Rule2022-16025
Air Plan Approval; Arizona, California, Nevada; Emissions Statements Requirements
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
July 29, 2022
Effective
August 29, 2022
Issuing agencies
Environmental Protection Agency
Abstract
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action to approve revisions, under the Clean Air Act (CAA or "Act"), to portions of the Arizona, California, and Nevada State Implementation Plans (SIPs) regarding emissions statements (ES) requirements for the 2015 ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). We are also taking final action to approve ES certifications ("certifications") adopted by various California air districts that existing SIP-approved rules are adequate to meet the ES requirements for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. In addition, we are finalizing our proposal that the following Arizona, California, and Nevada nonattainment areas (NAAs) meet the ES requirements for the 2015 ozone NAAQS: Phoenix-Mesa, Yuma, Amador County, Butte County, Imperial County, Los Angeles-San Bernardino Counties (West Mojave Desert), Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, Nevada County (Western part), Riverside County (Coachella Valley), Sacramento Metro, San Diego County, San Francisco Bay Area, San Joaquin Valley, San Luis Obispo (Eastern part), Sutter Buttes, Tuolumne County, Ventura County, and Las Vegas. We are also finalizing our proposal that two NAAs meet requirements for prior ozone NAAQS. Lastly, we are finalizing our proposal that Maricopa County Air Quality District (MCAQD) Rule 100, section 503, which we approved on February 15, 2022, meets the ES requirements for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 145 (Friday, July 29, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 145 (Friday, July 29, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45657-45663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-16025]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2021-0623; FRL-8997-02-R9]
Air Plan Approval; Arizona, California, Nevada; Emissions
Statements Requirements
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve revisions, under the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``Act''),
to portions of the Arizona, California, and Nevada State Implementation
Plans (SIPs) regarding emissions statements (ES) requirements for the
2015 ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). We are also
taking final action to approve ES certifications (``certifications'')
adopted by various California air districts that existing SIP-approved
rules are adequate to meet the ES requirements for the 2015 ozone
NAAQS. In addition, we are finalizing our proposal that the following
Arizona, California, and Nevada nonattainment areas (NAAs) meet the ES
requirements for the 2015 ozone NAAQS: Phoenix-Mesa, Yuma, Amador
County, Butte County, Imperial County, Los Angeles-San Bernardino
Counties (West Mojave Desert), Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin,
Nevada County (Western part), Riverside County (Coachella Valley),
Sacramento Metro, San Diego County, San Francisco Bay Area, San Joaquin
Valley, San Luis Obispo (Eastern part), Sutter Buttes, Tuolumne County,
Ventura County, and Las Vegas. We are also finalizing our proposal that
two NAAs meet requirements for prior ozone NAAQS. Lastly, we are
finalizing our proposal that Maricopa County Air Quality District
(MCAQD) Rule 100, section 503, which we approved on February 15, 2022,
meets the ES requirements for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
DATES: This rule is effective August 29, 2022.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2021-0623. All documents in the docket are
listed on the <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information. If you need assistance
in a language other than English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you,
please
[[Page 45658]]
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sina Schwenk-Mueller, EPA Region IX,
75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 947-4100 or
by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98cbfbf0effdf6f3d5edfdf4f4fdeab6cbf1f6f9d8fde8f9b6fff7ee"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c2f1f140b1912173109191010190e522f15121d3c190c1d521b130a">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On December 14, 2021 (86 FR 70996), the EPA proposed to approve the
following rules into their respective state SIPs.
Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adopted/
Agency Rule No. Rule title revised Submitted Deemed complete
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona Department of Arizona Annual \a\ 12/4/2020 12/22/2020 Complete by
Environmental Quality (ADEQ). Administrative Emissions Operation of
Code (AAC) R18- Inventory Law (COL), 6/
2-327. Questionnaire 22/2020.
and Emissions
Statement.
Pinal County Air Quality Rule 3-1-103... Annual 7/1/2020 7/21/2020 COL, 1/21/2021.
Control District (AQCD). Emissions
Inventory
Questionnaire
and Emissions
Statement.
Amador Air District.......... Rule 428....... Emissions 3/16/2021 6/10/2021 Letter, 9/25/
Statements. 2021.
