Notice2022-09086
Applications for New Awards; Education Innovation and Research (EIR) Program-Expansion Grants
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
April 27, 2022
Issuing agencies
Education Department
Abstract
The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice inviting applications for fiscal year (FY) 2022 for the EIR program-- Expansion Grants, Assistance Listing Number 84.411A (Expansion Grants). This notice relates to the approved information collection under OMB control number 1894-0006.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24986-24995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09086]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Education Innovation and Research
(EIR) Program--Expansion Grants
AGENCY: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice
inviting applications for fiscal year (FY) 2022 for the EIR program--
Expansion Grants, Assistance Listing Number 84.411A (Expansion Grants).
This notice relates to the approved information collection under OMB
control number 1894-0006.
DATES:
Applications Available: April 29, 2022.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: May 27, 2022.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: June 21, 2022.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: August 22, 2022.
Pre-Application Information: The Department will post additional
competition information for prospective applicants on the EIR program
website: <a href="https://oese.ed.gov/offices/office-of-discretionary-grants-support-services/innovation-early-learning/education-innovation-and-research-eir/fy-2022-competition/">https://oese.ed.gov/offices/office-of-discretionary-grants-support-services/innovation-early-learning/education-innovation-and-research-eir/fy-2022-competition/</a>.
ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the
[[Page 24987]]
Federal Register on December 27, 2021 (86 FR 73264) and available at
<a href="http://www.federalregister.gov/d/2021-27979">www.federalregister.gov/d/2021-27979</a>. Please note that these Common
Instructions supersede the version published on February 13, 2019, and,
in part, describe the transition from the requirement to register in
<a href="http://SAM.gov">SAM.gov</a> a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number to the
implementation of the Unique Entity Identifier (UEI). More information
on the phaseout of DUNS numbers is available at <a href="http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ofo/docs/unique-entity-identifier-transition-fact-sheet.pdf">www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ofo/docs/unique-entity-identifier-transition-fact-sheet.pdf</a>.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yvonne Crockett, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 3E344, Washington, DC 20202-
5900. Telephone: (202) 401-8105. Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c2a7abb082a7a6eca5adb4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="adc8c4dfedc8c983cac2db">[email protected]</span></a>.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll-free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The EIR program, established under section 4611
of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, as amended (ESEA),
provides funding to create, develop, implement, replicate, or take to
scale entrepreneurial, evidence-based, field-initiated innovations to
improve student achievement and attainment for high-need students and
to rigorously evaluate such innovations. The EIR program is designed to
generate and validate solutions to persistent education challenges and
to support the expansion of those solutions to serve substantially
higher numbers of students.
The central design element of the EIR program is its multi-tier
structure that links the amount of funding an applicant may receive to
the quality of the evidence supporting the efficacy of the proposed
project, with the expectation that projects that build this evidence
will advance through EIR's grant tiers: ``Early-phase,'' ``Mid-phase,''
and ``Expansion.''
``Early-phase,'' ``Mid-phase,'' and ``Expansion'' grants differ in
terms of the level of prior evidence of effectiveness required for
consideration for funding, the expectations regarding the kind of
evidence and information funded projects should produce, the level of
scale funded projects should reach, and, consequently, the amount of
funding available to support each type of project.
Expansion grants are supported by strong evidence (as defined in
this notice) for at least one population and setting, and grantees are
encouraged to implement at the national level (as defined in this
notice). Expansion grants provide funding for the implementation and
rigorous evaluation of a program that has been found to produce
sizable, significant impacts under a Mid-phase grant or other effort
meeting similar criteria, for the purposes of (a) determining whether
such impacts can be successfully reproduced and sustained over time;
and (b) identifying the conditions in which the program is most
effective.
This notice invites applications for Expansion grants only. The
notices inviting applications for Early-phase and Mid-phase grants are
published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.
Background
While this notice is for the Expansion tier only, the premise of
the EIR program is that new and innovative educational programs and
practices can help to overcome the persistent and significant
challenges to student success, particularly for underserved and high-
need students.
Note: The EIR program statute refers to ``high-need students''
but allows applicants to define the term as it relates to the
proposed project, population, and setting. In addressing the needs
of underserved students, the statutory requirement for serving
``high-need students'' can also be addressed.
These innovations need to be evaluated, and, if sufficient evidence
of effectiveness can be demonstrated, the intent is for these
innovations to be replicated and tested in new populations and
settings. EIR is not intended to provide support for practices that are
already commonly implemented by educators, unless significant
adaptations of such practices warrant testing to determine if they can
accelerate achievement, or increase the likelihood that the practices
can be widely, efficiently, and effectively implemented in new
populations and settings.
As an EIR project is implemented, grantees are encouraged to learn
more about how the practices improve student achievement and attainment
and to develop increasingly rigorous evidence of effectiveness and new
strategies to efficiently and cost-effectively scale to new school
districts, regions, and States. We encourage applicants to develop a
logic model, theory of action, or another conceptual framework that
includes the goals, objectives, outcomes, and key project components
(as defined in this notice) of the project that can support systems of
continuous improvement.
Note: Logic model (also referred to as a theory of action) means
a framework that identifies key project components of the proposed
project (i.e., the active ``ingredients'' that are hypothesized to
be critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and describes the
theoretical and operational relationships among the key project
components and relevant outcomes.
All EIR applicants and grantees should also consider how they need
to develop their organizational capacity, project financing, or
business plans to sustain their projects and continue implementation
and adaptation after Federal funding ends. The Department intends to
provide grantees with technical assistance in their dissemination,
scaling, and sustainability efforts.
