Notice2022-12711
Certain Steel Nails From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2020-2021
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
June 13, 2022
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that certain steel nails from Taiwan were sold in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 113 (Monday, June 13, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35734-35738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12711]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-854]
Certain Steel Nails From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2020-2021
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
[[Page 35735]]
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that certain steel nails from Taiwan were sold in the United
States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR),
July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021. Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable June 13, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6905.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 13, 2015, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) published
the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain steel nails (nails) from
Taiwan.\1\ On July 1, 2021, Commerce published in the Federal Register
a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the
Order.\2\ On July 30, 2021, Encore Green Co., Ltd. and Liang Kai Co.
requested an administrative review.\3\ On July 30, 2021, Commerce
received a request for an administrative review of 128 producers and/or
exporters of subject merchandise, filed on behalf of Mid Continent
Steel & Wire, Inc. (the petitioner).\4\ On August 2, 2021, Liang Chyuan
Industrial Co., Ltd.\5\ requested an administrative review of
itself.\6\ On September 7, 2021, we initiated an administrative review
of certain steel nails from Taiwan covering all companies for which a
review was requested in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of Korea,
Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic
of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders, 80 FR 39994 (July 13, 2015)
(Order).
\2\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative
Review, 86 FR 35065 (July 1, 2021).
\3\ See Harris Bricken's Letter, ``Administrative Review
Request,'' dated July 30, 2021.
\4\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Request for Administrative
Reviews,'' dated July 30, 2021.
\5\ Commerce determined that Liang Chyuan Industrial Co., Ltd.
and Integral Building Products Inc. comprise a single entity in
Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018, 84 FR 48116 (September 12,
2019), unchanged in Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Determination of No
Shipments; 2017-2018, 85 FR 14635 (March 13, 2020). Because there is
nothing on the record calling into question our prior finding, we
continue to treat these companies as part of a single entity for
this administrative review.
\6\ See Appleton Luff's Letter, ``Administrative Review
Request,'' dated August 2, 2021. Commerce's practice dictates that,
where a deadline falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, the
appropriate deadline is the next business day. See Notice of
Clarification: Application of ``Next Business Day'' Rule for
Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). Therefore, this
request for review was timely.
\7\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 50034 (September 7, 2021) (Initiation
Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On September 16, 2021, the petitioner filed a timely letter
withdrawing its request for review of 61 of the 128 companies
originally requested for review.\8\ On September 16, 2021, Encore Green
Co., Ltd. and Liang Kai Co. also withdrew their requests for review.\9\
Further, while the petitioner withdrew its review request for Liang
Chyuan Industrial Co., Ltd. and Integral Building Products, Inc., Liang
Chyuan Industrial Co., Ltd. did not withdraw its request for review of
itself.\10\ Therefore, we are not rescinding the review of: (1) the
single entity comprising Liang Chyuan Industrial Co., Ltd. and Integral
Building Products Inc.; or (2) Liang Kai Co., because active review
requests remain on the record for them. We are rescinding the review
with respect to the 59 companies \11\ for which all requests for review
were timely withdrawn by interested parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Withdrawal of Review Request,''
dated September 16, 2021.
\9\ See Harris Bricken's Letter, ``Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review,'' dated September 16, 2021. However, while
Liang Kai Co. withdrew its request for review, the petitioner did
not withdraw its review request for this company.
\10\ Despite the petitioner's withdrawal of the sole review
request with respect to Integral Building Products Inc., we do not
intend to rescind the review with respect to this company because it
is part of a single entity with Liang Chyuan Industrial Co., Ltd.,
for which a review request remains.
\11\ See Appendix III.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On December 8, 2021, we selected King Chuang Wen Trading Co., Ltd.
(King Chuang) and the single entity comprising Liang Chyuan Industrial
Co., Ltd. and Integral Building Products Inc. (collectively, Liang
Chyuan) as mandatory respondents in this administrative review.\12\
King Chuang and Liang Chyuan did not respond to the AD questionnaire.
On January 12, 2022, we selected Liang Kai Co., as an additional
mandatory respondent.\13\ Liang Kai Co. did not respond to the AD
questionnaire.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Memorandum, ``Respondent Selection,'' dated December 8,
2021.
