Notice2022-17066
Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada: Final Results and Final Rescission, in Part, of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 2020
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 9, 2022
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that producers and exporters of certain softwood lumber products (softwood lumber) from Canada received countervailable subsidies during the period of review (POR), January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. With respect to 18 companies, we are rescinding this administrative review because none of the companies had a reviewable entry during the POR.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 152 (Tuesday, August 9, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48455-48459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-17066]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-122-858]
Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada: Final Results and
Final Rescission, in Part, of the Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review, 2020
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
producers and exporters of certain softwood lumber products (softwood
lumber) from Canada received countervailable subsidies during the
period of review (POR), January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020.
With respect to 18 companies, we are rescinding this administrative
review because none of the companies had a reviewable entry during the
POR.
DATES: Applicable August 9, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Hall-Eastman (Canfor), John
Hoffner (JDIL), Kristen Johnson/Samuel Brummitt (Resolute), and Laura
Griffith (West Fraser), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482-1468, (202) 482-3315, (202) 482-4793/(202) 482-7851, and
(202) 482-6430, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce published the preliminary results of this countervailing
duty (CVD) administrative review of softwood lumber from Canada on
February 4, 2022, and invited interested parties to comment.\1\ For a
summary of the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results and a
full discussion of the issues raised by parties for the final results,
see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada:
Preliminary Results, Partial Rescission, and Preliminary Intent to
Rescind, in Part, the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review;
2020, 87 FR 6500 (February 4, 2022) (Preliminary Results).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Countervailing
Duty Order on Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada; 2020,''
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues
and Decision Memorandum). The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, members
of the public may access the IDM directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this order is certain softwood lumber
products from Canada. For a complete description of the scope of the
Order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Final Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part
Based on our analysis of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
data and comments received from interested parties, we determine that
the 18 companies listed below had no reviewable shipments, sales, or
entries of subject merchandise during the POR. Absent evidence of
shipments on the record, we are rescinding the administrative review of
these companies, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). For further
information, see ``Final Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part''
in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
AA Trading Ltd.
Blanchette & Blanchette Inc.
Canada Pallet Corp.
Careau Bois Inc.
Cedarcoast Lumber Products
CWP--Montreal inc.
Goldband Shake & Shingle Ltd.
Imperial Cedar Products, Ltd.
Les Produits Forestiers D&G Lt[eacute]e (aka, D&G Forest Products Ltd.)
Marcel Lauzon Inc.
North American Forest Products Ltd. (located in Saint-Quentin, New
Brunswick)
Sapphire Lumber Company
Scierie Alexandre Lemay & Fils Inc.
Skeena Sawmills Ltd
Sonora Logging Ltd.
[[Page 48456]]
Suncoast Industries Inc.
Western Timber Products, Inc.
WWW Timber Products Ltd.
Analysis of Subsidy Programs and Comments Received
Commerce conducted this CVD administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act). The subsidy programs under review, and the issues raised in case
and rebuttal briefs submitted by the interested parties, are discussed
in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues that the
parties raised, and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, is attached to this notice at Appendix I. Based on our
analysis of the comments received from the interested parties, we made
changes to the subsidy rates calculated for certain respondents. For a
discussion of these changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review
Because the rates calculated for the companies selected for
individual review are above de minimis and not based entirely on facts
available, we applied a subsidy rate based on a weighted average of the
subsidy rates calculated for the reviewed companies using sales data
submitted by those companies to calculate a rate for the companies not
selected for review. This is consistent with the methodology that we
would use in an investigation to establish the all-others rate,
pursuant to section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act. A list of all non-selected
companies is included in Appendix II.
For further information on the calculation of the non-selected
rate, see ``Final Ad Valorem Rate for Non-Selected Companies under
Review'' in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. For a list of the non-
selected companies, see Appendix II to this notice.
Final Results of Administrative Review
In accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) and of the Act and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5), we determine that the following total estimated
countervailable subsidy rates exist for 2020:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy rate
Companies ad valorem
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canfor Corporation and its cross-owned affiliates \3\... 0.95 percent
J.D. Irving, Limited and its cross-owned affiliates \4\. 2.41 percent
Resolute FP Canada Inc. and its cross-owned affiliates 10.10 percent
\5\....................................................
