Notice2022-14420
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2019
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
July 7, 2022
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers/exporters of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules (solar cells), from the People's Republic of China (China) during the period of review (POR) January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019. Commerce is also rescinding this review with respect to fifty- four companies that had no reviewable entries during the POR.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 129 (Thursday, July 7, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 129 (Thursday, July 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40491-40494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14420]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-980]
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled
Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and
Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2019
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers/exporters of
crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into
modules (solar cells), from the People's Republic of China (China)
during the period of review (POR) January 1, 2019, through December 31,
2019. Commerce is also rescinding this review with respect to fifty-
four companies that had no reviewable entries during the POR.
DATES: Applicable July 7, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Copyak, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3642.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 6, 2022, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of
this administrative review.\1\ On April 19, 2022, we extended the time
limit for the final results.\2\ On May 6, 2022, we issued a Post-
Preliminary Results Analysis Memorandum, and we invited comments from
interested parties on both the Preliminary Results and the Post-
Preliminary Analysis Memorandum.\3\ We received timely case briefs from
the following interested parties: (1) mandatory respondent JA Solar
Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd. (JA Solar); \4\ (2) the Government of
China (GOC); \5\ (3) domestic interested party the American Alliance
for Solar Manufacturing (the Alliance); \6\ and (4) mandatory
respondent Risen Energy Co. Ltd. (Risen).\7\ Trina Solar Co, Ltd. and
seven of its cross-owned companies (collectively, Trina) filed a letter
in lieu of case brief.\8\ On May 25, 2022, we received timely rebuttal
briefs from: (1) the Alliance,\9\ (2) the GOC,\10\ (3) Risen,\11\ and
(4) JA Solar.\12\ On June 14, 2022, we conducted a public hearing.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not
Assembled Into Modules, from the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and
Rescission of Review, in Part; 2019, 87 FR 748 (January 23, 2022)
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum (PDM).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Time Limit for Final Results
of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,'' dated April 19,
2022.
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Post-Preliminary Results Analysis
Memorandum,'' dated May 6, 2022 (Post-Preliminary Results Analysis
Memorandum), at 8.
\4\ See JA Solar's Letter, ``Case Brief,'' dated May 16, 2022.
\5\ See GOC's Letter, ``Case Brief,'' dated May 16, 2022.
\6\ See The Alliance's Letter, ``Case Brief,'' dated May 16,
2022.
\7\ See Risen's Letter, ``Case Brief-Resubmitted,'' dated June
2, 2022.
\8\ See JA Trina's Letter, ``Letter in Lieu of Case Brief,''
dated May 16, 2022. These seven companies are: Trina Solar
(Changzhou) Science and Technology Co., Ltd.; Yancheng Trina Guoneng
Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd. (formerly Yancheng Trina Solar
Energy Technology Co., Ltd.); Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.,
Turpin Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar (Hefei) Science and
Technology Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar Hezhong Photoelectric Co., Ltd.;
and Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy Co. Ltd.
\9\ See The Alliance's Letter, ``Rebuttal Brief,'' dated May 25,
2022.
\10\ See the GOC's Letter, ``Rebuttal Brief,'' dated May 25,
2022.
\11\ See Risen's Letter, ``Rebuttal Brief,'' dated May 25, 2022.
\12\ See JA Solar's Letter, ``Rebuttal Case Brief,'' dated May
25, 2022.
\13\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Public Hearing Schedule,'' dated
June 2, 2022; see also Transcript, ``Public Hearing,'' dated June
14, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the Order are solar cells from China.\14\
For a full description of the scope of the Order, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ On December 7, 2012, the Order was published. See
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled
into Modules, from the People's Republic of China: Countervailing
Duty Order, 77 FR 73017 (December 7, 2012). On December 17, 2021,
based on a changed circumstances review, the Order was amended. See
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled
into Modules, from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of
Changed Circumstances Reviews, and Revocation of the Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Orders, in Part, 86 FR 71615 (December 21, 2021)
(Order).
\15\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results and Partial Recission of the Administrative Review of
the Countervailing Duty Order on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the People's
Republic of China; 2019,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the interested parties' briefs are addressed
in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of topics discussed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum is provided in Appendix I to this
notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is
on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
After evaluating the comments received from interested parties and
record information, we made certain changes from the Preliminary
Results regarding the calculations of Risen and JA Solar's program
rates. These changes are explained in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with
section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
For each subsidy program found to be countervailable, Commerce finds
that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution from a
government or public entity that gives rise to a benefit to the
recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.\16\ For a description of
the methodology underlying all of Commerce's conclusions, including any
determination that relied upon the use of adverse facts available
pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of the Act, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 40492]]
Partial Rescission of Administrative Review
It is Commerce's practice to rescind an administrative review of a
countervailing duty order, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), when there
are no reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR for
which liquidation is suspended.\17\ Normally, upon completion of an
administrative review, the suspended entries are liquidated at the
countervailing duty assessment rate calculated for the review
period.\18\ Therefore, for an administrative review of a company to be
conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry that Commerce
can instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate at
the calculated countervailing duty assessment rate calculated for the
review period.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See, e.g., Lightweight Thermal Paper from the People's
Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2015, 82 FR 14349 (March 20, 2017); and
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe from the People's Republic
of China: Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review;
2017, 84 FR 14650 (April 11, 2019).
