Notice2022-08383
Spent Nuclear Fuel Management, Accelerated Basin De-Inventory Mission for H-Canyon, at the Savannah River Site
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
April 20, 2022
Issuing agencies
Energy Department
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is amending its August 7, 2000, Record of Decision (ROD) to the Savannah River Site Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0279, DOE 2000, SRS SNF EIS). The changes to the August 7, 2000, ROD memorialize DOE's decision to manage approximately 29.2 metric tons of heavy metal (MTHM) of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and target materials (hereafter referred to collectively as SNF), using conventional processing without recovery of uranium at the H-Canyon facility at the Savannah River Site (SRS). DOE anticipates that processing this SNF would begin in 2022 and continue for approximately 12 to 13 years. DOE will send the dissolved material to the liquid high-level radioactive waste (HLW) system prior to immobilization the material in a borosilicate glass waste form in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF). In the meantime, DOE will continue to safely store SNF and target materials in L-Basin at SRS, pending processing in H-Canyon.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23504-23506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08383]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Spent Nuclear Fuel Management, Accelerated Basin De-Inventory
Mission for H-Canyon, at the Savannah River Site
AGENCY: Office of Environmental Management, U.S. Department of Energy.
ACTION: Amended record of decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is amending its August 7,
2000, Record of Decision (ROD) to the Savannah River Site Spent Nuclear
Fuel Management Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0279, DOE
2000, SRS SNF EIS). The changes to the August 7, 2000, ROD memorialize
DOE's decision to manage approximately 29.2 metric tons of heavy metal
(MTHM) of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and target materials (hereafter
referred to collectively as SNF), using conventional processing without
recovery of uranium at the H-Canyon facility at the Savannah River Site
[[Page 23505]]
(SRS). DOE anticipates that processing this SNF would begin in 2022 and
continue for approximately 12 to 13 years. DOE will send the dissolved
material to the liquid high-level radioactive waste (HLW) system prior
to immobilization the material in a borosilicate glass waste form in
the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF). In the meantime, DOE will
continue to safely store SNF and target materials in L-Basin at SRS,
pending processing in H-Canyon.
ADDRESSES: This Amended ROD, the Supplement Analysis for the Spent
Nuclear Fuel Accelerated Basin De-inventory Mission for H-Canyon at the
Savannah River Site (SRS ABD SA), and related National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) documents are available on the DOE NEPA website at
<a href="http://www.energy.gov/nepa/nepa-documents">www.energy.gov/nepa/nepa-documents</a> and the SRS website at <a href="http://www.srs.gov/general/pubs/envbul/nepa1.htm">www.srs.gov/general/pubs/envbul/nepa1.htm</a>. To request copies of these documents,
please contact: Mr. Jeffrey Bentley, NEPA Document Manager, Savannah
River Operations Office, U.S. Department of Energy, P.O. Box B, Aiken,
South Carolina 29802, telephone: (803) 226-5113, email:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fb919e9d9d899e82d5999e958f979e82bb888988d59c948d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d17181b1b0f1804531f1813091118043d0e0f0e531a120b">[email protected]</span></a>.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information on the
management of SNF at SRS, please contact Mr. Bentley as listed in
ADDRESSES. For information on DOE's NEPA process, please contact: Mr.
William Ostrum, DOE-Office of Environmental Management, NEPA Compliance
Officer, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, EM-
4.31, Washington, DC 20585 or via phone at 202-586-2513 or email at
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#db8cb2b7b7b2bab6f594a8afa9aeb69bb3aaf5bfb4bef5bcb4ad"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c394aaafafaaa2aeed8cb0b7b1b6ae83abb2eda7aca6eda4acb5">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
DOE's purpose and need for action, as described in the SRS SNF EIS
(DOE/EIS-0279; DOE 2000), is to develop and implement a safe and
efficient SNF management strategy that includes preparing SNF and
target materials stored at or expected to be shipped to SRS for
ultimate disposition offsite.
In the SRS SNF EIS, DOE evaluated the potential environmental
impacts of alternatives for management of the SNF and target material.
DOE analyzed five reasonable alternatives that could be used to manage
SNF: No Action, Minimum Impact, Direct Disposal, Maximum Impact, and
the Preferred Alternative. The action alternatives represent
combinations of technologies applied to fuel groups.
Under the Preferred Alternative in the SRS SNF EIS, DOE would
prepare about 97 percent by volume (about 60 percent by mass) of the
aluminum SNF (ASNF) for disposition using a melt-and-dilute process.
The remaining 3 percent by volume (about 40 percent by mass) would be
managed using chemical processing.
