Rule2022-04833
Air Plan Approval; NC; Removal of Transportation Facilities Rules for Mecklenburg County
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
March 8, 2022
Effective
April 7, 2022
Issuing agencies
Environmental Protection Agency
Abstract
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision to the Mecklenburg County portion of the North Carolina SIP, hereinafter referred to as the Mecklenburg Local Implementation Plan (LIP). The revision was submitted by the State of North Carolina, through the North Carolina Division of Air Quality (NCDAQ), on behalf of Mecklenburg County Air Quality via a letter dated April 24, 2020. The revision seeks to remove transportation facilities rules from the Mecklenburg County Air Pollution Control Ordinance (MCAPCO) rules incorporated into the LIP. EPA is approving these changes pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 45 (Tuesday, March 8, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 8, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12869-12872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04833]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2020-0452; FRL-9175-02-R4]
Air Plan Approval; NC; Removal of Transportation Facilities Rules
for Mecklenburg County
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing a
State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision to
[[Page 12870]]
the Mecklenburg County portion of the North Carolina SIP, hereinafter
referred to as the Mecklenburg Local Implementation Plan (LIP). The
revision was submitted by the State of North Carolina, through the
North Carolina Division of Air Quality (NCDAQ), on behalf of
Mecklenburg County Air Quality via a letter dated April 24, 2020. The
revision seeks to remove transportation facilities rules from the
Mecklenburg County Air Pollution Control Ordinance (MCAPCO) rules
incorporated into the LIP. EPA is approving these changes pursuant to
the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).
DATES: This rule is effective April 7, 2022.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2020-0452. All documents in the docket
are listed on the <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> website. Although listed in the
index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> or in hard
copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. EPA requests that, if possible, you contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday
through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Sheckler, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, Region 4, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 61
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is
(404) 562-9992. Mrs. Sheckler can also be reached via electronic mail
at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ec9f84898f8780899ec28789808095ac899c8dc28b839a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a79626f6961666f7824616f6666734a6f7a6b246d657c">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The April 24, 2020, SIP revision sought to remove Mecklenburg's
transportation facilities rules from the Mecklenburg LIP. Specifically,
this revision requested that EPA remove the MCAPCO rules in Article
2.0000--Air Pollution Control Regulations and Procedures, Section
2.0800--Transportation Facilities, comprised of Rules 2.0801--Purpose
and Scope; 2.0802--Definitions; 2.0803--Highway Projects; and 2.0804--
Airport Facilities.\1\ EPA previously removed the State's
transportation facilities rules from the North Carolina regulatory
portion of the SIP on May 12, 2017. As a part of that action, EPA
approved NCDAQ's September 16, 2016, SIP revision containing a
demonstration showing that the repeal of the State's transportation
facilities rules satisfied CAA section 110(l). Section 110(l) prohibits
EPA from approving a SIP revision that would interfere with any
applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further
progress (as defined in section 171), or any other applicable
requirement of the Act. North Carolina's section 110(l) demonstration
was a statewide analysis that included Mecklenburg County. The section
110(l) analysis associated with the removal of the State's rules from
the SIP is therefore relevant to the proposed removal of Mecklenburg's
rules from the LIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ NCDAQ also asked EPA to remove Rules 2.0805--Parking
Facilities and 2.0806--Ambient Air Monitoring and Analysis. EPA is
not taking action to remove these two rules because they are not in
the LIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On October 28, 2021, EPA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM) proposing to approve the April 24, 2020, SIP revision requesting
removal of the transportation facilities rules from the MCAPCO rules
incorporated into the LIP. See 86 FR 59678. The NPRM includes an
updated 110(l) analysis and provides additional detail regarding the
background and rationale for this final EPA action. Comments on the
October 28, 2021, NPRM were due on or before November 29, 2021. EPA
received one adverse comment on the October 28, 2021, NPRM.\2\ This
comment is available in the docket for this action. See the Response to
Comment section of this final action for EPA's response.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ EPA received two adverse comments in the docket for this
rulemaking; however, one of the adverse comments was intended for a
separate rulemaking related to the Mecklenburg LIP. That rulemaking
is associated with Docket ID No. EPA-R04-OAR-2021-0055. EPA is
addressing that comment through that separate rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Response to Comment
As mentioned above, EPA received one adverse comment on the
proposed action. EPA's comment summary and response are provided below.
Comment: The Commenter expresses concern about the protectiveness
of the six criteria pollutants, also known as the national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS or standards). In particular, the Commenter
takes issue with how the NAAQS are measured and contends that they
should be revised to include more pollutants. The Commenter further
adds that air quality standards should not be relaxed in metro areas
and indicates that this removal would constitute a relaxation.
Additionally, the Commenter notes that metro areas with documented
nonattainment should not be permitted to relax previously legislated
air quality control measures. Rather, the Commenter suggests that these
metro areas should be subject to additional scrutiny and surveillance.
Finally, the Commenter expresses a general concern about the
relationship between the six criteria pollutants and indoor air
pollution.
Response: To the extent that the comment refers to the
protectiveness and measurement of the NAAQS, EPA notes that a review of
the NAAQS is outside of the scope of this rulemaking. This rulemaking
did not relate to any review or change of the NAAQS in Mecklenburg
County or any other area in the nation. In this rulemaking, EPA is
acting solely to remove the MCAPCO rules identified in the previous
section and the October 28, 2021, NPRM.
EPA notes that the Agency has a formal process for regular review
of the six criteria pollutants to determine whether the standards set
for each are still protective of human health and the environment.
