Approval of Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program Revisions; Negative Declaration of Existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators and Administrative Updates; South Dakota
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
With this direct final rule, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the "Agency") is promulgating approval of revisions to the South Dakota operating permit program for stationary sources under Clean Air Act (CAA) title V (the "title V program"), a Clean Air Act (CAA) section 111(d)/129 negative declaration for incinerators subject to the Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators (HMIWI) Emissions Guidelines, and making administrative updates. EPA is taking this final action in accordance with the CAA.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 96 (Wednesday, May 18, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 18, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30105-30108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10224]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 60, 61, 62, and 70
[EPA-R08-OAR-2021-0732; FRL-9829-02-R8]
Approval of Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program Revisions;
Negative Declaration of Existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste
Incinerators and Administrative Updates; South Dakota
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: With this direct final rule, the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA or the ``Agency'') is promulgating approval of revisions to
the South Dakota operating permit program for stationary sources under
Clean Air Act (CAA) title V (the ``title V program''), a Clean Air Act
(CAA) section 111(d)/129 negative declaration for incinerators subject
to the Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators (HMIWI) Emissions
Guidelines, and making administrative updates. EPA is taking this final
action in accordance with the CAA.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective on July 18, 2022 without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comments on or
before June 17, 2022. If adverse comments are received, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal
Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R08-OAR-2021-0732. All documents in the docket are listed in
the <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available electronically in
<a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>. To reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission, for
this action we do not plan to offer hard copy review of the docket.
Please email or call the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section if you need to make alternative arrangements for access
to the docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carson Coate, Air and Radiation
Division, EPA, Region 8, Mail code 8ARD, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado, 80202-1129, telephone number: (406) 457-5042, email address:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c6a5a9a7b2a3e8a5a7b4b5a9a886a3b6a7e8a1a9b0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ea89858b9e8fc4898b98998584aa8f9a8bc48d859c">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' means EPA.
I. Why is EPA using a direct final rule?
EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial action and anticipates no
adverse comments. However, elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve South Dakota's title V program
revisions, the negative declaration for 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ce, and
the administrative updates to 40 CFR 60.4 and 61.04, if relevant
adverse comments are filed.
If EPA receives adverse comments, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this
direct final rule will not take effect. EPA will address all public
comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA
will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at this time.
II. Background
Title V of the CAA as amended (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) directs
states to develop and submit to EPA programs for issuing operating
permits to all major stationary sources and to certain other
sources.\1\ As required under title V, EPA promulgated regulations
establishing the minimum elements of an approvable state title V
program and defined the corresponding procedures by which the EPA will
approve, oversee and, when necessary, withdraw approval of a state
title V program.\2\ South Dakota received final, full approval of its
title V program effective on February 28, 1996.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 42 U.S.C. 7661a.
\2\ 40 CFR part 70.
\3\ 61 FR 2720 (Jan. 29, 1996).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA require states to submit plans
to control certain pollutants (designated pollutants) at existing solid
waste combustor facilities (designated facilities) whenever standards
of performance have been established under section 111(b) for new
sources of the same type, and EPA has established emissions guidelines
for such existing sources.\4\ CAA section 129 directs EPA to establish
standards of performance for new sources (NSPS) and emissions
guidelines for existing sources for each category of solid waste
incineration unit.\5\ Under CAA section 129, NSPS and emissions
guidelines must contain numerical emissions limitations for particulate
matter, opacity (as appropriate), sulfur dioxide, hydrogen chloride,
oxides of nitrogen, carbon monoxide, lead, cadmium, mercury, and
dioxins and dibenzofurans.\6\ While NSPS are directly applicable to
affected facilities, emissions guidelines for existing units are
intended for states to use to develop a state plan to submit to EPA.\7\
When an affected facility is located in a state, the state must then
develop and submit a plan for the
[[Page 30106]]
control of the designated pollutant.\8\ Once approved by EPA, the state
plan becomes federally enforceable. If a state does not submit an
approvable state plan to EPA, EPA is responsible for developing,
implementing, and enforcing a federal plan.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 42 U.S.C. 7411(d), 7429(b)(2).
\5\ 42 U.S.C. 7429(a).
\6\ Id. 7429(a)(4).
\7\ Id. 7429(b)(2).
\8\ Id. See also id. 7411(d)(1).
