Home/Federal/Federal Register/2022-03769

Proposed Rule2022-03769

Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Helicopters

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published

February 23, 2022

Issuing agencies

Transportation DepartmentFederal Aviation Administration

Abstract

The FAA proposes to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2020-26-13, which applies to certain Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky) Model S-92A helicopters. AD 2020-26-13 requires establishing the life limit for certain part-numbered horizontal stabilizer root fittings FWD (forward root fittings) and certain part-numbered stabilizer strut fittings. AD 2020-26-13 also requires repetitively inspecting certain parts, and depending on the inspection results, removing parts from service. Finally AD 2020-26-13 prohibits installing certain stabilizer assemblies on any helicopter. Since the FAA issued AD 2020-26-13, the manufacturer notified the FAA that due to an error in the service information, certain part numbers in AD 2020-26-13 are incorrect. Also, the FAA determined that additional inspections are required to address the unsafe condition. This proposed AD would retain certain requirements and the prohibition for installing certain stabilizer assemblies on any helicopter from AD 2020-26-13 and would correct certain part numbers and require additional repetitive inspections. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 36 (Wednesday, February 23, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 23, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10115-10119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03769]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0146; Project Identifier AD-2021-00449-R]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2020-26-13, which applies to certain Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
(Sikorsky) Model S-92A helicopters. AD 2020-26-13 requires establishing
the life limit for certain part-numbered horizontal stabilizer root
fittings FWD (forward root fittings) and certain part-numbered
stabilizer strut fittings. AD 2020-26-13 also requires repetitively
inspecting certain parts, and depending on the inspection results,
removing parts from service. Finally AD 2020-26-13 prohibits installing
certain stabilizer assemblies on any helicopter. Since the FAA issued
AD 2020-26-13, the manufacturer notified the FAA that due to an error
in the service information, certain part numbers in AD 2020-26-13 are
incorrect. Also, the FAA determined that additional inspections are
required to address the unsafe condition. This proposed AD would retain
certain requirements and the prohibition for installing certain
stabilizer assemblies on any helicopter from AD 2020-26-13 and would
correct certain part numbers and require additional repetitive
inspections. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 11,
2022.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
<bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
<bullet> Fax: (202) 493-2251.
<bullet> Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
<bullet> Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Sikorsky's
Engineering Group at Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, 124 Quarry Road,
Trumbell, CT 06611, United States; phone: (800) 946-4337; email:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#66110515390513151239150314100f0503390308014801144b150f0d260a0b05094805090b">[email&#160;protected]</a>; website: <a href="http://www.sikorsky360.com">www.sikorsky360.com</a>. You
may view this service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort
Worth, TX 76177. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call (817) 222-5110.

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0146; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for Docket
Operations is listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dorie Resnik, Aerospace Engineer,
Aviation Safety Section, Boston ACO Branch, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; telephone (781)
238-7693; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b88195f9eeeb95f9f1ea95faf9fbf795fbf7ebf8ded9d996dfd7ce">[email&#160;protected]</a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2022-0146; Project Identifier
AD-2021-00449-R'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
the proposal because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
<a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this proposed AD.

Confidential Business Information

CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Dorie
Resnik, Aerospace Engineer, Aviation Safety Section, Boston ACO Branch,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington,
MA 01803; telephone (781) 238-7693; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#596074180f0a7418100b741b181a16741a160a193f3838773e362f">[email&#160;protected]</a>.
Any commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically
designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this
rulemaking.

