Notice2022-11875
Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange Rule 519, MIAX Pearl Order Monitor (“MOM”)
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
June 3, 2022
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 107 (Friday, June 3, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 107 (Friday, June 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33862-33866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11875]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-95000; File No. SR-PEARL-2022-22]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange
Rule 519, MIAX Pearl Order Monitor (``MOM'')
May 27, 2022.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice
is hereby given that on May 13, 2022, MIAX PEARL, LLC (``MIAX Pearl''
or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') a proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange 519, MIAX Pearl Order
Monitor (``MOM'').
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at <a href="http://www.miaxoptions.com/rule-filings/pearl">http://www.miaxoptions.com/rule-filings/pearl</a> at MIAX
PEARL's principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 519, MIAX Pearl Order
Monitor (``MOM'') to (i) establish an Exchange default Threshold
Setting for market orders \3\ to sell an option when the national best
bid is zero; (ii) provide that an Electronic Exchange Member (``EEM'')
\4\ may supply their own pre-set value to be used as the Threshold
Setting; (iii) reorganize the rule text for ease of reference; and (iv)
adopt new rule text to add additional detail regarding the Exchange's
process for evaluating and reevaluating market orders to sell.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A market order is an order to buy or sell a stated number of
option contracts at the best price available at the time of
execution. See Exchange Rule 516(a).
\4\ The term ``Electronic Exchange Member'' or ``EEM'' means the
holder of a Trading Permit who is a Member representing as agent
Public Customer Orders or Non-Customer Orders on the Exchange and
those non-Market Maker Members conducting proprietary trading.
Electronic Exchange Members are deemed ``members'' under the
Exchange Act. See Exchange Rule 100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 33863]]
Background
Currently, in order to avoid the occurrence of potential obvious or
catastrophic errors on the Exchange the MIAX Pearl Order Monitor will
prevent certain orders from executing or being placed on the Book \5\
at prices outside pre-set standard limits. Beginning after the Opening
Process \6\ is complete, the MIAX Pearl Order Monitor will be
operational each trading day until the close of trading.\7\ Exchange
Rule 519(a)(1)(i) provides that if the Exchange upon initial receipt or
reevaluation evaluates a market order from an EEM to sell an option
when the national best bid is zero and the Exchange's disseminated
offer is equal to or less than $0.10, the System \8\ will convert the
market order to sell to a limit order to sell with a limit price of one
Minimum Trading Increment.\9\ In this case, such sell orders will
automatically be placed on the Book in time priority and will be
displayed at the appropriate Minimum Price Variation.\10\ Exchange Rule
519(a)(1)(ii) provides that if the Exchange upon initial receipt or
reevaluation evaluates a market order from an EEM to sell an option
when the national best bid is zero and the national best offer is
greater than $0.10, the System will cancel the market order to sell.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The term ``Book'' means the electronic book of buy and sell
orders and quotes maintained by the System. See Exchange Rule 100.
\6\ See Exchange Rule 503.
\7\ See Exchange Rule 519(a).
\8\ The term ``System'' means the automated trading system used
by the Exchange for the trading of securities. See Exchange Rule
100.
\9\ See Exchange Rule 510(b).
\10\ See Exchange Rule 510(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposal
The Exchange now proposes to allow an Electronic Exchange Member to
determine their own pre-set value to be used as the threshold setting
(``Threshold Setting'') that the Exchange will use when evaluating
market orders to sell when the national best bid is zero and the
national best offer is less than, equal to, or greater than, the
Threshold Setting. EEM Members are not constrained by the Exchange in
determining their Threshold Setting and may set the threshold at any
value in accordance to their business and risk tolerances. EEM Members
will communicate their desired threshold value to the Exchange's Help
Desk \11\ in a form and manner to be determined by the Exchange and
communicated to Members via Regulatory Circular. The Exchange will
establish a default Threshold Setting of $0.10 (the current setting)
and communicate its value to Members via Regulatory Circular.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The term ``Help Desk'' means the Exchange's control room
consisting of Exchange staff authorized to make certain
determinations on behalf of the Exchange. The Help Desk shall report
to and be supervised by a senior executive of the Exchange. See
Exchange Rule 100.