Expansion projects are expected to scale practices that have prior
evidence of effectiveness, in order to improve outcomes for high-need
and underserved students. They are also expected to generate important
information about an intervention's effectiveness, such as for whom and
in which contexts a practice is most effective, including cost-
effectiveness. Expansion projects are uniquely positioned to help
answer critical questions about the process of scaling a practice to
the national level (as defined in this notice) across geographies.
Expansion grantees are encouraged to consider how the cost structure of
a practice can change as the intervention scales. Additionally,
grantees may want to consider multiple ways to facilitate
implementation fidelity without making scaling too onerous.
Expansion applicants are encouraged to design an evaluation that
has the potential to meet the strong evidence (as defined in this
notice) threshold. Expansion grantees should measure the cost-
effectiveness of their practices using administrative or other readily
available data. These types of efforts are critical to sustaining and
scaling EIR-funded effective practices after the EIR grant period ends,
assuming that the practice has positive effects on important student
outcomes. In order to support adoption or replication by other
entities, the evaluation of an Expansion project should identify and
codify the core elements of the EIR-supported practice that the project
implements and examine the effectiveness of the project for any new
populations or settings that are included in the project. The
Department intends to provide grantees and their independent evaluators
with
[[Page 24988]]
evaluation technical assistance. This evaluation technical assistance
could include grantees and their independent evaluators providing to
the Department or its contractor updated comprehensive evaluation plans
in a format as requested by the technical assistance provider and using
such tools as the Department may request. Grantees will be encouraged
to update this evaluation plan at least annually to reflect any changes
to the evaluation, with updates consistent with the scope and
objectives of the approved application.
The FY 2022 Expansion grant competition includes two absolute
priorities and two competitive preference priorities. Applicants have
the option of addressing one or both competitive preference priorities.
Absolute Priority 1--Strong Evidence establishes the evidence
requirement for this tier of grants. All Expansion applicants must
submit prior evidence of effectiveness that meets the strong evidence
standard.
Absolute Priority 2--Field-Initiated Innovations--General allows
applicants to propose projects that align with the purpose of the EIR
program: To create and take to scale entrepreneurial, evidence-based,
field-initiated innovations to improve student achievement and
attainment.
Through Competitive Preference Priority 1, the Department
encourages applicants to propose projects that promote equity in
educational opportunities and outcomes. Improving educational equity
and adequacy is a priority for the Nation's education system, with
particular emphasis on supporting underserved students.
Competitive Preference Priority 2 reflects the Administration's
ongoing commitment to addressing the impact of the novel coronavirus
2019 (COVID-19) on prekindergarten (Pre-K)-grade 12 education. COVID-19
has caused unprecedented disruption in schools across the country and
drawn renewed attention to the ongoing challenges for underserved
students. In response to the pandemic, educators have mobilized and
continue to address the needs of all students. Researchers and
educators are now working to understand and address the impact of
inconsistent access to instruction, services, and supports, and other
challenges.
We also know that for students in underserved communities,
inequities in educational opportunity and outcomes existed prior to
COVID-19. Those inequities have only been exacerbated by COVID-19. The
impact of the COVID-19 pandemic changed the education landscape for the
foreseeable future, especially as students continue to make up for lost
classroom instruction. However, it also provides an opportunity to
redesign how schools approach teaching and learning in ways that both
address long-standing gaps in educational opportunity and better
prepare students for college and careers.
The Department seeks projects that develop and evaluate evidence-
based, field-initiated innovations to remedy the inequities in our
country's education system. The proposed innovations should be designed
to better enable students to access the educational opportunities they
need to succeed in school and reach their future goals.
Through these priorities, the Department intends to advance
innovation, build evidence, and address the learning and achievement of
underserved and high-need students in Pre-K through grade 12.
Priorities: This notice includes two absolute priorities and two
competitive preference priorities. In accordance with 34 CFR
75.105(b)(2)(ii), Absolute Priority 1 is from 34 CFR 75.226(d)(2). In
accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(iv), Absolute Priority 2 is from
section 4611(a)(1)(A) of the ESEA. The competitive preference
priorities are from the Supplemental Priorities and Definitions for
Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal Register on
December 10, 2021 (86 FR 70612) (Supplemental Priorities).
Absolute Priorities: For FY 2022 and any subsequent year in which
we make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this
competition, these priorities are absolute priorities. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(3), we consider only applications that meet both Absolute
Priority 1 and Absolute Priority 2.
These priorities are:
Absolute Priority 1--Strong Evidence.
Projects supported by evidence that meets the conditions in the
definition of ``strong evidence.''
Note: An applicant must identify up to four studies to be
reviewed against the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Handbooks (as
defined in this notice) for the purposes of meeting the definition
of ``strong evidence.'' The studies may have been conducted by the
applicant or by a third party. An applicant must clearly identify
the citation for each study in the Evidence form. An applicant must
ensure that all cited studies are available to the Department from
publicly available sources and provide links or other guidance
indicating where each is available. The Department may not review a
study that an applicant fails to clearly identify for review.
In addition to including up to four study citations, an applicant
must provide in the Evidence form the following information: (1) The
positive student outcomes the applicant intends to replicate under its
Expansion grant and how these outcomes correspond to the positive
student outcomes in the cited studies; (2) the characteristics of the
population to be served under its Expansion grant and how these
characteristics correspond to the characteristics of the students in
the cited studies; (3) the characteristics of the setting to be served
under its Expansion grant and how these characteristics correspond to
the settings in the cited studies; and (4) the practice(s) the
applicant plans to implement under its Expansion grant and how the
practice(s) correspond with the practice(s) in the cited studies.