[[Page 10116]]

Background

The FAA issued AD 2020-26-13, Amendment 39-21368 (85 FR 84201,
December 28, 2020) (AD 2020-26-13) for Sikorsky Model S-92A helicopters
with forward root fitting part number (P/N) 92209-07111-101 or 92070-
20125-101; or stabilizer strut fitting P/N 92209-07404-041, 92209-
07403-041, or 92070-20117-041 installed on horizontal stabilizer
assembly (stabilizer assembly) P/N 92070-20117-045, 92070-20117-046,
92070-20125-041, 92070-20125-042, 92070-20125-043, 92070-20125-044,
92205-07400-043, or 92205-07400-045. AD 2020-26-13 was prompted by
seven incidents of fatigue cracks in forward root fittings. Fatigue
cracking in a forward root fitting degrades the load path and increases
the load on other assembly parts, particularly at the aft horizontal
stabilizer attachment points; therefore AD 2020-26-13 requires
determining the total hours time-in-service (TIS) of the forward root
fitting and the stabilizer strut fitting, establishing a life limit of
7,900 total hours TIS for certain part-numbered forward root fittings,
and establishing a life limit of 19,100 total hours TIS for certain
stabilizer strut fittings. For certain part-numbered stabilizer strut
fittings, AD 2020-26-13 also requires repetitive inspections of certain
parts of an affected stabilizer strut assembly. The FAA issued AD 2020-
26-13 to prevent a forward root fitting from remaining in service
beyond its life limit and to detect fatigue cracking in a forward root
fitting and prevent increased load and stress cracking in the
stabilizer root fitting aft.

Actions Since AD 2020-26-13 Was Issued

Since the FAA issued AD 2020-26-13, Sikorsky notified the FAA that
incorrect P/Ns are identified in the Applicability and the Required
Actions paragraphs of AD 2020-26-13. This NPRM would expand the
applicability of AD 2020-26-13 by adding an additional part-numbered
stabilizer assembly. This NPRM would correct paragraph (g)(4) of the
Required Actions so that the installation of the titanium stabilizer
strut fitting P/N 92209-07404-041 is terminating action for the 50-hour
TIS inspections of the aluminum stabilizer strut fitting P/N 92070-
20117-04 or 92209-07403-041.
Sikorsky also notified the FAA that an additional repetitive
inspection of certain parts of the stabilizer strut assembly is
required to prevent the unsafe condition; this NPRM includes this
repetitive inspection. Additionally, since AD 2020-26-13 was issued,
Sikorsky requested and the FAA approved a global Alternative Method of
Compliance (AMOC) to allow only removing parts from service that are
cracked, corroded, or have fretting, deformation, or wear rather than
require removing the upper and lower support strut rod ends, including
lug and conical fitting and both upper and lower attachment fittings on
the stabilizer from service. This NPRM incorporates that global AMOC
into the proposed requirements.

FAA's Determination

The FAA is issuing this NPRM after determining that the unsafe
condition described previously is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

This proposed AD would continue to require S-92 Maintenance Manual,
SA S92A-AMM-000, Temporary Revision (TR) 55-33, dated March 24, 2020
(TR 55-33), which the Director of the Federal Register approved for
incorporation by reference as of February 1, 2021 (85 FR 84201,
December 28, 2020).
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in ADDRESSES.

Other Related Service Information

The FAA reviewed S-92 Maintenance Manual SA S92A-AWL-000, TR No. 4-
58, dated October 2, 2017 (TR 4-58), and S-92 Maintenance Manual SA
S92A-AWL-000, TR No. 4-66 dated November 20, 2019 (TR 4-66). This
service information revises Task 4-00-00-200-000, Table 1 Replacement
Schedule, dated November 30, 2015. Both TR 4-58 and 4-66 revise the
Airworthiness Limitations Schedule by removing certain part-numbered
components, introducing new part-numbered components, and establishing
replacement intervals and recurring inspections for the forward root
fitting and the horizontal stabilizer strut fitting. TR 4-58 also
specifies inspecting the horizontal stabilizer and attaching hardware
at a recurring interval of 250 hours TIS.

Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM

This proposed AD would require determining the total hours TIS of
the forward root fitting and the stabilizer strut fitting. This
proposed AD would also require establishing a life limit of 7,900 total
hours TIS for certain part-numbered forward root fittings and
establishing a life limit of 19,100 total hours TIS for stabilizer
strut fitting P/N 92070-20117-041. Finally, this proposed AD would
require for certain part-numbered stabilizer strut fittings installed,
repetitively visually inspecting the following at intervals not to
exceed 50 hours TIS:
<bullet> The hat bushing and both upper and lower fittings for a
crack, corrosion, fretting, deformation, and wear.
<bullet> Both upper and lower support strut rod ends, including
each lug and conical fitting, and both upper and lower attachment
fittings on the stabilizer and pylon, including the bushings, for a
crack, corrosion, fretting, deformation, and wear.
<bullet> The surface of each Mylar washer P/N 92070-20117-104 on
certain stabilizer assemblies.
This proposed AD would also require repetitively inspecting the
following at intervals not to exceed 250 hours TIS or one year,
whichever occurs first:
<bullet> Each stabilizer attachment bolt and barrel nut set for
corrosion, a crack, and damage to the threads indicated by uneven
threads, missing threads, or cross-threading.
<bullet> Each forward root fitting and aft attachment fitting,
including inspecting the bolt holes and fastener holes for a crack,
wear, and corrosion; or as an alternative to detect any crack,
fluorescent penetrant inspecting (FPI) the area.
<bullet> Each forward and aft attachment fitting mating surface for
wear of the abrasion-resistant Teflon coating and degradation. For the
purposes of this inspection, degradation may be indicated by fretting.
If there is any wear of the coating or fretting, this proposed AD would
require stripping the coating and performing a FPI or eddy current
inspection to inspect for a crack. If there is no crack, this proposed
AD would require recoating the surfaces.
Depending on the inspection results, this proposed AD would require
removing parts from service before further flight.
Finally, this proposed AD would prohibit installing stabilizer
assembly P/N 92205-07400-043, 92205-07400-045, and 92205-07400-047 on
any helicopter.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information

The service information specifies that returning affected parts to
a Sikorsky specialist is required; whereas this proposed AD would not
include this requirement.

[[Page 10117]]

Costs of Compliance

The FAA estimates that this proposed AD would affect 82 helicopters
of U.S. registry. Labor costs are estimated at $85 per work-hour. Based
on these numbers, the FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD.
Visually inspecting the stabilizer assembly and attached hardware
would take about 3 work-hours for an estimated cost of $255 per
helicopter and $20,910 for the U.S. fleet per inspection cycle.
If required, replacing a hat bushing and both upper fittings and
lower fittings would take about 1 work-hour and parts would cost about
$10,000 for an estimated cost of $10,085 per replacement.
If required, replacing the upper and lower support strut rod ends,
including lug and conical fitting, would take about 1 work-hour and
parts would cost about $10,000 for an estimated cost of $10,085 per
replacement.
If required, replacing Mylar washers would take about 0.5 work-hour
and parts would cost about $76 for an estimated cost of $119 per
replacement.
If required, performing a fluorescent penetrant inspection would
take about 3 work-hours for an estimated cost of $255 per inspection.
If required, replacing a stabilizer assembly would take about 6
work-hours and parts would cost about $312,000 for an estimated cost of
$312,510 per replacement.
If required, replacing a forward root fitting would take about 10
work-hours and parts would cost about $25,000 for an estimated cost of
$25,850 per replacement.
If required, replacing a stabilizer strut fitting would take about
10 work-hours and parts would cost about $10,000 for an estimated cost
of $10,850 per replacement.
If required, replacing a forward root fitting and an aft attachment
fitting would take about 20 work-hours and parts would cost about
$50,000 for an estimated cost of $51,700 per replacement.
If required, removing wear or corrosion and applying corrosion
preventative compound would take about 0.5 work-hour and parts would
cost a nominal amount for an estimated cost of $43 per action.
If required, replacing a stabilizer attachment bolt and barrel nut
set would take about 1 work-hour and parts would cost about $500 for an
estimated cost of $585 per replacement.
If required, replacing a fastener would take about 0.1 work-hour
and parts would cost a nominal amount for an estimated cost of $9 per
fastener.
If required, removing the abrasion-resistant Teflon coating to
inspect each forward and aft attachment fitting mating surface would
take about 5 work-hours for an estimated cost of $425 per inspection.
If required, applying alodine or equivalent and applying abrasion-
resistant Teflon coating would take about 5 work hours with minimal
parts cost for an estimated cost of $425 per application.
According to Sikorsky, some of the costs of this proposed AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. The FAA does not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, the FAA has included all costs in this cost
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec. 39.13 [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive AD 2020-26-13, Amendment 39-21368
(85 FR 84201, December 28, 2020); and
0
b. Adding the following new airworthiness directive:

Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation: Docket No. FAA-2022-0146; Project
Identifier AD-2021-00449-R.

(a) Comments Due Date

The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) action by April 11, 2022.

(b) Affected ADs

This AD replaces AD 2020-26-13, Amendment 39-21368 (85 FR 84201,
December 28, 2020) (AD 2020-26-13).

This AD applies to Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Model S-92A
helicopters, certificated in any category, with the following
installed: Horizontal stabilizer root fitting FWD (forward root
fitting) part number (P/N) 92209-07111-101 or 92070-20125-101; or
stabilizer strut fitting P/N 92209-07403-041 or 92070-20117-041
installed on horizontal stabilizer assembly (stabilizer assembly) P/
N 92070-20117-045, 92070-20117-046, 92070-20125-041, 92070-20125-
042, 92070-20125-043, 92070-20125-044, 92205-07400-043, 92205-07400-
045, or 92205-07400-047.

(d) Subject

Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 5510, Horizontal
Stabilizer Structure.

(e) Unsafe Condition

This AD was prompted by incidents of fatigue cracks in a forward
root fitting and life limit recalculations for forward root fitting
P/N 92209-07111-101 and 92070-20125-101. The FAA is issuing this AD
to prevent a forward root fitting from remaining in service beyond
its life limit, detect fatigue cracking in a forward root fitting,
and prevent increased load and stress cracking in the stabilizer
root fitting aft. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could
result in failure of a stabilizer root fitting, separation of the
stabilizer assembly from the helicopter,

[[Page 10118]]