DOE issued the Final SRS SNF EIS in March 2000 and issued a ROD on
August 7, 2000, (65 FR 48224) selecting the Preferred Alternative.
Since the ROD was issued, DOE has not implemented the melt-and-dilute
technology. On April 5, 2013, DOE issued an Amended ROD to process a
portion of the ASNF using conventional processing in lieu of the melt-
and-dilute process (78 FR 20625).
DOE has explored various scenarios to address storage capacity
limitations and technical issues associated with SNF and target
materials at SRS. Due to the vast variety of ASNF at SRS, implementing
a dry storage program, as a potential alternative to the melt-and-
dilute process, that would be effective for all SNF is technically
challenging. Considering the storage capacity for non-aluminum SNF
(NASNF) and the future availability of processing capabilities (H-
Canyon) and liquid HLW systems (DWPF and Tank Farms) at SRS, DOE has
reevaluated the management approach for SNF at SRS.
DOE previously evaluated and decided to consolidate the SNF by fuel
type at Hanford, Idaho National Laboratory, and SRS, in the
Programmatic Spent Nuclear Fuel Management and Idaho National
Engineering Laboratory Environmental Restoration and Waste Management
Programs Environmental Impact Statement (SNF PEIS) (DOE/EIS-0203) and
associated ROD (60 FR 28680, June 1, 1995). However, the decision to
consolidate SNF by fuel type has not been fully implemented. DOE's
inventory of ASNF has not been consolidated at SRS, and the NASNF has
not been consolidated at the Idaho National Laboratory. This Amended
ROD would not change that decision made in the 1995 ROD.
Under this Amended ROD, SNF (including both ASNF and NASNF, and
target materials) located at SRS, would be transferred from L-Basin to
H-Canyon for conventional processing \1\ with no uranium recovery. At
H-Canyon, the SNF would be dissolved in hot nitric acid, producing a
solution of highly enriched uranium (HEU), fission products, aluminum,
and small amounts of transuranic materials such as neptunium and
plutonium. The resulting solutions (including uranium-235) would be
transferred to the SRS liquid HLW system and processed for
immobilization \2\ at DWPF; HEU would not be recovered. The key benefit
of the non-recovery scenario is that it requires only a single-unit
process step in addition to neutralization, greatly simplifying the
processing required in H-Canyon. Potentially, 75 percent of the H-
Canyon conventional processing systems (Head End, First Uranium Cycle,
High-Activity Waste Evaporation, Second Uranium Cycle, Low-Activity
Waste Evaporation, Solvent Recovery, and Acid Recovery) would not be
used. Additionally, no blending down of HEU to low enriched uranium
would be required. The resulting liquid waste would be sent to DWPF for
immobilization into borosilicate glass. The HLW glass-filled,
stainless-steel canisters from DWPF would be stored in S-Area until
sent to a repository for disposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Conventional processing is a chemical separation process
that involves dissolving spent nuclear fuel in nitric acid and
separating fission products from uranium using solvent extraction.
After conventional processing, the solution containing the fission
products is transferred to DWPF for immobilization in glass.
\2\ A small quantity of low-activity liquid waste would be sent
to the Salt Waste Processing Facility and eventually disposed of in
grout at the SRS Saltstone Disposal Facility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with DOE NEPA regulations at 10 CFR 1021.314, DOE
prepared the SRS ABD SA (DOE/EIS-0279-SA-07, 2022). Based on the SRS
ABD SA, DOE has determined that a supplemental or new environmental
impact statement is not required. DOE also concluded in the SRS ABD SA
that the proposed change and new information is not a substantial
change relative to the alternatives analyzed in the SRS SNF EIS and,
thus, no further NEPA analysis is required.
The impacts of the Proposed Action as described in the SA were
determined to be small and would not result in releases to the
environment or radiation doses or risks to members of the public or
workers that would be significantly larger than those evaluated in the
SRS SNF EIS. Annual impacts of processing the SNF described in the SA
would remain similar to or bounded by those analyzed in the SRS SNF EIS
since annual throughput would be similar. Since approximately 16
percent more SNF would be processed over the life of the Proposed
Action than the amount of SNF that was estimated to be processed under
the SRS SNF EIS, some impacts of processing could increase by up to 16
percent. However, the reduction in processing steps would substantially
[[Page 23506]]
reduce resource use and worker exposure and related impacts.
Under the Proposed Action, DOE estimates that immobilization of
liquid waste resulting from the processing of 29.2 MTHM SNF (without
uranium recovery) would result in about 505 HLW glass-filled stainless-
steel canisters. This results in 435 more canisters from SNF processing
than was analyzed in the previous SRS SNF EIS. In the context of the
approximately 8,400 HLW glass-filled stainless-steel canisters that
DOE's most recent estimate indicated would be produced at DWPF, this
increase is not substantial (less than 7 percent), and SRS's total
expected canisters would still be within the 10,000 canisters DOE
evaluated in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement,
Defense Waste Processing Facility (DOE/EIS-0082-S, November 1994) and
no additional storage capacity would be needed.
