Notice2022-14388
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Long-Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
July 8, 2022
Issuing agencies
Energy Department
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announces the availability of the second Draft Long-Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Draft Mercury Storage SEIS-II, DOE/EIS-0423-S2D) for public comment. As required by the Mercury Export Ban Act of 2008 and the 2016 Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (all together referred to as MEBA), DOE proposes to identify an existing facility or facilities for the long-term management and storage of elemental mercury generated within the United States. To this end, DOE issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Long-Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury (Mercury Storage EIS, DOE/EIS-0423, January 2011) and the first Final Long-Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Mercury Storage SEIS, DOE/EIS-0423-S1, September 2013), which analyzed reasonable alternatives, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), for locating and developing such a facility. On May 24, 2021, DOE announced its intent to prepare a second supplement to the Mercury Storage EIS to update these previous analyses of potential environmental impacts and analyze additional alternatives, in accordance with NEPA.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 130 (Friday, July 8, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 130 (Friday, July 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40830-40833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14388]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Long-
Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury
AGENCY: Office of Environmental Management, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announces the availability
of the second Draft Long-Term Management and Storage of Elemental
Mercury Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Draft Mercury
Storage SEIS-II, DOE/EIS-0423-S2D) for public comment. As required by
the Mercury Export Ban Act of 2008 and the 2016 Frank R. Lautenberg
Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (all together referred to as
MEBA), DOE proposes to identify an existing facility or facilities for
the long-term management and storage of elemental mercury generated
within the United States. To this end, DOE issued the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for the Long-Term Management and Storage
of Elemental Mercury (Mercury Storage EIS, DOE/EIS-0423, January 2011)
and the first Final Long-Term Management and Storage of Elemental
Mercury Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Mercury Storage
SEIS, DOE/EIS-0423-S1, September 2013), which analyzed reasonable
alternatives, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), for locating and developing such a facility. On May 24, 2021,
DOE announced its intent to prepare a second supplement to the Mercury
Storage EIS to update these previous analyses of potential
environmental impacts and analyze additional alternatives, in
accordance with NEPA.
DATES: DOE invites public comment on this Draft Mercury Storage SEIS-II
during a 45-day public comment period, which commences with the
publication of this Notice in the Federal Register and continues until
August 22, 2022. In preparing the Final Mercury Storage SEIS-II, DOE
will consider all comments received by that date. Comments received
after that date will be considered to the extent practicable. DOE will
hold two web-based public hearings via Zoom. The hearings will cover
the same material. The first hearing will be held on August 2, 2022,
from 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. EDT. The second hearing will be held on
August 4, 2022, from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. EDT. See Section V,
``Public Participation,'' for further information on the public comment
process and the web-based hearings.
ADDRESSES: Additional information regarding the SEIS-II, the 2011
Mercury Storage EIS, 2013 Mercury Storage SEIS,
[[Page 40831]]
and other related documents is available online at: <a href="https://www.energy.gov/nepa/doeeis-0423-s2-supplemental-environmental-impact-statement-long-term-management-and-storage">https://www.energy.gov/nepa/doeeis-0423-s2-supplemental-environmental-impact-statement-long-term-management-and-storage</a>. Please direct written
comments or questions on the Draft Mercury Storage SEIS-II using one of
the following methods:
<bullet> Zoom Hearing Room (during the scheduled dates); details
regarding the web-based public hearing are provided in Section V,
``Public Participation:'' <a href="https://em-doe.zoomgov.com/j/1608025687?pwd=Zndsbkp6THA4V2lFdXE3ZGExclF6Zz09">https://em-doe.zoomgov.com/j/1608025687?pwd=Zndsbkp6THA4V2lFdXE3ZGExclF6Zz09</a> (copy and paste into
web browser).
<bullet> Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bdf8d1d8d0d8d3c9dcd1f0d8cfdec8cfc4e2f3f8edfcfdd8d093d9d2d893dad2cb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e7a28b828a828993868baa82958492959eb8a9a2b7a6a7828ac9838882c9808891">[email protected]</span></a>. Please submit
comments as an email message or email attachment (i.e., Microsoft Word
or PDF file format) without encryption.
<bullet> Postal mail: Please submit comments by U.S. Mail to Ms.
Julia Donkin, NEPA Document Manager, Office of Environmental
Management, U.S. Department of Energy, EM-4.22, 1000 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585.