Pursuant to CAA sections 108 and 109, EPA must thoroughly review each
NAAQS every five years to account for the latest scientific knowledge
regarding the effects of the air pollutant on public health and
welfare.\3\ EPA solicits public comment as part of each five-year
review and invites the Commenter to share recent scientific discoveries
and concerns regarding air pollution during those comment periods.
Further, EPA refers the Commenter to EPA's website at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants/process-reviewing-national-ambient-air-quality-standards">https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants/process-reviewing-national-ambient-air-quality-standards</a> to learn more about EPA's process for reviewing
the NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See <a href="https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants/process-reviewing-national-ambient-air-quality-standards">https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants/process-reviewing-national-ambient-air-quality-standards</a> for information
regarding EPA's five-year NAAQS review process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 12871]]
In 2021, the EPA Administrator announced the Agency's intention to
review the standards for ozone and particulate matter on a schedule
more expeditiously than required by the CAA.<SUP>4 5</SUP> EPA notes
that the air quality standards are not legislated but are established
through a notice and rulemaking making process that allows for anyone
to submit a comment on proposed rules. The Commenter should use the
public comment periods associated with those reviews to express
concerns about the protectiveness of the standards. Additionally, EPA
notes that standards for the criteria pollutants are established to
apply nationwide and are not ``relaxed'' in individual areas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See https://www.epa.gov/ground-level-ozone-pollution/epa-
reconsider-previous-administrations-decision-retain-2015-
ozone#:~:text=EPA%20will%20ensure%20the%20Clean,2023%20to%20complete%
20this%20reconsideration for information regarding EPA's
announcement to reexamine the 2020 decision to retain the 2015 ozone
NAAQS.
\5\ See <a href="https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-reexamine-health-standards-harmful-soot-previous-administration-left-unchanged">https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-reexamine-health-standards-harmful-soot-previous-administration-left-unchanged</a> for
information regarding EPA's announcement to reexamine the December
2020 decision to retain the 2015 particulate matter NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While EPA sets the NAAQS, states play a primary role in
implementation. The CAA establishes a system of cooperative federalism
that sets specific roles for EPA and the states. In this system, EPA
provides national leadership and sets national standards for
environmental protection, such as the NAAQS.\6\ Under CAA section 110,
states have broad discretion to choose the mix of emission limitations
and other control measures, means, or techniques that they will
implement (or update) through a SIP to provide for attainment and
maintenance of the NAAQS. EPA's role, with respect to a SIP revision,
is focused on reviewing the submission to determine whether it meets
the minimum criteria of the CAA. Where it does, EPA must approve the
submission. When approving a SIP revision, the Agency is not
establishing its own requirements for the state to implement. If, at
any time, EPA finds that a SIP is inadequate to attain or maintain the
relevant NAAQS or otherwise does not comply with the CAA, EPA has the
authority under CAA section 110(k)(5) to require the state to revise
its SIP to correct such inadequacies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See <a href="https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants/naaqs-table">https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants/naaqs-table</a>
for information regarding the current NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For this rulemaking, EPA has concluded based on the 110(l)
analysis, that the removal of the transportation facilities rules from
the Mecklenburg LIP would not weaken or remove any pollution controls
or interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress, or any other applicable requirement of the
Act. As discussed in the October 28, 2021, NPRM, there are no
nonattainment areas in Mecklenburg County, the transportation
facilities rules are no longer federally required, Mecklenburg County
issues few transportation facility permits, the issued permits do not
require emissions controls, and the relevant NAAQS are not threatened.
With respect to the Commenter's concern about the relationship
between the NAAQS and indoor air pollution, the CAA does not require
states to control indoor air pollution. Congress did not design the CAA
(including the SIP process, NAAQS pollutants, or area nonattainment
delegations) to have any effect on indoor air pollution.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. EPA is finalizing the removal of MCAPCO
Section 2.0800--Transportation Facilities, including Rules 2.0801--
Purpose and Scope; 2.0802--Definitions; 2.0803--Highway Projects; and
2.0804--Airport Facilities, which are incorporated by reference in
accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR part 51. EPA has made, and
will continue to make, the SIP generally available at the EPA Region 4
Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
IV. Final Action
EPA is removing the MCAPCO rules under Article 2.0000--Air
Pollution Control Regulations and Procedures, Section 2.0800--
Transportation Facilities. Specifically, EPA is removing Rules 2.0801--
Purpose and Scope; 2.0802--Definitions; 2.0803--Highway Projects; and
2.0804--Airport Facilities, in their entirety, from the LIP. As a
result of this removal, no Section 2.0800 rules will be in the LIP, so
EPA is removing Section 2.0800--Transportation Facilities in its
entirety. EPA is taking final action to approve these changes to the
LIP because they are consistent with the CAA.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
<bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
<bullet> Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501et seq.);
<bullet> Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601et seq.);
<bullet> Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
<bullet> Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
<bullet> Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045(62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997);
<bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
<bullet> Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
<bullet> Does not provide EPAwith the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods,under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must
[[Page 12872]]
submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House
of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States.
EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until
60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is
not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by May 9, 2022. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: February 28, 2022.
Daniel Blackman,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 52
as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart II--North Carolina
Sec. 52.1770 [Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 52.1770(c)(3), the table is amended by removing the heading
for ``Section 2.0800 Transportation Facilities,'' and the entries for
``Section 2.0801,'' ``Section 2.0802,'' ``Section 2.0803,'' and
``Section 2.0804.''
[FR Doc. 2022-04833 Filed 3-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on March 8, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.