Notice2022-07746
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
April 12, 2022
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21684-21687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07746]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-94617; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2022-022]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Its Fee Schedule
April 6, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on April 1, 2022, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGX'') proposes to
amend its Fee Schedule. The text of the proposed rule change is
provided in Exhibit 5.
[[Page 21685]]
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (<a href="http://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/">http://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/</a>), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule applicable to its
equities trading platform (``EDGX Equity'') to modify the criteria of
Growth Tier 4. The Exchange proposes to implement this change effective
April 1, 2022.
The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the
Exchange is only one of 16 registered equities exchanges, as well as a
number of alternative trading systems and other off-exchange venues
that do not have similar self-regulatory responsibilities under the
Exchange Act, to which market participants may direct their order flow.
Based on publicly available information,\3\ no single registered
equities exchange has more than 17% of the market share. Thus, in such
a low-concentrated and highly competitive market, no single equities
exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of order
flow. The Exchange in particular operates a ``Maker-Taker'' model
whereby it pays rebates to members that add liquidity and assesses fees
to those that remove liquidity. The Exchange's Fee Schedule sets forth
the standard rebates and rates applied per share for orders that
provide and remove liquidity, respectively. Currently, for orders in
securities priced at or above $1.00, the Exchange provides a standard
rebate of $0.00160 per share for orders that add liquidity and assesses
a fee of $0.0030 per share for orders that remove liquidity. For orders
in securities priced below $1.00, the Exchange provides a standard
rebate of $0.00009 per share for orders that add liquidity and assesses
a fee of 0.30% of the total dollar value for orders that remove
liquidity. Additionally, in response to the competitive environment,
the Exchange also offers tiered pricing which provides Members
opportunities to qualify for higher rebates or reduced fees where
certain volume criteria and thresholds are met. Tiered pricing provides
an incremental incentive for Members to strive for higher tier levels,
which provides increasingly higher benefits or discounts for satisfying
increasingly more stringent criteria.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market Volume
Summary, Month-to-Date (March 25, 2022), available at <a href="https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/market_statistics/">https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/market_statistics/</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modification to Growth Volume Tier 4
Under footnote 1 of the Fee Schedule, the Exchange currently offers
various Add/Remove Volume Tiers. In particular, the Exchange offers
four Growth Tiers that each provide an enhanced rebate for Members'
qualifying orders yielding fee codes B,\4\ V,\5\ Y,\6\ 3 \7\ or 4,\8\
where a Member reaches certain add volume-based criteria, including
``growing'' its volume over a certain baseline month. Currently, Growth
Tier 4 provides an enhanced rebate of $0.0034 per share to MPIDs that
(1) add a Step-Up ADAV \9\ from October 2021 equal to or greater than
0.10% of the TCV \10\ or MPIDs that add a Step-Up ADAV from October
2021 equal to or greater than 15 million shares; and (2) MPIDs that add
an ADV \11\ equal to or greater than 0.30% of TCV or MPIDs that add an
ADV equal to or greater than 30 million shares. The Exchange now
proposes to amend the criteria of Growth Tier 4 to provide the rebate
to MPIDs that (1) add a Step-Up ADAV from October 2021 equal to or
greater than 0.10% of the TCV or MPIDs that add a Step-Up ADAV from
October 2021 equal to or greater than 16 million shares (instead of 15
million shares); and (2) and MPID that adds an ADV equal to or greater
than 0.30% of TCV or MPIDs that add an ADV equal to order great than 30
million shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Orders yielding Fee Code ``B'' are orders adding liquidity
to EDGX (Tape B).
\5\ Orders yielding Fee Code ``V'' are orders adding liquidity
to EDGX (Tape A).
\6\ Orders yielding Fee Code ``Y'' are orders adding liquidity
to EDGX (Tape C).
\7\ Orders yielding Fee Code ``3'' are orders adding liquidity
to EXGX in the pre and post market (Tapes A or C).
\8\ Orders yielding Fee Code ``4'' are orders adding liquidity
to EDGX in the pre and post market (Tape B).
\9\ ``Step-Up ADAV'' means ADAV in the relevant baseline month
subtracted from current ADAV. ``ADAV'' means average daily volume
calculated as the number of shares added per day. ADAV is calculated
on a monthly basis.
\10\ ``TCV'' means total consolidated volume calculated as the
volume reported by all exchanges and trade reporting facilities to a
consolidated transaction reporting plan for the month for which the
fees apply.
\11\ ``ADV'' means average daily volume calculated as the number
of shares added to, removed from, or routed by, the Exchange, or any
combination or subset thereof, per day. ADV is calculated on a
monthly basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the objectives of Section 6 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933
[sic] (the ``Act''),\12\ in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(4),\13\ in particular, as it is designed to provide for
the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among its Members and issuers and other persons using its facilities.
The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) \14\ requirements that the rules
of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts
and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest,
and, particularly, is not designed to permit unfair discrimination
between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. As described above,
the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which market
participants can readily direct order flow to competing venues if they
deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive or incentives to
be insufficient. The proposed rule change reflects a competitive
pricing structure designed to incentivize market participants to direct
their order flow to the Exchange, which the Exchange believes would
enhance market quality to the benefit of all Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that its proposed change to Growth Tier 4 is
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
[[Page 21686]]
discriminatory. The Exchange's proposal to amend Growth Tier 4 is
reasonable because the tier will continue to be available to all MPIDs
and will continue to provide MPIDs an opportunity to receive an
enhanced rebate. The Exchange notes that relative volume-based
incentives and discounts have been widely adopted by exchanges,\15\
including the Exchange,\16\ and are reasonable, equitable and non-
discriminatory because they are open to all Members on an equal basis
and provide additional benefits or discounts that are reasonably
related to (i) the value to an exchange's market quality and (ii)
associated higher levels of market activity, such as higher levels or
liquidity provision and/or growth thresholds, as well as assess similar
fees or rebates for similar types of orders, to that of the Exchange.
