Notice2022-13386
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Europe Limited; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amendments to the ICE Clear Europe Rules
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
June 23, 2022
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 120 (Thursday, June 23, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 120 (Thursday, June 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37539-37542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13386]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-95120; File No. SR-ICEEU-2022-011]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Europe Limited; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Amendments to the ICE Clear Europe Rules
June 16, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 10, 2022, ICE Clear Europe Limited (``ICE Clear Europe'' or the
``Clearing House'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule changes described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared primarily by ICE Clear
Europe. ICE Clear Europe filed the proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(4)(ii)
thereunder,\4\ such that the proposed rule change was immediately
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(4)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the
Proposed Rule Change
ICE Clear Europe Limited (``ICE Clear Europe'' or the ``Clearing
House'') proposes to modify its Clearing Rules (``Clearing Rules'' or
``Rules'') to provide greater certainty and additional detail with
respect to: (i) the correction of settlement prices in the case of
certain external events and (ii) the cash settlement of transactions in
lieu of delivery where a Clearing Member is in default or there are
grounds for declaring a default in respect of a Clearing Member, each
of the foregoing in respect of F&O Contracts. A copy of the proposed
amendments is set forth in Exhibit 5.
II. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis
for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, ICE Clear Europe included
statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule
change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule
change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places
specified in Item IV below. ICE Clear Europe has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections (A), (B), and (C) below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
(A) Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis
for, the Proposed Rule Change
(a) Purpose
ICE Clear Europe is proposing to amend its Clearing Rules to
provide greater certainty and additional detail in relation to (i) the
scenarios where there is an external or other change in a relevant
price or event which results in a need for the Clearing House to
correct settlement prices; and (ii) the cash settlement of transactions
in lieu of delivery where a Clearing Member is in default or there are
grounds for declaring a default in respect of a Clearing Member.
Determination of Settlement Price
Futures Contracts
Although the Exchange Delivery Settlement Price (``EDSP'') for a
futures contract is generally determined based on data provided by the
relevant Market, Rule 701(c) provides that in a number of scenarios the
Clearing House may itself determine the Exchange Delivery Settlement
Price. The amendments would add the cases of Force Majeure Event,
Illegality or Impossibility as circumstances in which the Clearing
House could take such
[[Page 37540]]
action. Although the existing general language of Rule 701(c) would
generally permit the determination by the Clearing House of the EDSP in
those cases, ICE Clear Europe believes it is appropriate, as a matter
of clarity and transparency, to provide so explicitly. The amendments
would also remove a redundant reference to the Clearing House acting in
its discretion. Rule 701(c) would also be updated to provide that any
EDSP determined under such Rule would be communicated only to affected
Clearing Members (as communication to unaffected Clearing Members
should be unnecessary).
A new subsection (d) would be added to Rule 701 and would provide
that the Clearing House would be entitled to amend any previously
communicated EDSP, including in respect of futures contracts already
settled or delivered, in the following two scenarios: (i) a Market or
other external pricing source has made an error in or amends the EDSP
or the basis for, or any element or input data in respect of the EDSP,
or (ii) there has been an error by the Clearing House. In such
scenarios, the Clearing House would be able to order revised payments
to reflect the amended EDSP, including in respect of settled or
delivered Contracts. Any amended EDSP determined by the Clearing House
under each new such subsection would be communicated to affected
Clearing Members, and any revised payments ordered by the Clearing
House in connection therewith would be promptly processed by the
Clearing House as part of its usual operational processes. The
amendments are intended to provide greater certainty under the Rules as
to the situations in which a change of price might take place and the
consequences of such change, including the rights and obligations of
the Clearing House in the event of a change in a settlement price, or
an input in the settlement price, and the rights and obligations of the
Clearing House and F&O Clearing Members to make appropriate payments in
the event of a resulting change in an EDSP, including following
settlement of a Contract. Such a change could occur, for example, where
an input for the EDSP is based by the relevant Market on a price
reporting service or prices in a spot or cash market for an underlying
commodity, or where an input price is subject to or affected by action
of relevant governmental or other authorities with jurisdiction over
those markets. Although the Clearing House has other existing general
authority, including under Rule 701(c) and Rule 109, that it might
potentially use to address such situations, the Clearing House believes
it is appropriate for the Clearing House to have explicit, specific
rules addressing the possibility of such a change in a relevant price,
in light of experiences with errors involving underlying prices and
other cases in which underlying or related markets have considered such
changes that could potentially have affected the EDSP. The amendments
would also provide increased certainty for Clearing Members and other
market participants as to the likely consequences of such changes
occurring. ICE Clear Europe does not expect that Rule 701(d) would be
commonly used in the ordinary course of business.