\13\ See Memorandum, ``Selection of Additional Mandatory
Respondent,'' dated January 12, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a complete description of the events that followed the
initiation of this administrative review, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.\14\ The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically via the Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at
<a href="http://access.trade.gov">http://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the
internet at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Steel
Nails from Taiwan; 2020-2021,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this Order is certain steel nails from
Taiwan. The certain steel nails subject to the Order are currently
classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) subheadings 7317.00.55.02, 7317.00.55.03, 7317.00.55.05,
7317.00.55.07, 7317.00.55.08, 7317.00.55.11, 7317.00.55.18,
7317.00.55.19, 7317.00.55.20, 7317.00.55.30, 7317.00.55.40,
7317.00.55.50, 7317.00.55.60, 7317.00.55.70, 7317.00.55.80,
7317.00.55.90, 7317.00.65.30, 7317.00.65.60 and 7317.00.75.00. Certain
steel nails subject to this Order also may be classified under HTSUS
subheadings 7907.00.60.00, 8206.00.00.00 or other HTSUS subheadings.
Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and for customs
purposes, the written product description, available in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum, remains dispositive.
Partial Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested
the review withdraws its request within 90 days of the publication of
the notice of initiation of the requested review. Because all requests
for administrative review of the 59 companies listed in Appendix III
were withdrawn by interested parties within 90 days of the date of
publication of the Initiation Notice, and no other interested party
requested a review of them, Commerce is rescinding this review with
respect to these companies, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
The administrative review remains active with respect to 69
companies (including the two companies
[[Page 35736]]
comprising the single Liang Chyuan entity, but listed separately in the
Initiation Notice).
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology
underlying the preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
Commerce received no-shipment certifications from four companies:
Astrotech Steels Private Limited, Geekay Wires Limited, Region
Industries Co., Ltd., and Region System Sdn. Bhd. To confirm these
companies' no-shipment claims, Commerce issued a no-shipment inquiry to
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and received no contradictory
information.\15\ Therefore, we preliminarily determine that these four
companies did not have any shipments of subject merchandise during the
POR. Consistent with Commerce's practice, we will not rescind the
review with respect to these companies, but, rather, will complete the
review and issue instructions based on the final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Memorandum, ``No Shipment Inquiry,'' dated January 21,
2022, where CBP confirmed that ``CBP's Base Metals ran an ACE query
. . . and found no entries by: Wiresmith, Astrotech Steels Private
Limited Company; Geekay Wires Limited; Region System, or Region
System Sdn. Bhd.; Region Industries, or Region Industries Co., Ltd.
. . .''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, Wiresmith Industrial Co., Ltd. (Wiresmith) and Create
Trading Co., Ltd. (Create Trading) are resellers of subject merchandise
that reported that they had no reviewable sales or shipments during the
POR because their respective unaffiliated producers had knowledge of
the final U.S. destination of the subject merchandise that they
produced and sold to the resellers. The resellers provided sales
documentation, such as invoices and packing lists from their
unaffiliated suppliers, as well as accounting records as evidence in
support of their claims.\16\ Commerce also issued supplemental
questionnaires to both resellers requesting additional information
regarding their respective statements of no sales or shipments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Create Trading Letter, ``Statement of No Sales to the
United States,'' dated October 7, 2021; see also Wiresmith Letter,
``Statement of No Sales to the United States,'' dated October 7,
2021 (Wiresmith SNS).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on the information provided by both resellers, we
preliminarily determine that Wiresmith and Create Trading were not the
first parties in the transaction chain to have knowledge that the
subject merchandise was destined for the United States, and, thus,
Wiresmith and Create Trading are not considered the exporters of
subject merchandise during the POR for purposes of this review.
Specifically, the record demonstrates that Wiresmith's and Create
Trading's respective unaffiliated suppliers had knowledge that the
steel nails they produced and sold to the resellers were destined for
the United States. Thus, we preliminarily determine that Wiresmith and
Create Trading had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.
Commerce finds that, based on the clarification in the 2003
Assessment of Antidumping Duties \17\ notice regarding the reseller
policy, we will not rescind the review in these circumstances but,
rather, complete the review with respect to the resellers and issue
appropriate instructions to CBP after the completion of the review.\18\
Specifically, we preliminarily find it appropriate in this case to
instruct CBP at the completion of the review to liquidate any existing
entries of subject merchandise produced and exported by the resellers'
respective unaffiliated suppliers at the rate applicable to the
unaffiliated producers, which, as discussed below, in this case is the
all-others rate.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003)
(Assessment of Antidumping Duties).
\18\ Id.
