Rule2022-13292
Finding of Failure To Submit a Clean Air Act Section 110 State Implementation Plan for Interstate Transport for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
June 22, 2022
Effective
July 22, 2022
Issuing agencies
Environmental Protection Agency
Abstract
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action, finding that the State of Alabama failed to submit a complete infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision to satisfy certain interstate transport requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) with respect to the 2015 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). Specifically, these requirements pertain to prohibiting significant contribution to nonattainment, or interference with maintenance, of the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS in other states. This finding of failure to submit a complete revision establishes a 2-year deadline for EPA to promulgate a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to address these interstate transport requirements for Alabama unless, prior to EPA promulgating a FIP, Alabama submits, and EPA approves, a SIP that meets these requirements.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 119 (Wednesday, June 22, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 22, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37235-37237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13292]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2022-0506; FRL-9895-01-R4]
Finding of Failure To Submit a Clean Air Act Section 110 State
Implementation Plan for Interstate Transport for the 2015 Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final action.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action, finding that the State of Alabama failed to submit a complete
infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision to satisfy
certain interstate transport requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or
Act) with respect to the 2015 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS). Specifically, these requirements pertain to
prohibiting significant contribution to nonattainment, or interference
with maintenance, of the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS in other states. This
finding of failure to submit a complete revision establishes a 2-year
deadline for EPA to promulgate a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to
address these interstate transport requirements for Alabama unless,
prior to EPA promulgating a FIP, Alabama submits, and EPA approves, a
SIP that meets these requirements.
DATES: Effective date of this action is July 22, 2022.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2022-0506. All documents in the docket
are listed on the <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> website. Although listed in the
index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials can either
be retrieved electronically via <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> or in hard copy at
the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation
Branch, Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday
through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Evan Adams of the Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Mr. Adams can be
reached by telephone at (404) 562-9009, or via electronic mail at
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4d2c292c203e63283b2c230d283d2c632a223b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2445404549570a4152454a644154450a434b52">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Notice and Comment Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
Section 553 of the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B), provides that, when
an agency for good cause finds that notice and public procedure are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, the
agency may issue a rule without providing notice and an opportunity for
public comment. EPA has determined that there is good cause for making
this final agency action without prior proposal and opportunity for
comment because no significant EPA judgment is involved in making a
finding of failure to submit SIPs, or elements of SIPs, required by the
CAA, where states have made no submissions or incomplete submissions,
to meet the requirement. Specifically, and as discussed further in the
preamble, Alabama has withdrawn a prior submission and has not made a
complete submission under CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2015
ozone NAAQS. Thus, notice and public procedure are unnecessary. EPA
finds that this constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
II. Background and Overview
A. Interstate Transport SIPs
CAA section 110(a) imposes an obligation upon states to submit SIP
revisions that provide for the implementation, maintenance, and
enforcement of a new or revised NAAQS within 3 years following the
promulgation of that NAAQS. CAA section 110(a)(2) lists specific
requirements that states must meet in these SIP submissions, as
applicable. EPA refers to this type of SIP as an
[[Page 37236]]
``infrastructure'' SIP because it ensures that states can implement,
maintain, and enforce the new or revised air standards. Within these
requirements, CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) contains requirements to
address interstate transport of NAAQS pollutants. A SIP for this sub-
section is referred to as an ``interstate transport SIP.'' In turn, CAA
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) requires that such a plan contain adequate
provisions to prohibit emissions from the state that will contribute
significantly to nonattainment of the NAAQS in any other state (``prong
1'') or interfere with maintenance of the NAAQS in any other state
(``prong 2''). Interstate transport prongs 1 and 2, also called
collectively the ``good neighbor'' provision, are the requirements
relevant to this action.
