Notice2022-17103
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 1 and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Add Subparagraph (f)(4) Regarding Directed Orders to NYSE Arca Rule 7.31-E
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 10, 2022
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 153 (Wednesday, August 10, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48738-48741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-17103]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-95428; File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2022-25]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
of Amendment No. 1 and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Add Subparagraph (f)(4)
Regarding Directed Orders to NYSE Arca Rule 7.31-E
August 4, 2022.
I. Introduction
On April 20, 2022, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to introduce Directed Orders. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on May 4,
2022.\3\ On June 16, 2022, the Commission extended to August 8, 2022,
the time period in which to approve the proposal, disapprove the
proposal, or institute proceedings to determine whether to approve or
disapprove the proposal.\4\ On July 28, 2022, the Exchange filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change with the Commission and
submitted Amendment No. 1 for inclusion in the public comment file.\5\
[[Page 48739]]
The Commission is publishing notice of the filing of Amendment No. 1 to
solicit comment from interested persons, and is approving the proposed
rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, on an accelerated
basis.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94843 (May 4, 2022),
87 FR 28081 (May 10, 2022) (SR-NYSEARCA-2022-25) (``Notice'').
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95116 (June 16,
2022), 87 FR 37543 (June 23, 2022).
\5\ In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange: (i) represents that
Directed Orders will not be routed to an ATS with which the Exchange
has a financial arrangement; and (ii) updates the anticipated
implementation date of the proposed rule change from the second
quarter to the third quarter of 2022. See Letter from Martha
Redding, Associate General Counsel, NYSE Arca, Inc., to Secretary,
Commission (July 28, 2022). Amendment No. 1 is available at <a href="https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nysearca-2022-25/srnysearca202225-20135099-306079.pdf">https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nysearca-2022-25/srnysearca202225-20135099-306079.pdf</a>.
\6\ The Commission received one comment letter that is not
germane to the proposal. See <a href="https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nysearca-2022-25/srnysearca202225-289416.htm">https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nysearca-2022-25/srnysearca202225-289416.htm</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Description of the Proposal, as
Modified by Amendment No. 1
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to modify Rule 7.31-E (Orders and Modifiers)
to add new subparagraph (f)(4) to provide for Directed Orders and to
make other conforming changes to its Rules in connection with the
addition of this new order type on the Exchange. The Directed Order, as
further defined below, would be an order sent to the Exchange to be
routed directly to an alternative trading system (``ATS'') specified by
an ETP Holder.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Directed Orders will not be routed to an ATS with which the
Exchange has a financial arrangement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to add Rule 7.31-E(f)(4), which would define
a Directed Order as a Limit Order with instructions to route on arrival
at its limit price to a specified ATS with which the Exchange maintains
an electronic linkage. Proposed Rule 7.31-E(f)(4) would further provide
that Directed Orders would be available for all securities eligible to
trade on the Exchange. Proposed Rule 7.31-E(f)(4) would also provide
that a Directed Order would not be assigned a working time or interact
with interest on the NYSE Arca Book. The Exchange also proposes to
provide in Rule 7.31-E(f)(4) that the ATS to which a Directed Order is
routed would be responsible for validating whether the order is
eligible to be accepted, and if such ATS determines to reject the
order, the order would be cancelled.
Proposed Rule 7.31-E(f)(4)(A) would provide that a Directed Order
must be designated for the Exchange's Core Trading Session, as defined
in Rule 7.34-E(a)(2).\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Because the Exchange proposes that Directed Orders may only
be designated for the Core Trading Session, the Exchange also
proposes conforming changes to Rule 7.34-E (Trading Sessions).
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to modify Rule 7.34-E(c)(1)(E)
to provide that Directed Orders designated for the Early Trading
Session would be rejected and Rule 7.34-E(c)(3)(C) to provide that
Directed Orders designated for the Late Trading Session would be
rejected.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule 7.31-E(f)(4)(A) would further provide that a Directed
Order must be designated with a Time in Force modifier of IOC \9\ or
Day \10\ and would be routed to the specified ATS with such modifier.
The Exchange proposes that a Directed Order designated IOC would be
traded in whole or in part on the ATS to which it is routed after
receipt of the order, and any untraded quantity would be cancelled. The
Exchange proposes that a Directed Order designated Day would expire at
the end of the Core Trading Session on the day it is entered. Proposed
Rule 7.31-E(f)(1)(A) would also provide that a Directed Order may not
be designated with any other modifiers defined in Rule 7.31-E.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Rule 7.31-E(b)(2), which provides that a Limit Order may
be designated with an Immediate-or-Cancel (``IOC'') modifier.