Butte County Air Quality Rule 434....... Emissions 6/25/2020 7/27/2020 COL, 1/27/2021.
Management District (AQMD). Statements.
El Dorado County AQMD........ Rule 1000...... Emission 8/25/2020 9/22/2020 COL, 3/22/2021.
Statement.
El Dorado County AQMD........ Rule 1000.1 \b\ Emission 8/25/2020 9/22/2020 COL, 3/22/2021.
Statement
Waiver.
Feather River AQMD........... Rule 4.8....... Further 8/3/2020 12/15/2020 COL, 6/15/2021.
Information.
Imperial County Air Pollution Rule 116....... Emissions 11/3/2020 2/19/2021 COL, 8/19/2021.
Control District (APCD). Statement and
Certification.
Placer County APCD........... Rule 503....... Emission 10/8/2020 12/15/2020 COL, 6/15/2021.
Statement.
San Luis Obispo County AQMD.. Rule 222....... Federal 6/24/2020 7/27/2020 COL, 1/27/2021.
Emission
Statement.
Tuolumne County APCD......... Rule 428....... Emissions 7/21/2020 8/3/2020 COL, 2/3/2021.
Statements.
Clark County Division of Air Section 12.9.1 Annual \d\ 8/18/2020 10/15/2020 COL, 4/15/2021.
Quality. \c\. Emissions
Statement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ The effectiveness date of this rulemaking is 1/19/2021.
\b\ Our proposed action incorrectly listed this rule number as 1001.1. The correct rule number is 1000.1.
\c\ NDEP submitted Section 12.9 ``Annual Emissions Statement and Inventory Requirements,'' which includes 12.9.1
``Annual Emissions Statement'' and 12.9.2 and 12.9.3. On 1/24/2022, NDEP withdrew 12.9.2 and 12.9.3 from SIP
consideration.
\d\ State effective date.
On December 14, 2021 (86 FR 70996), the EPA proposed to approve the
following emissions statements certifications into the California SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ All certifications in this table were submitted by the State
of California. The ``Adopted'' and ``Submitted'' and ``Deemed
Complete'' dates listed in Table 2 refer to those of the
certifications.
Table 2--Submitted Emissions Statements Certifications
[2015 Ozone NAAQS] \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Existing SIP
Local agency approved Rule Rule title Adopted Submitted Deemed complete
No.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Antelope Valley AQMD......... Rule 107 Certification 7/21/2020 8/3/2020 COL, 2/3/2021.
(2012); 78 FR of Submissions
21545 (April and Emission
11, 2013). Statements.
Mojave Desert AQMD........... Rule 107 Certification 10/28/2019 12/20/2019 COL, 6/20/2020.
(1992); 69 FR and Emission
29880 (May 26, Statements.
2004).
Northern Sierra AQMD......... Rule 513 Emissions 1/25/2021 3/23/2021 COL, 9/23/2021.
(2016); 82 FR Statements and
28240 (June Recordkeeping.
21, 2017) \a\.
Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD. Rule 105 (1996) Emissions 7/23/2020 8/3/2020 COL, 2/3/2021.
73 FR 32240 Statement.
(June 6, 2008).
San Diego County APCD........ Rule 19.3 Emissions 10/14/2020 1/12/2021 COL, 7/12/2021.
(1996); 65 FR Information.
12472 (March
9, 2000).
San Francisco Bay Area AQMD.. Reg 2--Permits Federal 7/15/2020 8/3/2020 COL, 2/3/2021.
2-1-429 Emissions
(2004); 83 FR Statement.
23372 (May 21,
2018).
San Joaquin Valley APCD...... Rule 1160 Emissions 6/18/2020 8/3/2020 COL, 2/3/2021.
(1992); 84 FR Statements
3302 (February (1992).
12, 2019).
[[Page 45659]]
South Coast AQMD............. Rule 301 Permitting and 6/5/2020 8/3/2020 COL, 2/3/2021.
(2019); 84 FR Associated
52005 (October Fees
1, 2019) \ b\. (paragraphs
(e)(1), except
(e)(1)(C),
(e)(2), (5),
and (8) only).