\9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The regulations at 40 CFR part 60, subpart B (Subpart B), contain
general provisions applicable to the adoption and submittal of state
plans for controlling designated pollutants. Additionally, 40 CFR part
62, subpart A, provides the procedural framework by which EPA will
approve or disapprove such plans submitted by a state. However, 40 CFR
60.23(b) and 62.06 provide that if there are no existing sources of the
designated pollutant in the state, the state may submit a letter of
certification to that effect (i.e., a negative declaration) in lieu of
a plan. The negative declaration exempts the state from the
requirements of Subpart B that require the submittal of a CAA section
111(d)/129 plan.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 40 CFR 60.23(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA promulgated the HMIWI NSPS and emissions guidelines in 1997 and
2009. The emissions guidelines are codified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart
Ce. Thus, states were required to submit plans for incinerators subject
to the HMIWI emissions guidelines pursuant to sections 111(d) and 129
of the Act and Subpart B or negative declarations pursuant to 40 CFR
60.23(b) and 62.06.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 40 CFR 60.39e.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. State Submittal
On January 3, 2020, in accordance with 40 CFR 70.4(i), South Dakota
submitted a request for approval of title V program revisions to
incorporate updated federal regulations through July 1, 2018, thereby
aligning state rules in South Dakota's Administrative Rules of South
Dakota (ARSD) with federal rules at 40 CFR part 70.\12\ Specifically,
South Dakota requested this change to Chapter 74:36:05--Operating
Permits for Part 70 Sources (sections 74:36:05:04(2) and (3), and
74:36:05:16.01(4), (8), (9), (17) and (18)) and Chapter 74:36:13--
Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (section 74:36:13:08).\13\ South
Dakota's submittal included clean and redlined copies of the revised
ARSD, which are available in the docket for this action. The submittal
also included evidence that public notice of the State's proposed
submittal ran in eleven South Dakota newspapers, that impacted sources
and other interested parties were notified, and a public hearing was
held on October 17, 2019.\14\ The State received no adverse public
comments on the requested changes to 74:36:05 and 74:36:13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See South Dakota 111d Package to EPA, p. 100, 120, 123-124,
January 3, 2020 (public notice explaining purpose of the regulations
and Proposed Amendments explaining requested changes).
\13\ Letter from Hunter Roberts, Secretary, South Dakota
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, to Gregory Sopkin,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 8, January 3, 2020. This letter
contained multiple requests. In this action we are addressing only
the request to revise South Dakota's title V operating permit
program. See id. at p. 5-6.
\14\ South Dakota 111d Package to EPA, p. 793-797.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On June 7, 2021, South Dakota submitted a negative declaration for
the HMIWI emissions guidelines in accordance with CAA sections 111(d)
and 129 and 40 CFR 60.23(b) and 62.06. The negative declaration
certified that no incinerators subject to the HMIWI emissions
guidelines and the requirements of sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA
exist in South Dakota. Specifically, South Dakota had one facility,
located at the University of South Dakota, that was considered a co-
fired combustor under the HMIWI NSPS. The University of South Dakota
disconnected the natural gas supply line to the incinerator in 2012 and
requested that the incinerator be removed from its title V air quality
operating permit in 2019.\15\ Therefore, South Dakota determined that
there were no longer any sources subject to the HMIWI emissions
guidelines.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Letter from Brian Limoges, Assistant Vice President of
Facilities Management, University of South Dakota, to Kyrik
Rombough, South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Re: Incinerator Permit 28.2201-19, July 13, 2019.
\16\ Letter from Kyrik Rombough, South Dakota Department of
Agriculture and Natural Resources, to Carl Daly, Acting Director of
Air & Radiation Division, EPA Region 8, June 7, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 16, 2021, South Dakota's Office of Attorney General
submitted a letter notifying EPA of the establishment of the South
Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources (DANR). The
letter stated that on January 19, 2021, South Dakota Governor, Kristi
Noem, executed Executive Order 2021-03, which provided for the merger
of the South Dakota Department of Agriculture (DOA) and the South
Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) into one
department--the DANR. According to the South Dakota Constitution,
executive reorganization orders become effective ``within ninety days
after submission'' of the executive order to the South Dakota
Legislature (Legislature) unless one of the two houses of the
Legislature disapproves of the executive reorganization (S.D.
Constitution, Article IV, Section 8).\17\ During the 2021 session,
neither house of the Legislature passed a resolution of disapproval of
Governor Noem's Executive Order 2021-03 and the Order became effective
April 19, 2021.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ SD DANR Merger SIP Submittal, January 21, 2022, p. 27-28,
Letter from Steven R. Blair, Assistant Attorney General, South
Dakota Office of Attorney General, to Deb Thomas, Acting Regional
Administrator, EPA Region 8, Re: Establishment of South Dakota
Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, April 16, 2021.
\18\ SD DANR Merger SIP Submittal, p. 1, Letter from Hunter
Roberts, Secretary, South Dakota Department of Agriculture and
Natural Resources, to KC Becker, Regional Administrator, EPA Region
8, January 20, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the April 16, 2021 letter, Assistant Attorney General Steven R.