West Fraser Mills Ltd. and its cross-owned affiliates 3.62 percent
\6\....................................................
Non-Selected Companies.................................. 3.83 percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed for these
final results of review within five days of the date of publication of
this notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Commerce finds the following companies to be cross-owned
with Canfor Corporation: Canadian Forest Products., Ltd. and Canfor
Wood Products Marketing, Ltd.
\4\ Commerce finds the following companies to be cross-owned
with J.D. Irving, Limited: Miramichi Timber Holdings Limited, The
New Brunswick Railway Company, Rothesay Paper Holdings Ltd., and St.
George Pulp & Paper Limited.
\5\ Commerce finds the following companies to be cross-owned
with Resolute FP Canada Inc.: Produits Forestiers Maurice SEC. and
Resolute Forest Products Inc.
\6\ Commerce finds the following companies to be cross-owned
with West Fraser Mills Ltd.: West Fraser Timber Co., Ltd., Blue
Ridge Lumber Inc., Sunpine Inc., Sundre Forest Products Inc.,
Manning Forest Products, Ltd., and West Fraser Alberta Holdings,
Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(2), Commerce will determine, and CBP shall assess,
countervailing duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise
covered by this review.
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier
than 41 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 356.8(a).
Cash Deposit Requirements
In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, Commerce
intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated
countervailing duties in the amounts shown for the companies subject to
this review. For all non-reviewed companies, we will instruct CBP to
continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at
the most recent company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the
company, as appropriate. These cash deposits, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to
APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing and publishing these final results of
administrative review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4) and 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: August 3, 2022.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations.
Appendix I--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. List of Issues
III. Case History
IV. Period of Review
V. Final Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part
VI. Scope of the Order
VII. Subsidies Valuation
VIII. Analysis of Programs
IX. Final Ad Valorem Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review
X. Analysis of Comments
A. General Issues
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Respects Canadian Sovereignty
Comment 2: Whether Commerce's Specificity Analysis for Certain
Qu[eacute]bec Programs Is Consistent With the Law
Comment 3: Whether Commerce's Countervailable Findings for
Qu[eacute]bec's Grant Programs Are Appropriate
Comment 4: Whether Electricity Curtailment Programs Are
Countervailable
Comment 5: Whether Agreements with Consumers to Reduce Energy
Consumption and GHG Are Grants
Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Rescind Lemay's Review
Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Consider Climate Change Goals
Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should Have Used a Sampling Methodology
to Select Respondents for This Review
B. General Stumpage Issues
Comment 9: Whether Stumpage Is an Untied Subsidy
C. Alberta Stumpage Issues
Comment 10: Whether the Alberta Stumpage Market Is Distorted
Comment 11: Whether TDA Survey Prices Are an Appropriate Benchmark
for Alberta Crown-Origin Stumpage
Comment 12: Whether FRIAA Dues are Part of the Alberta Stumpage
Price
D. British Columbia Stumpage Issues
Comment 13: Whether There Is a Useable Tier-One Benchmark in British