Ventura County APCD.......... Rule 24 (1992); Source 7/14/2020 7/29/2020 COL, 1/29/2021.
65 FR 76567 Recordkeeping,
(December 7, Reporting and
2000). Emissions
Statements.
Yolo-Solano AQMD............. Rule 3.18 Emissions 9/9/2020 11/2/2020 COL, 5/2/2021.
(1992); 69 FR Statements.
29880 (May 26,
2004).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ We note that in our December 11, 2017 action, Findings of Failure to Submit State Implementation Plan
Submittals for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) (82 FR 58118), we erroneously
listed the ``Emission statement'' requirement for Nevada County (Western part) in Table 1--Findings of Failure
to Submit Certain Required SIP Elements for 2008 Ozone NAAQS Nonattainment Areas.
\b\ South Coast AQMD has jurisdiction over Riverside (Coachella), and Rule 301 applies to both the South Coast
Air Basin and the Riverside (Coachella) NAAs.
In addition to the certifications for the 2015 ozone NAAQS, the San
Francisco Bay Area AQMD is certifying that Reg 2--Permits 2-1-429 meets
section 182(a)(3)(B) requirements for the 1997 and 2008 ozone NAAQS,
and the San Diego County APCD is certifying that Rule 19.3 meets
section 182(a)(3)(B) requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
We are finalizing approval of these rules and certifications
because we determined that they comply with the relevant CAA
requirements. Our proposed action contains more information on our
evaluation of the rules and certifications.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received one comment.
Comment: The commenter expresses support for air pollution control
and states that it is important that all the listed counties in our
proposal maintain stringent emission standards. However, the commenter
is concerned that the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation or in any other area where a tribe has jurisdiction. The
commenter worries that this could provide loopholes to pollute on
tribal reservations and wants to know if tribes want to be excluded
from state emission control measures.
Response: The comment refers to the EPA's statement that ``the SIP
is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other
area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction.'' The EPA typically uses such statements in actions
regarding state SIP submittals to explain the non-applicability of the
SIP in relevant areas of Indian country as a jurisdictional matter. The
States of Arizona, California, and Nevada submitted the rules in this
action to apply only on lands where the States and relevant local
agencies have jurisdiction. Under the Clean Air Act, states generally
lack jurisdiction to implement plans over Indian reservations and other
areas of Indian country where the EPA or a tribe has demonstrated
tribal jurisdiction. For this reason, the EPA typically excludes such
areas from its approvals of SIPs. The commenter's concern regarding the
inapplicability of the SIP in areas where an Indian tribe has
jurisdiction does not bear upon whether the rules that are the subject
of our action meet the applicable requirements for approval of a SIP
submission. Therefore, we do not find that the comment provides a basis
for the EPA to change its assessment of the submitted rules or our
proposal to approve them.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rules
and certifications as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as
authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA fully approves the
submitted rules and certifications because they fulfill all relevant
requirements. We are finalizing our proposed approval that the
following 2015 ozone nonattainment areas have met CAA section
182(a)(3)(B) requirements: Phoenix-Mesa, AZ; Yuma, AZ; Amador County,
CA; Butte County, CA; Imperial County, CA; Los Angeles-San Bernardino
Counties, CA (West Mojave Desert); Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin,
CA; Nevada County (Western part), CA; Riverside County (Coachella
Valley) CA; Sacramento Metro, CA; San Diego County, CA; San Francisco
Bay Area, CA; San Joaquin Valley, CA; San Luis Obispo (Eastern part),
CA; Sutter Buttes, CA; Tuolumne, County, CA; Ventura County, CA; and
Las Vegas, NV. We are also finalizing our proposed approval that the
San Francisco Bay Area NAA meets the emissions statements requirements
for the 1997 and 2008 ozone NAAQS, and the San Diego County NAA meets
these requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. Lastly, we are finalizing
our proposal that MCAQD Rule 100, section 503, which the EPA finalized
in a separate action on February 15, 2022 (87 FR 8418), meets the
emissions statements requirements for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
California rules described in section I of this preamble and set forth
below in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52. For the States of Arizona
and Nevada, the rules described in section I of the preamble and set
forth below in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 have been approved by
the EPA for inclusion in the SIP, have been incorporated by reference
by the EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under
sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final
rulemaking of the EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference
in the next update to the SIP compilation.\2\ The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these documents available through
<a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 45660]]
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
<bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
<bullet> Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
<bullet> Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
<bullet> Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
<bullet> Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
<bullet> Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
<bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
<bullet> Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
<bullet> Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 27, 2022. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: July 20, 2022.