If the Department determines that an applicant has provided
insufficient information, the applicant will not have an opportunity to
provide additional information. However, if the WWC determines that a
study does not provide enough information on key aspects of the study
design, such as sample attrition or equivalence of intervention and
comparison groups, the WWC may submit a query to the study author(s) to
gather information for use in determining a study rating. Authors would
be asked to respond to queries within 10 business days. Should the
author query remain incomplete within 14 days of the initial contact to
the study author(s), the study may be deemed ineligible under the grant
competition. After the grant competition closes, the WWC will, for
purposes of its own curation of studies, continue to include responses
to author queries and make updates to study reviews as necessary.
However, no additional information will be considered after the
competition closes and the initial timeline established for response to
an author query passes.
Absolute Priority 2--Field-Initiated Innovations--General.
Projects designed to create, develop, implement, replicate, or take
to scale entrepreneurial, evidence-based, field-initiated innovations
to improve student achievement and attainment for high-need students.
Competitive Preference Priorities: For FY 2022 and any subsequent
year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications
from this competition, these priorities are competitive preference
priorities. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award up to an additional
6 points to an application, depending on how well the application
addresses the competitive preference priorities.
If an applicant chooses to address one or both of the competitive
preference
[[Page 24989]]
priorities, the applicant must identify in the project narrative
section of its application the competitive preference priorities it
chooses to address.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1--Promoting Equity in Student
Access to Educational Resources and Opportunities (up to 3 points).
Projects designed to promote educational equity and adequacy in
resources and opportunity for underserved students in middle school or
high school that examine the sources of inequity and inadequacy and
implement responses, including rigorous, engaging, and well-rounded
(e.g., that include music and the arts) approaches to learning that are
inclusive with regard to race, ethnicity, culture, language, and
disability status and prepare students for college, career, and civic
life, including one or more of the following:
(a) Student-centered learning models that may leverage technology
to address learner variability (e.g., universal design for learning (as
defined in this notice), K-12 competency-based education (as defined in
this notice), project-based learning, or hybrid/blended learning) and
provide high-quality learning content, applications, or tools.
(b) Middle school courses or projects that prepare students to
participate in advanced coursework in high school.
(c) Advanced courses and programs, including dual enrollment and
early college programs.
(d) Project-based and experiential learning, including service and
work-based learning.
(e) High-quality career and technical education courses, pathways,
and industry-recognized credentials that are integrated into the
curriculum.
Competitive Preference Priority 2--Addressing the Impact of COVID-
19 on Students, Educators, and Faculty (up to 3 points).
Projects that are designed to address the impacts of the COVID-19
pandemic, including impacts that extend beyond the duration of the
pandemic itself, on the students most impacted by the pandemic, with a
focus on underserved students and the educators who serve them
through--
(a) Conducting community asset-mapping and needs assessments that
may include an assessment of the extent to which students, including
subgroups of students, have become disengaged from learning, including
students not participating in in-person or remote instruction, and
specific strategies for reengaging and supporting students and their
families; and
(b) Using evidence-based instructional approaches and supports,
such as professional development, coaching, ongoing support for
educators, high quality tutoring, expanded access to rigorous
coursework and content across K-12, and expanded learning time to
accelerate learning for students in ways that ensure all students have
the opportunity to successfully meet challenging academic content
standards without contributing to tracking or remedial courses.
Definitions: The definitions of ``baseline,'' ``evidence-based,''
``experimental study,'' ``strong evidence,'' ``national level,''
``nonprofit,'' ``performance measure,'' ``performance target,''
``project component,'' ``relevant outcome,'' and ``What Works
Clearinghouse Handbooks (WWC Handbooks)'' are from 34 CFR 77.1. The
definitions of ``local educational agency'' and ``State educational
agency'' are from section 8101 of the ESEA. The definitions of
``children or students with disabilities,'' ``competency-based
education,'' ``disconnected youth,'' ``early learning,'' ``educator,''
``English learner,'' ``military- or veteran-connected student,''
``underserved students,'' and ``universal design for learning'' are
from the Supplemental Priorities.
Baseline means the starting point from which performance is
measured and targets are set.
Children or students with disabilities means children with
disabilities as defined in section 602(3) of the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. 1401(3)) and 34 CFR 300.8,
or students with disabilities, as defined in the Rehabilitation Act of
1973 (29 U.S.C. 705(37), 705(202)(B)).
Competency-based education (also called proficiency-based or
mastery-based learning) means learning based on knowledge and skills
that are transparent and measurable. Progression is based on
demonstrated mastery of what students are expected to know (knowledge)
and be able to do (skills), rather than seat time or age.
Disconnected youth means an individual, between the ages 14 and 24,
who may be from a low-income background, experiences homelessness, is
in foster care, is involved in the justice system, or is not working or
not enrolled in (or at risk of dropping out of) an educational
institution.
Early learning means any (a) State-licensed or State-regulated
program or provider, regardless of setting or funding source, that
provides early care and education for children from birth to
kindergarten entry, including, but not limited to, any program operated
by a child care center or in a family child care home; (b) program
funded by the Federal Government or State or local educational agencies
(including any IDEA-funded program); (c) Early Head Start and Head
Start program; (d) non-relative child care provider who is not
otherwise regulated by the State and who regularly cares for two or
more unrelated children for a fee in a provider setting; and (e) other
program that may deliver early learning and development services in a
child's home, such as the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home
Visiting Program; Early Head Start; and Part C of IDEA.