\18\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2).
\19\ See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We continue to find that fifty-four companies subject to this
review did not have reviewable entries of subject merchandise for which
liquidation is suspended. Because there is no evidence on the record to
indicate that these companies had entries, exports, or sales of subject
merchandise during the POR, we are rescinding this review with respect
to these companies consistent with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). See Appendix
III for a complete list of these companies.
Companies Not Selected for Individual Review
The Act and Commerce's regulations do not directly address the
establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for
individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an
administrative review pursuant to section 777A(e)(2) of the Act.
Generally, Commerce looks to section 705(c)(5) of the Act, which
provides instructions for determining the all-others rate in an
investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for companies
which were not selected for individual examination in an administrative
review. Section 777A(e)(2) of the Act provides that ``the individual
countervailable subsidy rates determined under subparagraph (A) shall
be used to determine the all-others rate under section 705(c)(5) {of
the Act{time} .'' Under section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others
rate is normally ``an amount equal to the weighted average of the
countervailable subsidy rates established for exporters and producers
individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis
countervailable subsidy rates, and any rates determined entirely {on
the basis of facts available{time} .''
For these final results, we calculated above de minimis rates for
Risen and JA Solar. Therefore, for the remaining companies under review
(i.e., the companies for which we did not receive a timely request for
withdrawal of review and which we are not finding to be cross-owned
with the mandatory respondents), we calculated the all-others rate
using a simple average of the individual subsidy rates calculated for
the two mandatory respondents to be 15.75 percent ad valorem. See
Appendix II for a complete list of these companies.
Final Results of Administrative Review
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), Commerce calculated a
countervailable subsidy rate for the two mandatory company respondents,
Risen and JA Solar.
We determine that, for the period January 1, 2019, through December
31, 2019, the following net countervailable subsidy rates exist:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy
rate
Producer/exporter (percent ad
valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd. (JA Solar) \20\..... 18.58
Risen Energy Co., Ltd.\21\................................. 12.92
Non-Selected Companies \22\................................ 15.75
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ JA Solar is cross-owned with the following 35 companies:
(1) Shanghai JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd. (JA Shanghai); (2) JA
(Hefei) Renewable Energy Co., Ltd. (Hefei Renewable); (3) Hefei JA
Solar Technology Co., Ltd. (JA Hefei); (4) JA Solar Investment China
Co., Ltd. (J A Investment); (5) JA Solar Technology Yangzhou Co.,
Ltd. (JA Solar); (6) Jing Hai Yang Semiconductor Material (Donghai)
Co., Ltd. (Jing Hai Yang); (7) Donghai JingAo Solar Energy Science
and Technology Co., Ltd. (JA Donghai); (8) Solar Silicon Valley
Electronic Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (Solar Silicon Valley);
(9) Beijing Jinfeng Investment Co., Ltd. (Beijing Jinfeng); (10)
JingAo Solar Co., Ltd. (JingAo Solar); (11) Ningjin Songgong
Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. (Songgong Electronic Materials); (12)
Jinglong Industry and Commerce Group Co., Ltd. (Jinglong Group);
(13) Ningjin County Jingyuan New Energy Investment Co., Ltd.
