
facility, and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation
NMS, while adopting a series of steps to improve the current market
model, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most
important to investors and listed companies.'' \15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005),
70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (``Regulation NMS Adopting
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Likewise, in NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission
\16\ (``NetCoalition'') the D.C. Circuit upheld the Commission's use of
a market-based approach in evaluating the fairness of market data fees
against a challenge claiming that Congress mandated a cost-based
approach.\17\ As the court emphasized, the Commission ``intended in
Regulation NMS that `market forces, rather than regulatory
requirements' play a role in determining the market data . . . to be
made available to investors and at what cost.'' \18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir. 2010).
\17\ See NetCoalition, at 534-535.
\18\ Id. at 537.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, ``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is
`fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market
system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that
act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to
take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of
order flow from broker dealers'. . . . '' \19\ Although the court and
the SEC were discussing the cash equities markets, the Exchange
believes that these views apply with equal force to the options
markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ Id. at 539 (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No.
59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008)
(SR-NYSEArca-2006-21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to remove the limit on
the amount of QCC Rebate that will be paid in a given month because it
would allow members and member organizations to be paid QCC Rebates,
for all qualifying executed QCC Orders, without limitation. Further,
removing the limit on the amount of QCC Rebate that would be paid in a
given month will permit Phlx to compete more effectively with other
options exchange for QCC Orders by incentivizing market participants to
transact a greater amount of QCC Orders on Phlx in order to receive a
QCC Rebate.
The Exchange believes that it is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to remove the limit on the amount of QCC Rebate that
will be paid in a given month because all qualifying market
participants are eligible to transact QCC Orders, either electronically
or on the Trading Floor, and would, therefore, be eligible to receive
QCC Rebates for all qualifying executed QCC Orders, without limitation.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Inter-Market Competition
The proposal does not impose an undue burden on inter-market
competition. The Exchange believes its proposal remains competitive
with other options markets and will offer market participants with
another choice of where to transact options. The Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants
can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities available at
other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange
must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other
exchanges. Because competitors are free to modify their own fees in
response, and because market participants may readily adjust their
order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to which
fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition is
extremely limited.
Intra-Market Competition
The proposed amendments do not impose an undue burden on intra-
market competition. The Exchange believes that removing the limit on
the amount of QCC Rebate that will be paid in a given month does not
impose an undue burden on competition because all qualifying market
participants are eligible to transact QCC Orders, either
[[Page 50654]]
electronically or on the Trading Floor, and would, therefore, be
eligible to receive QCC Rebates for all qualifying executed QCC Orders,
without limitation.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91e3e4fdf4bcf2fefcfcf4ffe5e2d1e2f4f2bff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="daa8afb6bff7b9b5b7b7bfb4aea99aa9bfb9f4bdb5ac">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2022-33 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2022-33. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2022-33 and should be submitted on
or before September 7, 2022.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-17669 Filed 8-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 17, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.