Educator means an individual who is an early learning educator,
teacher, principal or other school leader, specialized instructional
support personnel (e.g., school psychologist, counselor, school social
worker, early intervention service personnel), paraprofessional, or
faculty.
English learner means an individual who is an English learner as
defined in section 8101(20) of the ESEA, or an individual who is an
English language learner as defined in section 203(7) of the Workforce
Innovation and Opportunity Act.
Evidence-based means the proposed project component is supported by
strong evidence.
Experimental study means a study that is designed to compare
outcomes between two groups of individuals (such as students) that are
otherwise equivalent except for their assignment to either a treatment
group receiving a project component or a control group that does not.
Randomized controlled trials, regression discontinuity design studies,
and single-case design studies are the specific types of experimental
studies that, depending on their design and implementation (e.g.,
sample attrition in randomized controlled trials and regression
discontinuity design studies), can meet What Works Clearinghouse (WWC)
standards without reservations as described in the WWC Handbooks (as
defined in this notice):
(i) A randomized controlled trial employs random assignment of, for
example, students, teachers, classrooms, or schools to receive the
project component being evaluated (the treatment group) or not to
receive the project component (the control group).
(ii) A regression discontinuity design study assigns the project
component being evaluated using a measured variable (e.g., assigning
students reading below a cutoff score to tutoring or developmental
education classes) and controls for that variable in the analysis of
outcomes.
[[Page 24990]]
(iii) A single-case design study uses observations of a single case
(e.g., a student eligible for a behavioral intervention) over time in
the absence and presence of a controlled treatment manipulation to
determine whether the outcome is systematically related to the
treatment.
Local educational agency (LEA) means:
(a) In General. A public board of education or other public
authority legally constituted within a State for either administrative
control or direction of, or to perform a service function for, public
elementary schools or secondary schools in a city, county, township,
school district, or other political subdivision of a State, or of or
for a combination of school districts or counties that is recognized in
a State as an administrative agency for its public elementary schools
or secondary schools.
(b) Administrative Control and Direction. The term includes any
other public institution or agency having administrative control and
direction of a public elementary school or secondary school.
(c) Bureau of Indian Education Schools. The term includes an
elementary school or secondary school funded by the Bureau of Indian
Education but only to the extent that including the school makes the
school eligible for programs for which specific eligibility is not
provided to the school in another provision of law and the school does
not have a student population that is smaller than the student
population of the LEA receiving assistance under the ESEA with the
smallest student population, except that the school shall not be
subject to the jurisdiction of any SEA (as defined in this notice)
other than the Bureau of Indian Education.
(d) Educational Service Agencies. The term includes educational
service agencies and consortia of those agencies.
(e) State Educational Agency. The term includes the SEA in a State
in which the SEA is the sole educational agency for all public schools.
Military- or veteran-connected student means one or more of the
following:
(a) A child participating in an early learning program, a student
enrolled in preschool through grade 12, or a student enrolled in career
and technical education or postsecondary education who has a parent or
guardian who is a member of the uniformed services (as defined by 37
U.S.C. 101), in the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard,
Space Force, National Guard, Reserves, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, or Public Health Service or is a veteran of the
uniformed services with an honorable discharge (as defined by 38 U.S.C.
3311).
(b) A student who is a member of the uniformed services, a veteran
of the uniformed services, or the spouse of a service member or
veteran.
(c) A child participating in an early learning program, a student
enrolled in preschool through grade 12, or a student enrolled in career
and technical education or postsecondary education who has a parent or
guardian who is a veteran of the uniformed services (as defined by 37
U.S.C. 101).
National level describes the level of scope or effectiveness of a
process, product, strategy, or practice that is able to be effective in
a wide variety of communities, including rural and urban areas, as well
as with different groups (e.g., economically disadvantaged, racial and
ethnic groups, migrant populations, individuals with disabilities,
English learners, and individuals of each gender).
Nonprofit, as applied to an agency, organization, or institution,
means that it is owned and operated by one or more corporations or
associations whose net earnings do not benefit, and cannot lawfully
benefit, any private shareholder or entity.
Performance measure means any quantitative indicator, statistic, or
metric used to gauge program or project performance.
Performance target means a level of performance that an applicant
would seek to meet during the course of a project or as a result of a
project.
Project component means an activity, strategy, intervention,
process, product, practice, or policy included in a project. Evidence
may pertain to an individual project component or to a combination of
project components (e.g., training teachers on instructional practices
for English learners and follow-on coaching for these teachers).
Relevant outcome means the student outcome(s) or other outcome(s)
the key project component is designed to improve, consistent with the
specific goals of the program.
State educational agency (SEA) means the agency primarily
responsible for the State supervision of public elementary schools and
secondary schools.
Strong evidence means that there is evidence of the effectiveness
of a key project component in improving a relevant outcome for a sample
that overlaps with the populations and settings proposed to receive
that component, based on a relevant finding from one of the following:
(i) A practice guide prepared by the WWC using version 2.1, 3.0,
4.0, or 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks reporting a ``strong evidence base''
for the corresponding practice guide recommendation;
(ii) An intervention report prepared by the WWC using version 2.1,
3.0, 4.0, or 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks reporting a ``positive effect''
on a relevant outcome based on a ``medium to large'' extent of
evidence, with no reporting of a ``negative effect'' or ``potentially
negative effect'' on a relevant outcome; or
(iii) A single experimental study reviewed and reported by the WWC
using version 2.1, 3.0, 4.0, or 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks, or otherwise
assessed by the Department using version 4.1 of the WWC Handbook, as
appropriate, and that--
(A) Meets WWC standards without reservations;
(B) Includes at least one statistically significant and positive
(i.e., favorable) effect on a relevant outcome;
(C) Includes no overriding statistically significant and negative
effects on relevant outcomes reported in the study or in a
corresponding WWC intervention report prepared under version 2.1, 3.0,
4.0, or 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks; and
(D) Is based on a sample from more than one site (e.g., State,
county, city, school district, or postsecondary campus) and includes at
least 350 students or other individuals across sites. Multiple studies
of the same project component that each meet requirements in paragraphs
(iii)(A), (B), and (C) of this definition may together satisfy this
requirement in this paragraph (iii)(D).