The amendments would also redesignate the ultimate paragraph in
Rule 705 as subsection (b). This non-substantive update is intended to
improve the organization and readability of the Rules, and to align
with the parallel provision in Rule 805. A further conforming change
would be made to the same paragraph provide that the discharge of the
rights and obligations of Clearing Members upon settlement would be
made expressly subject to Rule 701(d) (as discussed above), a change
which reflects the Clearing House's present interpretation of how these
two provisions interrelate.
Parallel changes would be made for Options Contracts in Rules
802(c) and (d). Rule 802(c) would be amended to add Force Majeure
Event, Illegality or Impossibility to the list of scenarios that
entitle the Clearing House to determine the EDSP at its discretion. The
amendments would also remove a redundant reference to the Clearing
House acting in its discretion. Rule 802(c) would be updated to provide
that any EDSP determined under such Rule would be communicated to
affected Clearing Members, for the reasons discussed for Rule 701(c)
above.
A new subsection (d) would also be added to Rule 802 and would
provide that the Clearing House would be entitled at its discretion to
amend any previously communicated EDSP for option contracts, including
in respect of contracts already settled or delivered, in the following
two scenarios: (i) a Market or other external pricing source has made
an error in or amends the EDSP or the basis for, or any element or
input data in respect of the EDSP, or (ii) there has been an error by
the Clearing House. In such scenarios, the Clearing House would be able
to order revised payments, including in respect of settled or delivered
Contracts. Any amended EDSP determined by the Clearing House under each
new such subsection would be communicated to affected Clearing Members,
and any revised payments ordered by the Clearing House in connection
therewith would be promptly processed by the Clearing House as part of
its usual operational processes. The purpose and rationale for these
amendments is substantially the same as for the amendments to Rule
701(d), as discussed above.
Similar to the changes to Rule 705 discussed above, a conforming
change would be made to Rule 807 to provide that the discharge of
Clearing Members on settlement would be subject to Rule 802(d) (as
discussed above). Likewise, a change would be made to Rule 808(b) to
provide that the termination of rights and obligations upon abandonment
of an option would be subject to Rule 802(d), for similar reasons.
Cash Settlement on Default
The Clearing House proposes to amend Rule 703(h) to provide greater
certainty as to the treatment of delivery obligations under F&O
Contracts in the event of a default by a Clearing Member or when there
are grounds for declaring a default in respect of a Clearing Member.
Depending upon the kind of F&O Contract, pursuant to existing Rule
703(f) and the Delivery Procedures, selling Clearing Members may be
matched with buying Clearing Members to effect delivery between them,
in satisfaction of the selling Clearing Member's delivery obligation to
the Clearing House and the Clearing House's delivery obligation to the
buying Clearing Member. In the case of other F&O Contracts, there is no
such matching and delivery is made by Sellers to the Clearing House and
then by the Clearing House to Buyers, pursuant to Rules 703(b) to (e)
and the Delivery Procedures.
The proposed amendments to Rule 703(h) would provide further
detail, consistent with existing Clearing House practices and
interpretations, as to what happens when a Clearing Member which has
been matched for purposes of delivery fails to perform its delivery
obligations. Rule 703(h) applies to a Clearing Member that has been
declared a Defaulter or is subject to grounds for declaring an Event of
Default or Force Majeure Event. In such a case, the Clearing House
already has under Rule 703(h) the ability to direct that delivery
obligations be substituted for cash, including as against non-
defaulting Clearing Members. This enables it to ensure that the number
of Contracts under delivery remain matched and that the Clearing House
does not need to source deliverable commodities in the physical
marketplace. Amended Rule
[[Page 37541]]
703(h) would provide explicitly that a relevant Contract of the
defaulter may be substituted for cash settlement obligations at a price
determined by ICE Clear Europe at its discretion. The rights,
liabilities, and obligations of any Clearing Member with an Account
having an opposite delivery position in Contracts in the same Set could
then, at the discretion of the Clearing House, also be substituted for
cash settlement obligations at the same price. These amendments are
intended to build on the Clearing House's existing authority to
substitute cash settlement for delivery obligations in the case of
default, in furtherance of its default management, and more clearly
reflect how the existing authority would operate in practice.