Columbia
[[Page 48457]]
E. New Brunswick Stumpage Issues
Comment 14: Whether the Private Stumpage Market in New Brunswick Is
Distorted and Should be Used as Tier-One Benchmarks
F. Ontario Stumpage Issues
Comment 15: Whether Ontario's Crown Stumpage Market Is Distorted
Comment 16: Whether the MNP Ontario Survey Prices May Serve as an
Appropriate Tier One Benchmark
Comment 17: Whether Ontario's Stumpage Prices Distort the Log Market
G. Qu[eacute]bec Stumpage Issues
Comment 18: Whether Qu[eacute]bec's Stumpage Market Is Distorted
Comment 19: Whether Qu[eacute]bec's Auction Prices Are an
Appropriate Tier-One Benchmark to Measure Whether the GOO and the
GOQ Sold Crown-Origin Standing Timber for LTAR
H. British Columbia Stumpage Benchmark Issues
Comment 20: Whether Commerce Should Use F2M Pricing Data as a
Benchmark for BC Stumpage and the BC LER
Comment 21: Use and Selection of a Beetle-Killed Benchmark Price for
the Final Results
Comment 22: Whether Commerce's Selection of a Log Volume Conversion
Factor Was Appropriate
Comment 23: Whether Commerce Should Adjust the BC Log Benchmark
Price for Certain Scaling and G&A Costs
Comment 24: Whether to Account for BC's ``Stand-as-a-Whole''
Stumpage Pricing
I. Nova Scotia Stumpage Benchmark Issues
Comment 25: Whether Private Standing Timber Prices in Nova Scotia
Are Available in the Provinces at Issue
Comment 26: Whether the Tree Size in Nova Scotia, as Measured by
Diameter, Is Comparable to Tree Size in Qu[eacute]bec, Ontario, and
Alberta
Comment 27: Whether SPF Tree Species in Nova Scotia Are Comparable
to SPF Tree Species in Qu[eacute]bec, Ontario, and Alberta
Comment 28: Whether Nova Scotia's Forest Is Comparable to the
Forests of New Brunswick, Qu[eacute]bec, Ontario, and Alberta
Comment 29: Whether to Revise the Conversion Factor Used in
Calculation of the Nova Scotia Benchmark
Comment 30: Whether Commerce Should Adjust the Method Used to Index
the Nova Scotia Benchmark
Comment 31: Whether the Nova Scotia Benchmark is Comparable or
Should Be Adjusted to Account for Log Product Characteristics
Comment 32: Reliability of Nova Scotia Private-Origin Standing
Timber Benchmark
Comment 33: Whether Nova Scotia Is Comparable to Qu[eacute]bec,
Ontario, and Alberta in Terms of Haulage Costs and Whether to
Otherwise Adjust the Nova Scotia Benchmark to Account for Such
Differences
Comment 34: Whether to Adjust the Nova Scotia Benchmark to Account
for Spruce Budworm-Infested Timber
Comment 35: Whether to Adjust the Nova Scotia Benchmark to Account
for Beetle-Killed-Timber Harvested in Alberta
Comment 36: Whether Pulp Mill Consumption of Standing Timber in Nova
Scotia Creates Unique Market Conditions that Are Not Comparable to
Market Conditions in Qu[eacute]bec, Ontario, and Alberta
Comment 37: Whether to Add a C$3.00/m3 Silviculture Fee to the Nova
Scotia Benchmark
Comment 38: Whether to Compare Government Transaction-Specific
Prices to an Average Benchmark Price or Offset the LTAR Benefit
Using Negative Benefits
Comment 39: Whether the Nova Scotia Benchmark Adequately Accounts
for Regional and Country-Level Differences
Comment 40: Whether Commerce Should Publicly Disclose the Anonymized
Data that Comprise the 2017-2018 Private Market Survey and the Price
Index Used to Calculate the Nova Scotia Benchmark
Comment 41: Whether Log Pricing Differences Between Nova Scotia and
New Brunswick Require an Adjustment to the Nova Scotia Benchmark
Utilized in JDIL's Stumpage Benefit Analysis
Comment 42: Whether Commerce Should Make Adjustments to Stumpage
Rates Paid by the Respondents to Account for ``Total Remuneration''
in Alberta, New Brunswick, Ontario, and Qu[eacute]bec
J. Log Export Restraint Issues
Comment 43: Whether Commerce Should Find Restrictions on Log Exports
in Alberta, New Brunswick, Ontario, and Qu[eacute]bec to Be
Countervailable Subsidies
Comment 44: Whether the LER in British Columbia Results in a
Financial Contribution