Underserved student means a student (which may include children in
early learning environments, students in K-12 programs, and students in
postsecondary education or career and technical education, as
appropriate) in one or more of the following subgroups:
(a) A student who is living in poverty or is served by schools with
high concentrations of students living in poverty.
(b) A student of color.
(c) A student who is a member of a federally recognized Indian
Tribe.
(d) An English learner.
(e) A child or student with a disability.
(f) A disconnected youth.
(g) A technologically unconnected youth.
(h) A migrant student.
(i) A student experiencing homelessness or housing insecurity.
[[Page 24991]]
(j) A lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, or
intersex (LGBTQI+) student.
(k) A student who is in foster care.
(l) A student without documentation of immigration status.
(m) A pregnant, parenting, or caregiving student.
(n) A student impacted by the justice system, including a formerly
incarcerated student.
(o) A student who is the first in their family to attend
postsecondary education.
(p) A student performing significantly below grade level.
(q) A military- or veteran-connected student.
Universal design for learning has the meaning ascribed it in
section 103(24) of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.
What Works Clearinghouse Handbooks (WWC Handbooks) means the
standards and procedures set forth in the WWC Standards Handbook,
Versions 4.0 or 4.1, and WWC Procedures Handbook, Versions 4.0 or 4.1,
or in the WWC Procedures and Standards Handbook, Version 3.0 or Version
2.1 (all incorporated by reference, see Sec. 77.2). Study findings
eligible for review under WWC standards can meet WWC standards without
reservations, meet WWC standards with reservations, or not meet WWC
standards. WWC practice guides and intervention reports include
findings from systematic reviews of evidence as described in the WWC
Handbooks documentation.
Note: The What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards
Handbooks are available at <a href="https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks">https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks</a>.
Program Authority: Section 4611 of the ESEA, 20 U.S.C. 7261.
Note: Projects will be awarded and must be operated in a manner
consistent with the nondiscrimination requirements contained in
Federal civil rights laws.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86,
97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to
Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in
2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department
in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part
200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR
part 3474. (d) The Supplemental Priorities.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of
higher education (IHEs) only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $159,400,000.
These estimated available funds are the total available for new
awards for all three types of grants under the EIR program (Early-
phase, Mid-phase, and Expansion grants).
Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of
applications, we may make additional awards in subsequent years from
the list of unfunded applications from this competition.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: Up to $15,000,000.
Maximum Award: We will not make an award exceeding $15,000,000 for
a project period of 60 months. The Department intends to fund one or
more projects under each of the EIR competitions, including Expansion
(84.411A), Mid-phase (84.411B), and Early-phase (84.411C). Entities may
submit applications for different projects for more than one
competition (Early-phase, Mid-phase, and Expansion). The maximum new
award amount a grantee may receive under these three competitions,
taken together, is $15,000,000. If an entity is within funding range
for multiple applications, the Department will award the highest
scoring applications up to $15,000,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: 1-5.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
Note: Under section 4611(c) of the ESEA, the Department must use
at least 25 percent of EIR funds for a fiscal year to make awards to
applicants serving rural areas, contingent on receipt of a
sufficient number of applications of sufficient quality. For
purposes of this competition, we will consider an applicant as rural
if the applicant meets the qualifications for rural applicants as
described in the Eligible Applicants section and the applicant
certifies that it meets those qualifications through the
application.
In implementing this statutory provision and program requirement,
the Department may fund high-quality applications from rural applicants
out of rank order in the Expansion competition.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants:
(a) An LEA;
(b) An SEA;
(c) The Bureau of Indian Education (BIE);
(d) A consortium of SEAs or LEAs;
(e) A nonprofit (as defined in this notice) organization; and
(f) An LEA, an SEA, the BIE, or a consortium described in clause
(d), in partnership with--
(1) A nonprofit organization;
(2) A business;
(3) An educational service agency; or
(4) An IHE.
To qualify as a rural applicant under the EIR program, an applicant
must meet both of the following requirements:
(a) The applicant is--
(1) An LEA with an urban-centric district locale code of 32, 33,
41, 42, or 43, as determined by the Secretary;
(2) A consortium of such LEAs;
(3) An educational service agency or a nonprofit organization in
partnership with such an LEA; or
(4) A grantee described in clause (1) or (2) in partnership with an
SEA; and
(b) A majority of the schools to be served by the program are
designated with a locale code of 32, 33, 41, 42, or 43, or a
combination of such codes, as determined by the Secretary.
Applicants are encouraged to retrieve locale codes from the
National Center for Education Statistics School District search tool
(<a href="https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/districtsearch/">https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/districtsearch/</a>), where districts can be
looked up individually to retrieve locale codes, and the Public School
search tool (<a href="https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/schoolsearch/">https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/schoolsearch/</a>), where individual
schools can be looked up to retrieve locale codes. More information on
rural applicant eligibility is in the application package.