\12\ The Exchange proposes to convert its current $0.10
threshold setting to the Exchange default Threshold Setting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to adopt new subparagraph (i) to paragraph
(a)(1) of Rule 519 to provide that, for the purposes of this Rule an
EEM may establish a pre-set value to be used as the Threshold Setting
by communicating its value to the Exchange's Help Desk in a form and
manner to be determined by the Exchange and communicated via Regulatory
Circular. The Exchange will establish a default Threshold Setting of
$0.10 and communicate its value to Members via Regulatory Circular. If
an EEM does not establish a Threshold Setting the Exchange default
value will be used. Currently, the Exchange uses a value of $0.10 as
its threshold value for purposes of evaluating or reevaluating market
orders to sell when the national best bid is zero.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Exchange Rule 519(a)(i) and (ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to adopt new subparagraph (ii) to paragraph
(a)(1) of Rule 519 to provide that, if the Exchange receives a market
order from an EEM to sell an option when the national best bid is zero
and the national best offer is less than or equal to the Threshold
Setting, the System will convert the market order to sell, to a limit
order to sell, with a limit price of one Minimum Trading Increment.\14\
The Exchange proposes to use the national best offer as the reference
price in determining how to handle a market order to sell when the
national best bid is zero as the national best offer better represents
the current market conditions. This provision is consistent with the
operation of the current rule, however the Threshold Setting used for
evaluation purposes under the Exchange's proposal may now be either the
Exchange's default setting of $0.10 or the Member's Threshold Setting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Exchange Rule 510, Minimum Price Variations and Minimum
Trading Increments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to adopt new subparagraph (iii) to paragraph
(a)(1) of Rule 519 to provide that, if the Exchange reevaluates \15\ a
market order from an EEM to sell an option when the resulting national
best bid is zero and either the trade price, route price, or national
best offer is less than or equal to the Threshold Setting, the System
will convert the market order to sell, to a limit order to sell, with a
limit price of one Minimum Trading Increment. In the event the Exchange
receives a market order to sell and the Exchange is zero bid but an
away market is not, the Exchange will route the order to that away
exchange at the away market price, the ``route price.'' For the
purposes of this rule, the execution price of a trade in the subject
series is considered the ``trade price.'' The Exchange uses the route
price, trade price, or national best offer to determine the proper
disposition of a market order to sell when the national best bid
becomes zero.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ A reevaluation of an order occurs when the order has been
routed to an away exchange and is returned to the Exchange
partially, or completely, unfilled.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current paragraph (i) describes the initial evaluation and
reevaluation process of a market order to sell whereas each process is
given separate treatment under this proposal. Specifically, new
proposed paragraph (ii) describes the initial evaluation process of a
market order to sell when the national best bid is zero and new
proposed paragraph (iii) describes the reevaluation process of a market
order to sell when the national best bid becomes zero. The Exchange
believes this format provides additional clarity to the Exchange's
rules regarding its order handling process when the Exchange
reevaluates a market order to sell when the national best bid becomes
zero.
The Exchange proposes to adopt new subparagraph (iv) to paragraph
(a)(1) of Rule 519 to provide that, in either case of (ii) or (iii)
above, such sell orders will automatically be placed on the Book in
time priority and will be displayed at the appropriate Minimum Price
Variation.\16\ The Exchange notes that this language is identical to
the current rule text.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ Id.
\17\ See Exchange Rule 519(a)(1)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to adopt new subparagraph (v) to paragraph
(a)(1) of Rule 519 to provide that, if the Exchange receives a market
order from an EEM to sell an option when the national best bid is zero
and the national best offer is greater than the Threshold Setting, the
System will reject the order. This provision is consistent with the
operation of the current rule, however under the Exchange's proposal
the Threshold Setting used for evaluation purposes may now be either
the Exchange default setting of $0.10 or the Member's Threshold
Setting.
The Exchange proposes to adopt new subparagraph (vi) to paragraph
(a)(1) of Rule 519 to provide that, if the Exchange reevaluates a
market order
[[Page 33864]]
from an EEM to sell an option when the resulting national best bid is
zero and both (A) the trade price or route price, and (B) the national
best offer are greater than the Threshold Setting, the System will
reject the order or cancel any unexecuted balance of the order. The
Exchange uses the route price or trade price, in conjunction with the
national best offer to determine the proper disposition of a market
order to sell when the national best bid becomes zero. The Exchange
believes considering both the route price or trade price, and the
national best offer, provides a clear indication of the current market
conditions when either the route price or trade price and the national
best offer is greater than the Threshold Setting and allows the
Exchange to make the proper determination regarding the disposition of
the order.
The proposed rule text provides additional detail regarding the
System's behavior when the Exchange reevaluates a market order from an
EEM to sell and the national best bid is zero. Example 1 below
describes the System processing when the national best bid is below the
Threshold Setting, and Example 2 describes the System processing when
the national best bid is above the Threshold Setting.