\19\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India:
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR
77610, 77612 (December 19, 2008) (Shrimp from India); Certain Pasta
from Turkey: Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 76 FR 23974, 23977 (April 29, 2011),
unchanged in Pasta from Turkey: Notice of Final Results of the 14th
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 68399 (November 4,
2011) (Pasta from Turkey).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facts Available
Pursuant to section 776(a) of the Act, Commerce is preliminarily
relying upon facts otherwise available to assign estimated dumping
margins to King Chuang, Liang Chyuan, and Liang Kai Co. because all
three respondents were unresponsive to our requests for information,
thereby withholding necessary information that was requested by
Commerce, and significantly impeding the conduct of the review.
Further, Commerce preliminarily determines that King Chuan, Liang
Chyuan, and Liang Kai Co. failed to cooperate by not acting to the best
of their ability to comply with requests for information and, thus,
Commerce is applying an adverse inference in selecting among the facts
available, in accordance with section 776(b) of the Act. For a full
description of the methodology underlying our conclusions regarding the
application of adverse facts available, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Rate for Non-Selected Companies
The statute and Commerce's regulations do not directly address the
establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for
individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an
administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act.
Commerce's practice in calculating a rate for non-examined companies in
cases involving limited selection based on exporters or producers
accounting for the largest volumes of trade has been to look to section
735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, which provides instructions for
calculating the all-others rate in an investigation. In accordance with
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision in
Albemarle,\20\ we are relying on the ``expected method'' pursuant to
section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act and the SAA,\21\ and, thus, are
applying a review-specific rate based on the individual rates
preliminarily applied to King Chuang, Liang Chyuan, and Liang Kai Co.
in this administrative review (i.e., 78.17 percent) to the companies
not selected for individual examination. For a detailed discussion, see
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d 1345 (Fed.
Cir. 2016) (Albemarle).
\21\ See Statement of Administrative Action Accompanying the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act, H.R. Rep. No. 103-316, Vol. 1 (1994)
(SAA) at 873 (when ``the dumping margins for all of the exporters
and producers that are individually investigated are determined
entirely on the basis of the facts available or are zero or de
minimis . . . {t{time} he expected method in such cases will be to
weight-average the zero and the de minimis margins and margins
determined pursuant to the facts available.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of Review
We preliminarily determine that, for the period July 1, 2020,
through June 30, 2021, the following estimated dumping margins exist:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dumping
Exporter/producer margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
King Chuang Wen Trading Co., Ltd............................ 78.17
Liang Chyuan Industrial Co., Ltd./Integral Building Products 78.17
Inc........................................................
Liang Kai Co................................................ 78.17
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 35737]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dumping
Exporter/producer margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to Companies Under Review Not
Selected for Individual Examination
------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Appendix II for the 59 companies under review subject to 78.17
the review-specific rate...................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
Normally, Commerce discloses the calculations performed in
connection with preliminary results to interested parties within five
days after the date of publication of this notice. Because Commerce
preliminarily applied a rate based on total AFA to each of the
mandatory respondents in this review, in accordance with section 776 of
the Act, there are no calculations to disclose.
Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days
after the date of publication of this notice.\22\ Rebuttal briefs, the
content of which is limited to the issues raised in the case briefs,
must be filed within seven days from the deadline date for the
submission of case briefs.\23\ Parties who submit case or rebuttal
briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with each argument:
(1) a statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and
(3) a table of authorities.\24\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be
filed electronically via ACCESS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
\23\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2); see also Temporary Rule
Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID-19, 85 FR 17006
(March 26, 2020).
\24\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2); see also Temporary
Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID19; Extension
of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS. An electronically-filed document must be received successfully
in its entirety by ACCESS by 5 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after
the date of publication of this notice.\25\ Hearing requests should
contain: (1) the party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the
number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed.
Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to issues raised in the
briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold
the hearing at a time and date to be determined.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
\26\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative
review, including the results of its analysis raised in any written
briefs, no later than 120 days after the publication of these
preliminary results in the Federal Register, unless otherwise
extended.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; see also 19 CFR
351.213(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Verification
As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the Act, Commerce verified the
information relied upon in making its preliminary results with respect
to Create Trading. Normally, Commerce verifies information using
standard procedures, including an on-site examination of original
accounting, financial, and sales documentation. However, due to travel
restrictions in response to the global COVID-19 pandemic, Commerce was
unable to conduct on-site verification in this review. Accordingly, we
chose to verify the information relied upon in making the preliminary
results through alternative means in lieu of an on-site verification.