Comment 45: Whether Log Export Restraints Have an Impact in British
Columbia
K. Purchase of Goods for MTAR Issues
<bullet> British Columbia
Comment 46: Whether Commerce Correctly Calculated a Benefit for BC
Hydro EPAs
Comment 47: Whether Benefits Under the BC Hydro EPA Program Are Tied
to Electricity Production and Not Lumber Products
<bullet> Ontario and Qu[eacute]bec
Comment 48: Whether Resolute's Ontario and Qu[eacute]bec Electricity
PPAs Are Tied to Non-Subject Merchandise
Comment 49: Whether Commerce Applied the Correct Benchmark to
Calculate the Benefit Under the IESO CHP III Program
Comment 50: Whether the IESO CHP III Program Is Specific
Comment 51: Whether Commerce Applied the Correct Benchmark to
Calculate the Benefit Under the Hydro-Qu[eacute]bec PAE 2011-01
Program
Comment 52: Whether the Hydro-Qu[eacute]bec PAE 2011-01 Program Is
Specific
L. Grant Program Issues
<bullet> Federal
Comment 53: Whether Funds West Fraser Received for a Lignin Plant
through the SDTC Program are Tied to Non-Subject Merchandise
Comment 54: Whether the SDTC Program Is Specific
Comment 55: Whether the Green Jobs Program Is Countervailable
<bullet> Alberta
Comment 56: Whether the CES Program Is Specific
Comment 57: Whether the TIER Program Is Countervailable
Comment 58: Whether the Payments Made from AESO to West Fraser for
Load Shedding Constitute a Financial Contribution
Comment 59: Whether the AESO Load Shedding Program Is a Grant
Comment 60: Whether the Benefit Calculation For Load Shedding
Payments to West Fraser Should Be Adjusted For West Fraser's Costs
Incurred
Comment 61: Whether the AESO Load Shedding Program Is Specific
<bullet> British Columbia
Comment 62: Whether the Purchase of Carbon Offsets From Canfor
Is Countervailable
<bullet> New Brunswick
Comment 63: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Find the
Silviculture and License Management Programs Countervailable
Comment 64: Whether Commerce Should Find LIREPP Countervailable
<bullet> Ontario
Comment 65: Whether the IESO Demand Response Provides a Benefit and
Is Specific
Comment 66: Whether the IESO IEI Is Specific
Comment 67: Whether the OFRFP Is Countervailable
Comment 68: Whether the TargetGHG Is Specific
Comment 69: Whether the TargetGHG Is Tied to Non-Subject Merchandise
<bullet> Qu[eacute]bec
Comment 70: Whether the PCIP and PIAF Are Countervailable
Comment 71: Whether the PDB Is Countervailable
Comment 72: Whether the C[ocirc]te-Nord Wood Residue Program Is
Countervailable
Comment 73: Whether the Investment Program in Public Forests
Affected by Natural or Anthropogenic Disturbances Is Countervailable
Comment 74: Whether the MCRP Is Countervailable
Comment 75: Whether the PIB Is Countervailable
Comment 76: Whether the [Eacute]coPerformance Is Specific
Comment 77: Whether the FDRCMO Is Countervailable
Comment 78: Whether the MFOR Is De Facto Specific
Comment 79: Whether FDRCMO and MFOR Are Non-Recurring Subsidies
Comment 80: Whether the Hydro-Qu[eacute]bec IEO Provides a Benefit
and Is Specific
Comment 81: Whether the Hydro-Qu[eacute]bec Special L Rate Is Tied
to the Production of Paper
[[Page 48458]]
Comment 82: Whether the Hydro-Qu[eacute]bec Special L Rate Confers a
Benefit
Comment 83: Whether the Hydro-Qu[eacute]bec EDL Is De Jure Specific
Comment 84: Whether Road Clearing Contracts with Hydro-Qu[eacute]bec
Are Countervailable
M. Tax and Other Revenue Foregone Programs Issues
<bullet> Federal
Comment 85: Whether the Federal and Provincial SR&ED Tax Credits Are
Specific
Comment 86: Whether the ACCA for Class 29 and Class 53 Assets
Program Is Specific
Comment 87: Whether Commerce Was Correct to Treat the ACCA as an
Individual Program
Comment 88: Whether the Class 1 Additional CCA Program Provides a
Financial Contribution that Confers a Benefit
Comment 89: Whether the Class 1 Additional CCA Program Is Specific
<bullet> Alberta
Comment 90: Whether Tax Savings Under Alberta's Schedule D Are
Countervailable
