Rule2022-12561
National Service Life Insurance Premium Payment and Loan Amendment
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
June 10, 2022
Effective
July 11, 2022
Issuing agencies
Veterans Affairs Department
Abstract
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is amending its National Service Life Insurance (NSLI) regulations to offer Service- Disabled Veterans' Insurance (S-DVI) policyholders the option of remitting premiums for government life insurance coverage only on a monthly or annual basis. VA is also increasing the amount that Veteran policyholders are eligible to borrow against the value of their life insurance policies and to adjust the interest rates charged for fixed- rate loans in certain circumstances.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 112 (Friday, June 10, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 112 (Friday, June 10, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35419-35421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12561]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 8
RIN 2900-AR29
National Service Life Insurance Premium Payment and Loan
Amendment
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is amending its
National Service Life Insurance (NSLI) regulations to offer Service-
Disabled Veterans' Insurance (S-DVI) policyholders the option of
remitting premiums for government life insurance coverage only on a
monthly or annual basis. VA is also increasing the amount that Veteran
policyholders are eligible to borrow against the value of their life
insurance policies and to adjust the interest rates charged for fixed-
rate loans in certain circumstances.
DATES: This rule is effective July 11, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Weaver, Insurance Specialist,
Department of Veterans Affairs Insurance Service (310/290B), 5000
Wissahickon Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19144, (215) 842-2000, ext. 4263.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 13, 2021, VA published in the
Federal Register (86 FR 56846) a proposed rule to amend its regulations
governing the NSLI programs. Interested persons were invited to submit
written comments on or before December 13, 2021. VA received two
comments concerning the proposed changes to the modes of payment for
NSLI premiums.
The first commenter stated that VA makes the ``confusing argument
that allowing veterans to pay their life insurance bills quarterly or
semi-annually adds administrative complexity and program costs,'' and
that the commenter cannot understand how providing additional payment
options ``should add any administrative complexity.'' A second
commenter
[[Page 35420]]
stated that calculating quarterly and semi-annual premiums ``should not
have a higher program cost than calculating the annual premiums.''
We explained in our proposed rulemaking that very few Veteran
policyholders choose to pay premiums on a semi-annual or quarterly
basis. As part of recent VA efforts to modernize the information
technology systems of its life insurance programs, VA purchased
commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) policy maintenance software used by
other private insurance companies. This purchase enabled VA to minimize
information technology transformation costs to policyholders compared
to a custom-designed system built from the ground-up for VA use. This
COTS system does not offer quarterly and semi-annual premium modes, and
VA would have to incur additional costs to have the contracted vendor
add these modes for VA use. VA's analysis indicated that the costs for
this customization were disproportionate to the value of the associated
benefit, given the relatively few policyholders who choose these
payment modes. If VA were to continue these payment options, it would
add administrative complexity and program costs because VA would either
have to purchase a customized enhancement for these modes or develop a
manual solution to override the functionality of the COTS system when
policyholders choose to pay premiums on a semi-annual or quarterly
basis. We note that, while the COTS system will be used for current and
new policies, current policies will retain the options they have by
hardcoding the prior option into the new system at conversion. A
policyholder who elects a monthly or annual payment mode after
conversion will not have the option to return to a quarterly or semi-
annual payment. Again, to allow the quarterly and semi-annual payment
options for new policies under the COTS system would require a more
costly customized enhancement. Further, VA is required to manage its
life insurance programs in a cost-effective and actuarially sound
manner (see, e.g., 38 U.S.C. 1920(b); 1925(d)(2)), and continuing to
offer premium modes that would increase costs for all policyholders
while benefitting a relative few, while also potentially increasing
lapse rates for vulnerable disabled veterans, is not actuarially sound
because it is not cost-effective.