\10\ See Rule 7.31-E(b)(1), which provides that orders may be
designated with a Day modifier, and that an order to buy or sell
designated Day, if not traded, will expire at the end of the
designated session on the day on which it was entered.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule 7.31-E(f)(4)(B) would provide that a Directed Order
in a security that is having its initial listing on the Exchange would
be rejected if received before the IPO Auction concludes.
Proposed Rule 7.31-E(f)(4)(C) would provide that, during a trading
halt or pause, an incoming Directed Order would be rejected.
Proposed Rule 7.31-E(f)(4)(D) would provide that a request to
cancel a Directed Order designated Day would be routed to the ATS to
which the order was routed.
The Exchange also proposes a conforming change to Rule 7.19-E (Pre-
Trade Risk Controls). The Exchange proposes to modify Rule 7.19-
E(a)(5), which sets forth the definition of Gross Credit Risk Limit and
currently provides that unexecuted orders in the NYSE Arca Book, orders
routed on arrival pursuant to Rule 7.37-E(a)(1), and executed orders
are included for purposes of calculating the Gross Credit Risk Limit.
The Exchange proposes to modify Rule 7.19-E(a)(5) to specify that
orders routed on arrival pursuant to Rule 7.31-E(f)(4) would also be
included for purposes of the Gross Credit Risk Limit calculation.
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would
facilitate additional trading opportunities by offering ETP Holders the
ability to designate orders submitted to the Exchange to be routed to
an ATS of their choosing for execution. The Exchange believes the
proposed change would encourage ETP Holders to utilize the Exchange as
a venue for order entry and further believes that the proposed change
could create efficiencies for ETP Holders by enabling them to send
orders that they wish to route to an alternate destination through the
Exchange, thereby enabling them to leverage order entry protocols and
specifications already configured for their interactions with the
Exchange. The Exchange notes that the Directed Order, as proposed,
would operate similarly to the Primary Only Order already offered by
the Exchange, which is an order that is routed directly to the primary
listing market on arrival, without being assigned a working time or
interacting with interest on the NYSE Arca Book.\11\ The Exchange also
believes that the Directed Order would offer ETP Holders functionality
akin to order types and routing options that currently exist on other
equities exchanges.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Rule 7.31-E(f)(1). NYSE Arca also offers variations of
the Primary Only Order, including the Primary Only Until 9:45 Order,
which is a Limit or Inside Limit Order that, on arrival and until
9:45 a.m. Eastern Time, routes to the primary listing market, and
the Primary Only Until 3:55 Order, which is a Limit or Inside Limit
Order entered on the Exchange until 3:55 p.m. Eastern Time, after
which time the order is cancelled on the Exchange and routed to the
primary listing market. See Rules 7.31-E(f)(2) and (f)(3). The
Exchange's affiliated exchanges NYSE American LLC (``NYSE
American''), NYSE Chicago, Inc. (``NYSE Chicago''), and NYSE
National, Inc. (``NYSE National'') (collectively, the ``Affiliated
Exchanges'') also offer the Primary Only Order and variations
thereof. See NYSE American Rules 7.31E(f)(1)--(f)(3); NYSE Chicago
Rules 7.31(f)(1)--(f)(3); NYSE National Rules 7.31(f)(1)--(f)(3).