Comment 91: Whether Alberta's TEFU Program Is Countervailable
Comment 92: Whether the Property Tax EOA Is Countervailable
<bullet> British Columbia
Comment 93: Whether BCAA Section 9 Closure Allowance Provides a
Financial Contribution and Is Specific
Comment 94: Whether British Columbia's Coloured Fuel Program Is
Countervailable
Comment 95: Whether the CleanBC CIIP and CIF Are Countervailable
<bullet> New Brunswick
Comment 96: Whether Commerce Correctly Calculated the Benefit JDIL
Received from the Atlantic Investment Tax Credit
Comment 97: Whether Commerce Correctly Calculated the Benefit JDIL
Received from the New Brunswick Research & Development Tax Credit
Comment 98: Whether Commerce Should Find New Brunswick's Property
Tax Incentives for Private Forest Producers Program Countervailable
Comment 99: Whether the Gasoline and Fuel Tax Program Provides a
Financial Contribution in the Form of Revenue Forgone or Can Be
Found Specific
<bullet> Qu[eacute]bec
Comment 100: Whether the Tax Credit for Investments Relating to
Manufacturing and Processing Equipment Is Specific
Comment 101: Whether the Tax Credit for an On-the-Job Training Is
Specific
Comment 102: Whether the Research Consortium Tax Credit Is De Facto
Specific
Comment 103: Whether the Refund of Fuel Tax Paid on Fuel Used for
Stationary Purposes Is Specific
Comment 104: Whether the Additional CCA Relating to Manufacturing
and Processing Equipment Is Specific
N. Company-Specific Issues
<bullet> Resolute
Comment 105: Whether Commerce Should Reconsider If the GOO Forgave
Debt Owed by Resolute
Comment 106: Whether Commerce Erred in Calculating Resolute's
Benefit Under the Additional CCA Relating to Manufacturing and
Processing Equipment Program
<bullet> West Fraser
Comment 107: Whether to Revise West Fraser's Sales Denominators
XI. Recommendation
Appendix II--Non-Selected Exporters/Producers
1074712 BC Ltd.
5214875 Manitoba Ltd.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ In the Initiation Notice, AM Lumber Brokerage was not
included. Subsequently, we determined that 5214875 Manitoba was
doing business under the name AM Lumber Brokerage. Thus, entries
made under company name AM Lumber Brokerage should be entered under
5214875 Manitoba. See Initiation Notice, 86 FR at 12610.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
54 Reman
752615 B.C Ltd., Fraserview Remanufacturing Inc., dba Fraserview
Cedar Products.
9224-5737 Quebec Inc. (aka A.G. Bois)
Absolute Lumber Products, Ltd.
Adwood Manufacturing Ltd.
Aler Forest Products, Ltd.
All American Forest Products Inc.
Alpa Lumber Mills Inc.
Andersen Pacific Forest Products Ltd.
Anglo-American Cedar Products, Ltd.
Antrim Cedar Corporation
Aquila Cedar Products, Ltd.
Arbec Lumber Inc. (aka Arbec Bois Doeuvre Inc.)
Aspen Planers Ltd.
B&L Forest Products Ltd
B.B. Pallets Inc.
Babine Forest Products Limited
Bakerview Forest Products Inc.
Bardobec Inc.
BarretteWood Inc.
Barrette-Chapais Ltee
Benoit & Dionne Produits Forestiers Ltee
Best Quality Cedar Products Ltd.
Blanchet Multi Concept Inc.
Bois Aise de Montreal Inc.
Bois Bonsai Inc.
Bois Daaquam inc. (aka Daaquam Lumber Inc.)
Bois D'oeuvre Cedrico Inc. (aka Cedrico Lumber Inc.)
Bois et Solutions Marketing SPEC, Inc. (aka SPEC Wood & Marketing
Solution or SPEC Wood and Marketing Solutions Inc.)
Boisaco Inc.
Boscus Canada Inc.
Boucher Bros. Lumber Ltd.
BPWood Ltd.
Bramwood Forest Inc.
Brunswick Valley Lumber Inc.
Burrows Lumber (CD) Ltd., Theo A. Burrows Lumber Company Limited
(aka Burrows Lumber Inc.)
Busque & Laflamme Inc.
Campbell River Shake & Shingle Co., Ltd.
Canasia Forest Industries Ltd.
Canyon Lumber Company, Ltd.
Carrier & Begin Inc.
Carrier Forest Products Ltd.
Carrier Lumber Ltd.
Carter Forest Products Inc.
Cedar Island Forest Products Ltd.
Cedar Valley Holdings Ltd.
Cedarland Forest Products Ltd.
Cedarline Industries, Ltd.
Central Cedar Ltd.
Central Forest Products Inc.
Centurion Lumber, Ltd.