Pursuant to CAA section 110(k)(1)(B), EPA must determine within 60
days of receipt, but no later than 6 months after the date by which a
state is required to submit a SIP revision, whether a state has made a
submission that meets the minimum completeness criteria established
pursuant to CAA section 110(k)(1)(A). These criteria are set forth at
40 CFR part 51, appendix V. EPA refers to the determination that a
state has not submitted a SIP submission that meets the minimum
completeness criteria as a ``finding of failure to submit.'' If EPA
finds a state has failed to submit a SIP revision to meet its statutory
obligation to address CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), then pursuant to
CAA section 110(c)(1), EPA has not only the authority, but the
obligation, to promulgate a FIP within 2 years to address the CAA
requirement. This finding, therefore, starts a 2-year ``clock'' for
promulgation by EPA of a FIP, in accordance with CAA section 110(c)(1),
unless prior to such promulgation the state submits, and EPA approves,
a revision from the state to meet the requirements of CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). Even where EPA has promulgated a FIP, EPA will
withdraw that FIP if a state submits, and EPA approves, a SIP
satisfying the relevant requirements. EPA notes that this action does
not start a mandatory sanctions clock pursuant to CAA section 179
because this finding of failure to submit does not pertain to a part D
plan for nonattainment areas, required under CAA section 110(a)(2)(I),
or a SIP call pursuant to CAA section 110(k)(5).
B. Background on 2015 Ozone NAAQS, Alabama SIP Revisions, and
Incompleteness Determination
On October 1, 2015, EPA promulgated a new 8-hour primary and
secondary ozone NAAQS of 70 parts per billion (ppb), which is met when
the 3-year average of the annual fourth highest daily maximum 8-hour
concentration does not exceed 70 ppb.\1\ Pursuant to the 3-year period
provided in CAA section 110(a)(1), infrastructure SIP revisions
addressing the revised standard were due on October 1, 2018.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Final Rule, National Ambient Air Quality Standards for
Ozone, 80 FR 65292 (October 26, 2015).
\2\ EPA previously made findings of failure to submit with
respect to interstate transport obligations for the 2015 8-hour
ozone NAAQS for a number of other states. See 84 FR 66612 (December
5, 2019). As discussed further in this notice, at the time EPA made
those findings, Alabama had provided a complete submission, which it
has subsequently withdrawn.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 20, 2018, Alabama submitted a SIP revision to address the
interstate transport requirements for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS. On
February 22, 2022, EPA proposed to disapprove Alabama's August 20,
2018, SIP revision because the Agency preliminarily determined, based
on updated EPA modeling, that Alabama's SIP revision did not meet CAA
requirements to contain the necessary provisions to eliminate emissions
that will contribute significantly to nonattainment or interfere with
maintenance of the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS in any other state.\3\ See
87 FR 9545.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Previously, EPA proposed approval of Alabama's August 20,
2018, interstate transport SIP submission for the 2015 8-hour ozone
NAAQS based on modeling released in 2018. See 84 FR 71854 (December
30, 2019). However, based on new modeling released in 2020, it
became evident that Alabama was projected to be linked above 1
percent of the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS to downwind nonattainment and
maintenance receptors (see 87 FR 9553 n.40). As a result, EPA
deferred acting on Alabama's SIP submission when it published a
supplemental proposal in 2021 to approve four other southeastern
states' good neighbor SIP submissions using the updated modeling.
See 86 FR 37942, 37943 (July 19, 2021). Additional modeling
confirmed the results of the 2020 modeling. In its February 22,
2022, notice, EPA announced that the Agency was withdrawing its 2019
proposed approval and was proposing disapproval of that submission
instead. See 87 FR 9545 (February 22, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 21, 2022, Alabama withdrew its August 20, 2018, SIP
revision.\4\ Additionally, on that same day, Alabama provided EPA a new
SIP revision to address the CAA interstate transport requirements for
the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See the docket for this rulemaking for a copy of Alabama's
April 21, 2022, withdrawal letter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the CAA, a SIP revision may be considered ``complete''
by either of two methods: (1) EPA may make a determination that a SIP
is complete under the ``completeness criteria'' set out at 40 CFR part
51, appendix V, see CAA section 110(k)(1); or (2) a SIP may be deemed
complete by operation of law if EPA has failed to make a completeness
determination within 6 months after receipt of the State's SIP
submission, see CAA section 110(k)(1)(B).