Kerry Drake,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental
Protection Agency amends Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart D--Arizona
0
2. In Sec. 52.120, paragraph (c):
0
a. Amend Table 2 is amended by revising the entry ``R18-2-327''; and
0
b. Amend Table 9 by revising the entry ``3-1-103''.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 52.120 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
[[Page 45661]]
Table 2--EPA-Approved Arizona Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Additional
State citation Title/subject effective date EPA approval date explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article 3 (Permits and Permit Revisions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
R18-2-327.................. Annual Emissions 1/19/2021 [INSERT Federal Submitted on December
Inventory Register CITATION], 22, 2020.
Questionnaire and July 29, 2022.
Emissions Statement.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Table 9--EPA-Approved Pinal County Air Pollution Control Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Additional
State citation Title/subject effective date EPA approval date explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 3. Permits and Permit Revisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
3-1-103.................... Annual emissions 7/1/2020 [INSERT Federal Submitted on July 21,
inventory Register CITATION], 2020.
questionnaire and July 29, 2022.
emissions statement.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Subpart F--California
0
3. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(190)(i)(C)(3),
(C)(4) and (D)(2), (c)(381)(i)(A)(8), (c)(389)(i)(B)(6),
(c)(442)(i)(G)(2), (c)(457)(i)(D)(2), (c)(562)(i)(A)(2), (c)(573),
(574), (575), (576), (577), (578), (579), (580), (581), (582) and (583)
to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan-in part.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(190) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) * * *
(3) Previously approved on May 26, 2004 in paragraph
(c)(190)(i)(C)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
(c)(575)(i)(A)(1), Rule 1000 adopted on September 21, 1992.
(4) Previously approved on May 26, 2004 and added in an error
correction on August 29, 2019, in paragraph (c)(190)(i)(C)(2) of this
section and now deleted with replacement in (c)(575)(i)(A)(2), Rule
1000.1 adopted on September 21, 1992.
(D) * * *
(2) Previously approved on May 26, 2004 in paragraph
(c)(190)(i)(D)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
(c)(576)(i)(A)(1), Rule 4.8 adopted on September 14, 1992.
* * * * *
(381) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(8) Previously approved on December 7, 2012 in paragraph
(c)(381)(i)(A)(6) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
(c)(583)(i)(A)(1), Rule 116, ``Emissions Statement and Certification,''
adopted on February 23, 2010.
* * * * *
(389) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(6) Previously approved on December 7, 2012 in paragraph
(c)(389)(i)(B)(4) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
(c)(576)(i)(B)(1), Rule 503, ``Emission Statement,'' amended on August
12, 2010.
* * * * *
(442) * * *
(i) * * *
(G) * * *
(2) Previously approved on June 11, 2015 in paragraph
(c)(442)(i)(G)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
(c)(573)(i)(A)(1), Rule 434, ``Emission Statements,'' adopted on April
25, 2013.
* * * * *
(457) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) * * *
(2) Previously approved on June 11, 2015 in paragraph
(c)(457)(i)(D)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
(c)(573)(i)(B)(1), Rule 222, ``Federal Emission Statement,'' adopted on
May 28, 2014.
* * * * *
(562) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(2) Rule 116, ``Emission Statement and Certification,'' revised on
November 3, 2020.
* * * * *
(573) Amended regulations for the following APCDs were submitted on
July 27, 2020 by the Governor's designee as an attachment to a letter
dated July 23, 2020.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Butte County Air Quality
Management District.
(1) Rule 434, ``Emission Statements,'' amended on June 25, 2020.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District.
[[Page 45662]]
(1) Rule 222, ``Federal Emission Statement,'' revised on June 24,
2020.
(2) [Reserved]
(ii) [Reserved]
(574) New and amended regulations and materials for the following
APCDs were submitted on August 3, 2020 by the Governor's designee as an
attachment to a letter dated August 3, 2020.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Tuolumne County Air Pollution
Control District.