Example 1
MPV: $0.05
Exchange default Threshold Setting: $0.10
EEM selected Threshold Setting: $0.25
PBBO \18\ (0) 0.00 x 5.00 (10)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ The term ``PBBO'' means the best bid or offer on MIAX
Pearl. See Exchange Rule 100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABBO \19\ (10) 0.10 x 0.15 (10)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ The term ``ABBO'' or ``Away Best Bid or Offer'' means the
best bid(s) or offer(s) disseminated by other Eligible Exchanges
(defined in Rule 1400(g)) and calculated by the Exchange based on
market information received by the Exchange from OPRA. See Exchange
Rule 100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NBBO \20\ (10) 0.10 x 0.15 (10)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ The term ``NBBO'' means the national best bid or offer as
calculated by the Exchange based on market information received by
the Exchange from OPRA. See Exchange Rule 100.
Market order to sell 20 contracts is received by the Exchange.
The Exchange routes the order to the 0.10 bid on the away exchange
by sending a limit order to sell 10 at $0.10 (the route price).
The order is executed on the away exchange, sell 10 at $0.10, and
the away market becomes zero bid.
PBBO: (0) 0.00 x 5.00 (10)
ABBO: (0) 0.00 x 0.15 (10)
NBBO: (0) 0.00 x 0.15 (10)
Using the EEM selected Threshold Setting of $0.25 to reevaluate the
order, the remainder of the order (10 contracts) would be converted to
a limit order to sell and placed on the Exchange as the national best
offer (0.15) (and the route price of $0.10) is less than or equal to
the EEM selected Threshold Setting of $0.25. The 10 contracts would
then be displayed on the Exchange at an offer price of one minimum
trading increment or $0.05.
PBBO: (0) 0.00 x 0.05 (10)
ABBO: (0) 0.00 x 0.15 (10)
NBBO: (0) 0.00 x 0.05 (10)
If the Exchange default Threshold Setting was used for the
evaluation, the remainder of the order would be cancelled as the
national best offer (0.15) is greater than the Exchange default
Threshold Setting of $0.10.
Example 2
MPV: $0.05
Exchange default Threshold Setting: $0.10
Member selected Threshold Setting: $0.25
PBBO (0) 0.00 x 5.00 (10)
ABBO (10) 0.40 x 0.50 (10)
NBBO (10) 0.40 x 0.50 (10)
Market order to sell 20 contracts is received by the Exchange. The
Exchange is zero bid for that series and routes the order to the away
exchange by sending a limit order to sell 10 at $0.40 (the route
price).
The order is executed on the away exchange, sell 10 at $0.40, and
the away market becomes zero bid.
PBBO: (0) 0.00 x 5.00 (10)
ABBO: (0) 0.00 x 0.50 (10)
NBBO: (0) 0.00 x 0.50 (10)
Using the Member selected Threshold Setting of $0.25 to reevaluate
the order, the remainder of the order (10 contracts) would be cancelled
as both (i) the route price ($0.40) and (ii) the national best offer
($0.50) are greater than the Threshold Setting ($0.25).
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act \21\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \22\ in particular, in that it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in, securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes its proposal promotes just and equitable
principles of trade, removes impediments to and perfects the mechanisms
of a free and open market and a national market system, and in general,
protects investors and the public interest by allowing EEMs to
establish the threshold setting for the evaluation of market orders to
sell when the national best bid is zero. The Exchange believes that
allowing EEMs to determine the threshold setting provides greater
flexibility and allows the EEM to tailor the threshold setting to the
business and risk tolerances of the Member.
The Exchange believes its proposal to allow EEMs the flexibility to
establish their own pre-set value to be used for evaluation purposes of
market orders to sell when the national best bid is zero allows EEMs to
align their risk protections with their risk tolerance. EEMs have the
discretion to set their pre-set value to whatever value best aligns to
their risk profile, which may be as low as $0.00.\23\ The Exchange
provides EEMs the ability to tailor risk protection functionality to
the risk profile of the EEM, and has allowed EEMs to customize their
risk protection setting for other risk protections offered on the
Exchange. Specifically, the Exchange allows EEMs to set the maximum
size of an order for the purposes of the MIAX Pearl Order Monitor Size
Protection, and if the EMM does not designate the maximum size, the
Exchange provides a default value.\24\ Additionally, the Exchange
provides Members the option to set a price protection limit on a per
order basis, and orders received without a price protection limit
receive the Exchange defined default value.\25\ The current proposal to
allow EEMs to determine a pre-set value to be used as the Threshold
Setting continues the Exchange's approach of allowing a Member to
customize its risk
[[Page 33865]]
protections to better align to the risk tolerance of the Member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ The Exchange notes that the Nasdaq Phlx does not have a
threshold evaluation and, in the case where the bid price for any
options series is $0.00, a Market Order accepted into the System to
sell that series shall be considered a Limit Order to sell at a
price equal to the minimum trading increment as defined in Nasdaq
Phlx Options 3, Section 3. Orders will be placed on the Limit Order
book in the order in which they were received by the System. With
respect to Market Orders to sell which are submitted prior to the
Opening Process and persist after the Opening Process, those orders
are posted at a price equal to the minimum trading increment as
defined in Options 3, Section 3. See Nasdaq Phlx Options 3, Section
10(b).
