VHA Claims and Appeals Modernization
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is amending its regulations concerning its claims and appeals process governing various programs administered by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). The Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017 (hereafter referred to as the AMA) amended the procedures applicable to administrative review and appeal of VA decisions on claims for benefits, creating a new, modernized review system. This amendment will sunset certain VHA regulations which are inconsistent with the AMA.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 140 (Friday, July 22, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 140 (Friday, July 22, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43746-43748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15572]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Parts 17 and 70
RIN 2900-AQ44
VHA Claims and Appeals Modernization
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is amending its
regulations concerning its claims and appeals process governing various
programs administered by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). The
Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017 (hereafter
referred to as the AMA) amended the procedures applicable to
administrative review and appeal of VA decisions on claims for
benefits, creating a new, modernized review system. This amendment will
sunset certain VHA regulations which are inconsistent with the AMA.
DATES: Effective date: This rule is effective August 22, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erik Shepherd, Chief, VHA Claims and
[[Page 43747]]
Appeals Modernization, Office of Regulations, Appeals, and Policy,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20420, (202) 450-7882 (This is not a toll-free number.).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a document published in the Federal
Register on February 21, 2020, VA published a proposed rule to revise
38 CFR 17.133, 17.276, 17.904, 17.1006, and 70.40 to make clear that
VHA reconsideration is available only in legacy claims. VA also
proposed to revise Sec. 17.132 to clarify that appeal to the Board of
Veterans' Appeals, as the sole avenue for disputing a VA decision
regarding payment or reimbursement for care at a non-VA facility or by
a non-VA provider, will apply only to payment decisions made for legacy
claims. 85 FR 10118. VA provided a 60-day comment period, which ended
on April 21, 2020. VA received six comments on the proposed rule. We
adopt the proposed rule as final, with one technical change. The
technical change removes the proposed amendments to 38 CFR 17.276 from
this rulemaking for the reasons stated below.
Two comments expressed general support for VHA's adoption of
processes contained in the AMA, but did not suggest any changes to the
rule as proposed. To the extent that one comment indicated that the
full potential has not yet been met for VHA appeals, and any
opportunity to speed up the process should be considered and executed,
VA has implemented the AMA as generally applicable to benefits
administered throughout VA, to include benefits administered by VHA.
The current rulemaking only addressed current VHA regulations that are
inconsistent with the AMA and the VA Claim and Appeals Modernization
regulatory amendments. As the proposed rule did not attempt to
delineate any VHA specific appeals process updates, we believe that
this portion of the comment is outside the scope of the proposed
rulemaking. VA appreciates these comments and makes no changes based on
these comments.
Two comments recommended that VA open new medical schools. Because
the proposed rule sought to discontinue certain legacy processes
associated with VA claims, and did not address other VA processes or
more specifically the concept of VA establishing medical schools, these
comments are beyond the scope of the proposed rule, and we make no
changes based on these comments.
One comment alleged discrimination and referred to a Historically
Underutilized Business Zone (HUB Zone) appeal. Without more information
in the comment to link the alleged discrimination to the proposed rule,
we believe a general reference to a HUB Zone appeal is beyond the scope
of the proposed rule that sought to discontinue certain legacy
processes associated with VA claims. We therefore make no changes based
on this comment.
Lastly, one comment encouraged VA to revise Sec. 17.133 as
proposed to add U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development-VA
Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) Program benefits as an enumerated benefit
subject to reconsideration under the legacy administrative processes.
VA's proposed rule contemplated neither expansion, contraction, nor
clarification of the benefits subject to the legacy administrative
processes. Instead, the preamble to the proposed rule merely stated
that reconsiderations would only be available to legacy appeals as the
term legacy appeal is defined in parts 3 and 19 of title 38 of the Code
of Federal Regulations. As the proposed rule did not attempt to define
or clarify what is contemplated in the definition of legacy appeal, we
believe that this comment is also outside the scope of the proposed
rulemaking. VA is not making any changes based on this comment.
In a related rulemaking, RIN 2900-AP02, VA proposed changes to 38
CFR 17.276. See 83 FR 2396. RIN 2900-AP02 was finalized and published
first and, as such, any changes to 38 CFR 17.276 are removed and
included in RIN 2900-AP02. See 87 FR 41594. VA received no comments on
the proposed changes to 38 CFR 17.276 in either rulemaking. Given that
the changes proposed to 38 CFR 17.276 are now addressed by RIN 2900-
AP02, any changes in the original proposed rule related to 38 CFR
17.276 are removed from this rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this rule is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
12866. The Regulatory Impact Analysis associated with this rulemaking
can be found as a supporting document at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-
612). This rule only affects procedures regarding the appeals process;
it does not affect the cost of filing an appeal nor any amount duly
owed to a small entity. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the
initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of 5
U.S.C. 603 and 604 do not apply.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This final rule would have no such effect
on State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3521).
Assistance Listing
The Assistance Listing numbers and titles for the programs affected
by this document are 64.009--Veterans Medical Care Benefits; 64.039--
CHAMPVA.
Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs designated this rule
as not a major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Parts 17 and 70
Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Alcoholism,
Claims, Day care, Dental health, Drug abuse, Foreign relations,
Government contracts, Grant programs-health, Grant programs-veterans,
Health care, Health facilities, Health professions, Health records,
Homeless, Medical and dental schools, Medical devices, Medical
research, Mental health programs, Nursing homes, Philippines, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
[[Page 43748]]
Scholarships and fellowships, Travel and transportation expenses,
Veterans.
Signing Authority
Denis McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on June 17, 2022, and authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for
publication electronically as an official document of the Department of
Veterans Affairs.
Consuela Benjamin,
Regulations Development Coordinator, Office of Regulation Policy &
Management, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, we amend 38 CFR parts 17
and 70 as set forth below:
PART 17--MEDICAL
0
1. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read in part as
follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and as noted in specific sections.
* * * * *
0
2. Amend Sec. 17.132 by:
0
a. Designating the undesignated paragraph as paragraph (b).
0
b. Adding paragraph (a).
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 17.132 Appeals.
(a) This section applies only to legacy claims.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 17.133 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 17.133 Procedures.
(a) Scope. This section sets forth reconsideration procedures
regarding claims for benefits administered by the Veterans Health
Administration (VHA). This section applies only to legacy claims.
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec. 17.904 by:
0
a. Designating the undesignated paragraph as paragraph (b).
0
b. Adding paragraph (a).
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 17.904 Review and appeal process.
(a) This section applies only to legacy claims.
* * * * *
0
5. Amend Sec. 17.1006 by revising the final sentence to read as
follows:
Sec. 17.1006 Decisionmakers.
* * * Any decision denying a benefit must be in writing and inform
the claimant of VA appeal rights.
* * * * *
PART 70--VETERANS TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS
0
6. The authority citation for part 70 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 111, 111A, 501, 1701, 1714, 1720,
1728, 1782, 1783, and E.O. 11302, 31 FR 11741, 3 CFR, 1966-1970
Comp., p. 578, unless otherwise noted.
0
7. Amend Sec. 70.40 by:
0
a. Designating the undesignated paragraph as paragraph (b).
0
b. Adding paragraph (a).
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 70.40 Administrative procedures.
(a) This section applies only to legacy claims.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2022-15572 Filed 7-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
</pre></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.