The Draft Mercury Storage SEIS-II is available at: <a href="https://www.energy.gov/nepa/doeeis-0423-s2-supplemental-environmental-impact-statement-long-term-management-and-storage">https://www.energy.gov/nepa/doeeis-0423-s2-supplemental-environmental-impact-statement-long-term-management-and-storage</a>.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions concerning the Draft Mercury
Storage SEIS-II or the public hearing can be sent to Ms. Julia Donkin,
NEPA Document Manager, Office of Environmental Management, U.S.
Department of Energy, EM-4.22, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20585, (202) 586-5000, or to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2b615e47424a056f44454042456b4e46054f444e054c445d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cc86b9a0a5ade288a3a2a7a5a28ca9a1e2a8a3a9e2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a>. Direct
questions specific to DOE's elemental mercury program to Mr. David
Haught, Mercury Program Manager, Office of Environmental Management,
U.S. Department of Energy, EM-4.22, 1000 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586-5000, or to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1a5e7b6c737e34527b6f7d726e5a726b347e757f347d756c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d99db8afb0bdf791b8acbeb1ad99b1a8f7bdb6bcf7beb6af">[email protected]</span></a>.
For general information concerning the DOE Office of Environmental
Management NEPA process, please contact Mr. William Ostrum, Office of
Environmental Management NEPA Compliance Officer, U.S. Department of
Energy, EM-4.31, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585,
(202) 586-2513, or to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#12457b7e7e7b737f3c5d616660677f527a633c767d773c757d64"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="83d4eaefefeae2eeadccf0f7f1f6eec3ebf2ade7ece6ade4ecf5">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Mercury Export Ban Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-414) and the 2016
Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (Pub. L.
114-182) (all together referred to as MEBA), amended the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA; 15 U.S.C. 2601-2629) and the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA; 42 U.S.C. 6939f) to address, among
other things, the export and long-term management and storage of
elemental mercury. MEBA prohibits the sale, distribution, or transfer
by Federal agencies to any other Federal agency, any state or local
government agency, or any private individual or entity, of any
elemental mercury under the control or jurisdiction of a Federal agency
(with certain limited exceptions). MEBA also amended section 266(c) of
TSCA to prohibit the export of elemental mercury from the United States
(with certain limited exceptions). MEBA directs DOE to designate a
facility (or facilities) of DOE for the long-term management and
storage of elemental mercury generated within the United States. MEBA
further provides the Secretary of Energy with the authority to
establish such terms, conditions, and procedures as are necessary to
carry out this long-term management and storage function. Although the
phrase ``facility (or facilities) of [DOE]'' is not defined in MEBA,
DOE has a longstanding practice in various other contexts of leasing
facilities to accomplish the Department's core mission. Consistent with
that practice, DOE construes the term ``facility of DOE'' to include a
facility leased from a commercial entity or by another Federal agency
over which the Department provides an appropriate level of oversight
and guidance. Accordingly, if DOE were to designate a facility that
currently is owned by a commercial entity or by another Federal agency,
DOE would obtain an appropriate leasehold interest in that facility to
comply with MEBA. DOE would ensure that any such facility currently
owned by a commercial entity or by another Federal agency would afford
DOE an appropriate level of responsibility and control over the
facility.
The primary sources of elemental mercury in the United States
include mercury generated as a byproduct of the gold-mining process and
mercury reclaimed from recycling and waste recovery activities. In
addition, DOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) stores
approximately 1,200 metric tons of elemental mercury at the Oak Ridge
Reservation in Tennessee, which was generated in support of NNSA's
mission.
The 2011 Mercury Storage EIS evaluated seven candidate locations
for the elemental mercury storage facility, as well as a No-Action
Alternative. The locations included new facility construction, use of
existing facilities, or both. The candidate locations evaluated in 2011
were: DOE Grand Junction Disposal site near Grand Junction, Colorado
(new construction); DOE Hanford Site near Richland, Washington (new
construction); Hawthorne Army Depot near Hawthorne, Nevada (existing
facilities); DOE Idaho National Laboratory near Idaho Falls, Idaho (new
construction and an existing facility); Kansas City Plant in Kansas
City, Missouri (existing facility); DOE Savannah River Site near Aiken,
South Carolina (new construction); and the Waste Control Specialists
LLC (WCS) site near Andrews, Texas (new construction and an existing
facility).
The 2013 Mercury Storage SEIS evaluated three additional
alternative locations, all in the vicinity of the Waste Isolation Pilot
Plant near Carlsbad, New Mexico (all new construction). The 2013
Mercury Storage SEIS also updated some of the relevant analyses for
alternatives presented in the 2011 Mercury Storage EIS.