Chaleur Forest Products Inc.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ In the Initiation Notice, we included the company name
``Fornebu Lumber Co. Ltd.'' See Initiation Notice, 86 FR at 12608.
Subsequently, we determined that the successor-in-interest to
Fornebu Lumber Co. Ltd. is Chaleur Forest Products Inc. See Certain
Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Notice of Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 86 FR 43189
(August 6, 2021) (Chaleur CCR Final).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chaleur Forest Products LP \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ In the Initiation Notice, we included the company name
``Chaleur Sawmills LP.'' See Initiation Notice, 86 FR at 12607.
Subsequently, we determined that the successor-in-interest to
Chaleur Sawmills LP is Chaleur Forest Products LP. See Chaleur CCR
Final.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Channel-ex Trading Corporation
Clair Industrial Development Corp. Ltd.
Clermond Hamel Ltee
CNH Products Inc.
Coast Mountain Cedar Products Ltd.
Columbia River Shake & Shingle Ltd./Teal Cedar Products Ltd., dba
The Teal Jones Group \10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ In the Initiation Notice, ``Teal Cedar Products Ltd.'' and
``The Teal-Jones Group'' were inadvertently listed separately. See
Initiation Notice, 86 FR at 12610.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commonwealth Plywood Co. Ltd.
Comox Valley Shakes (2019) Ltd.
Conifex Fibre Marketing Inc.
Cowichan Lumber Ltd.
CS Manufacturing Inc., dba Cedarshed
CWP--Industriel Inc.
D & D Pallets Ltd.
Dakeryn Industries Ltd.
Decker Lake Forest Products Ltd.
Delco Forest Products Ltd.
Delta Cedar Specialties Ltd.
Devon Lumber Co. Ltd.
DH Manufacturing Inc.
Direct Cedar Supplies Ltd.
Distribution Rioux Inc.
Doubletree Forest Products Ltd.
Downie Timber Ltd.
Dunkley Lumber Ltd.
EACOM Timber Corporation
East Fraser Fiber Co. Ltd.
Edgewood Forest Products Inc.
Elrod Cartage Ltd.
ER Probyn Export Ltd.
Falcon Lumber Ltd.
Fontaine Inc.
Foothills Forest Products Inc.
Fraser Specialty Products Ltd.
FraserWood Industries Ltd.
Furtado Forest Products Ltd.
Gilbert Smith Forest Products Ltd.
Glandell Enterprises Inc.
Goldwood Industries Ltd.
Goodfellow Inc.
Gorman Bros. Lumber Ltd.
Greendale Industries Inc.
Greenwell Resources Inc.
Griff Building Supplies Ltd.
[[Page 48459]]
Groupe Crete Chertsey Inc.
Groupe Crete Division St-Faustin Inc.
Groupe Lebel Inc.
Groupe Lignarex inc.
H.J. Crabbe & Sons Ltd.
Haida Forest Products Ltd.
Hampton Tree Farms, LLC dba Hampton Lumber Sales Canada
Hornepayne Lumber LP
Hudson Mitchell & Sons Lumber Inc.
Hy Mark Wood Products Inc.
Interfor Corporation
Interfor Sales & Marketing Ltd.
Intertran Holdings Ltd. dba Richmond Terminal
Island Cedar Products Ltd
J&G Log Works Ltd.
J.H. Huscroft Ltd.
Jan Woodlands (2001) Inc.
Jasco Forest Products Ltd.
Jazz Forest Products Ltd.
Jhajj Lumber Corporation
Kalesnikoff Lumber Co. Ltd.
Kan Wood, Ltd.
Kebois Ltd (aka Kebois Ltee)
Kelfor Industries Ltd.
Kermode Forest Products Ltd.
Keystone Timber Ltd.
L'Atelier de Readaptation au Travail de Beauce Inc.
Lafontaine Lumber Inc.
Langevin Forest Products Inc.
Lecours Lumber Co. Limited
Leisure Lumber Ltd.
Les Bardeaux Lajoie Inc.
Les Bois d'oeuvre Beaudoin Gauthier inc.
Les Bois Martek Lumber
Les Bois Traites M.G. Inc.
Les Chantiers de Chibougamau ltd.
Les Industries P.F. Inc.
Leslie Forest Products Ltd.
