Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Reporting Tax Information on Certain Foreign Procurements (DFARS Case 2021-D029)
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to allow for the efficient and accurate identification of contracts subject to excise tax withholding. DoD is also proposing to prohibit use of the Governmentwide commercial purchase card as a method of payment when the tax on certain foreign procurements applies. These changes will promote the efficient administration of the excise tax.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 120 (Thursday, June 23, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 120 (Thursday, June 23, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37473-37476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13370]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 213, 229, 232, and 252
[Docket DARS-2022-0014]
RIN 0750-AL51
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Reporting Tax
Information on Certain Foreign Procurements (DFARS Case 2021-D029)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to allow for the efficient and accurate
identification of contracts subject to excise tax withholding. DoD is
also proposing to prohibit use of the Governmentwide commercial
purchase card as a method of payment when the tax on certain foreign
procurements applies. These changes will promote the efficient
administration of the excise tax.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to
the address shown below on or before August 22, 2022, to be considered
in the formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by DFARS Case 2021-D029, using
any of the following methods:
[cir] Federal eRulemaking Portal: <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>.
Search for ``DFARS Case 2021-D029'' in the search box and select
``Search.'' Select ``Comment'' and follow the instructions to submit a
comment. Please include your name, company name (if any), and ``DFARS
Case 2021-D029'' on any attached document.
[cir] Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8de2fee9a3e9ebecfffecde0ece4e1a3e0e4e1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="98f7ebfcb6fcfef9eaebd8f5f9f1f4b6f5f1f4">[email protected]</span></a>. Include DFARS Case 2021-D029 in
the subject line of the message.
Comments received generally will be posted without change to
<a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, including any personal information
provided. To confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, approximately two to three days after submission
to verify posting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David E. Johnson, telephone 202-913-
5764.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD is proposing to revise the DFARS to allow for the accurate
identification of contracts subject to excise tax withholding, as well
as the proper identification of those contracts for which the
contractor claimed a full exemption from the tax. Section 301 of the
James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-
347), codified at 26 U.S.C. 5000C, imposes a two-percent excise tax on
specified Federal procurement payments to certain foreign persons; it
does not apply to payments to United States persons. With certain
exceptions, to administer this tax DoD must withhold an amount equal to
two percent of the amount of specified Federal procurement payments.
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) solicitation provision 52.229-
11, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements--Notice and Representation,
provides offerors an opportunity to claim a full exemption from the tax
at the time of their offer. The proposed DFARS contract clause 252.229-
70XX, Full Exemption from Two-Percent Excise Tax on Certain Foreign
Procurements, is needed because presently no guidance, requirement, or
mechanism exists to document an offeror's claim of full exemption from
the tax.
Currently, the contract clause at FAR 52.229-12, Tax on Certain
Foreign
[[Page 37474]]
Procurements, requires the DoD payment office to withhold the two-
percent excise tax if the contractor does not submit an Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) Form W-14, Certificate of Foreign Contracting
Party Receiving Federal Procurement Payments, with each invoice.
However, if the contractor claimed a full exemption at the time of its
offer, then the contractor is not required to submit IRS Form W-14 with
each invoice. Accordingly, the DoD payment systems and networks may
erroneously withhold the tax if the contractor's full exemption that
was claimed at the time of its offer is not documented in the contract.
Inclusion of the proposed clause at DFARS 252.229-70XX will ensure the
DoD payment office and other DoD organizations are aware of contractors
claiming a full exemption at the time of contract award.
DoD is also proposing to prohibit use of the Governmentwide
commercial purchase card (GCPC) as a method of payment on contracts
subject to the two-percent excise tax. When the GCPC is used as a
method of payment, a third party, i.e., the bank that issued the GCPC,
and not the DoD payment office, processes the payment to the
contractor. In this situation, the Government lacks a mechanism to
withhold the tax prior to the contractor being paid.
This proposed rule is intended to promote efficient administration
of the two-percent excise tax. It does not impose a new requirement or
burden on contractors or the public. Rather, this proposed rule likely
benefits contractors by minimizing the likelihood of erroneous
withholding of the two-percent excise tax.