The Exchange also believes that the existing rebate under Growth Tier 4
continues to be commensurate with the existing and proposed criteria.
That is, the rebate reasonably reflects the difficulty in achieving the
corresponding criteria as amended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See BZX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote 1, Add/Remove
Volume Tiers.
\16\ See EDGX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote 1, Add/Remove
Volume Tiers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the change to Growth Tier 4 will benefit
all market participants by incentivizing continuous liquidity and,
thus, deeper more liquid markets as well as increased execution
opportunities. Particularly, the proposal is designed to incentivize
liquidity, which further contributes to a deeper, more liquid market
and provide even more execution opportunities for active market
participants at improved prices. This overall increase in activity
deepens the Exchange's liquidity pool, offers additional cost savings,
supports the quality of price discovery, promotes market transparency
and improves market quality, for all investors.
The Exchange also believes that the proposed amendment to Growth
Tier 4 represents an equitable allocation of rebates and is not
unfairly discriminatory because all MPIDs are eligible for the tier and
would have the opportunity to meet the tier's criteria and would
receive the proposed rebate if such criteria is met. Without having a
view of activity on other markets and off-exchange venues, the Exchange
has no way of knowing whether this proposed rule change would
definitely result in any MPIDs qualifying for the proposed tiers. While
the Exchange has no way of predicting with certainty how the proposed
tier will impact MPID activity, the Exchange anticipates that at least
one MPID will be able to compete for and reach the proposed criteria in
Growth Tier 4. The Exchange also notes all MPIDs are eligible to
satisfy the revised criteria of Growth Tier 4 and further believes the
proposed change will provide a reasonable means to encourage future
overall growth in Members' order flow to the Exchange by offering an
enhanced rebate on qualifying orders. Moreover the proposed criteria
will not adversely impact any MPID or Member's ability to qualify for
other reduced fee or enhanced rebate tiers. Should any MPID not meet
the proposed criteria under Growth Tier 4, the MPID will merely not
receive the corresponding enhanced rebate.
As noted above, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive
market. The Exchange in only one of 16 equity venues to which market
participants may direct their order flow, and it represents a small
percentage of the overall market. It is also only one of several maker-
taker exchanges. Competing equity exchanges offer similar rates and
tiered pricing structures to that of the Exchange, including schedules
of rebates and fees that apply based upon members achieving certain
volume thresholds.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Rather, as discussed above,
the Exchange believes that the proposed change would encourage the
submission of additional order flow to a public exchange, thereby
promoting market depth, execution incentives and enhanced execution
opportunities, as well as price discovery and transparency for all
Members. As a result, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes
further the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering
competition among orders, which promotes ``more efficient pricing of
individual stocks for all types of orders, large and small.''
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change does not impose any
burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Particularly, the proposed
change to Growth Tier 4 will apply to all Members equally in that all
Members are eligible for the tier, have a reasonable opportunity to
meet the tier's criteria and will receive the enhanced rebate on their
qualifying orders if such criteria is met. The Exchange does not
believe the proposed changes burdens competition, but rather, enhances
competition as it is intended to increase the competitiveness of EDGX
by amending an existing pricing incentive in order to attract order
flow and incentivize participants to increase their participation on
the Exchange, providing for additional execution opportunities for
market participants and improved price transparency. Greater overall
order flow, trading opportunities, and pricing transparency benefits
all market participants on the Exchange by enhancing market quality and
continuing to encourage Members to send orders, thereby contributing
towards a robust and well-balanced market ecosystem.
Next, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change does not
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As previously
discussed, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market.
Members have numerous alternative venues that they may participate on
and direct their order flow, including other equities exchanges, off-
exchange venues, and alternative trading systems. Additionally, the
Exchange represents a small percentage of the overall market. Based on
publicly available information, no single equities exchange has more
than 17% of the market share.\17\ Therefore, no exchange possesses
significant pricing power in the execution of order flow. Indeed,
participants can readily choose to send their orders to other exchange
and off-exchange venues if they deem fee levels at those other venues
to be more favorable. Moreover, the Commission has repeatedly expressed
its preference for competition over regulatory intervention in
determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets.
Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the
importance of market forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and,
also, recognized that current regulation of the market system ``has
been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to investors and listed
companies.'' \18\ The fact that this market is competitive has also
long been recognized by the courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities and
Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit stated as follows: ``[n]o one
disputes that competition for order flow is
[[Page 21687]]
`fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market
system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that
act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to
take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of
order flow from broker dealers' . . .''.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ Supra note 3.
\18\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
\19\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010)
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#becccbd2db93ddd1d3d3dbd0cacdfecddbdd90d9d1c8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c0e091019511f1311111912080f3c0f191f521b130a">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2022-022 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2022-022. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2022-022, and should be
submitted on or before May 3, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-07746 Filed 4-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on April 12, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.