Notice2022-17399
Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products From Brazil, China, India, Japan, South Korea, and the United Kingdom
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 12, 2022
Issuing agencies
International Trade Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 155 (Friday, August 12, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 155 (Friday, August 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 49886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-17399]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-540-543 and 731-TA-1283-1287 and 1290
(Review)]
Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products From Brazil, China, India, Japan,
South Korea, and the United Kingdom
Determinations
On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the
Act''), that revocation of the countervailing duty orders on cold-
rolled steel flat products (``cold-rolled steel'') from China, India,
and South Korea and the antidumping duty orders on cold-rolled steel
from China, India, Japan, South Korea, and the United Kingdom would be
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. The
Commission further determines that revocation of the countervailing and
antidumping duty orders on cold-rolled steel from Brazil would not be
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The record is defined in Sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
\2\ Commissioners Rhonda K. Schmidtlein and Randolph J. Stayin
determine that revocation of the countervailing duty orders on CRS
from Brazil, China, India, and South Korea and the antidumping duty
orders on CRS from Brazil, China, India, Japan, South Korea, and the
United Kingdom would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence
of material injury to an industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Commission instituted these reviews on June 1, 2021 (86 FR
29286) and determined on September 7, 2021 that it would conduct full
reviews (86 FR 52180, September 20, 2021). Notice of the scheduling of
the Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in
connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission,
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on
December 13, 2021 (86 FR 70864). The Commission conducted its hearing
on May 24, 2022. All persons who requested the opportunity were
permitted to participate.
The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its
determinations in these reviews on August 9, 2022. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5339 (August 2022),
entitled Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil, China, India,
Japan, South Korea, and the United Kingdom: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-
540-543 and 731-TA-1283-1287 and 1290 (Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 9, 2022.
Katherine Hiner,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-17399 Filed 8-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 12, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.