Blair stated that all State programs previously authorized to carry out
EPA programs would continue to function in the same manner and all
current environmental protection activities conducted under existing
EPA approved or delegated programs under the DOA and/or the DENR would
continue intact under the newly established DANR. Further, Mr. Blair
stated that the merger caused no substantive budgetary or personnel
changes, that the new DANR has all the authorities, powers, and duties
of the previous DOA and DENR, and that the laws in effect at the time
EPA approved or delegated authority to DOA and/or DENR continue to be
fully effective and enforceable. Mr. Blair explained that the merger
did not require any substantive changes to state law or administrative
rules; the statutes and rules were merely updated to reflect the name
of the new department.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ SD DANR Merger SIP Submittal, p. 27-28.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In a January 20, 2022 letter, the Secretary of the DANR, Hunter
Roberts (the Governor's designee), submitted a request that EPA
recognize the merger of South Dakota's DOA with the DENR to form the
new DANR and incorporate corresponding revisions to the ARSD related to
South Dakota's state implementation plan (SIP). Secretary Roberts
stated that the ARSD provisions were automatically updated with the
DANR's new name during the merger process. Additionally, Secretary
Roberts stated that South Dakota's Board of Minerals and Environment
approved the DANR's request to ask EPA to recognize the department's
new name in South Dakota's SIP during a public hearing on December 16,
2021. Secretary Roberts further confirmed that the merger did not cause
a substantive change to state law or administrative rules and that DANR
maintains the same authorities, powers, and duties covered and
[[Page 30107]]
implemented under the previous department name.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ SD DANR Merger SIP Submittal, p.1, Letter from Hunter
Roberts, Secretary, South Dakota Department of Agriculture and
Natural Resources, to KC Becker, Regional Administrator, EPA Region
8, January 20, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Final Action
South Dakota submitted the necessary information for EPA to review
the title V program revisions, the 111(d) negative declaration, and the
non-substantive revisions to South Dakota's ARSD to reflect the merger
of South Dakota's DOA with the DENR to form the new DANR. EPA is now
acting to fully approve South Dakota's January 3, 2020 and January 20,
2022 title V program revisions under 40 CFR 70.4(i). Specifically, we
are approving changes to ARSD 74:36:05:04(2) and (3),
74:36:05:16.01(4), (8), (9), (17) and (18), and 74:36:13:08 so that
they align with federal regulations promulgated through July 1, 2018.
In addition, we are approving the department name change to the
DANR in South Dakota's title V program fees rule at ARSD 74:37:01:08.
In its SIP submittal dated January 20, 2022, South Dakota inadvertently
included this non-SIP provision. In a March 4, 2022 email, Kyrik
Rombough, South Dakota's State Air Director, confirmed that ARSD
74:37:01:08 contains the fee provision for the State's title V
operating permit program and should be included in the update to the
title V program.\21\ Thus, EPA is taking action to approve the change
to ARSD 74:37:08 in this direct final rule. We are also updating 40 CFR
part 70, appendix A to reference the January 3, 2020, and January 20,
2022 requested revisions. We are also making an administrative update
to 40 CFR part 70, appendix A to delete reference to the expiration of
an outdated interim approval and instead include reference to our full
approval of South Dakota's title V program in 1996.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See Email dated March 4, 2022, from Kyrik Rombough,
Engineer Manager III, South Dakota Department of Agriculture and
Natural Resources, to Monica Morales, Acting Deputy Director, EPA
Region 8 Air and Radiation Division.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA is also approving South Dakota's June 7, 2021 negative
declaration certifying that no incinerators subject to the HMIWI
emissions guidelines and the requirements of sections 111(d) and 129 of
the CAA exist in South Dakota per CAA sections 111(d) and 129 and 40
CFR 60.23(b) and 62.06. We are also updating 40 CFR part 62, subpart
QQ, and 40 CFR part 62, subpart A. The negative declaration fulfills
South Dakota's obligations under CAA sections 111(d) and 129. The
submittal of this negative declaration exempts South Dakota from the
requirement to submit a state plan for incinerators subject to the
HMIWI emissions guidelines under 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ce.
EPA is also changing ``Department of Environment and Natural
Resources'' to ``Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources'' in
40 CFR 60.4(b)(43) and changing ``Department of Water and Natural
Resources'' to ``Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources'' in
61.04(b)(43). These are non-substantive, administrative changes that
reflect DANR's new name.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a state
title V program submittal that complies with the provisions of the Act
and applicable federal regulations; 40 CFR 70.4(i). Thus, in reviewing
title V program submittals, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided they meet the criteria of the CAA and the criteria, standards
and procedures defined in 40 CFR part 70. The Administrator is also
required by the CAA to approve a CAA section 111(d)/129 submission that
complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal
regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7411(d); 42 U.S.C. 7429; 40 CFR part 60,
subparts B and Ce; and 40 CFR part 62, subpart A. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements beyond
those imposed by state law.