Although a national repository for SNF has not yet been identified,
DOE remains committed to meeting its obligations to safely dispose of
SNF and HLW. The estimated 505 additional HLW canisters that would
eventually require disposal would be more than offset by the estimated
1,000 SNF storage canisters that would have needed disposal if the SNF
were not processed in H-Canyon.
Under the Proposed Action, because the uranium would not be
recovered, the fissile material concentration in the HLW glass needs to
be as much as 2,500 grams per cubic meter to maximize the amount of
material allowed in the H-Canyon transfers sent to the HLW sludge
batches. Analyses indicate that increasing the fissile material content
in the glass up to 2,500 grams per cubic meter would not constitute a
criticality issue and would have minimal impact on key properties
related to durability of the glass. Testing has demonstrated that the
HLW glass produced under the Proposed Action will meet the performance
standards of previously produced DWPF glasses.
Implementing the Proposed Action would entail activities at H-
Canyon that are the same as or comparable to existing or historical
operations and are largely bounded by activities evaluated in the SRS
SNF EIS. Therefore, the Proposed Action is not expected to result in
substantial increases to the range of cumulative impacts described in
the SRS SNF EIS.
Amended Decision
DOE has decided to implement the Proposed Action as described in
the SRS ABD SA. DOE will manage up to 29.2 MTHM of SNF using
conventional processing without uranium recovery in H-Canyon at SRS.
DOE anticipates processing these materials beginning as early as 2022,
and continuing approximately 12 to 13 years, consistent with program
and policy priorities and funding. DOE will use three dissolvers in
order to cost-effectively utilize H-Canyon and expeditiously complete
the mission, although only two dissolvers would be operated at any one
time. Meanwhile, SNF will continue to be stored in L-Basin at SRS,
pending processing in H-Canyon.
In the ROD for the SRS SNF EIS (65 FR 48224, August 7, 2000), DOE
identified the Minimum Impact Alternative as the environmentally
preferable alternative; this has not changed. No environmental impacts
resulting from operations under this amended decision would require
specific mitigation measures. DOE will continue its current practices
and policies to use all practicable means to avoid or minimize
environmental harm and impacts to workers when implementing the actions
described herein. For example, DOE will continue to evaluate and
implement, as appropriate, physical modifications to the H-Canyon
facility and process chemistry changes that would reduce personnel
exposure, facility effluents, and waste generation.
Basis for Decision
The proposed use of conventional processing for 29.2 MTHM of SNF,
including target materials, as described in the SRS ABD SA (DOE/EIS-
0279-SA-07, 2022) and this amendment to DOE's 2000 SNF ROD (65 FR
48224) takes advantage of existing processes in existing facilities.
The activities encompassed by this amended decision will not incur
potential health or environmental impacts significantly different from
those analyzed in existing NEPA reviews. This amended decision reduces
the overall cost of managing the currently stored SNF by eliminating
the need for storage in L-Basin and maximizes near-term utilization of
H-Canyon to expeditiously complete the mission. Further, the actions
resulting from this Amended ROD allow processing of the remaining
inventory of SNF stored at SRS L-Basin, converts the SNF to forms that
are proliferation resistant and can be safely stored for long periods
with minimal maintenance.
As described in the SRS ABD SA, most impacts would be similar to or
bounded by those described in the SRS SNF EIS. While the decision
documented in this Amended ROD will increase the number of canisters of
vitrified HLW, it is not expected to significantly affect the quantity
of vitrified HLW canisters requiring management and would be more than
offset by the SNF canisters that would not require disposal.
The actions to be taken pursuant to this Amended ROD strongly
support U.S. non-proliferation policy and goals by permanently
dispositioning the HEU contained in the SNF. This Proposed Action is
consistent with U.S. agreements regarding receipt of foreign research
reactor materials in which involved countries with the economic ability
to do so contribute to the costs of transportation and U.S. receipt,
processing, and disposition of the materials.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on April 8,
2022, by William I. White, Senior Advisor for Environmental Management,
Office of Environmental Management, pursuant to delegated authority
from the Secretary of Energy. That document with the original signature
and date is maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in
compliance with the requirements of the Office of the Federal Register,
the undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of the Department of Energy. The
administrative process in no way alters the legal effect of this
document upon publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on April 14, 2022.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2022-08383 Filed 4-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on April 20, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.