Notice2022-10733
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Order Instituting Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Shares of the WisdomTree Bitcoin Trust Under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
May 19, 2022
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 97 (Thursday, May 19, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 97 (Thursday, May 19, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30546-30548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10733]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-94907; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2022-006]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Order
Instituting Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a
Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Shares of the WisdomTree Bitcoin
Trust Under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares
May 13, 2022.
On January 25, 2022, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to list and trade shares (``Shares'') of the
WisdomTree Bitcoin Trust (``Trust'') under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4),
Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The proposed rule change was published
for comment in the Federal Register on February 14, 2022.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94184 (Feb. 8,
2022), 87 FR 8318 (``Notice''). The Commission has received no
comments on the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On March 18, 2022, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\4\ the
Commission designated a longer period within which to approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule
change.\5\ This order institutes proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B)
of the Act \6\ to determine whether to approve or disapprove the
proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94476, 87 FR 16800
(Mar. 24, 2022). The Commission designated May 15, 2022, as the date
by which it should approve, disapprove, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change.
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Summary of the Proposal
As described in more detail in the Notice,\7\ the Exchange proposes
to list and trade the Shares of the Trust under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4),
which governs the listing and trading of Commodity-Based Trust Shares
on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Notice, supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The investment objective of the Trust would be to gain exposure to
the price of bitcoin, less expenses and liabilities of the Trust's
operation.\8\ The Trust would hold bitcoin, and it would calculate the
Trust's net asset value (``NAV'') daily based on the value of bitcoin
as reflected by the CF Bitcoin US Settlement Price (``Reference
Rate''). The Reference Rate was created, and is administered, by CF
Benchmarks Ltd., an independent entity. The Reference Rate aggregates
the trade flow of several bitcoin platforms. The current platform
composition of the Reference Rate is Bitstamp, Coinbase, Gemini, itBit,
and Kraken. In calculating the Reference Rate, the methodology creates
a joint list of the trade prices and sizes from the constituent
platforms between 3:00 p.m. E.T. and 4:00 p.m. E.T. The methodology
then divides this list into 12 equally-sized time intervals of 5
minutes and calculates the volume-weighted median trade price for each
of those time intervals. The Reference Rate is the arithmetic mean of
these 12 volume-weighted median trade prices.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See id. at 8329. WisdomTree Digital Commodity Services, LLC
(``Sponsor'') is the sponsor of the Trust, and Delaware Trust
Company is the trustee. U.S. Bank, N.A. would serve as the custodian
of the Trust (``Custodian''). U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC dba
U.S. Bank Global Fund Services would be the administrator and
transfer agent (``Administrator'') of the Trust. Foreside Fund
Services LLC would be the marketing agent in connection with the
creation and redemption of Shares. See id. at 8318-19, 8329.
\9\ See id. at 8329-30.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Each Share would represent a fractional undivided beneficial
interest in and ownership of the Trust. The Trust's assets would
consist of bitcoin held by the Custodian on behalf of the Trust. The
Trust generally does not intend to hold cash or cash equivalents.
However, there may be situations where the Trust would unexpectedly
hold cash on a temporary basis.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See id. at 8329.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Administrator would determine the NAV and NAV per Share of the
Trust, on each day that the Exchange is open for regular trading, after
4:00 p.m. E.T. (often by 5:30 p.m. E.T. and almost always by 8:00 p.m.
E.T.). The NAV of the Trust is the aggregate value of the Trust's
assets less total liabilities of the Trust, each determined on the
basis of generally accepted accounting principles. In determining the
Trust's
[[Page 30547]]
NAV, the Administrator values the bitcoin held by the Trust based on
the price set by the Reference Rate as of 4:00 p.m. E.T.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See id. at 8330.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Trust would provide information regarding the Trust's bitcoin
holdings, as well as an Intraday Indicative Value (``IIV'') per Share
updated every 15 seconds, as calculated by the Exchange or a third-
party financial data provider during the Exchange's Regular Trading
Hours (9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. E.T.). The IIV would be calculated by
using the prior day's closing NAV per Share as a base and updating that
value during Regular Trading Hours to reflect changes in the value of
the Trust's bitcoin holdings during the trading day.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See id. at 8334.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
When the Trust sells or redeems its Shares, it would do so in ``in-
kind'' transactions in blocks of 50,000 Shares at the Trust's NAV.
