Proposed Rule2022-12783
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Milford Haven, Hudgins, VA
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
June 14, 2022
Effective
August 19, 2022
Issuing agencies
Homeland Security DepartmentCoast Guard
Abstract
The Coast Guard proposes to modify the operating schedule that governs the SR223 (Gwynn's Island) Bridge, across Milford Haven, mile 0.1, at Hudgins, Virginia. This proposed temporary modification will allow the drawbridge to be maintained in the closed-to-navigation position and is necessary to accommodate bridge maintenance. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 114 (Tuesday, June 14, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 14, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35939-35940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12783]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2022-0226]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Milford Haven, Hudgins, VA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to modify the operating schedule that
governs the SR223 (Gwynn's Island) Bridge, across Milford Haven, mile
0.1, at Hudgins, Virginia. This proposed temporary modification will
allow the drawbridge to be maintained in the closed-to-navigation
position and is necessary to accommodate bridge maintenance. We invite
your comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before July 1, 2022. The Coast Guard anticipates that this proposed
rule will be effective from 2 a.m. on August 19, 2022, through 11 p.m.
on April 15, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2022-2026 using Federal Decision Making Portal at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Ms. Crystal Tucker, Bridge Administration Branch
Fifth District, Coast Guard telephone 757-398-6422, email
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1e5d6c676d6a7f723075306a6b7d757b6c5e6b6d7d7930737772"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5f1c2d262c2b3e337134712b2a3c343a2d1f2a2c3c3871323633">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
OMB Office of Management and Budget
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Advance, Supplemental)
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis
The Virginian Department of Transportation, who owns and operates
the SR223 (Gwynn's Island) Bridge, across Milford Haven, mile 0.1, at
Hudgins, Virginia, has requested this modification to allow the
drawbridge to be maintained in the closed-to-navigation position to
facilitate maintenance of the drawbridge.
The SR223 (Gwynn's Island) Bridge, across Milford Haven, mile 0.1,
at Hudgins, Virginia has a vertical clearance of 12 feet above mean
high water in the closed position and unlimited vertical clearance
above mean high water in the open position. The current operating
schedule for the drawbridge is published in 33 CFR 117.5.
This proposed rule is necessary to facilitate safe and effective
bridge maintenance of the drawbridge, while providing for the
reasonable needs of navigation. Vessels that can safely transit through
the bridge in the closed position with the reduced clearance may do so,
if at least a thirty-minute notice is given, to allow for navigation
safety. The SR223 (Gwynn's Island) Bridge is the only land-based method
for access on and off Gwynn's Island, therefore, placing the bridge in
the open position to perform extensive bridge maintenance would
adversely affect residents on the island.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
Under this proposed rule, the drawbridge will be maintained in the
closed-to-navigation position twenty-four hours a day, seven days a
week from 2 a.m. on August 19, 2022, through 11 p.m. on April 15, 2023.
This proposed rule is necessary to accommodate extensive maintenance on
the SR223 (Gwynn's Island) Bridge.
The bridge will not be able to open for emergencies and there is no
immediate alternative route for vessels unable to pass through the
bridge in the closed position. Vessels that can safely transit through
the bridge in the closed position with the reduced vertical clearance
may do so, if at least a thirty-minute notice is given, to allow for
navigation safety.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes and Executive Orders and we discuss
First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is a result of pre rulemaking
coordination with maritime stakeholders including federal agencies.
This proposed rule effectively balances the competing interests of land
and maritime transportation.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
bridge may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section IV, A
above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact
on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
[[Page 35940]]
qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically
affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this
proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01, Rev.1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning Policy COMDTINST 5090.1
(series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f). The
Coast Guard has determined that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule promulgates the
operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. Normally such
actions are categorically excluded from further review, under paragraph
L49, of Chapter 3, Table 3-1 of the U.S. Coast Guard Environmental
Planning Implementation Procedures.
Neither a Record of Environmental Consideration nor a Memorandum
for the Record are required for this rule. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal Decision
Making Portal at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. To do so, go to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, type USCG-2022-0226 in the search box and click
``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the Search Results column,
and click on it. Then click on the Comment option. If your material
cannot be submitted using <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, contact the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document
for alternate instructions.
To view documents mentioned in this proposed rule as being
available in the docket, find the docket as described in the previous
paragraph, and then select ``Supporting & Related Material'' in the
Document Type column. Public comments will also be placed in our online
docket and can be viewed by following instructions on the <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> Frequently Asked Questions web page. We review all
comments received, but we will only post comments that address the
topic of the proposed rule. We may choose not to post off-topic,
inappropriate, or duplicate comments that we receive.
We accept anonymous comments. Comments we post to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> will include any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and submissions in response to this
document, see DHS's eRulemaking System of Records notice (85 FR 14226,
March 11, 2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 117.1017T to read as follows:
Sec. 117. 1017T Milford Haven.
The draw of the SR223 (Gwynn's Island) Bridge, mile 0.1, in
Hudgins, need not be open for vessels from 2 a.m. on July 19, 2022,
through 11 p.m. on April 15, 2023.
Dated: June 8, 2022.
S.N. Gilreath,
Rear Admiral U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2022-12783 Filed 6-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on June 14, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.