Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Geophysical Surveys Related to Oil and Gas Activities in the Gulf of Mexico
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), as amended, its implementing regulations, and NMFS' MMPA Regulations for Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Geophysical Surveys Related to Oil and Gas Activities in the Gulf of Mexico, notification is hereby given that a Letter of Authorization (LOA) has been issued to QuarterNorth Energy LLC (QuarterNorth) for the take of marine mammals incidental to geophysical survey activity in the Gulf of Mexico.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 132 (Tuesday, July 12, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41288-41290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14740]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[RTID 0648-XC103]
Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to Geophysical Surveys Related to Oil and Gas Activities in
the Gulf of Mexico
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of issuance of Letter of Authorization.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), as
amended, its implementing regulations, and NMFS' MMPA Regulations for
Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Geophysical Surveys Related to Oil
and Gas Activities in the Gulf of Mexico, notification is hereby given
that a Letter of Authorization (LOA) has been issued to QuarterNorth
Energy LLC (QuarterNorth) for the take of marine mammals incidental to
geophysical survey activity in the Gulf of Mexico.
DATES: The LOA is effective from July 1, 2022, through December 31,
2022.
ADDRESSES: The LOA, LOA request, and supporting documentation are
available online at: <a href="http://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/incidental-take-authorization-oil-and-gas-industry-geophysical-survey-activity-gulf-mexico">www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/incidental-take-authorization-oil-and-gas-industry-geophysical-survey-activity-gulf-mexico</a>. In case of problems accessing these documents, please call the
contact listed below (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben Laws, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427-8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking
is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed authorization is
provided to the public for review.
An authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS
finds that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses (where
relevant), and if the permissible methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such takings
are set forth. NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103
as an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.
Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the
MMPA defines ``harassment'' as: any act of pursuit, torment, or
annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild (Level A harassment); or (ii) has the
potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not
limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding,
[[Page 41289]]
feeding, or sheltering (Level B harassment).
On January 19, 2021, we issued a final rule with regulations to
govern the unintentional taking of marine mammals incidental to
geophysical survey activities conducted by oil and gas industry
operators, and those persons authorized to conduct activities on their
behalf (collectively ``industry operators''), in Federal waters of the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico (GOM) over the course of 5 years (86 FR 5322;
January 19, 2021). The rule was based on our findings that the total
taking from the specified activities over the 5-year period will have a
negligible impact on the affected species or stock(s) of marine mammals
and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of
those species or stocks for subsistence uses. The rule became effective
on April 19, 2021.
Our regulations at 50 CFR 217.180 et seq. allow for the issuance of
LOAs to industry operators for the incidental take of marine mammals
during geophysical survey activities and prescribe the permissible
methods of taking and other means of effecting the least practicable
adverse impact on marine mammal species or stocks and their habitat
(often referred to as mitigation), as well as requirements pertaining
to the monitoring and reporting of such taking. Under 50 CFR
217.186(e), issuance of an LOA shall be based on a determination that
the level of taking will be consistent with the findings made for the
total taking allowable under these regulations and a determination that
the amount of take authorized under the LOA is of no more than small
numbers.
Summary of Request and Analysis
QuarterNorth plans to conduct a single checkshot velocity survey
within Green Canyon OCS Lease Block 39. See Section 1.1 of
QuarterNorth's application for a map. QuarterNorth plans to use an 8-
element, 1,170 cubic inch (in\3\) airgun array. Please see
QuarterNorth's application for additional detail.
Consistent with the preamble to the final rule, the survey effort
proposed by QuarterNorth in its LOA request was used to develop LOA-
specific take estimates based on the acoustic exposure modeling results
described in the preamble (86 FR 5322, 5398; January 19, 2021). In
order to generate the appropriate take number for authorization, the
following information was considered: (1) survey type; (2) location (by
modeling zone \1\); (3) number of days; and (4) season.\2\ The acoustic
exposure modeling performed in support of the rule provides 24-hour
exposure estimates for each species, specific to each modeled survey
type in each zone and season.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For purposes of acoustic exposure modeling, the GOM was
divided into seven zones. Zone 1 is not included in the geographic
scope of the rule.
\2\ For purposes of acoustic exposure modeling, seasons include
Winter (December-March) and Summer (April-November).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
No checkshot velocity surveys were included in the modeled survey
types, and use of existing proxies (i.e., 2D, 3D NAZ, 3D WAZ, Coil) is
generally conservative for use in evaluation of these survey types.
Summary descriptions of these modeled survey geometries are available
in the preamble to the proposed rule (83 FR 29212, 29220; June 22,
2018). Coil was selected as the best available proxy survey type for
QuarterNorth checkshot survey because the spatial coverage of the
planned surveys is most similar to the coil survey pattern. For the
planned survey, a single checkshot velocity survey for the collection
of borehole seismic data is planned to occur at the surface above a
well head located in approximately 1,923 feet (ft) of water. Receivers
will be lowered directly into the well from a wireline. There will be
no towing or movement of the airgun array, as it will be operated at a
static location above the well. The coil survey pattern in the model
was assumed to cover approximately 144 kilometers squared (km\2\) per
day (compared with approximately 795 km\2\, 199 km\2\, and 845 km\2\
per day for the 2D, 3D NAZ, and 3D WAZ survey patterns, respectively).
Among the different parameters of the modeled survey patterns (e.g.,
area covered, line spacing, number of sources, shot interval, total
simulated pulses), NMFS considers area covered per day to be most
influential on daily modeled exposures exceeding Level B harassment
criteria. Because QuarterNorth's planned survey is expected to cover no
additional area as a stationary source the coil proxy is most
representative of the effort planned by QuarterNorth in terms of
predicted Level B harassment.