For that reason, this action:
<bullet> Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
<bullet> Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
<bullet> Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
<bullet> Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
<bullet> Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
<bullet> Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
<bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
<bullet> Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
<bullet> Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition,
this action is not approved to apply in Indian country, as defined at
18 U.S.C. 1151, or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. As such, this rule does not
have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs
on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 18, 2022. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 60
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
[[Page 30108]]
Air pollution control, Aluminum, Beverages, Carbon monoxide, Chemicals,
Coal, Electric power plants, Fluoride, Gasoline, Glass and glass
products, Grains, Greenhouse gases, Hazardous substances, Household
appliances, Industrial facilities, Insulation, Intergovernmental
relations, Iron, Labeling, Lead, Lime, Metals, Motor vehicle pollution,
Natural gas, Nitrogen dioxide, Petroleum, Phosphate, Plastics materials
and synthetics, Polymers, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Rubber and rubber products, Sewage disposal, Steel, Sulfur oxides,
Vinyl, Volatile organic compounds, Waste treatment and disposal, Zinc.
40 CFR Part 61
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Arsenic, Asbestos, Benzene, Beryllium, Hazardous
substances, Intergovernmental relations, Mercury, Radioactive
materials, Radon, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Uranium,
Vinyl chloride.
40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Aluminum, Fertilizers, Fluoride, Industrial
facilities, Intergovernmental relations, Methane, Ozone, Phosphate,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds, Waste treatment and disposal.
40 CFR Part 70
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Title V.
Dated: May 8, 2022.
KC Becker,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
40 CFR parts 60, 61, 62 and 70 are amended as follows:
PART 60--STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW STATIONARY SOURCES
0
1. The authority citation for part 60 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 42 U.S.C. 7401-7601.
Subpart A--General Provisions
0
2. In Sec. 60.4, revise paragraph (b)(43) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.4 Address.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(43) State of South Dakota, Air Quality Program, Department of
Agriculture and Natural Resources, Joe Foss Building, 523 East Capitol,
Pierre, SD 57501-3181.
* * * * *
PART 61--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
0
3. The authority citation for part 61 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart A-General Provisions
0
4. In Sec. 61.04, revise paragraph (b)(43) to read as follows:
Sec. 61.04 Address.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(43) State of South Dakota, Department of Agriculture and Natural
Resources, Air Quality Program, Joe Foss Building, 523 East Capitol,
Pierre, SD 57501-3181.
* * * * *
PART 62--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS FOR DESIGNATED
FACILITIES AND POLLUTANTS
0
5. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart QQ--South Dakota
0
6. Revise Sec. 62.10360 to read as follows:
Sec. 62.10360 Identification of plan.
The State of South Dakota submitted a letter on June 7, 2021,
certifying that there are no designated facilities subject to the
emissions guidelines for existing hospital medical infectious waste
incinerators under 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ce, operating within the
State's jurisdiction.
Sec. Sec. 62.10361 and 62.10362 [Removed]
0
7. Remove Sec. Sec. 62.10361 and 62.10362.
PART 70--STATE OPERATING PERMIT PROGRAMS
The authority citation for part 70 continues to read as follows:
0
8. The authority citation for part 70 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
0
9. In appendix A to part 70 the entry ``South Dakota'' is amended by
revising paragraph (a) and adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 70--Approval Status of State and Local Operating
Permits Programs
* * * * *
South Dakota
(a) South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural
Resources: Submitted on November 12, 1993; full approval effective
on February 28, 1996.
* * * * *
(d) The State of South Dakota submitted operating permit program
revisions on January 3, 2020 and January 22, 2022. On January 3,
2020, South Dakota submitted for program approval revisions to the
Administrative Rules of South Dakota, Chapters 74:36:05:04(2),
74:36:05:04(3), 74:36:05:16.01(4), 74:36:05:16.01(8),
74:36:05:16.01(9), 74:36:05:16.01(17), 74:36:05:16.01(18), and
74:36:13:08. The state effective date of these revisions is November
25, 2019. On January 22, 2022, South Dakota submitted for program
approval revisions to Administrative Rules of South Dakota, Chapter
74:37:01:08. The state effective date is April 19, 2021. The
revisions are effective on July 18, 2022.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2022-10224 Filed 5-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.