EPA evaluated the SIP revision that Alabama sent on April 21, 2022,
for completeness pursuant to the criteria in 40 CFR part 51, appendix
V, and concluded it is an incomplete SIP submission. On June 15, 2022,
EPA sent a letter to Alabama explaining the Agency's incompleteness
determination. This letter is included in the docket for this
action.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ While this letter is included in the docket for this action,
and explains the deficiencies in the April 21, 2022, document, EPA
is not reopening its determination of incompleteness in this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Where EPA determines that a SIP revision does not meet the Appendix
V completeness criteria, the state shall be treated as not having made
the submission. See CAA section 110(k)(1)(C). Accordingly, EPA is
finding that Alabama has failed to submit a complete SIP revision
addressing the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the
2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Notwithstanding this finding, and the
associated obligation of EPA to promulgate a FIP for Alabama within two
years of this finding, EPA intends to continue to work with Alabama in
order to provide assistance as necessary to help the State develop an
approvable SIP revision.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ EPA notes that there is no mechanism for the State to
rescind the prior withdrawal of its August 20, 2018, submission.
See, e.g., 80 FR 39961, 39964-65 (July 13, 2015); see also Letter,
from Beverly H. Banister, USEPA Region 4, to Sheila Holman, NCDENR,
``Response to North Carolina's June 26, 2015 Letter Seeking to
Rescind the September 3, 2014 Withdrawal of the 2008 Ozone
Infrastructure State Implementation Plan Certification Regarding
Interstate Transport'' (June 30, 2015) (EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0943-0062)
(finding rescission of SIP withdrawal to constitute an incomplete
SIP revision and ``inappropriate'' where the withdrawal was relied
upon by plaintiffs and EPA in resolving deadline-suit litigation).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Finding of Failure To Submit for Failing To Make an Interstate
Transport SIP Submission for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS
As explained in Section II of this preamble, EPA finds the Alabama
has not submitted a complete interstate transport SIP revision to meet
the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2015 8-hour
ozone NAAQS.
IV. Environmental Justice Considerations
This notice makes a procedural finding that Alabama has failed to
submit a SIP revision to address CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the
2015 ozone NAAQS. EPA did not conduct an
[[Page 37237]]
environmental analysis for this action because it would not directly
affect the air emissions of particular sources. Because this action
will not directly affect the air emissions of particular sources, it
does not affect the level of protection provided to human health or the
environment. Therefore, this action will not have potential
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority, low-income or indigenous populations.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Orders 12866: Regulatory Planning and Executive Order
13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was,
therefore, not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act. This final action does
not establish any new information collection requirement apart from
what is already required by law. This finding relates to the
requirement in the CAA for states to submit SIPs under section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) of the CAA for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This action is not subject to the RFA. The RFA applies only to
rules subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553 or any other statute.
This action is not subject to notice and comment requirements because
the agency has invoked the APA ``good cause'' exemption under 5 U.S.C.
553(b).
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538 and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local or tribal governments or the private sector.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. This action finds that Alabama has failed to
complete the requirement in the CAA to submit a SIP under section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) of the CAA for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. No tribe is
subject to the requirement to submit a transport SIP under section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) of the CAA for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. In addition,
the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in
any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to
this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern health or safety risks that EPA has
reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, per the
definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of the
Executive Order. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045
because it is a finding that Alabama has failed to submit a complete
SIP that satisfies interstate transport requirements under section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) of the CAA for the 2015 ozone NAAQS and does not
directly or disproportionately affect children.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
EPA believes the human health or environmental risk addressed by
this action will not have potential disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects on minority, low-income, or
indigenous populations. In finding that Alabama has failed to submit a
complete SIP that satisfies the interstate transport requirements under
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) of the CAA for the 2015 ozone NAAQS, this
action does not adversely affect the level of protection provided to
human health or the environment.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
L. Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by August 22, 2022. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements (see CAA section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: June 15, 2022.
Daniel Blackman,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2022-13292 Filed 6-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on June 22, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.