For the 2011 Mercury Storage EIS and the 2013 Mercury Storage SEIS,
DOE estimated that up to approximately 10,000 metric tons of elemental
mercury would need to be managed and stored at the DOE facility during
the 40-year period of analysis.
On December 6, 2019, DOE issued a Record of Decision (ROD) to
document its designation of the WCS site near Andrews, Texas, for the
management and storage of up to 6,800 metric tons of elemental mercury
in leased portions of existing buildings at the WCS site (84 FR 66890).
The ROD was supported by DOE's Supplement Analysis of the Final Long-
Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury Environmental Impact
Statement (DOE/EIS-0423-SA-1), which determined that the long-term
management and storage of up to 6,800 metric tons of elemental mercury
in existing buildings at the WCS site would not constitute a
substantial change from the proposal evaluated in the 2011 Mercury
Storage EIS and updated in the 2013 Mercury Storage SEIS. On December
23, 2019, DOE published its rule to establish the fee for long-term
management and storage of elemental mercury (84 FR 70402; the ``Fee
Rule'').
Two domestic generators of elemental mercury subsequently filed
complaints in United States District Court challenging, among other
things, the validity of the Fee Rule and the ROD (Coeur Rochester, Inc.
v. Brouillette et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-03860-RJL [D.D.C. filed
December 31, 2019] and Nevada Gold Mines LLC v. Brouillette et al.,
Case
[[Page 40832]]
No. 1:20-cv-00141-RJL [D.D.C filed January 17, 2020]). On August 21,
2020, DOE and Nevada Gold Mines LLC executed a settlement agreement
that resolved Nevada Gold Mines' lawsuit. Consistent with that
agreement, on September 3, 2020, DOE filed a motion in the District
Court asking the Court to vacate and remand the Fee Rule. The District
Court granted the motion to vacate and remand the Fee Rule on September
5, 2020. Given the rulemaking process required to establish a fee for
the long-term management and storage of elemental mercury, and the
expiration of DOE's lease with WCS in June 2021, DOE also agreed in the
settlement with Nevada Gold Mines to withdraw the designation of WCS.
DOE subsequently withdrew the designation of WCS under MEBA in an
amended ROD on October 6, 2020 (85 FR 63105). On April 25, 2021, the
District Court signed a joint stipulation to dismiss Coeur Rochester,
Inc.'s lawsuit.
II. Purpose and Need for Action
MEBA established January 1, 2019, as the date by which a DOE
facility for the long-term management and storage of elemental mercury
generated within the United States must be operational. MEBA requires
that DOE adjust fees for generators temporarily accumulating elemental
mercury if the DOE facility is not operational by January 1, 2019. If
the DOE facility is not operational by January 1, 2020, DOE must: (1)
immediately accept the conveyance of title to all elemental mercury
that has accumulated on site prior to January 1, 2020,\1\ (2) pay any
applicable Federal permitting costs, and (3) store, or pay the cost of
storage of, until the time at which a facility is operational,
accumulated mercury to which the Secretary has title in a facility that
has been issued a permit. Because statutory milestone dates have now
passed, DOE needs to designate a facility and begin accepting elemental
mercury as soon as practicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Conveyance of title pertains to mercury accumulated in
accordance with 42 U.S.C. 6939f(g)(2)(D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Proposed Action
DOE proposes to designate one or more facilities for the long-term
management and storage of elemental mercury in accordance with MEBA.
Facilities must comply with applicable requirements of section 5(d) in
MEBA, ``Management Standards for a Facility,'' including the
requirements of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as amended by RCRA, and
other state-specific permitting requirements. Consistent with the
Supplement Analysis prepared in 2019 but updated to account for
accumulation of elemental mercury since then, the SEIS-II evaluates the
potential environmental impacts of an estimated inventory of up to
7,000 metric tons of elemental mercury that could require management
and storage during the 40-year period of analysis.
After completion of DOE's Proposed Action, DOE would establish the
fee for long-term management and storage of elemental mercury through a
rulemaking conducted pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. 551 et seq.). DOE would evaluate the potential environmental
impacts of the rulemaking in accordance with NEPA implementing
procedures at 10 CFR part 1021 at that time.