II. Discussion and Analysis
This proposed rule applies to Federal Government contracts that
include FAR clause 52.229-12, that are valued over $250,000, and that
are awarded to foreign persons for goods or services, if the goods are
manufactured or produced or the services are provided in any country
that is not a party to an international procurement agreement with the
United States (see FAR 25.003 for the definitions of ``World Trade
Organization Government Procurement Agreement (WTO GPA) country'' and
``Free Trade Agreement country''). FAR 29.402-3(b) requires FAR clause
52.229-12 to be included in solicitations in which FAR provision
52.229-11 is included and in the resulting contract when the contractor
represented that it is a foreign person.
Paragraph (d)(2) of FAR provision 52.229-11 allows the offeror to
claim either a ``full exemption'' or a ``partial or no exemption'' from
the excise tax. However, in accordance with FAR 29.402-3, FAR 52.229-12
will be included in the resulting contract where the offeror had
indicated that it is a foreign person, regardless of whether the
offeror may have claimed a full exemption as part of their offer.
The DoD finance and accounting systems utilize the presence of
various FAR clauses in contracts to determine entitlement to payment,
including required offsets and withholds. However, the presence or
absence of FAR 52.229-12 in contracts does not in itself allow DoD
payment systems or networks to determine whether withholding the two-
percent excise tax is correct for a given contract or whether a
contractor had claimed a full exemption in their initial offer.
The proposed clause at DFARS 252.229-70XX, by its inclusion in the
contract, will provide for a simple and efficient method for
contracting officers to alert the DoD payment systems and networks that
a contractor claimed a full exemption in its offer, thereby preventing
erroneous withholding of the two-percent excise tax. This clause would
also complement FAR 52.229-12 in applicable contracts where FAR 52.229-
12 requires contractors to notify contracting officers of a change in
circumstances concerning the full exemption during the performance of
the contract, causing the contractor to be subject to the tax.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold (SAT) and for Commercial Services and Commercial Products,
Including Commercially Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items
This rule proposes to create a new DFARS clause 252.229-70XX, Full
Exemption from Two-Percent Excise Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements,
to implement section 301 of the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and
Compensation Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-347), codified at 26 U.S.C.
5000C. The clause at DFARS 252.229-70XX is prescribed at DFARS 229.402-
70(k) for use in contracts that include the clause at FAR 52.229-12,
Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements, for which the contractor
represented in its offer that it is a foreign person and is fully
exempt from the tax for reasons cited on their IRS Form W-14. FAR
52.229-12 is used when FAR 52.229-11, Tax on Certain Foreign
Procurements--Notice and Representation, is used; and FAR 52.229-11
does not apply to acquisitions that do not exceed the simplified
acquisition threshold. Accordingly, DoD does not intend to apply the
rule to acquisitions at or below the SAT but does intend to apply the
rule to the acquisition of commercial services and commercial products,
including COTS items.
A. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold
41 U.S.C. 1905 governs the applicability of laws to contracts or
subcontracts in amounts not greater than the simplified acquisition
threshold. It is intended to limit the applicability of laws to such
contracts or subcontracts. 41 U.S.C. 1905 provides that if a provision
of law contains criminal or civil penalties, or if the Federal
Acquisition Regulatory Council makes a written determination that it is
not in the best interest of the Federal Government to exempt contracts
or subcontracts at or below the SAT, the law will apply to them. The
Principal Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting (DPC), is the
appropriate authority to make comparable determinations for regulations
to be published in the DFARS, which is part of the FAR system of
regulations. DoD does not intend to make that determination. Therefore,
this rule will not apply at or below the SAT.
B. Applicability to Contracts for the Acquisition of Commercial
Services and Commercial Products Including COTS Items
10 U.S.C. 3452 (previously 10 U.S.C. 2375) exempts contracts and
subcontracts for the acquisition of commercial products, including COTS
items, and commercial services from provisions of law enacted after
October 13, 1994, unless the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition
and Sustainment (USD(A&S)) makes a written determination that it would
not be in the best interest of DoD to exempt contracts for the
procurement of commercial products and commercial services from the
applicability of the provision or contract requirement, except for a
provision of law that--
<bullet> Provides for criminal or civil penalties;
<bullet> Requires that certain articles be bought from American
sources pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 4862 (previously 10 U.S.C. 2533c), or
that strategic materials critical to national security be bought from
American sources pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 4863 (previously 10 U.S.C.
