Notice2022-06189
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Qualifications for the Market Maker Plus Program in Options 7, Section 3
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
March 24, 2022
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 57 (Thursday, March 24, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 57 (Thursday, March 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16816-16819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06189]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-94468; File No. SR-ISE-2022-07]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the
Qualifications for the Market Maker Plus Program in Options 7, Section
3
March 18, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on March 4, 2022, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the qualifications for the
Exchange's Market Maker Plus program in its Pricing Schedule at Options
7, Section 3.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at <a href="https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/ise/rules">https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/ise/rules</a>, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the
qualifications for the Exchange's Market Maker Plus program in its
Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section 3. The Exchange initially filed
the proposed pricing changes on February 23, 2022 (SR-ISE-2022-05). On
March 4, 2022, the Exchange withdrew that filing and submitted this
filing.
Today, the Exchange operates a Market Maker Plus program for
regular orders in Select Symbols \3\ and Non-Select Symbols \4\ that
provides the below tiered incentives to Market Makers \5\ based on time
spent quoting at the National Best Bid or National Best Offer
(``NBBO''). This program is designed to reward Market Makers that
contribute to market quality by maintaining tight markets in Select and
Non-Select Symbols.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ ``Select Symbols'' are options overlying all symbols listed
on the Exchange that are in the Penny Interval Program.
\4\ ``Non-Select Symbols'' are options overlying all symbols
excluding Select Symbols.
\5\ The term ``Market Makers'' refers to Competitive Market
Makers and Primary Market Makers, collectively.
Select Symbols Other Than SPY, QQQ, IWM, AMZN, FB, and NVDA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Market Maker Plus tier (specified percentage) Maker rebate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tier 1 (80% to less than 85%)........................... ($0.15)
Tier 2 (85% to less than 95%)........................... (0.18)
Tier 3 (95% or greater)................................. (0.22)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SPY, QQQ, and IWM
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Market Maker Plus tier (specified Regular Maker Linked Maker
percentage) rebate rebate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tier 1a (50% to less than 65%).......... ($0.00) N/A
Tier 1b (65% to less than 80%) or (over (0.05) N/A
50% and adds liquidity in the
qualifying symbol that is executed at a
volume of greater than 0.10% of
Customer Total Consolidated Volume)....
Tier 2 (80% to less than 85%) or (over (0.18) ($0.15)
50% and adds liquidity in the
qualifying symbol that is executed at a
volume of greater than 0.20% of
Customer Total Consolidated Volume)....
Tier 3 (85% to less than 90%) or (over (0.22) (0.19)
50% and adds liquidity in the
qualifying symbol that is executed at a
volume of greater than 0.25% of
Customer Total Consolidated Volume)....
Tier 4 (90% or greater) or (over 50% and (0.26) (0.23)
adds liquidity in the qualifying symbol
that is executed at a volume of greater
than 0.50% of Customer Total
Consolidated Volume)...................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AMZN, FB, and NVDA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Market Maker Plus tier (specified percentage) Maker rebate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tier 1 (70% to less than 85%)........................... ($0.15)
Tier 2 (85% to less than 95%)........................... (0.18)
[[Page 16817]]
Tier 3 (95% or greater)................................. (0.22)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Select Symbols (Excluding Index Options)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maker fee/
Market Maker Plus tier (specified percentage) rebate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tier 1 (80% to less than 90%)........................... $0.50
Tier 2 (90% to less than 98%)........................... 0.30
Tier 3 (98% or greater)................................. (0.40)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Market Makers are evaluated each trading day for the percentage of
time spent on the NBBO for qualifying series that expire in two
successive thirty calendar day periods beginning on that trading day. A
Market Maker Plus is a Market Maker who is on the NBBO a specified
percentage of the time on average for the month based on daily
performance in the qualifying series for each of the two successive
periods described above.\6\ A Market Maker's worst quoting day each
month for each of the two successive periods described above, on a per
symbol basis, is excluded in calculating whether a Market Maker
qualifies for this fee or rebate. In addition, a Market Maker who
qualifies for Market Maker Plus Tiers 2 or higher in at least four of
the previous six months are eligible to receive a reduced Tier 2
incentive in a given month where the Market Maker does not qualify for
any Market Maker Plus tiers. For Select Symbols, this rebate is the
applicable Tier 2 rebate reduced by $0.08 per contract. For Non-Select
Symbols, this fee is the Tier 2 fee increased by $0.08 per contract.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Qualifying series are series trading between $0.03 and $3.00
(for options whose underlying stock's previous trading day's last
sale price was less than or equal to $100) and between $0.10 and
$3.00 (for options whose underlying stock's previous trading day's
last sale price was greater than $100) in premium.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange now proposes to amend existing language around the
reduced Tier 2 incentive to provide that a Market Maker who qualifies
for Market Maker Plus Tier 2 or higher in at least four of the previous
six months will be eligible to receive a reduced Tier 2 incentive in a
given month where the Market Maker does not qualify for Market Maker
Plus Tier 2 or higher. The Exchange also proposes to add that for the
avoidance of doubt, if a Market Maker has achieved Tier 2 or higher in
at least four of the previous six months, but does not achieve Tier 2
or higher in the current month, that Market Maker will receive the
better of the reduced Tier 2 incentive or any applicable Tier 1
incentive the Market Maker qualified for in the current month. The
Exchange is proposing this language to avoid inadvertently penalizing
Market Makers that qualify for a Market Maker Plus Tier 1 incentive in
a given month, yet receive a lower incentive than if that Market Maker
achieved no Market Maker Plus tier in the same time frame.