In addition, all available acoustic exposure modeling results
assume use of a 72-element, 8,000 in\3\ array. Thus, estimated take
numbers for this LOA are considered conservative due to the differences
in both the airgun array (8-elements, 1,170 in\3\), and in daily survey
area planned by QuarterNorth (as mentioned above), as compared to those
modeled for the rule.
The survey is planned to occur for a maximum of 1 day in Zone 5.
The survey may occur in either season. Therefore, the take estimates
for each species are based on the season that has the greater value for
the species (i.e., winter or summer).
In this case, use of the exposure modeling produces results that
are smaller than average GOM group sizes for multiple species (Maze-
Foley and Mullin, 2006). NMFS' typical practice in such a situation is
to increase exposure estimates to the assumed average group size for a
species in order to ensure that, if the species is encountered,
exposures will not exceed the authorized take number. However, other
relevant considerations here lead to a determination that increasing
the estimated exposures to average group sizes would likely lead to an
overestimate of actual potential take. In this circumstance, the very
short survey duration (six hours over the course of a day) and
relatively small Level B harassment isopleths produced through use of
the 8-element, 1,170 in\3\ airgun array (compared with the modeled 72-
element, 8,000 in\3\ array) mean that it is unlikely that certain
species would be encountered at all, much less that the encounter would
result in exposure of a greater number of individuals than is estimated
through use of the exposure modeling results. As a result, in this case
NMFS has not increased the estimated exposure values to assumed average
group sizes in authorizing take.
Based on the results of our analysis, NMFS has determined that the
level of taking authorized through the LOA is consistent with the
findings made for the total taking allowable under the regulations. See
Table 1 in this notice and Table 9 of the rule (86 FR 5322; January 19,
2021).
Small Numbers Determination
Under the GOM rule, NMFS may not authorize incidental take of
marine mammals in an LOA if it will exceed ``small numbers.'' In short,
when an acceptable estimate of the individual marine mammals taken is
available, if the estimated number of individual animals taken is up
to, but not greater than, one-third of the best available abundance
estimate, NMFS will determine that the numbers of marine mammals taken
of a species or stock are small. For more information please see NMFS'
discussion of the MMPA's small numbers requirement provided in the
final rule (86 FR 5322, 5438; January 19, 2021).
The take numbers for authorization, which are determined as
described above, are used by NMFS in making the
[[Page 41290]]
necessary small numbers determinations, through comparison with the
best available abundance estimates (see discussion at 86 FR 5322, 5391;
January 19, 2021). For this comparison, NMFS' approach is to use the
maximum theoretical population, determined through review of current
stock assessment reports (SAR; <a href="http://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessments">www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessments</a>) and model-predicted
abundance information (<a href="https://seamap.env.duke.edu/models/Duke/GOM/">https://seamap.env.duke.edu/models/Duke/GOM/</a>).
For the latter, for taxa where a density surface model could be
produced, we use the maximum mean seasonal (i.e., 3-month) abundance
prediction for purposes of comparison as a precautionary smoothing of
month-to-month fluctuations and in consideration of a corresponding
lack of data in the literature regarding seasonal distribution of
marine mammals in the GOM. Information supporting the small numbers
determinations is provided in Table 1.
Table 1--Take Analysis
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authorized Percent
Species take \1\ Abundance \2\ abundance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rice's whale.................................................... 0 51 n/a
Sperm whale..................................................... 26 2,207 1.2
Kogia spp....................................................... \3\ 10 4,373 0.2
Beaked whales................................................... 116 3,768 3.1
Rough-toothed dolphin........................................... 20 4,853 0.4
Bottlenose dolphin.............................................. 95 176,108 0.1
Clymene dolphin................................................. 56 11,895 0.5
Atlantic spotted dolphin........................................ 38 74,785 0.1
Pantropical spotted dolphin..................................... 255 102,361 0.2
Spinner dolphin................................................. 68 25,114 0.3
Striped dolphin................................................. 22 5,229 0.4
Fraser's dolphin................................................ 6 1,665 0.4
Risso's dolphin................................................. 17 3,764 0.4
Melon-headed whale.............................................. 37 7,003 0.5
Pygmy killer whale.............................................. 9 2,126 0.4
False killer whale.............................................. 14 3,204 0.4
Killer whale.................................................... 0 267 n/a
Short-finned pilot whale........................................ 11 1,981 0.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Scalar ratios were not applied in this case due to brief survey duration.
\2\ Best abundance estimate. For most taxa, the best abundance estimate for purposes of comparison with take
estimates is considered here to be the model-predicted abundance (Roberts et al., 2016). For those taxa where
a density surface model predicting abundance by month was produced, the maximum mean seasonal abundance was
used. For those taxa where abundance is not predicted by month, only mean annual abundance is available. For
the killer whale, the larger estimated SAR abundance estimate is used.
\3\ Includes 1 takes by Level A harassment and 9 takes by Level B harassment.
Based on the analysis contained herein of QuarterNorth's proposed
survey activity described in its LOA application and the anticipated
take of marine mammals, NMFS finds that small numbers of marine mammals
will be taken relative to the affected species or stock sizes and
therefore is of no more than small numbers.
Authorization
NMFS has determined that the level of taking for this LOA request
is consistent with the findings made for the total taking allowable
under the incidental take regulations and that the amount of take
authorized under the LOA is of no more than small numbers. Accordingly,
we have issued an LOA to QuarterNorth authorizing the take of marine
mammals incidental to its geophysical survey activity, as described
above.
Dated: July 5, 2022.
Kimberly Damon-Randall,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-14740 Filed 7-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
</pre></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.