2533b); or
<bullet> Specifically refers to 10 U.S.C. 3452 and states that it
shall apply to contracts and subcontracts for the acquisition of
commercial products (including COTS items) and commercial services; or
[[Page 37475]]
<bullet> USD(A&S) determines in writing that it would not be in the
best interest of the Government to exempt contracts or subcontracts for
the acquisition of commercial products or commercial services from the
applicability of the provision or contract clause requirement.
Section 301 of the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act
of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-347), codified at 26 U.S.C. 5000C and implemented
by this rule, does not impose criminal or civil penalties; does not
require purchase pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 4862 or 4863; and does not refer
to 10 U.S.C. 3452. Section 301 will not apply to the acquisition of
commercial services or commercial products including COTS items unless
a written determination is made. Due to delegations of authority from
USD(A&S), the Principal Director, DPC, is the appropriate authority to
make the written determination. DoD intends to make that determination
to apply this rule to the acquisition of commercial services and
commercial products including COTS items, if otherwise applicable.
C. Determination
The proposed clause at 252.229-70XX is intended to provide a simple
and efficient way for contracting officers to alert the DoD payment
systems and networks that a contractor claimed a full exemption from
the two-percent excise tax in its offer, thereby preventing erroneous
withholding of the tax. Not applying the clause to contracts for the
acquisition of commercial services and commercial products, including
COTS items, would exclude contracts intended to be covered by this
proposed rule and undermine the overarching purpose of the rule.
Consequently, DoD plans to apply the proposed rule to contracts for the
acquisition of commercial services and commercial products, including
COTS items.
IV. Expected Impact of the Rule
This proposed rule will promote efficient administration of the
two-percent excise tax. It imposes no new requirement or burden on
contractors or the public. Rather, this proposed rule likely benefits
contractors by minimizing the possibility of erroneous withholding of
the two-percent excise tax. Additionally, the two-percent excise tax
applies only to specified Federal procurement payments to certain
foreign persons; it does not apply to payments to U.S. persons.
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993.
VI. Congressional Review Act
As required by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801-808)
before an interim or final rule takes effect, DoD will submit a copy of
the interim or final rule with the form, Submission of Federal Rules
under the Congressional Review Act, to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States. A
major rule under the Congressional Review Act cannot take effect until
60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This rule is not
anticipated to be a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this proposed rule to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because the rule does not implement any requirements with which small
entities must comply. However, an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis has been performed and is summarized as follows:
This proposed rule aids the administration of the two-percent
excise tax on specified Federal procurement payments to certain foreign
persons by prescribing inclusion of a new DFARS clause in contracts
when the tax on certain foreign procurements applies and the contractor
claimed a full exemption from the tax. Further, this proposed rule
prohibits use of the Governmentwide commercial purchase card as a
method of payment when the tax on certain foreign procurements applies
and the contractor did not claim a full exemption.
The objective of this proposed rule is to promote efficient
administration of the two-percent excise tax on specified Federal
procurement payments to certain foreign persons. The legal basis for
the rule is 41 U.S.C. 1303 and section 301 of the James Zadroga 9/11
Health and Compensation Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-347), codified at 26
U.S.C. 5000C.
The proposed rule applies to Federal Government contracts that
include the clause at FAR 52.229-12, Tax on Certain Foreign
Procurements; that are valued over $250,000; and that are awarded to
foreign persons for goods or services, if the goods are manufactured or
produced or the services are provided in any country that is not a
party to an international procurement agreement with the United States
(see FAR 25.003 for the definitions of ``World Trade Organization
Government Procurement Agreement (WTO GPA) country'' and ``Free Trade
Agreement country''). Data for fiscal year 2021 was obtained from the
Federal Procurement Data System for contract awards reflecting these
criteria. There were 123 total contract awards; 117 were awarded to 56
unique large entities and 6 were awarded to 4 unique small entities for
a total of 60 unique foreign entities. Accordingly, the proposed rule
is not expected to have a significant impact on small entities based in
the United States.