Authorized participants would deliver, or facilitate the delivery of,
bitcoin to the Trust's account with the Custodian in exchange for
Shares when they purchase Shares, and the Trust, through the Custodian,
would deliver bitcoin to such authorized participants when they redeem
Shares with the Trust.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See id. at 8329.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although the Trust would not be an investment company registered
under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (``1940 Act''),
the Exchange represents that:
<bullet> The Trust would qualify as an investment company under
Accounting Standards Update 2013-08 and, as such, the Sponsor would
ensure that the Trust's financial statements would be audited at least
annually by an independent registered public accounting firm and, as
part of such audit, the auditor would be expected to perform procedures
similar to those used for exchange-traded funds registered under the
1940 Act (``ETFs'');
<bullet> The Sponsor would facilitate the Trust's compliance with
the financial record keeping and reporting requirements under the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;
<bullet> The Trust's Custodian would qualify as a ``custodian''
under the 1940 Act, and the Custodian would agree to exercise
reasonable care, prudence, and diligence such as a person having
responsibility for the safekeeping of property of the Trust would
exercise;
<bullet> The Trust would be subject to the transparency
requirements of Rule 6c-11 under the 1940 Act;
<bullet> The Sponsor would adopt procedures to ensure there are no
transactions with affiliated persons that would be prohibited by
Section 17 of 1940 Act and the applicable rules and regulations
thereunder;
<bullet> The Trust would maintain a fidelity bond for the benefit
of the Trust in the maximum amount required by Rule 17g-1 of the 1940
Act; and
<bullet> The Sponsor or applicable service provider of the Trust
would maintain the books and records of the Trust in satisfaction of
the requirements of Section 31 of the 1940 Act.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See id. at 8323-24.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove SR-
CboeBZX-2022-006 and Grounds for Disapproval Under Consideration
The Commission is instituting proceedings pursuant to Section
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \15\ to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or disapproved. Institution of proceedings is
appropriate at this time in view of the legal and policy issues raised
by the proposed rule change, as discussed below. Institution of
proceedings does not indicate that the Commission has reached any
conclusions with respect to any of the issues involved. Rather, as
described below, the Commission seeks and encourages interested persons
to provide comments on the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act,\16\ the Commission is
providing notice of the grounds for disapproval under consideration.
The Commission is instituting proceedings to allow for additional
analysis of the proposed rule change's consistency with Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act, which requires, among other things, that the rules of a
national securities exchange be ``designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices'' and ``to protect investors and the
public interest.'' \17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ Id.
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission asks that commenters address the sufficiency of the
Exchange's statements in support of the proposal, which are set forth
in the Notice,\18\ in addition to any other comments they may wish to
submit about the proposed rule change. In particular, the Commission
seeks comment on the following questions and asks commenters to submit
data where appropriate to support their views:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Notice, supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. What are commenters' views on whether the proposed Trust and
Shares would be susceptible to manipulation? What are commenters' views
generally on whether the Exchange's proposal is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices? What are commenters'
views generally with respect to the liquidity and transparency of the
bitcoin markets, the bitcoin markets' susceptibility to manipulation,
and thus the suitability of bitcoin as an underlying asset for an
exchange-traded product?
2. What are commenters' views of the Exchange's assertion that
regulatory and financial landscapes relating to bitcoin and other
digital assets have changed significantly since 2016? \19\ Are the
changes that the Exchange identifies sufficient to support the
determination that the proposed listing and trading of the Shares are
consistent with the Act?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See id. at 8320-22.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Based on data provided and the academic research cited by the
Exchange,\20\ do commenters agree with the Exchange that CME now
represents a regulated market of significant size related to bitcoin?
\21\ What are commenters' views on whether there is a reasonable
likelihood that a person attempting to manipulate the Shares would also
have to trade on CME to manipulate the Shares? Do commenters agree with
the Exchange's assertion that the combination of (a) CME Bitcoin
Futures acting as the predominant influence on price discovery; (b) the
overall size of the bitcoin market; and (c) the ability for market
participants to buy or sell large amounts of bitcoin without
significant market impact, helps to prevent the Shares from becoming
the predominant force on pricing in either the bitcoin spot or CME
Bitcoin Futures markets? \22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See id. at 8325-27, 8327 n.62.