(b) Statutory Basis
ICE Clear Europe believes that the proposed amendments to the
Clearing Membership Procedures are consistent with the requirements of
Section 17A of the Act \5\ and the regulations thereunder applicable to
it. In particular, Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \6\ requires, among
other things, that the rules of a clearing agency be designed to
promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities
transactions and, to the extent applicable, derivative agreements,
contracts, and transactions, the safeguarding of securities and funds
in the custody or control of the clearing agency or for which it is
responsible, and the protection of investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed changes to the Rules are intended to provide greater
certainty and additional detail as to (i) the rights and obligations of
the Clearing House and F&O Clearing Members in scenarios where there is
an external or other change of price which results in a need to change
or correct the EDSP, including after settlement occurs; and (ii) the
way in which the Clearing House could effect cash settlement in lieu of
delivery in the case of an F&O Clearing Member default or where a
Clearing Member is subject to ground for declaring a default. The
amendments relating to changes in EDSP are intended to provide greater
certainty as to the actions the Clearing House may take in
circumstances where there is a potential change in a settlement price,
including where settlement has already occurred and additional payments
would be required. The Clearing House believes it is important to have
clear provisions in the Rules for this scenario given the potential
impact on market participants. The amendments with respect to cash
settlement of delivery obligations in case of default are not intended
to materially change the substance of the rights or obligations of the
Clearing House and Clearing Members but would provide greater clarity
as to the applicable process. The amendments also remove certain
overlapping or duplicative information in order to improve organization
and readability. In ICE Clear Europe's view the amendments would thus
facilitate the clearing and settlement process, as well as default
management, by the Clearing House. The proposed amendments would
therefore facilitate the prompt and accurate clearing of cleared
Contracts, the safeguarding of securities and funds in the custody or
control of the Clearing House or for which it is responsible, and the
protection of investors and the public interest in the sound operations
of the Clearing House, consistent with the requirements of Section
17A(b)(3)(F).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For similar reasons, the amendments to the Rules are also
consistent with relevant provisions of Rule 17Ad-22.\8\ Rule 17Ad-
22(e)(1) provides that ``[e]ach covered clearing agency shall
establish, implement, maintain and enforce written policies and
procedures reasonable designed to, as applicable [. . .] provide for a
well-founded, clear, transparent and enforceable legal basis for each
aspect of its activities in all relevant jurisdictions''.\9\ As
discussed above, the amendments will provide greater certainty for
market participants as to the rights and obligations of the Clearing
House and F&O Clearing Members in cases where there is a subsequent
change in a settlement price or inputs in the settlement price. The
amendments also elucidate the rights and obligations relating to
delivery in a default scenario. As such, the amendments are consistent
with establishing a well-founded, clear and transparent basis for the
activities of the Clearing House, within the meaning of Rule 17Ad-
22(e)(1).\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22.
\9\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(1).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 17Ad-22(e)(8) provides that ``[e]ach covered clearing agency
shall establish, implement, maintain and enforce written policies and
procedures reasonable designed to, as applicable [. . .] define the
point at which settlement is final to be no later than the end of the
day on which the payment or obligation is due. . . .''.\11\ As
described above, the amendments address a change in EDSP in limited
circumstances where there has been an error or other change in a
relevant underlying price. Where necessary, the amendments would also
provide for additional payments to or from Clearing Members to reflect
the amended price. ICE Clear Europe does not believe that correction of
an error or similar circumstance, even though it may require additional
payments, would be inconsistent with finality of settlement within the
meaning of Rule 17Ad-22(e)(8). Specifically, in ICE Clear Europe's
view, the proposed amendments should not be viewed as affecting the
finality of settlement payments previously made (which were final and
irrevocable when made in accordance with the settlement finality
provisions of the ICE Clear Europe Rules and applicable settlement
finality regulations) but rather as establishing an independent new
payment obligation, with a new payment date, to reflect the change in
EDSP. Such new payment obligation would itself give rise to or be
subsumed in a new payment transfer order which would be subject to the
settlement finality provisions of Part 12 of the ICE Clear Rules. As
such, the amendments are not inconsistent with the finality
requirements of Rule 17Ad-22(e)(8).\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(8).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 17Ad-22(e)(10) provides that ``[e]ach covered clearing agency
shall establish, implement, maintain and enforce written policies and
procedures reasonable designed to, as applicable [. . .] establish and
maintain transparent written standards that state its obligations with
respect to the delivery of physical instruments, and establish and
maintain operational practices that identify, monitor and manage the
risks associated with such physical deliveries.'' \13\ As set forth
above, the amendments would clarify the rights and obligations of the
Clearing House and Clearing Members with respect to physical delivery
in the case of a failure to perform by a Clearing Member, by setting
forth the ability of the Clearing House to provide for cash settlement
in lieu of physical delivery in that scenario. In addition, this
authority will facilitate the Clearing House's ability to manage its
risk associated with a failed physical delivery in the context of a
Clearing Member default. The amendments are therefore consistent with
the requirements of Rule 17Ad-22(e)(10).\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(10).
