Notice2022-05504
Certain Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems, Robots, and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination To Review in Part a Final Initial Determination and Order No. 33; and, on Review, To Find No Violation of Section 337 Termination of the Investigation
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
March 16, 2022
Issuing agencies
International Trade Commission
Abstract
Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review in part the presiding administrative law judge's ("ALJ") final initial determination ("ID") issued on December 13, 2021, finding no violation of section 337, and Order No. 33 ("Markman Order"), issued on July 22, 2021, in the above-referenced investigation. On review, the Commission has determined to find no violation of section 337. The investigation is terminated in its entirety.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14906-14907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05504]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1228]
Certain Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems, Robots, and
Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination To Review in
Part a Final Initial Determination and Order No. 33; and, on Review, To
Find No Violation of Section 337 Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to review in part the presiding
administrative law judge's (``ALJ'') final initial determination
(``ID'') issued on December 13, 2021, finding no violation of section
337, and Order No. 33 (``Markman Order''), issued on July 22, 2021, in
the above-referenced investigation. On review, the Commission has
determined to find no violation of section 337. The investigation is
terminated in its entirety.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2392. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at <a href="https://edis.usitc.gov">https://edis.usitc.gov</a>. For help accessing EDIS, please email
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7431303d27473c1118043401071d00175a131b02"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0247464b51314a676e724277716b76612c656d74">[email protected]</span></a>. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at <a href="https://www.usitc.gov">https://www.usitc.gov</a>. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on November 6, 2020, based on a complaint filed on behalf of AutoStore
Technology AS of Norway; AutoStore AS of Norway; and AutoStore System
Inc. of Derry, New Hampshire (collectively, ``Complainants''). 85 FR
71096 (Nov. 6, 2020). The complaint, as supplemented, alleged
violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of
certain automated storage and retrieval systems, robots, and components
thereof by reason of infringement of claims 1-6 of U.S. Patent No.
10,093,525 (``the '525 patent''); claims 1 and 18-20 of U.S. Patent No.
10,294,025 (``the '025 patent''); claims 1-4 and 11-15 of U.S. Patent
No. 10,474,140 (``the '140 patent''); claims 1, 2, and 5-15 of U.S.
Patent No. 10,494,239 (``the '239 patent''); and claim 19 of U.S.
Patent No. 10,696,478 (``the '478 patent''). Id. The complaint further
alleged that a domestic industry exists. Id. The Commission's notice of
investigation named eight respondents: Ocado Group Plc; Ocado Central
Services Ltd.; Ocado Innovation Ltd.; Ocado Operating Ltd.; Ocado
Solutions, Ltd.; Tharsus Group Ltd.; and Printed Motor Works Ltd., all
of the United Kingdom; and Ocado Solutions USA Inc. of Tysons Corner,
Virginia (collectively, ``Respondents''). Id. at 71097. The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations did not participate as a party in this
investigation. Id.
Respondent Printed Motor Works Ltd. was terminated from the
investigation based on withdrawal of allegations in the complaint. See
Order No. 19, at 1 (June 2, 2021), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (June
22, 2021).
The asserted claims of the '140 patent and claims 1 and 18 of the
'025 patent were terminated from the investigation. See Order No. 59
(August 9, 2021), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Aug. 20, 2021).
Complainants' allegations that Respondents' 500 series robot and
redesigned 500 series robot infringe claims 19 and 20 of the '025
patent were also terminated from the investigation. Id.
The Markman Order, issued on July 22, 2021, construed claim terms
from all five asserted patents. See Order No. 33 (July 22, 2021). The
Markman Order found claims 2 and 3 of the '525 patent and claims 5, 6,
14, and 15 of the '239 patent to be indefinite. Id. at 35-39.
An evidentiary hearing was held on August 2-6, 2021.
On December 13, 2021, the ALJ issued the final ID finding no
violation of section 337 and his recommended determination (``RD'').
Specifically, the ID found the accused products infringe claims 1 and 6
of the '525 patent; claims
[[Page 14907]]
1, 2, and 7-13 of the '239 patent; and claim 19 of the '478 patent; but
those claims are invalid for failure to comply with the written
description requirement and the enablement requirement of 35 U.S.C.
112, para. 1. The ID also found claims 4 and 5 of the '525 patent
invalid as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. 112, para. 2, because they depend
from claims 2 and 3 of the '525 patent, which the ALJ found indefinite
in the Markman Order. As for the '025 patent, the ID found the accused
products do not infringe claims 19 and 20 and the claims have not been
shown to be invalid. The ID further found that Complainants have shown
that the domestic industry requirement has been satisfied with respect
to the asserted patents under section 337(a)(3)(B).
The parties filed a joint motion to extend the time for them to
file petitions for review from December 27, 2021 (with responses due
January 4, 2022) to December 30, 2021 (with responses due January 10,
2022). On December 14, 2021, the Chair granted the motion.
On December 30, 2021, Complainants and Respondents filed separate
petitions for review of the ID. On January 10, 2022, they filed
separate replies to the petitions for review.
The Commission solicited submissions from the public on public
interest issues raised by the recommended determination. On January 14,
2022, the Kroger Co. submitted comments on the public interest for the
Commission to consider should the Commission find a violation.
Having reviewed the record of the investigation, including the
final ID, the Markman Order, and the parties' submissions, the
Commission has determined to review in part the final ID and the
Markman Order. Specifically, the Commission has determined to review:
(1) The ALJ's construction of the terms ``vehicle body'' and ``a
plurality of [rolling members/wheels] attached to the vehicle body'' in
the asserted claims of the '525, '239, and '478 patents; (2) the ID's
finding that claims 2-5 of the '525 patent and claims 5, 6, 14, and 15
of the '239 patent are invalid as indefinite; (3) the ID's construction
of the term ``a displacement motor'' in claim 1 of the '025 patent; and
(4) the ID's findings that the economic prong of the domestic industry
is satisfied. Among other findings, the Commission has determined not
to review the ID's finding that the asserted claims of the '525, '239,
and '478 patents are invalid for failing to comply with the written
description and enablement requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112, para. 1.
On review, the Commission affirms with modification the ALJ's
construction of the terms ``vehicle body'' and ``a plurality of
[rolling members/wheels] attached to the vehicle body'' in the claims
of the '525, '239, and '478 patents. The Commission also affirms the
ALJ's finding of indefiniteness with respect to certain claims of the
'525 and '239 patents and the ID's construction of the term ``a
displacement motor'' in claim 1 of the '025 patent with the additional
analyses provided in its opinion. Having adopted the ID's findings that
the asserted claims of the '525, '239, and '478 patents are invalid and
the asserted claims of the '025 patent are not infringed, the
Commission has determined to take no position on the economic prong of
the domestic industry requirement.\1\ Accordingly, the Commission has
determined to affirm with modifications the ID's finding of no
violation of section 337. The investigation is terminated in its
entirety. The Commission's reasoning in support of its determination is
set forth more fully in its opinion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Chair Kearns would affirm the ID's finding that the economic
prong was not established with respect to AutoStore USA's
investments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission vote for this determination took place on March 10,
2022.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR
part 210.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 10, 2022.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-05504 Filed 3-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on March 16, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.