(Ningjin Jingyuan); (14) Hebei Jinglong New Materials Technology
Group Co., Ltd. (Jinglong New Materials); (15) Hebei Jinglong Sun
Equipment Co. Ltd. (Hebei Jinglong); (16) Hebei Jingle
Optoelectronic Technology Co., Ltd. (Hebei Jingle); (17) Ningjin
Jingxing Electronic Material Co., Ltd. (Ningjin Jingxing); (18)
Ningjin Saimei Ganglong Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. (Saimei
Ganglong); (19) Hebei Ningtong Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. (Hebei
Ningtong); (20) JA Solar (Xingtai) Co., Ltd. (JA Xingtai); (21)
Xingtai Jinglong Electronic Material Co., Ltd. (Jinglong Electronic
Materials); (22) Xingtai Jinglong PV Materials Co., Ltd. (Jinglong
PV Materials); (23) JA PV Technology Co., Ltd. (PV Technology); (24)
Ningjin Jinglong PV Industry Investment Co., Ltd. (Jinglong PV
Investment); (25) Baotou JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd. (JA Baotou);
(26) Xingtai Jinglong New Energy Co., Ltd. (Jinglong New Energy);
(27) Ningjin County Jing Tai Fu Technology Co., Ltd. (Jing Tai Fu);
(28) JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd. (JA Technology); (29) Jinglong
Technology Holdings Co., Ltd. (Jinglong Technology); (30) Ningjin
Guiguang Electronics Investment Co., Ltd. (Ningjin Guiguang); (31)
Ningjin Longxin Investment Co., Ltd. (Longxin Investment); (32)
Beijing JA Solar PV Technology Co., Ltd. (JA Beijing); (33) Solar
Silicon Peak Electronic Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (Solar
Silicon Peak); (34) Jingwei Electronic Materials Co., Ltd.; and (35)
Taicang Juren PV Material Co., Ltd. See the Preliminary Results PDM.
\21\ Risen is cross-owned with the following 13 companies: (1)
Risen Energy Co., Ltd. (Risen); (2) Risen (Luoyang) New Energy Co.,
Ltd.; (3) Risen (Wuhai) New Energy Co., Ltd.; (4) Risen Energy
(Changzhou) Co., Ltd.; (5) Risen Energy (Yiwu) Co., Ltd.; (6)
Zhejiang Boxin Investment Co., Ltd.; (7) Zhejiang Twinsel Electronic
Technology Co., Ltd. (8) JiuJiang Shengchao Xinye Technology Co.,
Ltd. (including JiuJang Shengshao Xinye Technology Co., Ltd.
Ruichang Branch); (9) Jiangsu Sveck New Material Co., Ltd.; (10)
Changzhou Sveck Photovoltaic New Material Co., Ltd.; (11) (including
Changzhou Sveck Photovoltaic New Material Co., Ltd. Jintan Danfeng
Road Branch); (12) Changzhou Sveck New Material Technology Co.,
Ltd.; Ninghai Risen Energy Power Development Co., Ltd., and (13)
Risen (Ningbo) Electric Power Development Co., Ltd. See the
Preliminary Results PDM.
\22\ See Appendix II of this notice for a list of all companies
that remain under review but were not selected for individual
examination, and to which Commerce has assigned the non-selected
companies' rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce will disclose to the parties in this proceeding the
calculations performed for these final results within five days of the
date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to sections 751(a)(1) and (a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b), Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess,
countervailing duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise
in accordance with the final results of this review.
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
For the companies for which this review is rescinded, Commerce will
instruct CBP to assess countervailing duties on all appropriate entries
at a rate equal to the cash deposit of estimated
[[Page 40493]]
countervailing duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, during the POR in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(l)(i).
Cash Deposit Instructions
In accordance with section 751(a)(1) and (a)(2)(C) of the Act,
Commerce intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated
countervailing duties in the amounts shown for the companies listed
above on shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the
final results of this administrative review. For all non-reviewed
firms, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits of
estimated countervailing duties at the all-others rate or the most
recent company-specific rate applicable to the company, as appropriate.
These cash deposits, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: June 29, 2022.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Rescission of the Administrative Review, in Part
V. Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review
VI. Use of Facts Available and Application of Adverse Inferences
VII. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
VIII. Subsidies Valuation Information
IX. Analysis of Programs
X. Discussion of Comments
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Apply Adverse Facts Available
(AFA) to the Export Buyer's Credit Program (EBCP)
Comment 2: Whether the EBCP Should be Treated as an Export
Program
Comment 3: Whether Input Producers of Solar Grade Polysilicon,
Aluminum Extrusions, and Solar Glass are Authorities
Comment 4: Whether the Provision of Electricity for Less than
Adequate Remuneration (LTAR) Program is Countervailable
Comment 5: Whether ``Other Subsidies'' are Countervailable
Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Find that the Renminbi (RMB)
is Not Undervalued
Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Alter the Ocean Freight
Benchmark Calculations
Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should Alter the Benchmark
Calculations for the Provision of Solar Glass for LTAR Program
Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should Alter the Benchmark