Note: If you are a nonprofit organization, under 34 CFR 75.51,
you may demonstrate your nonprofit status by providing: (1) Proof
that the Internal Revenue Service currently recognizes the applicant
as an organization to which contributions are tax deductible under
section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code; (2) a statement from
a State taxing body or the State attorney general certifying that
the organization is a nonprofit organization operating within the
State and that no part of its net earnings may lawfully benefit any
private shareholder or individual; (3) a certified copy of the
applicant's certificate of incorporation or similar document if it
clearly establishes the nonprofit status of the applicant; or (4)
any item described above if that item applies to a State or national
parent organization, together with a statement by the State or
parent organization that the applicant is a local nonprofit
affiliate.
In addition, any IHE is eligible to be a partner in an application
submitted by an LEA, SEA, BIE, consortium of SEAs or LEAs, or a
nonprofit organization. A private IHE that is a nonprofit organization
may apply for an EIR grant. A nonprofit organization, such as a
[[Page 24992]]
development foundation, that is affiliated with a public IHE may apply
for a grant. A public IHE that has 501(c)(3) status would also qualify
as a nonprofit organization and may apply for an EIR grant. A public
IHE without 501(c)(3) status (even if that entity is tax exempt under
Section 115 of the Internal Revenue Code or any other State or Federal
provision), or that could not provide any other documentation of
nonprofit status described in 34 CFR 75.51(b), however, would not
qualify as a nonprofit organization, and therefore would not be
eligible to apply for and receive an EIR grant.
2. a. Cost Sharing or Matching: Under section 4611(d) of the ESEA,
each grant recipient must provide, from Federal, State, local, or
private sources, an amount equal to 10 percent of funds provided under
the grant, which may be provided in cash or through in-kind
contributions, to carry out activities supported by the grant. Grantees
must include a budget showing their matching contributions to the
budget amount of EIR grant funds and must provide evidence of their
matching contributions for the first year of the grant in their grant
applications.
Section 4611(d) of the ESEA authorizes the Secretary to waive the
matching requirement on a case-by-case basis, upon a showing of
exceptional circumstances, such as:
(i) The difficulty of raising matching funds for a program to serve
a rural area;
(ii) The difficulty of raising matching funds in areas with a
concentration of LEAs or schools with a high percentage of students
aged 5 through 17--
(A) Who are in poverty, as counted in the most recent census data
approved by the Secretary;
(B) Who are eligible for a free or reduced price lunch under the
Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.);
(C) Whose families receive assistance under the State program
funded under part A of title IV of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
601 et seq.); or
(D) Who are eligible to receive medical assistance under the
Medicaid program; and
(iii) The difficulty of raising funds on Tribal land.
Applicants that wish to apply for a waiver must include a request
in their application that describes why the matching requirement would
cause serious hardship or an inability to carry out project activities.
Further information about applying for waivers can be found in the
application package.
b. Indirect Cost Rate Information: This program uses an
unrestricted indirect cost rate. For more information regarding
indirect costs, or to obtain a negotiated indirect cost rate, please
see <a href="http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/intro.html">www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/intro.html</a>.
c. Administrative Cost Limitation: This program does not include
any program-specific limitation on administrative expenses. All
administrative expenses must be reasonable and necessary and conform to
Cost Principles described in 2 CFR part 200 subpart E of the Uniform
Guidance.
3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this competition may not award
subgrants to entities to directly carry out project activities
described in its application.
4. Other: a. Funding Categories: An applicant will be considered
for an award only for the type of EIR grant for which it applies. An
applicant may not submit an application for the same proposed project
under more than one type of grant (e.g., both an Expansion grant and
Mid-phase grant).
Note: Each application will be reviewed under the competition it
was submitted under in the <a href="http://Grants.gov">Grants.gov</a> system, and only applications
that are successfully submitted by the established deadline will be
peer reviewed. Applicants should be careful that they download the
intended EIR application package and that they submit their
applications under the intended EIR competition.
b. Evaluation: The grantee must conduct an independent evaluation
of the effectiveness of its project.
c. High-need students: The grantee must serve high-need students.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to
follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of
Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal
Register on December 27, 2021 (86 FR 73264) and available at
<a href="http://www.federalregister.gov/d/2021-27979">www.federalregister.gov/d/2021-27979</a>, which contain requirements and
information on how to submit an application. Please note that these
Common Instructions supersede the version published on February 13,
2019, and, in part, describe the transition from the requirement to
register in <a href="http://SAM.gov">SAM.gov</a> a DUNS number to the implementation of the UEI.
More information on the phase-out of DUNS numbers is available at
<a href="http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ofo/docs/unique-entity-identifier-transition-fact-sheet.pdf">www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ofo/docs/unique-entity-identifier-transition-fact-sheet.pdf</a>.
2. Submission of Proprietary Information: Given the types of
projects that may be proposed in applications for Expansion grants,
your application may include business information that you consider
proprietary. In 34 CFR 5.11 we define ``business information'' and
describe the process we use in determining whether any of that
information is proprietary and, thus, protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4 of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552, as
amended).
Because we plan to make successful applications available to the
public, you may wish to request confidentiality of business
information.
Consistent with Executive Order 12600, please designate in your
application any information that you believe is exempt from disclosure
under Exemption 4. In the appropriate Appendix section of your
application, under ``Other Attachments Form,'' please list the page
number or numbers on which we can find this information. For additional
information please see 34 CFR 5.11(c).
3. Intergovernmental Review: This competition is subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under
Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for this
competition.
4. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
5. Recommended Page Limit: The application narrative is where you,
the applicant, address the selection criteria that reviewers use to
evaluate your application. We recommend that you (1) limit the
application narrative for an Expansion grant to no more than 35 pages
and (2) use the following standards:
<bullet> A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1''
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
<bullet> Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
<bullet> Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
<bullet> Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier,
Courier New, or Arial.
The recommended page limit does not apply to the cover sheet; the
budget section, including the narrative budget justification; the
assurances and certifications; or the one-page abstract, the resumes,
the bibliography, or the
[[Page 24993]]
letters of support. However, the recommended page limit does apply to
all of the application narrative.
6. Notice of Intent to Apply: The Department will be able to review
grant applications more efficiently if we know the approximate number
of applicants that intend to apply. Therefore, we strongly encourage
each potential applicant to notify us of their intent to submit an
application. Applicants may access this form using the link available
on the Notice of Intent to Apply section of the competition website:
<a href="https://oese.ed.gov/offices/office-of-discretionary-grants-support-services/innovation-early-learning/education-innovation-and-research-eir/fy-2022-competition/">https://oese.ed.gov/offices/office-of-discretionary-grants-support-services/innovation-early-learning/education-innovation-and-research-eir/fy-2022-competition/</a>. Applicants that do not submit a notice of
intent to apply may still apply for funding; applicants that do submit
a notice of intent to apply are not bound to apply or bound by the
information provided.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for the Expansion
competition are from 34 CFR 75.210. The points assigned to each
criterion are indicated in the parentheses next to the criterion. An
applicant may earn up to a total of 100 points based on the selection
criteria for the application.
A. Significance (up to 15 points).
The Secretary considers the significance of the proposed project.
In determining the significance of the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(1) The national significance of the proposed project. (5 points)
(2) The extent to which the proposed project involves the
development or demonstration of promising new strategies that build on,
or are alternatives to, existing strategies. (5 points)
(3) The potential contribution of the proposed project to increased
knowledge or understanding of educational problems, issues, or
effective strategies. (5 points)
B. Strategy to Scale (up to 35 points).
The Secretary considers the applicant's strategy to scale the
proposed project. In determining the applicant's capacity to scale the
proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(1) The extent to which the applicant identifies a specific
strategy or strategies that address a particular barrier or barriers
that prevented the applicant, in the past, from reaching the level of
scale that is proposed in the application. (10 points)
(2) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives
of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly
defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing
project tasks. (5 points)
(3) The applicant's capacity (e.g., in terms of qualified
personnel, financial resources, or management capacity) to bring the
proposed project to scale on a national or regional level (as defined
in 34 CFR 77.1(c)) working directly, or through partners, during the
grant period. (10 points)
(4) The mechanisms the applicant will use to broadly disseminate
information on its project so as to support further development or
replication. (10 points)
C. Quality of the Project Design (up to 15 points).
The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the proposed
project. In determining the quality of the design of the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(1) The extent to which there is a conceptual framework underlying
the proposed research or demonstration activities and the quality of
that framework. (5 points)
(2) The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be
achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable.
(5 points)
(3) The extent to which the design of the proposed project is
appropriate to, and will successfully address, the needs of the target
population or other identified needs. (5 points)
D. Quality of the Project Evaluation (up to 35 points).
The Secretary considers the quality of the evaluation to be
conducted of the proposed project. In determining the quality of the
evaluation, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(1) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will, if well
implemented, produce evidence about the project's effectiveness that
would meet the What Works Clearinghouse standards without reservations
as described in the What Works Clearinghouse Handbook (as defined in 34
CFR 77.1(c)). (20 points)
(2) The extent to which the evaluation will provide guidance about
effective strategies suitable for replication or testing in other
settings. (5 points)
(3) The extent to which the evaluation plan clearly articulates the
key project components, mediators, and outcomes, as well as a
measurable threshold for acceptable implementation. (5 points)
(4) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide
performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward
achieving intended outcomes. (5 points)
Note: Applicants may wish to review the following technical
assistance resources on evaluation: (1) WWC Procedures and Standards
Handbooks: <a href="https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks">https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks</a>; (2) ``Technical
Assistance Materials for Conducting Rigorous Impact Evaluations'':
<a href="http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/projects/evaluationTA.asp">http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/projects/evaluationTA.asp</a>; and (3) IES/NCEE
Technical Methods papers: <a href="http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/tech_methods/">http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/tech_methods/</a>. In
addition, applicants may view an optional webinar recording that was
hosted by the Institute of Education Sciences. The webinar focused
on more rigorous evaluation designs, discussing strategies for
designing and executing experimental studies that meet WWC evidence
standards without reservations. This webinar is available at:
<a href="https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Multimedia/18">https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Multimedia/18</a>.
2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition,
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
requires various assurances, including those applicable to Federal
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department
(34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
Before making awards, we will screen applications submitted in
accordance with the requirements in this notice to determine whether
applications have met eligibility and other requirements. This
screening process may occur at various stages of the process;
applicants that are determined to be ineligible will not receive a
grant, regardless of peer reviewer scores or comments.
Peer reviewers will read, prepare a written evaluation of, and
score the assigned applications, using the selection criteria provided
in this notice.
3. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.206, before awarding grants under this competition the Department
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR
200.208, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, under 2 CFR
3474.10, in appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant
if the applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management
[[Page 24994]]
system that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D;
has not fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not
responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently
$250,000), under 2 CFR 200.206(a)(2), we must make a judgment about
your integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under
Federal awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before
we make an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about
you that is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred
to as the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System
(FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for Award Management. You may
review and comment on any information about yourself that a Federal
agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of your currently active
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the
Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.