\21\ See id. at 8320.
\22\ See id. at 8328.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. The Exchange states that bitcoin is resistant to price
manipulation and that other means to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices exist to justify dispensing with the
requirement to enter into a surveillance sharing agreement with a
regulated market of significant size related to bitcoin.\23\ In support
of its assertion, the Exchange states that ``the significant liquidity
in the spot market and the impact of market orders on the overall price
of bitcoin mean that attempting to move the price of bitcoin is
costly.'' \24\ The Exchange further states that potential manipulation
concerns are mitigated by ``the significant increase in trading volume
in Bitcoin Futures[,] the
[[Page 30548]]
growing body of evidence that the CME Bitcoin Futures market represents
a regulated market of significant size . . . , the growth of liquidity
at the inside in the spot market for bitcoin, and certain features of
the Shares and the Reference Rate . . .'' \25\ What are commenters'
views regarding the Exchange's argument?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See id. at 8327 n.65.
\24\ See id. at 8328.
\25\ See id. at 8327; see also id. at 8332.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. The Exchange states that ETFs that provide exposure to bitcoin
through CME Bitcoin Futures (``Bitcoin Futures ETFs'') are ``a sub-
optimal'' for U.S. investors looking for long-term exposure to bitcoin
and that any proposal to list and trade a Spot Bitcoin ETP should be
reviewed by the Commission with this in mind.\26\ The Exchange further
states that it would be inconsistent to allow the listing and trading
of Bitcoin Futures ETFs while simultaneously disapproving Spot Bitcoin
ETPs on the basis that the CME Bitcoin Futures market is not a
regulated market of significant size. According to the Exchange, this
would be ``particularly true for the Trust, which will use the
[Reference Rate] as its price source to calculate its daily [NAV], with
inputs from the same bitcoin trading platforms . . . and materially the
same methodology as is used to price CME Bitcoin Futures.'' \27\ Do
commenters agree or disagree and why?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See id. at 8323.
\27\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. According to the Exchange, the Trust is structured ``to operate
as if certain 1940 Act provisions apply, providing transparency and
investor protections such that a distinction between Bitcoin Futures
ETFs and Spot Bitcoin ETPs is unwarranted.'' \28\ Does the
representation that the Trust will ``operate as if certain 1940 Act
provisions apply'' help mitigate the concerns the Commission previously
expressed, including concerns pertaining to fraud and manipulation?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See id. at 8325.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Procedure: Request for Written Comments
The Commission requests that interested persons provide written
submissions of their views, data, and arguments with respect to the
issues identified above, as well as any other concerns they may have
with the proposal. In particular, the Commission invites the written
views of interested persons concerning whether the proposal is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) or any other provision of the Act, and
the rules and regulations thereunder. Although there do not appear to
be any issues relevant to approval or disapproval that would be
facilitated by an oral presentation of views, data, and arguments, the
Commission will consider, pursuant to Rule 19b-4, any request for an
opportunity to make an oral presentation.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, as amended by the Securities
Act Amendments of 1975, Public Law 94-29 (June 4, 1975), grants the
Commission flexibility to determine what type of proceeding--either
oral or notice and opportunity for written comments--is appropriate
for consideration of a particular proposal by a self-regulatory
organization. See Securities Act Amendments of 1975, Senate Comm. on
Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs, S. Rep. No. 75, 94th Cong., 1st
Sess. 30 (1975).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments regarding whether the proposal should be approved or
disapproved by June 9, 2022. Any person who wishes to file a rebuttal
to any other person's submission must file that rebuttal by June 23,
2022.
Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a0d2d5ccc58dc3cfcdcdc5ced4d3e0d3c5c38ec7cfd6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="156760797038767a7878707b6166556670763b727a63">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
File Number SR-CboeBZX-2022-006 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2022-006. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2022-006 and should be submitted
by June 9, 2022. Rebuttal comments should be submitted by June 23,
2022.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-10733 Filed 5-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on May 19, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.