\12\ See, e.g., Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq''), Equity 4,
Equity Trading Rules, Rule 4758(a)(ix) (defining the Nasdaq Directed
Order as an order designed to use a routing strategy under which the
order is directed to an automated trading center other than Nasdaq,
as directed by the entering party, without checking the Nasdaq
Book); Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``EDGX'') Rules 11.8(c)(7)
(defining the Routing/Directed ISO order type as an ISO that
bypasses the EDGX system and is immediately routed by EDGX to a
specified away trading center for execution) and 11.11(g)(2)
(providing for the DRT routing option, in which an order is routed
to an alternative trading system as instructed); Cboe EDGA Exchange,
Inc. (``EDGA'') Rules 11.8(c)(7) (defining the Routing/Directed ISO
order type as an ISO that bypasses the EDGA system and is
immediately routed by EDGA to a specified away trading center for
execution) and 11.11(g)(2) (providing for the DRT routing option, in
which an order is routed to an alternative trading system as
instructed); Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'') Rules 11.13(b)(3)(D)
(providing for the DRT routing option, in which an order is routed
to an alternative trading system as instructed) and 11.13(b)(3)(F)
(defining the Directed ISO routing option, under which an ISO order
would bypass the BZX system and be sent to a specified away trading
center); Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. (``BYX'') Rules 11.13(b)(3)(D)
(providing for the DRT routing option, in which an order is routed
to an alternative trading system as instructed) and 11.13(b)(3)(F)
(defining the Directed ISO routing option, under which an ISO order
would bypass the BYX system and be sent to a specified away trading
center). The Exchange also believes that the Directed Order would
provide functionality similar to the C-LNK routing strategy formerly
offered by EDGA, in which C-LNK orders bypassed EDGA's local book
and routed directly to a specified Single Dealer Platform
destination. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82904 (March
20, 2018), 83 FR 12995 (March 26, 2018) (SR-CboeEDGA-2018-004)
(Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change To Expand an Offering Known a Cboe Connect To Provide
Connectivity to Single-Dealer Platforms Connected to the Exchange's
Network and To Propose a Per Share Executed Fee for Such Service).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 48740]]
Because of the technology changes associated with this proposed
rule change, the Exchange will announce the implementation date by
Trader Update.\13\ Subject to effectiveness of this proposed rule
change, the Exchange anticipates that the proposed change will be
implemented in the third quarter of 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The Exchange will also provide information regarding the
ATS(s) to which a Directed Order may be designated to route by
Trader Update.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934,\14\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\15\ in particular, because it is
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a
free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is designed to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and promote just and equitable principles of trade because the
Directed Order would offer ETP Holders access to additional trading
opportunities by permitting them to designate orders submitted to the
Exchange to be routed directly to a specified ATS for execution. The
Exchange further believes that the proposed change would remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market by
offering ETP Holders the option to send orders that they wish to route
to an alternate destination for execution through the Exchange, which
would create efficiencies to the extent ETP Holders are able to
leverage existing protocols and specifications. Finally, the Exchange
notes that the proposed functionality is not novel, as both the
Exchange and other exchanges offer their members functionality whereby
an exchange routes orders on behalf of a member to a specified trading
center without such order interacting with the exchange's book.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See notes 11 & 12, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange believes that
the proposed rules governing Directed Orders would promote competition
because they would provide for an order type on the Exchange that would
facilitate additional trading opportunities for market participants.
The Exchange further believes that the proposed rules would allow it to
offer ETP Holders functionality similar to order types and routing
options that exist on other equities exchanges, thereby enabling the
Exchange to compete with such exchanges.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See note 12, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Discussion and Commission Findings
After careful review of the proposal, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.\18\ In
particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,\19\ which requires, among other things, that the rules of a
national securities exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest, and that the rules of a national securities exchange
not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is reasonably
designed to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free
and open market and a national market system because it would provide
ETP Holders with additional trading opportunities by providing them
with the option to designate orders to be routed by the Exchange
directly to a specified ATS for execution. The use of Directed Orders
would be voluntary, and the Exchange represents that it would not
direct orders to any ATSs with which the Exchange has a financial
relationship. The Commission also believes that the proposed rule
change would not permit unfair discrimination among customers, brokers,
or dealers because Directed Orders will be available to all ETP Holders
on an equal basis. Finally, the Commission believes that the proposed
changes to Exchange Rule 7.19-E(a)(5) will ensure that Directed Orders
are included in the calculation of Gross Credit Risk Limit.
IV. Solicitation of Comments on Amendment No. 1 to the Proposed Rule
Change
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether Amendment No. 1
is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the
following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2a585f464f07494547474f445e596a594f49044d455c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6113140d044c020e0c0c040f1512211204024f060e17">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2022-25 on the subject line.
[[Page 48741]]
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2022-25. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2022-25 and should be submitted
on or before August 31, 2022.
V. Accelerated Approval of Amendment No. 1
As noted above,\20\ in Amendment No. 1, as compared to the original
proposal,\21\ the Exchange: (i) represents that Directed Orders will
not be routed to an ATS with which the Exchange has a financial
arrangement; and (ii) updates the anticipated implementation date of
the proposed rule change from the second quarter to the third quarter
of 2022. The Commission finds that Amendment No. 1 to the proposal
raises no novel regulatory issues, that it is reasonably designed to
protect investors and the public interest, and that it is consistent
with the requirements of the Act. Accordingly, the Commission finds
good cause, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\22\ to approve the
proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, on an accelerated
basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See supra note 5.
\21\ See Notice, supra note 3.
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\23\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSEARCA-2022-25), as
modified by Amendment No. 1, be, and hereby is, approved on an
accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-17103 Filed 8-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 10, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.