5. In General: In accordance with the Office of Management and
Budget's guidance located at 2 CFR part 200, all applicable Federal
laws, and relevant Executive guidance, the Department will review and
consider applications for funding pursuant to this notice inviting
applications in accordance with:
(a) Selecting recipients most likely to be successful in delivering
results based on the program objectives through an objective process of
evaluating Federal award applications (2 CFR 200.205);
(b) Prohibiting the purchase of certain telecommunication and video
surveillance services or equipment in alignment with section 889 of the
National Defense Authorization Act of 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232) (2 CFR
200.216);
(c) Providing a preference, to the extent permitted by law, to
maximize use of goods, products, and materials produced in the United
States (2 CFR 200.322); and
(d) Terminating agreements in whole or in part to the greatest
extent authorized by law if an award no longer effectuates the program
goals or agency priorities (2 CFR 200.340).
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you
are awarded a grant under this competition, you will be required to
openly license to the public grant deliverables created in whole, or in
part, with Department grant funds. When the deliverable consists of
modifications to pre-existing works, the license extends only to those
modifications that can be separately identified and only to the extent
that open licensing is permitted under the terms of any licenses or
other legal restrictions on the use of pre-existing works.
Additionally, a grantee or subgrantee that is awarded competitive grant
funds must have a plan to disseminate these public grant deliverables.
This dissemination plan can be developed and submitted after your
application has been reviewed and selected for funding. For additional
information on the open licensing requirements please refer to 2 CFR
3474.20.
Note: The evaluation report is a specific deliverable under an
Expansion grant that grantees must make available to the public.
Additionally, EIR grantees are encouraged to submit final studies
resulting from research supported in whole or in part by EIR to the
Educational Resources Information Center (<a href="http://eric.ed.gov">http://eric.ed.gov</a>).
4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition,
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the most current performance and
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting,
please go to <a href="http://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html">www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html</a>.
(c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the Secretary may provide a grantee
with additional funding for data collection analysis and reporting. In
this case the Secretary establishes a data collection period.
5. Performance Measures: For the purpose of Department reporting
under 34 CFR 75.110, the Department has established a set of
performance measures (as defined in this notice) for the Expansion
grants.
Annual performance measures: (1) The percentage of grantees that
reach their annual target number of students as specified in the
application; (2) the percentage of grantees that reach their annual
target number of high-need students as specified in the application;
(3) the percentage of grantees with ongoing well-designed and
independent evaluations that will provide evidence of their
effectiveness at improving student outcomes in multiple contexts; (4)
the percentage of grantees that implement an evaluation that provides
information about the key practices and the approach of the project so
as to facilitate replication; (5) the percentage of grantees that
implement an evaluation that provides information on the cost-
effectiveness of the key practices to identify potential obstacles and
success factors to scaling; and (6) the cost per student served by the
grant.
Cumulative performance measures: (1) The percentage of grantees
that reach the targeted number of students specified in the
application; (2) the percentage of grantees that reach the targeted
number of high-need students specified in the application; (3) the
percentage of grantees that implement a completed well-designed, well-
implemented, and independent evaluation that provides evidence of their
effectiveness at improving student outcomes at scale; (4) the
percentage of grantees with a completed well-designed, well-
implemented, and independent evaluation that provides information about
the key elements and the approach of the project so as to
[[Page 24995]]
facilitate replication or testing in other settings; (5) the percentage
of grantees with a completed evaluation that provided information on
the cost-effectiveness of the key practices to identify potential
obstacles and success factors to scaling; and (6) the cost per student
served by the grant.
Project-Specific Performance Measures: Applicants must propose
project-specific performance measures and performance targets (as
defined in this notice) consistent with the objectives of the proposed
project. Applications must provide the following information as
directed under 34 CFR 75.110(b) and (c):
(1) Performance measures. How each proposed performance measure
would accurately measure the performance of the project and how the
proposed performance measure would be consistent with the performance
measures established for the program funding the competition.
(2) Baseline (as defined in this notice) data. (i) Why each
proposed baseline is valid; or (ii) if the applicant has determined
that there are no established baseline data for a particular
performance measure, an explanation of why there is no established
baseline and of how and when, during the project period, the applicant
would establish a valid baseline for the performance measure.
(3) Performance targets. Why each proposed performance target is
ambitious yet achievable compared to the baseline for the performance
measure and when, during the project period, the applicant would meet
the performance target(s).
(4) Data collection and reporting. (i) The data collection and
reporting methods the applicant would use and why those methods are
likely to yield reliable, valid, and meaningful performance data; and
(ii) the applicant's capacity to collect and report reliable, valid,
and meaningful performance data, as evidenced by high-quality data
collection, analysis, and reporting in other projects or research.
All grantees must submit an annual performance report with
information that is responsive to these performance measures.
6. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things, whether a grantee
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of
the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, whether
the grantee has made substantial progress in achieving the performance
targets in the grantee's approved application.
In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: On request to the program contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities
can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an
accessible format. The Department will provide the requestor with an
accessible format that may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or text
format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file, braille, large print,
audiotape, or compact disc, or other accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of
Federal Regulations at <a href="http://www.govinfo.gov">www.govinfo.gov</a>. At this site you can view this
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at
<a href="http://www.federalregister.gov">www.federalregister.gov</a>. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Ruth E. Ryder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Programs, Office of
Elementary and Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2022-09086 Filed 4-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on April 27, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.