The first commenter also stated that an article that we cited to in
our proposed rulemaking concerning lapse rates (Cathy Ho & Nancy Muise,
U.S. Individual Life Persistency: Guaranteed & Simplified Issue--A
Joint Study Sponsored by Soc'y of Actuaries & LIMRA 16 (2013), <a href="https://www.soa.org/globalassets/assets/Files/Research/Exp-Study/research-2013-gisi-study.pdf">https://www.soa.org/globalassets/assets/Files/Research/Exp-Study/research-2013-gisi-study.pdf</a> (last visited Jan. 13, 2022)) ``is not compelling'' and
that there must be ''better ways for the VA to allocate its resources
than reducing the number of payment options available to veterans.''
The second commenter suggested that, because the data in the article is
``two decades old,'' VA should use a more recent study.
In the proposed rule we stated that ``research shows that lapse
rates tend to increase with the number of premium payments made each
year, with the notable exception of monthly payment modes.'' Id. We
cited to this research because the results of the study support our
effort to minimize lapsed life insurance coverage by offering fewer,
simpler payment options. We also cited to this research because some of
the commercial insurers that we reviewed relied upon this research as
well as a prior 2005 study when limiting premium payment options to
reduce costs and minimize lapse of coverage for their policyholders.
See Marianne Purushotham, U.S. Individual Life Persistency Update--A
Joint Study Sponsored by LIMRA International and the Society of
Actuaries, <a href="https://www.soa.org/globalassets/assets/Files/Research/Exp-Study/US-Indiv-Life-Persistency-Report-Final.pdf">https://www.soa.org/globalassets/assets/Files/Research/Exp-Study/US-Indiv-Life-Persistency-Report-Final.pdf</a> (2005) (last visited
Jan. 13, 2022). Because the 2013 study is consistent with the 2005
study that was conducted by the same insurance trade group, we have no
reason to believe this pattern would change with more recent data.
Also, VA has historically observed more inconsistent premiums from
veterans paying under semi-annual and quarterly payment modes. For the
reasons stated above, VA will adopt the proposed rule as final, without
change.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this rule is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
12866. The Regulatory Impact Analysis associated with this rulemaking
can be found as a supporting document at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612. This final rule will directly affect only individuals and will not
directly affect any small entities. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
605(b), the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604 do not apply.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This final rule will have no such effect on
State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3521).
Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs designated this rule
as not a major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Assistance Listing
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance numbers and titles for
the programs affected by this document are 64.030, Life Insurance for
Veterans--Face Amount of New Life Insurance Policies Issued, and
64.031, Life Insurance for Veterans--Direct Payments for Insurance.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 8
Disability benefits, Life insurance, Loan programs--veterans,
Military personnel, Veterans.
Signing Authority
Denis McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on June 6, 2022, and authorized the undersigned to sign and
[[Page 35421]]
submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for
publication electronically as an official document of the Department of
Veterans Affairs.
Luvenia Potts,
Regulations Development Coordinator, Office of Regulation Policy &
Management, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, VA amends 38 CFR part 8 as
set forth below:
PART 8--NATIONAL SERVICE LIFE INSURANCE
0
1. The authority citation for part 8 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1901-1929, 1981-1988, unless
otherwise noted.
0
2. Amend Sec. 8.2 by revising paragraph (c)(2) and adding paragraph
(c)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 8.2 Payment of premiums.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) Policyholders may pay premiums in advance on an annual basis.
(3) Policyholders insured as of July 11, 2022 may pay premiums in
advance on an annual, semi-annual, or quarterly basis.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 8.13:
0
a. In paragraph (a), by removing ``which will not exceed 94 percent''
and adding ``policy'' before ``reserve'' in the first sentence.
0
b. By revising paragraph (d).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 8.13 Policy loans.
* * * * *
(d) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, the
variable loan rate shall not exceed 12 percent or be lower than 5
percent per annum. For policyholders with an existing fixed-rate loan
who subsequently apply for an additional loan on the same policy, the
existing fixed-rate loan shall be refinanced into the new variable-rate
loan at the prevailing variable rate at the time of the new loan
application.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2022-12561 Filed 6-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on June 10, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.