Commerce issued a questionnaire in lieu of on-site verification to
Create Trading.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See Commerce's Letter, ``In Lieu of On-Site Verification
Questionnaire,'' dated May 2, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the administrative review, Commerce shall
determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review. For the companies for which we have
rescinded this review, Commerce intends to instruct CBP to assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries at a rate equal to the
cash deposit rate of estimated antidumping duties required at the time
of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during the
POR, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to
issue assessment instructions to CBP for the rescinded companies no
earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the preliminary
results of this administrative review in the Federal Register.
If the preliminary results are unchanged for the final results, we
will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 78.17
percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which were
produced and/or exported by King Chuang, Liang Chyuan, Liang Kai Co.,
and the companies which were not selected for individual examination.
With respect to the four companies that certified they had no
shipments, if we continue to find that they had no shipments of subject
merchandise in the final results, we will instruct CBP to liquidate any
existing entries of subject merchandise produced by the four companies,
but exported by other parties, at the rate for the intermediate
reseller, if available, or at the all-others rate.
With respect to the two resellers, Wiresmith and Create Trading, as
discussed above, we preliminarily determine that the resellers were not
the first parties in the transaction chain to have knowledge that the
subject merchandise was destined for the United States, and thus the
resellers are not considered the exporters of subject merchandise
during the POR for purposes of this review. Consistent with the 2003
Assessment of Antidumping Duties notice and reseller policy, we find it
appropriate in this case to instruct CBP to liquidate any existing
entries of merchandise produced by the resellers' unaffiliated
producers and exported by the resellers at the rate applicable to the
producer(s).\29\ Because none of the producer(s) have their own rates,
we will instruct CBP to liquidate entries at the all-others rate from
the investigation, as revised, of 2.16 percent,\30\ in accordance with
the reseller policy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ See, e.g., Shrimp from India; and Pasta from Turkey.
\30\ The all-others rate from the underlying investigation was
revised in Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan: Notice of Court Decision
Not in Harmony with Final Determination in Less than Fair Value
Investigation and Notice of Amended Final Determination, 82 FR
55090, 55091 (November 20, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for King Chuang,
Liang Chyuan, and Liang Kai Co and the companies listed in Appendix II
will be
[[Page 35738]]
equal to the dumping margin established in the final results of this
administrative review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated
companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed
segment of this proceeding in which they were reviewed; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or in
the investigation, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will
be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this
proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to
be 2.16 percent, the all-others rate. These cash deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and sections 19 CFR
351.213(h)(1) and 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: June 7, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Methodology