(1) Rule 428, ``Emission Statements,'' adopted on July 21, 2020.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) Additional materials. (A) Antelope Valley Air Quality
Management District.
(1) ``Emission Statement Certification,'' adopted July 21, 2020.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District.
(1) ``Emissions Statements Certification for the 2015 Ozone
NAAQS,'' adopted July 23, 2020.
(2) [Reserved]
(C) San Francisco Bay Area Air Quality Management District.
(1) ``Clean Air Act Emissions Statement Certification,'' adopted
July 15, 2020.
(2) [Reserved]
(D) San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District.
(1) ``Emissions Statement Program Certification for the 2015 8-Hour
Ozone Standard,'' adopted June 18, 2020.
(2) [Reserved]
(E) South Coast Air Quality Management District.
(1) ``Emissions Statement Certification,'' adopted June 5, 2020.
(2) [Reserved]
(575) Amended regulations for the following APCDs were submitted on
September 22, 2020 by the Governor's designee as an attachment to a
letter dated September 18, 2020.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) El Dorado County Air Quality Management District.
(1) Rule 1000, ``Emission Statement,'' revised on August 25, 2020.
(2) Rule 1000.1, ``Emission Statement Waiver,'' revised on August
25, 2020.
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) [Reserved]
(576) Amended regulations for the following APCDs were submitted on
December 15, 2020 by the Governor's designee as an attachment to a
letter dated December 14, 2020.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Feather River Air Quality
Management District.
(1) Rule 4.8, ``Further Information,'' amended on August 3, 2020.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) Placer County Air Pollution Control District.
(1) Rule 503, ``Emission Statement,'' amended on October 8, 2020.
(2) [Reserved]
(ii) [Reserved]
(577) Amended regulations for the following APCDs were submitted on
June 10, 2021 by the Governor's designee as an attachment to a letter
dated June 10, 2021.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Amador Air District.
(1) Rule 428, ``Emissions Statements,'' adopted on March 16, 2021.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) [Reserved]
(578) The following plan was submitted on December 20, 2019 by the
Governor's designee.
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) Additional materials. (A) Mojave Desert Air Quality Management
District.
(1) ``Emission Statement Certification,'' adopted October 28, 2019.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(579) The following plan was submitted on July 29, 2020 by the
Governor's designee.
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) Additional materials.(A) Ventura County Air Pollution Control
District.
(1) ``2020 Emissions Statement Certification for Ventura County,
California,'' adopted July 14, 2020.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(580) The following plan was submitted on November 2, 2020 by the
Governor's designee.
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) Additional materials. (A) Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management
District.
(1) ``2015 Federal Ozone Standard Emissions Statement Certification
for the Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District,'' adopted
September 9, 2020.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(581) The following plan was submitted on January 12, 2021 by the
Governor's designee.
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) Additional materials. (A) San Diego County Air Pollution
Control District.
(1) ``Emissions Statement Rule Certification,'' adopted October 14,
2020.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(582) The following plan was submitted on March 23, 2021 by the
Governor's designee.
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) Additional materials. (A) Northern Sierra Air Quality
Management District.
(1) ``Certification of Emissions Statements Rule Adequacy,''
adopted January 25, 2021.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(583) Amended regulations for the following APCD were submitted on
February 19, 2021 by the Governor's designee as an attachment to a
letter dated February 18, 2021.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Imperial County Air Pollution
Control District.
(1) Rule 116, ``Emissions Statement and Certification,'' revised on
November 3, 2020.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) [Reserved]
Subpart DD--Nevada
0
4. In Sec. 52.1470, Table 3 is amended by adding an entry for
``Section 12.9.1'' after the entry for ``Section 12.7: Subsection
12.7.5'' to read as follows:
(c) * * *
* * * * *
Table 3--EPA-Approved Clark County Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Additional
State citation Title/subject effective date EPA approval date explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Section 12.9.1............. Annual Emissions 8/18/2020 [INSERT Federal Submitted on October
Statement. Register CITATION], 15, 2020.
July 29, 2022.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 45663]]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2022-16025 Filed 7-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on July 29, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.