Notice2022-17433
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange's Pricing Schedule at Equity 7, Section 114(f)
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 15, 2022
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 156 (Monday, August 15, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 156 (Monday, August 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50135-50137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-17433]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-95458; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2022-045]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend the Exchange's Pricing Schedule at Equity 7, Section 114(f)
August 9, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on July 28, 2022, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's Pricing Schedule at
Equity 7, Section 114(f) (``Pricing Schedule'').
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at <a href="https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/nasdaq/rules">https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/nasdaq/rules</a>, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the Exchange's
Pricing Schedule at Equity 7, Section 114(f) applicable to the
Designated Liquidity Provider (``DLP'') \3\ Program. The Exchange
proposes to amend certain of the market quality metrics (``MQMs'') for
rebates applicable to DLPs in Nasdaq-listed securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Equity 7, Section 114(f)(2) defines a ``Designated Liquidity
Provider'' or ``DLP'' as a registered Nasdaq market maker for a
Qualified Security that has committed to maintain minimum
performance standards. A DLP shall be selected by Nasdaq based on
factors including, but not limited to, experience with making
markets in exchange-traded products, adequacy of capital,
willingness to promote Nasdaq as a marketplace, issuer preference,
operational capacity, support personnel, and history of adherence to
Nasdaq rules and securities laws. Nasdaq may limit the number of
DLPs in a security, or modify a previously established limit, upon
prior written notice to members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to amend Equity 7, Section 114(f)(4) to
revise the monthly performance criteria related to the specific rebates
provided under Equity 7, Section 114(f)(5). Specifically, the Exchange
is adding a fifth MQM that concerns auction quality requirements
(``Auction Quality Requirements''). In order for a DLP to qualify for a
DLP Standard Rebate, it will need to meet 4 of 5 of the Standard MQMs
in the assigned exchange-traded product (``ETP'') as measured by Nasdaq
to qualify for the Standard Rebate (rather than the current 4 of 4 of
the Standard MQMs). In order for a DLP to qualify for an Enhanced
Rebate, a DLP will need to meet all 5 Enhanced MQMs in the assigned ETP
as measured by Nasdaq to qualify for the Enhanced Rebate. The current
MQMs are measured on average in the assigned ETP during regular market
hours, however, the Auction Quality Requirements will be measured each
auction against the metrics set forth below.
The Auction Quality Requirement for the Standard Rebate requires
that the auction price must be within 350 basis points (opening) and
100 basis points (closing) of the first reference price within 30
seconds prior to the market open (opening) and within 120 seconds prior
to the market close (closing). The Auction Quality Requirement for the
Enhanced Rebate requires that the auction price must be within 150
basis points (opening) and 50 basis points (closing) of the first
reference price
[[Page 50136]]
within 30 seconds prior to the market open (opening) and within 120
seconds prior to the market close (closing). The Exchange believes that
the Auction Quality Requirement thresholds for the Standard Rebate
outlined above are very achievable for DLPs, while the Auction Quality
Requirement thresholds for the Enhanced Rebate outlined above are
within reach for most DLPs.
The Exchange also proposes to amend Equity 7, Section 114(f)(4) to
revise the monthly performance criteria related to secondary DLPs
(``Secondary DLPs''). Specifically, the current MQM says that the
Secondary DLP qualifies for Secondary DLP Rebates in ETPs if it meets
any 2 of the 4 Enhanced MQMs. This will be revised to say that it must
meet 2 of the Enhanced MQMs, excluding the Auction Quality Requirements
metric. In essence, this means this MQM will remain unchanged.
Description of the Changes
This proposal amends Equity 7, Section 114(f)(4) for certain of the
MQMs tied to the rebates applicable for DLPs in Nasdaq-listed
securities. The Exchange believes that these changes will encourage
DLPs to monitor orders leading up to the auctions and participate in
the auctions for Nasdaq-listed securities. As previously discussed, the
revision to the monthly performance criteria related to Secondary DLPs
in Equity 7, Section 114(f)(4) is being made simply to maintain the
status quo of the MQMs for Secondary DLPs.
Nasdaq is proposing these changes to encourage DLPs to maintain
better market quality leading up to and at the time of the opening and
closing auctions for Nasdaq-listed securities, as well as to remain
competitive with NYSE Arca, Inc. (``Arca'') and Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.
(``Cboe''),\4\ which have both recently added auction quality standards
for their DLP equivalents as well.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities and Exchange Act Release No. 92053 (May 27,
2021), 86 FR 29868 (June 3, 2021) (SR-NYSEArca-2021-43); and
Securities and Exchange Act Release No. 93616 (Nov. 19, 2021), 86 FR
67524 (Nov. 26, 2021) (SR-CboeBZX-2021-073) [sic].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposals are consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,\5\ in general, and further the objectives of
Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\6\ in particular, in that they
provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among members and issuers and other persons using its
facilities and do not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers,
brokers or dealers. The Exchange also notes that its ETP listing
business operates in a highly-competitive market in which market
participants, which include both DLPs and ETP issuers, can readily
transfer their listings or opt not to participate, respectively, if
they deem fee levels, liquidity incentive programs, or any other factor
at a particular venue to be insufficient or excessive. The proposed
rule change reflects a competitive pricing structure designed to
incentivize issuers to list new products and transfer existing products
to the Exchange and market participants to enroll and participate as
DLPs on the Exchange, which the Exchange believes will enhance market
quality in qualified ETPs listed on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b) (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amend Equity 7, Section 114(f)(4) To Revise the Monthly Performance
Criteria Related to Specific Rebates Provided Under Equity 7, Section
114(f)(5), and To Address Secondary DLPs
The Exchange believes that amending Equity 7, Section 114(f)(4) to
revise the monthly performance criteria related to the specific rebates
provided under Equity 7, Section 114(f)(5) by better aligning the
behavior required to qualify for rebates with the nature of the rebates
provided is reasonable because the Exchange must from time to time
assess the effectiveness of the incentives it provides to market
participants in return for the beneficial behavior required to receive
the incentive.