Lignum Forest Products LLP
Linwood Homes Ltd.
Lonestar Lumber Inc.
Lulumco Inc.
Magnum Forest Products, Ltd.
Maibec inc.
Manitou Forest Products Ltd.
Marwood Ltd.
Materiaux Blanchet Inc.
Mid Valley Lumber Specialties, Ltd.
Midway Lumber Mills Ltd.
Mill & Timber Products Ltd.
Millar Western Forest Products Ltd.
Mirax Lumber Products Ltd.
Mobilier Rustique (Beauce) Inc.
Monterra Lumber Mills Limited
Morwood Forest Products Inc.
Multicedre ltee
Nakina Lumber Inc.
National Forest Products Ltd.
Nicholson and Cates Ltd
Norsask Forest Products Limited Partnership
North American Forest Products Ltd. (located in Abbotsford, British
Columbia)
North Enderby Timber Ltd.
Northland Forest Products Ltd.
Olympic Industries, Inc./Olympic Industries Inc-Reman Code/Olympic
Industries ULC/Olympic Industries ULC-Reman/Olympic Industries ULC-
Reman Code
Oregon Canadian Forest Products Inc. dba Oregon Canadian Forest
Products
Pacific Coast Cedar Products, Ltd.
Pacific Lumber Remanufacturing Inc.
Pacific Pallet, Ltd.
Pacific Western Wood Works Ltd.
PalletSource Inc.
Parallel Wood Products Ltd.
Pat Power Forest Products Corporation
Phoenix Forest Products Inc.
Pioneer Pallet & Lumber Ltd.
Porcupine Wood Products Ltd.
Portbec Forest Products Ltd (aka Les Produits Forestiers Portbec
Ltee)
Power Wood Corp.
Precision Cedar Products Corp.
Prendiville Industries Ltd. (aka Kenora Forest Products)
Produits Forestiers Petit Paris Inc.
Produits forestiers Temrex, s.e.c. (aka Temrex Forest Products LP)
Produits Matra Inc. and Sechoirs de Beauce Inc.
Promobois G.D.S. inc.
Rayonier A.M. Canada GP
Rembos Inc.
Rene Bernard Inc.
Rick Dubois
Rielly Industrial Lumber Inc.
River City Remanufacturing Inc.
S&R Sawmills Ltd
S&W Forest Products Ltd.
San Industries Ltd.
Sawarne Lumber Co. Ltd.
Scierie St-Michel inc.
Scierie West Brome Inc.
Scott Lumber Sales
Shakertown Corp.
Sigurdson Forest Products Ltd.
Silvaris Corporation
Sinclar Group Forest Products Ltd.
Skana Forest Products Ltd.
Source Forest Products
South Beach Trading Inc.
South Coast Reman Ltd.
South Fraser Container Terminals
Specialiste du Bardeau de Cedre Inc (aka SBC)
Spruceland Millworks Inc.
Star Lumber Canada Ltd.
Suncoh Custom Lumber Ltd.
Sundher Timber Products Inc.
Surplus G Rioux
Surrey Cedar Ltd.
Taan Forest Limited Partnership
Taiga Building Products Ltd.
Tall Tree Lumber Company
Terminal Forest Products Ltd.
The Wood Source Inc.
Tolko Industries Ltd. and Tolko Marketing and Sales Ltd.
Trans-Pacific Trading Ltd.
Triad Forest Products Ltd.
Twin Rivers Paper Co. Inc.
Tyee Timber Products Ltd.
Usine Sartigan Inc.
Vaagen Fibre Canada, ULC
Valley Cedar 2 Inc.
Vancouver Specialty Cedar Products Ltd.
Visscher Lumber Inc
W.I. Woodtone Industries Inc.
Waldun Forest Product Sales Ltd.
Watkins Sawmills Ltd.
West Bay Forest Products Ltd.
Western Forest Products Inc.
Western Lumber Sales Limited
Westminster Industries Ltd.
Weston Forest Products Inc.
Weyerhaeuser Co.
White River Forest Products L.P.
Winton Homes Ltd.
Woodline Forest Products Ltd.
Woodstock Forest Products
Woodtone Specialties Inc.
[FR Doc. 2022-17066 Filed 8-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 9, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.