\24\ See Exchange Rule 519(b).
\25\ See Exchange Rule 515(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes its proposal to reorganize the current rule
text to describe each scenario separately (i.e., evaluation of a market
order to sell when the national best bid is zero and the national best
offer is less than or equal to the Threshold Setting (proposed
paragraph (ii)); reevaluation of a market order to sell when the
national best bid becomes zero and the national best offer is less than
or equal to the Threshold Setting (proposed paragraph (iii)); initial
evaluation of a market order to sell when the national best bid is zero
and the national best offer is greater than the Threshold Setting
(proposed paragraph (v)); and reevaluation of a market order to sell
when the national best bid becomes zero and the national best offer is
greater than the Threshold Setting (proposed paragraph vi))) better
organizes the rule text. The Exchange believes discussing each scenario
separately and describing the evaluations that are performed by the
System to determine the proper disposition of the order provides
transparency and clarity in the Exchange's rules.
The Exchange believes its proposal promotes just and equitable
principles of trade, removes impediments to and perfects the mechanisms
of a free and open market and a national market system, and in general,
protects investors and the public interest by providing additional
detail regarding the Exchange's process for reevaluating market orders
from an EEM to sell when the national best bid becomes zero. The
Exchange believes it is in the best interest of investors and the
public to accurately describe the behavior of the Exchange's System in
its rules as this information may be used by investors to make
decisions concerning the submission of their orders. Transparency and
clarity are consistent with the Act because it removes impediments to
and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, protects investors and the public
interest by accurately describing how market orders to sell in zero bid
series are handled on the Exchange. It is in the public interest for
rules to be accurate and concise so as to eliminate the potential for
confusion.
Additionally, the Exchange believes its proposal promotes just and
equitable principles of trade, removes impediments to and perfects the
mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system, and
in general, protects investors and the public interest by re-organizing
the rule text for ease of reference. The Exchange believes that
Exchange rules should be clear and transparent so as to avoid the
potential for confusion.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange does not believe that its proposal will impose any
burden on intra-market competition as all EEMs that submit market
orders to the Exchange will be treated equally and the Rules of the
Exchange apply equally to all Exchange Members. Additionally, the
proposal allows each EEM to determine the pre-set value to be used as
the Threshold Setting and allows each EEM to align their Threshold
Setting to their risk tolerance.
The Exchange does not believe that its proposal will impose any
burden on inter-market competition as the Exchange's proposal is not a
competitive filing but one that provides additional detail regarding
the Exchange's process for reevaluating market orders from an EEM to
sell when the national bid becomes zero. Additionally, the Exchange's
proposal is similar to the rules of at least one other options
exchange.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See Cboe Rule 5.34(a)(1)(A) which provides that if the
System receives a sell market order in a series after it is open for
trading with an NBB of zero: (i) If the NBO in the series is less
than or equal to $0.50, then the System converts the market order to
a limit order with a limit price equal to the minimum trading
increment applicable to the series and enters the order into the
Book with a timestamp based on the time it enters the Book. If the
order has a Time-in-Force of GTC or GTD that expires on a subsequent
day, the order remains on the Book as a limit order until it
executes, expires, or the User cancels it. (ii) if the NBO in the
series is greater than $0.50, then the System cancels or rejects the
market order, or routes the market order to PAR for manual handling,
subject to a User's instructions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such
shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective
pursuant to 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \27\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \28\
thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\28\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#86f4f3eae3abe5e9ebebe3e8f2f5c6f5e3e5a8e1e9f0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8cfef9e0e9a1efe3e1e1e9e2f8ffccffe9efa2ebe3fa">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
File Number SR-PEARL-2022-22 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PEARL-2022-22. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
[[Page 33866]]
available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of
the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do
not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
PEARL-2022-22, and should be submitted on or before June 24, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\29\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-11875 Filed 6-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on June 3, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.