The MQM will be changed from the current requirement to meet all 4
of 4 of the Standard MQMs to qualify for the Standard Rebate to needing
to meet 4 of 5 of the Standard MQMs in the assigned ETP as measured by
Nasdaq to qualify for the Standard Rebate. Additionally, the MQM will
be changed from the current requirement to meet all 4 of 4 of the
Enhanced MQMs to qualify for the Enhanced Rebate to needing to meet all
5 of 5 of the Enhanced MQMs in the assigned ETP as measured by Nasdaq
to qualify for the Enhanced Rebate.
The Exchange believes that the Auction Quality Requirements for the
Standard Rebate and the Enhanced Rebate, as discussed above, are an
equitable allocation and are not unfairly discriminatory because the
Exchange believes that the Auction Quality Requirement thresholds for
the Standard Rebate are very achievable for DLPs, while the Auction
Quality Requirement thresholds for the Enhanced Rebate are within reach
for most DLPs.
The Exchange believes that the proposed revisions to the MQMs for
Primary and Secondary DLPs are an equitable allocation and are not
unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange will apply the same
criteria to all DLPs so that they can qualify for rebates that are
available to all qualifying members and that reward meaningful quote
quality and liquidity in ETPs. The Exchange also believes that the
proposed revisions to the MQMs for Primary and Secondary DLPs are an
equitable allocation and are not unfairly discriminatory among Exchange
members because any member may become a market maker and take the steps
necessary to also become a DLP, including meeting the proposed minimum
criteria under Equity 7, Section 114(f)(4).\7\ The DLP Program is
limited to Exchange market makers because of their unique role in the
markets, including their obligation to provide liquidity in the
securities in which they are registered. Thus, the DLP Program is a
further extension of the market maker's role in providing liquidity in
specific securities, to the benefit of all market participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The Exchange will select DLPs based on the factors in Equity
7, Section 114(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also believes these changes are an equitable
allocation and are not unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange is
proposing these changes to the DLP Program to encourage DLPs to
maintain better market quality leading up to and at the time of the
opening and closing auctions for Nasdaq-listed securities, as well as
to remain competitive with Arca and Cboe,\8\ which have both recently
added auction quality standards for their DLP equivalents as well.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend Equity 7, Section
114(f)(4) to address Secondary DLPs is reasonable because it simply
maintains the status quo of the MQMs for Secondary DLPs.
The Exchange also believes that amending the DLP Program as
proposed is an equitable allocation of rebates and is not unfairly
discriminatory because it will allocate its rebates fairly among its
market participants (i.e., the Exchange will pay higher rebates to DLPs
that meet higher MQMs and will pay DLPs higher fixed rebates for the
ETPs with lower ADVs).
[[Page 50137]]
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants
can readily favor competing venues if they deem rebates (this includes
the related MQMs) or fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive,
or rebate opportunities available at other venues to be more favorable.
In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust its
rebates (this includes the related MQMs) and fees to remain competitive
with other exchanges and with alternative trading systems that have
been exempted from compliance with the statutory standards applicable
to exchanges. Because competitors are free to modify their own rebates
(this includes the related MQMs) and fees in response, and because
market participants may readily adjust their order routing practices,
the Exchange believes that the degree to which rebate (this includes
the related MQMs) and fee changes in this market may impose any burden
on competition is extremely limited.
In this instance, the Exchange is proposing to modify certain of
the MQMs to qualify for the incentives provided to market makers for
participation in the DLP program in an effort to improve the program by
providing more targeted measurements to improve and increase market
quality in all ETPs.
The Exchange uses incentives, such as the rebates of the DLP
program, to incentivize market participants to improve the market. The
Exchange must, from time to time, assess the effectiveness of
incentives (and related MQMs) and adjust them when they are not as
effective as the Exchange believes they could be. Moreover, the
Exchange is ultimately limited in the amount of rebates it may offer.
The proposed amended MQMs are reflective of such an analysis.
The Exchange notes that participation in the DLP program is
entirely voluntary and, to the extent that registered market makers
determine that the MQMs and related rebates are not in line with the
level of market-improving behavior the Exchange requires, a DLP may
elect to deregister as such with no penalty.
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed changes place an
unnecessary burden on competition and, in sum, if the changes proposed
herein are unattractive to market makers, it is likely that the
Exchange will lose participation in the DLP program as a result. Thus,
the Exchange does not believe that the proposal represents a burden on
competition among Exchange members, or that the proposal will impair
the ability of members or competing order execution venues to maintain
their competitive standing in the financial markets.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \10\
thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1e6c6b727b337d7173737b706a6d5e6d7b7d30797168"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c6b4b3aaa3eba5a9ababa3a8b2b586b5a3a5e8a1a9b0">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2022-045 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2022-045. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2022-045 and should be submitted
on or before September 6, 2022.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-17433 Filed 8-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 15, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.