\14\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(10).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 37542]]
(B) Clearing Agency's Statement on Burden on Competition
ICE Clear Europe does not believe the proposed amendments would
have any impact, or impose any burden, on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The amendments
are being adopted to update and provide greater legal certainty under
the Rules to address scenarios in which the Clearing House may need to
amend an EDSP, including as a result of a change in a relevant input.
Other amendments would elucidate the rights and obligations of Clearing
Members with respect to physical delivery in the case of a Clearing
Member default. The amendments would apply to all F&O Clearing Members.
Although the amendments address scenarios where a market participant
may be obligated to make a payment as a result of a change in an EDSP,
which could impose costs on such market participant, that result would
depend on the market participant's own positions and reflect a change
in the underlying relevant price or input to correctly reflect the
value of the relevant Contract. Similarly, the amendments address the
ability of the Clearing House to impose cash settlement in lieu of
physical settlement, including on non-defaulters, which could impose a
cost on such market participant. However, that result would depend on
the Clearing Member's own positions and reflects a cost and risk to
which the Clearing Members are already exposed and which arise commonly
in clearing systems. ICE Clear Europe does not believe the amendments
would otherwise affect the costs of clearing, the ability of market
participants to access clearing, or the market for clearing services
generally. Therefore, ICE Clear Europe does not believe the proposed
rule change imposes any burden on competition that is inappropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
(C) Clearing Agency's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change
Received From Members, Participants or Others
ICE Clear Europe consulted with a number of market participants,
including a relevant futures industry group, in connection with the
development of the proposed rule changes, and considered feedback from
such participants in preparing the specific rule changes that are now
proposed to be adopted. In particular, market participants raised
questions concerning (i) the circumstances in which settlement prices
might be changed, and (ii) the appropriate timeframe in which a change
to EDSP may be made. In developing the current proposal, ICE Clear
Europe notes that the amendments are generally intended to deal with
changes from external pricing sources, which may be permitted to make
such changes in a variety of circumstances, and with a variety of
characterizations, that are outside the control of ICE Clear Europe and
may be difficult to define more specifically in advance. ICE Clear
Europe also notes that it has not defined a specific timeframe in which
a change to EDSP may be made, in light of the fact that different
Markets cleared by ICE Clear Europe and different external pricing
sources may have their own time period in which changes to relevant
prices may be made. ICE Clear Europe has thus sought to maintain
appropriate flexibility to deal with the range of potential changes to
relevant prices as they may arise.
ICE Clear Europe has also conducted a formal public consultation
with respect to the proposed rule changes.\15\ No written comments were
received as a result of the public consultation. ICE Clear Europe will
notify the Commission of any written comments received with respect to
the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ ICE Clear Europe Circular C22/056 (25 April 2022),
available at <a href="https://www.theice.com/publicdocs/clear_europe/circulars/C22056.pdf">https://www.theice.com/publicdocs/clear_europe/circulars/C22056.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \16\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \17\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>) or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e193948d84cc828e8c8c848f9592a1928482cf868e97"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="acded9c0c981cfc3c1c1c9c2d8dfecdfc9cf82cbc3da">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
File Number SR-ICEEU-2022-011 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ICEEU-2022-011. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of such filings will also be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of ICE Clear Europe and on ICE
Clear Europe's website at <a href="https://www.theice.com/notices/Notices.shtml?regulatoryFilings">https://www.theice.com/notices/Notices.shtml?regulatoryFilings</a>.
All comments received will be posted without change. Persons
submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ICEEU-2022-011 and should be
submitted on or before July 14, 2022.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-13386 Filed 6-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on June 23, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.