Calculations for the Provision of Aluminum Extrusions for LTAR
Program
Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should Change the Inland Freight
Values Used for the Benefit Calculations of the Provision of Solar
Glass, Aluminum Extrusions, and Solar Grade Polysilicon for LTAR
Programs
Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should Adjust the Benefit
Calculations for the Other Subsidy Programs
Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should Exclude Risen's Other
Business Revenue from Risen's Sales Denominators
Comment 13: Whether Commerce Should Tie Benefits from the
Provision of International Ocean Shipping Services for LTAR Program
to Specific Markets or Products
Comment 14: Whether the Provision of International Ocean
Shipping Services for LTAR Program is Specific
Comment 15: Whether Commerce Should Apply AFA to Determine that
Government of China (GOC0 Authorities Provided a Financial
Contribution for All of the Respondents' Purchases Under the of
International Ocean Shipping Services for LTAR Program
Comment 16: Whether Commerce Should Make Changes to the
Calculations of JA Solar and Risen's Sales Denominators
Comment 17: Whether Commerce Should Make Changes to Its Land
Benchmark Calculations
Comment 18: Whether Commerce Should Treat Benefits from JA
Solar's Leases as Recurring and Revise the Benchmark Used for the
Provision of Land for LTAR Program Benefit Calculations for Leases
Comment 19: Whether Commerce Should Determine that JA Solar is
Creditworthy
Comment 20: Whether Commerce Should Revise its Determination on
the Tax Exemptions Under the Article 26(2) of the Enterprise Income
Tax Law Program
Comment 21: Whether Commerce Should Remove VAT from the Solar
Glass Benchmark Used to Calculate the Benefit from the Provision of
Solar Glass for LTAR to JA Shanghai
Comment 22: Whether Commerce Should Correct Certain Errors in JA
Solar's Calculations
Comment 23: Whether Commerce Should Correct Certain Errors in
Risen's Calculations
XI. Recommendation
Appendix II
Non-Selected Companies Under Review
1. Canadian Solar International Limited
2. Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu) Inc.
3. Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang) Inc.
4. Chint Solar (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd.
5. CSI Cells Co., Ltd.
6. CSI-GCL Solar Manufacturing (Yancheng) Co., Ltd.
7. Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd.
8. Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.
9. Jinko Solar Import and Export Co., Ltd.
10. LONGi Solar Technology Co., Ltd.
11. Suntech Power Co., Ltd.
12. Yingli Energy (China) Co., Ltd.
Appendix III
Intent To Rescind Review, In Part
1. Astronergy Co., Ltd.
2. Astronergy Solar
3. Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd.
4. Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.
5. Boviet Solar Technology Co., Ltd.
6. BYD (Shangluo) Industrial Co., Ltd.
7. Chint New Energy Technology (Haining) Co., Ltd.
8. Chint Solar (Hong Kong) Company Limited
9. Chint Solar (Jiuquan) Co., Ltd.
10. CSI Modules (Dafeng) Co., Ltd.
11. DelSolar (Wujiang) Ltd.
12. DelSolar Co., Ltd.
13. De-Tech Trading Limited HK
14. Dongguan Sunworth Solar Energy Co., Ltd.
15. Eoplly New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.
16. ERA Solar Co., Ltd.
17. ET Solar Energy Limited
18. Fuzhou Sunmodo New Energy Equipment Co., Ltd.
19. GCL System Integration Technology Co. Ltd
20. Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.
21. Hangzhou Sunny Energy Science and Technology Co., Ltd.
22. Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.
23. Jiangsu High Hope Int'l Group
24. Jinko Solar International Limited
25. JinkoSolar Technology (Haining) Co., Ltd.
26. LERRI Solar Technology Co., Ltd.
27. LightWay Green New Energy Co., Ltd.
28. Lixian Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.
29. Longi (HK) Trading Ltd.
30. Ningbo ETDZ Holdings, Ltd.
31. ReneSola Jiangsu Ltd.
32. Renesola Zhejiang Ltd.
33. Shenzhen Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.
34. Sumec Hardware & Tools Co., Ltd.
35. Sunpreme Solar Technology (Jiaxing) Co.,
[[Page 40494]]
Ltd.
36. Suntimes Technology Co., Limited
37. Systemes Versilis, Inc.
38. Taimax Technologies Inc.
39. Talesun Energy
40. Talesun Solar
41. tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
42. Tianjin Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.
43. Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.
44. Toenergy Technology Hangzhou Co., Ltd.
45. Yingli Green Energy International Trading Company Limited
46. Zhejiang ERA Solar Technology Co., Ltd.
47. Zhejiang Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.
48. Zhejiang Sunflower Light Energy Science & Technology Limited
Liability Company
49. Trina Solar Co., Ltd. (formerly Changzhou Trina Solar Energy
Co., Ltd.) \24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ During the administrative review, this company was
imprecisely referred to as Trina Solar Energy Co. Ltd. See Trina
Solar's Letter, ``Letter in Lieu of Case Brief,'' dated May 16,
2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
50. Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy Co., Ltd.
51. Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science and Technology Co., Ltd.
52. Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.
53. Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.
54. Yancheng Trina Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2022-14420 Filed 7-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on July 7, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.