Specifically, a Market Maker that qualifies for the SPY, QQQ, and IWM
Market Maker Plus Tier 1b incentive in a given month would receive a
rebate of $0.05 per contract today. If that Market Maker did not
qualify for any tier in the same month, but had qualified for SPY, QQQ,
and IWM Market Maker Plus Tiers 2 or higher in four of the prior six
months, the Market Maker would receive a reduced Tier 2 incentive of
$0.10 (i.e., $0.18 Tier 2 rebate minus $0.08).\7\ The Exchange believes
that providing a lower rebate in such instances where the Market Maker
had better performance by percentage of time spent at the NBBO versus
paying a higher rebate solely due to the four month lookback protection
is contrary to the intent of the Market Maker Plus program, which is to
reward Market Makers that contribute to market quality by maintaining
tight markets in symbols traded on the Exchange. The proposed language
will therefore make clear that in the foregoing instance, the Exchange
would provide the qualifying Market Maker with the higher incentive of
$0.10 versus the $0.05 incentive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The Exchange has found an instance where a Market Maker fell
into this category.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\8\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\9\ in particular, in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among members and issuers and other persons using any facility,
and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's proposed changes to its Pricing Schedule are
reasonable in several respects. As a threshold matter, the Exchange is
subject to significant competitive forces in the market for options
securities transaction services that constrain its pricing
determinations in that market. The fact that this market is competitive
has long been recognized by the courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities
and Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit stated as follows: ``[n]o one
disputes that competition for order flow is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC
explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market system, buyers and sellers of
securities, and the broker-dealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders for
execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to take its market share
percentages for granted' because `no exchange possesses a monopoly,
regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker
dealers'. . . .'' \10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010)
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation
NMS, while adopting a series of steps to improve the current market
model, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its
[[Page 16818]]
broader forms that are most important to investors and listed
companies.'' \11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005),
70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (``Regulation NMS Adopting
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Numerous indicia demonstrate the competitive nature of this market.
For example, clear substitutes to the Exchange exist in the market for
options security transaction services. The Exchange is only one of
sixteen options exchanges to which market participants may direct their
order flow. Within this environment, market participants can freely and
often do shift their order flow among the Exchange and competing venues
in response to changes in their respective pricing schedules. As such,
the proposal represents a reasonable attempt by the Exchange to
increase its liquidity and market share relative to its competitors.
As discussed above, the Exchange's proposal is intended to avoid
inadvertently penalizing Market Makers that qualify for the SPY, QQQ,
and IWM Market Maker Plus Tier 1b incentive in a given month, yet
receive a lower incentive than if that Market Maker achieved no Market
Maker Plus tier in the same time frame (i.e., $0.05 versus $0.10 per
contract rebate). The Exchange believes that providing a lower rebate
in such instances where the Market Maker had better performance by
percentage of time spent at the NBBO versus paying a higher rebate
solely due to the four month lookback protection is contrary to the
intent of the Market Maker Plus program to reward Market Makers that
maintain tight markets in symbols traded on the Exchange. The Exchange
believes that the proposed language reasonably addresses this
unintended gap and will continue to encourage Market Makers to post
tight markets by rewarding Market Makers with higher incentives to
achieve better performance.
The Exchange believes that the proposed language is equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory as all Market Makers are subject to the
same qualification criteria for Market Maker Plus. The Exchange also
believes that it is not unfairly discriminatory to offer this program's
incentives to Market Makers only. Market Makers, and in particular,
those Market Makers that participate in and qualify for the Market
Maker Plus program, add value through continuous quoting, and are
subject to additional requirements and obligations (such as quoting
obligations) that other market participants are not. Lastly, the
proposed language will continue to encourage Market Makers to post
tight markets in symbols traded on the Exchange, thereby increasing
liquidity and attracting additional order flow to the Exchange, which
benefits all market participants in the quality of order interaction.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
In terms of intra-market competition, while the proposed language
would apply directly to Market Makers that participate in the Market
Maker Plus program, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes
will continue to fortify participation in the program, ultimately to
the benefit of all market participants. As discussed above, continuing
to encourage participation in the Market Maker Plus program will
improve market quality by incentivizing Market Makers to provide
significant quoting at the NBBO. This, in turn, improves trading
conditions for all market participants through narrower bid-ask spreads
and increased depth of liquidity available at the inside market,
thereby attracting additional order flow to the Exchange.
In terms of inter-market competition, the Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants
can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities available at
other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange
must continually adjust its fees and rebates to remain competitive with
other exchanges. Because competitors are free to modify their own fees
in response, and because market participants may readily adjust their
order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to which
fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition is
extremely limited.
In sum, if the changes proposed herein are unattractive to market
participants, it is likely that the Exchange will lose market share as
a result. Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed
changes will impair the ability of members or competing order execution
venues to maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \12\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \13\ thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) Necessary or
appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of
investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#483a3d242d652b2725252d263c3b083b2d2b662f273e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="92e0e7fef7bff1fdfffff7fce6e1d2e1f7f1bcf5fde4">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2022-07 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2022-07. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the
[[Page 16819]]
proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting
comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal
identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2022-07 and should be
submitted on or before April 14, 2022.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-06189 Filed 3-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on March 24, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.