IV. Proposed Alternatives
The Mercury Storage SEIS-II evaluates the potential environmental
impacts associated with implementation of the Proposed Action in
existing facilities at the following reasonable alternative locations:
<bullet> Hawthorne Army Depot in Hawthorne, Nevada;
<bullet> WCS in Andrews County, Texas;
<bullet> Bethlehem Apparatus in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania;
<bullet> Perma-Fix Diversified Scientific Services, Inc., in
Kingston, Tennessee;
<bullet> Veolia North America in Gum Springs, Arkansas; and
<bullet> Clean Harbors (facilities in Pecatonica, Illinois;
Greenbrier, Tennessee; and Tooele, Utah).
DOE has also updated the analysis of the No-Action Alternative.
For each of the above alternative locations, the Mercury Storage
SEIS-II provides an evaluation of the potential environmental impacts
for the following resource areas: land use and ownership, and visual
resources; geology, soils, and geologic hazards; water resources; air
quality and noise; ecological resources; cultural and paleontological
resources; site infrastructure; waste management; occupational and
public health and safety (including normal operations, facility
accidents, transportation, and intentional destructive acts);
socioeconomics; and environmental justice. The SEIS-II also includes a
description of reasonably foreseeable environmental trends and planned
actions within the region of influence for each alternative site. The
SEIS-II evaluates the potential cumulative impacts of actions that have
a reasonably close causal relationship or that occur at the same time
and place as the Proposed Action.
In the 2011 Mercury Storage EIS and the 2013 Mercury Storage SEIS,
DOE identified the WCS alternative as the preferred alternative. DOE no
longer has a specific preferred alternative. However, DOE does prefer
one or more of the alternative locations with existing commercial
facilities because selection of one or more of these facilities would
best address DOE's schedule urgency established by MEBA.
V. Public Participation in the NEPA Process
DOE has published the Draft Mercury Storage SEIS-II on the internet
at: <a href="https://www.energy.gov/nepa/doeeis-0423-s2-supplemental-environmental-impact-statement-long-term-management-and-storage">https://www.energy.gov/nepa/doeeis-0423-s2-supplemental-environmental-impact-statement-long-term-management-and-storage</a>.
Additionally, DOE has scheduled two web-based public hearings to allow
DOE to present information about the Draft SEIS-II and to receive oral
comments from the public. The first hearing will be held on August 2,
2022, from 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. EDT. The second hearing will be held
on August 4, 2022, from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. EDT. Registration
details are included below and are also available on the DOE website
for long-term management and storage of elemental mercury (<a href="https://www.energy.gov/em/long-term-management-and-storage-elemental-mercury">https://www.energy.gov/em/long-term-management-and-storage-elemental-mercury</a>).
If you are joining the web-based public hearing via the internet (the
preferred approach), use the link below to log in to the Zoom Meeting
Room. If you are joining the web-based public hearing via phone, dial
the number below and follow the prompts. Documents and the presentation
for the public hearing will be made available on the DOE website for
long-term management and storage of elemental mercury (<a href="https://www.energy.gov/em/long-term-management-and-storage-elemental-mercury">https://www.energy.gov/em/long-term-management-and-storage-elemental-mercury</a>).
Persons who wish to provide oral comments at the hearing may sign up
either before the hearing by submitting a request to
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a7edd2cbcec689e3c8c9cccec9e7c2ca89c3c8c289c0c8d1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7a300f16131b543e15141113143a1f17541e151f541d150c">[email protected]</span></a> (preferred approach) or during the meeting. To
join the first web-based public hearing (August 2, 2022) via Zoom
Meeting Room: <a href="https://em-doe.zoomgov.com/j/1608025687?pwd=Zndsbkp6THA4V2lFdXE3ZGExclF6Zz09">https://em-doe.zoomgov.com/j/1608025687?pwd=Zndsbkp6THA4V2lFdXE3ZGExclF6Zz09</a> (copy and paste into
web browser).
To join the second web-based public hearing (August 4, 2022) via
Zoom Meeting Room: <a href="https://em-doe.zoomgov.com/j/1608025687?pwd=Zndsbkp6THA4V2lFdXE3ZGExclF6Zz09">https://em-doe.zoomgov.com/j/1608025687?pwd=Zndsbkp6THA4V2lFdXE3ZGExclF6Zz09</a> (copy and paste into
web browser).
Signing Authority
This document of the U.S. Department of Energy was signed on
[[Page 40833]]
June 27, 2022, by William I. White, Senior Advisor for Environmental
Management, pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary of
Energy. That document with the original signature and date is
maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance
with the requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the
undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to
sign and submit the document in electronic format for publication, as
an official document of the U.S. Department of Energy. This
administrative process in no way alters the legal effect of this
document upon publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on June 30, 2022.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2022-14388 Filed 7-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on July 8, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.