Proposed Rule2022-08933
Security Zone; Naval Submarine Base New London, Groton, CT
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
April 27, 2022
Issuing agencies
Homeland Security DepartmentCoast Guard
Abstract
The Coast Guard is proposing to modify the security zone boundaries surrounding Naval Submarine Base New London in Groton, CT. The proposed amendment to the security zone is to encompass the entire operational area of the Naval Submarine Base. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24927-24930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08933]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2022-0082]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zone; Naval Submarine Base New London, Groton, CT
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to modify the security zone
boundaries surrounding Naval Submarine Base New London in Groton, CT.
The proposed amendment to the security zone is to encompass the entire
operational area of the Naval Submarine Base. We invite your comments
on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 27, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2022-0082 using the Federal Decision Making Portal at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Marine Science Technician 2nd Class
Mark Paget, Waterways Management Division, Sector Long Island Sound;
telephone: (203) 468-4583; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98d5f9eaf3b6d9b6c8f9fffdecd8edebfbffb6f5f1f4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d994b8abb2f798f789b8bebcad99acaababef7b4b0b5">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Long Island Sound
CT Connecticut
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On August 15, 2003 the Coast Guard published a final rule entitled
``Regulated Navigation Areas, Safety and Security Zones; Long Island
Sound Marine Inspection and Captain of the Port Zone'' in the Federal
Register (68 FR 48798). With this rule we added 33 CFR 165.153 creating
a regulated navigation area establishing a speed restriction in the
vicinity of Naval Submarine Base New London and the Lower Thames River.
Later, on February 10, 2012, the Coast Guard published a final rule
entitled ``Special Local Regulations; Safety and Security Zones;
Recurring Events in Captain of the Port Long Island Sound Zone'' in the
Federal Register (77 FR 6955). With this rule we added 33 CFR 100.100
and revised Sec. Sec. 165.151 and 165.154. The changes removed 37
regulated areas, established 33 new safety zones, three special local
regulations, one security zone, and consolidatde and simplified these
regulations.
The Naval Submarine Base New London, Groton, CT, is the home to a
portion of the U.S. Navy's Fast Attack Nuclear Submarines. During a
recent security assessment of the base, it was determined that the
existing security zone does not adequately cover the entirety of naval
assets, piers, or planned pier extension projects. Therefore, Naval
Submarine Base New London has requested to expand the existing security
zone to safeguard its waterfront facility and its naval vessels while
moored from destruction, loss, or injury from sabotage or other
subversive acts, or other causes of a similar nature.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to modify and expand the existing
security zone cited in 33 CFR 165.154(a)(3). The Captain of the Port
Long Island Sound (COTP) proposes to modify current points in the
boundary of the security zone. This would allow the zone to completely
encompass the security barriers and allow room for planned pier
expansion projects.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
Part 165 of 33 CFR contains specific regulated navigation areas and
limited access areas to prescribe general regulations for different
types of limited or controlled access areas and regulated navigation
areas and list specific areas and their boundaries. Section 165.154
establishes Safety and Security Zones: Captain of the Port Long Island
Sound Zone.
The Coast Guard proposes to modify the location of the existing
security zone listed in 33 CFR 165.154(a)(3) Safety and Security Zones:
Captain of the Port Long Island Sound Zone, to expand the zone, as
indicated in the illustration below. This expansion would allow the
zone to completely encompass the security barriers and allow room to
expand piers as required.
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
[[Page 24928]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP27AP22.004
BILLING CODE 9110-04-C
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and
[[Page 24929]]
Executive orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the security zone. Vessel traffic would be
able to safely transit around the security zone which would impact a
small designated area of the Thames River.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
security zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the potential effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a security
zone to limit access near Naval Submarine Base New London, Groton, CT.
Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review
under paragraph L60a of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual
023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of
this preamble. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision Making Portal at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. To
do so, go to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, type USCG-2022-0082 in the
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If you cannot submit your material by using <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate
instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public
[[Page 24930]]
comments will also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by
following instructions on the <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> Frequently
Asked Questions web page. We review all comments received, but we will
only post comments that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may
choose not to post off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that
we receive.
Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
post to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> will include any personal
information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions
to the docket in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security Measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
proposing to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS.
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6
and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1,
Revision No. 01.2.
0
2. Amend Sec. 165.154 by revising paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 165.154 Safety and Security Zones; Captain of the Port Long
Island Sound Zone Safety and Security Zones.
(a) * * *
(3) Naval Submarine Base New London, Groton, CT (i) Location. All
navigable waters of the Thames River, from surface to bottom, West of
Naval Submarine Base New London, Groton, CT, enclosed by a line
beginning at a point on the shoreline at 41[deg]23'7.9'' N,
072[deg]05'13.7'' W; then to 41[deg]23'7.9'' N, 072[deg]05'16.9'' W;
then to 41[deg]22'50.3'' N, 072[deg]05'30.8'' W; then to
41[deg]23'42.9'' N, 072[deg]05'40.1'' W; then to 41[deg]23'46.7'' N,
072[deg]05'42.3'' W; then to 41[deg]23'53.9'' N, 072[deg]05'44.5'' W;
then to 41[deg]24'8.7'' N, 072[deg]05'44.5'' W; then to
41[deg]24'16.2'' N, 072[deg]05'43.4'' W; then to a point on the
shoreline 41[deg]24'16.2'' N, 072[deg]05'36.4'' W; then along the
shoreline to the point of beginning (NAD 83).
(ii) [Reserved]
* * * * *
Dated: April 21, 2022.
E.J. Van Camp,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Long Island Sound.
[FR Doc. 2022-08933 Filed 4-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on April 27, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.