V. Recommendation
Appendix II--List of Companies Under Review Not Selected for Individual
Examination
1. Acu-Transport Co., Ltd.
2. Allwin Architectural Hardware Inc.
3. Alsons Manufacturing India LLP
4. An Chen Fa Machinery Co., Ltd.
5. Bollore Logistics India Private Ltd.
6. Bon Voyage Logistics Inc.
7. Boss Precision Works Co., Ltd.
8. C.H. Robinson Freight Services Ltd.
9. C.H.Robinson World Wide India Pvt. Ltd.
10. Casia Global Logistics Co., Ltd.
11. Chief Ling Entreprise Co., Ltd
12. China Intl. Freight Co., Ltd.
13. China Sea Forwarders Co., Ltd.
14. Crane Worldwide Logistics LLC
15. De Well Container Shipping Inc.
16. DHL Global Forwarding Sg. Pte. Ltd.
17. Diversified Freight System Corporation
18. Eusu Logistics Co., Ltd.
19. Evergreen Logistics Corp.
20. Everise Global Logistics Co., Ltd.
21. Grandlink Logistics Co., Ltd.
22. Honour Lane Logistics Company Ltd.
23. Honour Lane Shipping Ltd.
24. Houseware Taiwan Industries Ltd.
25. Inmax Industries Sdn. Bhd.
26. K.E. & Kingstone Co., Ltd.
27. Kay Guay Entreprises Co., Ltd.
28. Kerry Indev Logistics Private Limited
29. King Compass Logistics Limited
30. King Freight International Corp.
31. Lien Bin Industries Co., Ltd.
32. New Marine Consolidator Co., Ltd.
33. NMC Logistics International Co., Ltd.
34. Oceanlink/Topair International Co.
35. OEC Freight Worldwide Co., Ltd.
36. Orient Containers Sdn., Bhd.
37. Orient Express Container Co., Ltd.
38. Orient Star International Logistics Co., Ltd.
39. Orient Star Transport International Ltd.
40. Oriental Vanguard Logistics Co., Ltd.
41. Pacific Concord International Ltd.
42. Pacific Star Express Corp.
43. Panda Logistics Co., Ltd.
44. Ray Fu Entreprise Co., Ltd.
45. SAR Transport Systems Pvt. Ltd.
46. Schenker (H.K.) Ltd.
47. Storeit Services LLP.
48. Success Progress International Tran
49. T.H.I. Logistics Co., Ltd.
50. T.V.L. Container Line Limited
51. The Ultimate Freight Management (Taiwan) Ltd.
52. Topocean Consolidation Service (Taiwan) Ltd.
53. Trans Luck Global Logistics Co., Ltd.
54. Trans Wagon International Co., Ltd.
55. Transwell Logistics Co., Ltd.
56. Transworld Transportation Co., Ltd.
57. UPS Supply Chain Solutions (Taiwan) Co., Ltd.
58. Valuemax Products Co., Ltd.
59. Worldwide Logistics Co., Ltd.
Appendix III--Companies Rescinded From Review
1. Aplus Pneumatic Corp.
2. Bonuts Hardware Logistics Co., Ltd.
3. Cheng CH International Co., Ltd.
4. Chia Pao Metal Co., Ltd.
5. China Staple Enterprise Corporation
6. Chite Enterprises Co., Ltd.
7. Crown Run Industrial Corp.
8. De Fasteners Inc.
9. Easylink Industrial Co., Ltd.
10. Encore Green Co., Ltd.
11. Faithful Engineering Products Co., Ltd.
12. General Merchandise Consolidators, Inc.
13. Hor Liang Industrial Corp.
14. Hoyi Plus Co., Ltd.
15. Interactive Corp.
16. Jade Shuttle Enerprise Co., Ltd.
17. Jau Yeou Industry Co., Ltd.
18. JC Grand Corporation
19. Jen Ju Enterprise Co., Ltd.
20. Jet Crown International Co., Ltd.
21. Jiajue Industrial Co., Ltd.
22. Jinsco International Corp.
23. Ko's Nail Inc.
24. Korea Wire Co., Ltd.
25. Linkwell Industry Co., Ltd.
26. Locksure Inc.
27. Lu Kang Hand Tools Industrial Co., Ltd.
28. Master United Corp.
29. Maytrans International Corp.
30. Ming Cheng Hardware Co., Ltd.
31. Nailermate Enterprise Corporation
32. Nailtech Co., Ltd.
33. Newrex Screw Corporation
34. Panther T&H Industry Co.
35. Patek Tool Co., Ltd.
36. Point Edge Corp.
37. President Industrial Inc.
38. Pro Team Coil Nail Enterprise Incor.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ Commerce determined that Pro-Team and PT Enterprise
comprise a single entity in Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Partial Rescission of Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 82 FR 36744
(August 7, 2017), unchanged in Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial
Rescission of Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 83 FR 6163 (February
13, 2018). However, Commerce inadvertently listed them separately in
the Initiation Notice, rather than as a combined single entity on a
single line.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
39. PT Enterprise, Inc.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ As noted above, PT Enterprise Inc. and Pro Team Coil Nail
Enterprise Incor. comprise a single entity. Commerce inadvertently
listed them separately in the Initiation Notice, rather than as a
combined single entity on a single line.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
40. Romp Coil Nail Industries Inc.
41. Shinn Chuen Corp.
42. Six2 Fastener Imports Inc.
43. Taiwan Shan Yin International Co., Ltd.
44. Taiwan Wakisangyo Co., Ltd.
45. Techart Mechanical Corporation
46. Test-Rite Int'l Co., Ltd.
47. Theps Co., Ltd.
48. Trans-Top Enterprise Co., Ltd.
49. Trim International Inc.
50. U-Can-Do Hardware Corp.
51. UJL Industries Co., Ltd.
52. Unicatch Industrial Co., Ltd.
53. Vim International Entreprise Co., Ltd.
54. Wattson Fastener Group Inc.
55. Wictory Co., Ltd.
56. Yehdyi Enterprise Co., Ltd.
57. Yu Chi Hardware Co., Ltd.
58. Zhishan Xing Entreprise Co., Ltd.
59. Zon Mon Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2022-12711 Filed 6-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on June 13, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.