This rule imposes no reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements. The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
any other Federal rules. There are no known available alternatives to
the proposed rule to accomplish the desired objective.
DoD invites comments from small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small
entities.
DoD will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2021-D029), in
correspondence.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) applies to this
rule. However, these changes to the DFARS do not impose additional
information collection requirements to the paperwork burden previously
approved under OMB Control Number 1545-2263, entitled Tax on Certain
Foreign Procurement.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 213, 229, 232, and 252
Government procurement.
Jennifer D. Johnson,
Editor/Publisher, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 213, 229, 232, and 252 are proposed to be
amended as follows:
[[Page 37476]]
0
1. The authority citation for parts 213, 229, 232, and 252 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 213--SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES
0
2. Amend section 213.301 by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph
(5) and adding a new paragraph (4) to read as follows:
213.301 Governmentwide commercial purchase card.
* * * * *
(4) The contracting officer shall not authorize the Governmentwide
commercial purchase card as a method of payment during any contract
period of performance if the contract includes the clause at FAR
52.229-12, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements, unless the contract
also includes the clause at 252.229-70XX, Full Exemption from Two-
Percent Excise Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements, indicating that the
contractor is fully exempt from the tax.
* * * * *
PART 229--TAXES
0
3. Add subpart 229.2, consisting of section 229.204, to read as
follows:
SUBPART 229.2--FEDERAL EXCISE TAXES
229.204 Federal excise tax on specific foreign contract payments.
The contracting officer shall not authorize the Governmentwide
commercial purchase card as a method of payment during any contract
period of performance if the contract includes the clause at FAR
52.229-12, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements, unless the contract
also includes the clause at 252.229-70XX, Full Exemption from Two-
Percent Excise Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements, indicating that the
contractor is fully exempt from the tax.
0
4. Amend section 229.402-70 by adding paragraph (k) to read as follows:
229.402-70 Additional provisions and clauses.
* * * * *
(k) Use the clause at 252.229-70XX, Full Exemption from Two-Percent
Excise Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements, in contracts that include
the clause at FAR 52.229-12, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements, when
the contractor has--
(1) Represented that it is a foreign person in response to the
provision at FAR 52.229-11, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements--Notice
and Representation; and
(2) Indicated that it is fully exempt from the tax for reasons
cited on their IRS Form W-14, Certificate of Foreign Contracting Party
Receiving Federal Procurement Payments.
PART 232--CONTRACT FINANCING
0
5. Add sections 232.1108 and 232.1108-70 to subpart 232.11 to read as
follows:
232.1108 Payment by Governmentwide commercial purchase card.
232.1108-70 Prohibition of Governmentwide commercial purchase card as
a method of payment when the tax on certain foreign procurements
applies.
The contracting officer shall not authorize the Governmentwide
commercial purchase card as a method of payment during any contract
period of performance if the contract includes the clause at FAR
52.229-12, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements, unless the contract
also includes the clause at 252.229-70XX, Full Exemption from Two-
Percent Excise Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements, indicating that the
contractor is fully exempt from the tax.
PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
6. Add section 252.229-70XX to read as follows:
252.229-70XX Full Exemption from Two-Percent Excise Tax on Certain
Foreign Procurements.
As prescribed in 229.402-70(k), use the following clause: FULL
EXEMPTION FROM TWO-PERCENT EXCISE TAX ON CERTAIN FOREIGN PROCUREMENTS
(DATE)
(a) As the Contractor represented in its offer, any item,
including any item delivered under subcontract; any service; or any
combination thereof delivered under this contract is fully exempt
from the 2-percent excise tax withholding imposed by 26 U.S.C. 5000C
and implemented by Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.229-12,
Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements.
(b) If the full exemption no longer applies due to a change in
circumstances during the performance of the contract, causing the
Contractor to become subject to the withholding for the 2-percent
excise tax as imposed by 26 U.S.C. 5000C, then the Contractor shall
immediately comply with the notification and billing requirements of
FAR clause 52.229-12.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2022-13370 Filed 6-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.