and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

(f) Compliance

Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

(1) Within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the effective
date of this AD:
(i) Determine the total hours TIS of the forward root fitting P/
N 92209-07111-101 or 92070-20125-101. If the total hours TIS of the
forward root fitting is unknown, use the total hours TIS of the
stabilizer assembly instead.
(A) If the forward root fitting has accumulated 7,900 or more
total hours TIS, before further flight, remove the forward root
fitting from service.
(B) If the forward root fitting has accumulated less than 7,900
total hours TIS, before exceeding 7,900 total hours TIS, remove the
forward root fitting from service.
(ii) Thereafter following paragraph (g)(1)(i) of this AD, remove
the forward root fitting from service before accumulating 7,900
total hours TIS.
(iii) For stabilizer assemblies with stabilizer strut fitting P/
N 92070-20117-041 installed, perform the following actions:
(A) Determine the total hours TIS of stabilizer strut fitting P/
N 92070-20117-041.
(B) If the stabilizer strut fitting has accumulated 19,100 or
more total hours TIS, before further flight, remove the stabilizer
strut fitting from service.
(C) If the stabilizer strut fitting has accumulated less than
19,100 total hours TIS, before exceeding 19,100 total hours TIS,
remove the stabilizer strut fitting from service.
(iv) Thereafter following paragraph (g)(1)(iii) of this AD,
remove the stabilizer strut fitting from service before accumulating
19,100 total hours TIS.
(2) For helicopters with stabilizer strut fitting P/N 92070-
20117-041 or 92209-07403-041 installed, within 50 hours TIS after
the effective date of this AD and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 50 hours TIS:
(i) Remove the support strut and using a cheese cloth (or
similar cloth) and isopropyl alcohol, clean the upper and lower
support strut rod ends, horizontal stabilizer attachment fitting,
and the tail rotor pylon attachment fitting.
(ii) If installed, visually inspect the surface of each Mylar
washer P/N 92070-20117-104 (Mylar washer). The surface should be
smooth and continuous. If there is any visible damage such as any
tear or scrape, remove the Mylar washer from the peelable-ply washer
P/N 92070-20117-105 (peelable-ply washer) and remove the Mylar
washer from service as follows:
(A) Dampen a low-lint cloth with 3M 6041 adhesive remover and
place on the top of the Mylar washer.
(B) Allow the adhesive remover to soften the Mylar washer and
peel the Mylar washer back.
(C) Repeat with more solvent until the Mylar washer and adhesive
are removed.
(D) Clean the peelable-ply washer with cheese cloth moistened
with isopropyl alcohol and adhere a new Mylar washer to the
peelable-ply washer.
Note 1 to paragraph (g)(2)(ii): Stabilizer assembly P/Ns 92070-
20125-041, 92070-20125-042, 92070-20125-043, and 92070-20125-044 do
not utilize the Mylar washer. The inspection of the Mylar washer is
not required on helicopters with stabilizer assembly P/N 92070-
20125-041, 92070-20125-042, 92070-20125-043, or 92070-20125-044
installed.
(iii) Using a 10X or higher power magnifying glass, a
flashlight, and a mirror, visually inspect the hat bushing and both
upper fittings and lower fittings for a crack, corrosion, fretting,
deformation, and wear. If there is a crack, corrosion, fretting,
deformation, or wear on any part, before further flight, remove the
part from service.
(iv) Using a 10X or higher power magnifying glass, a flashlight,
and a mirror, visually inspect both upper and lower support strut
rod ends, including each lug and conical fitting, and both upper and
lower attachment fittings on the stabilizer and pylon including the
bushings for a crack, corrosion, fretting, deformation, and wear. If
there is a crack, corrosion, fretting, deformation, or wear on any
part, before further flight, remove the part from service.
(3) Within 250 hours TIS or one year, whichever occurs first
after the effective date of this AD, and thereafter at intervals not
to exceed 250 hours TIS or one year, whichever occurs first:
(i) Remove the stabilizer assembly and visually inspect each
stabilizer attachment bolt and barrel nut set for corrosion, a
crack, and damage to the threads. For the purposes of this
inspection, damage may be indicated by uneven threads, missing
threads, or cross-threading.
(A) If there is corrosion within allowable limits, before
further flight, treat for corrosion in accordance with FAA-approved
procedures.
(B) If there is corrosion that exceeds allowable limits, or a
crack, or damage to the threads, before further flight, remove the
bolt and barrel nut set from service.
(ii) Inspect the forward root fitting and the aft attachment
fitting by:
(A) Gaining access to the inside of the horizontal stabilizer.
(B) Using Brulin Cleaner SD 1291 (or equivalent) and a low-lint
cloth, remove all traces of sealing compound, oil, and dirt from the
stabilizer mounting surfaces.
(C) Using a 10X or higher magnifying glass, inspect for any
crack, wear, and corrosion.
(1) If there is a crack, before further flight, remove the
affected forward root fitting and the affected aft attachment
fitting from service.
(2) If there is wear or corrosion that exceeds allowable limits,
before further flight, remove the affected forward root fitting and
the affected aft attachment fitting from service.
(3) If there is wear or corrosion within allowable limits,
before further flight, treat for corrosion in accordance with FAA-
approved procedures.
(D) Visually inspect each attachment fitting bolt hole and
fastener hole for a crack, wear, and corrosion.
(1) If there is a crack, before further flight, remove the
affected forward root fitting and the affected aft attachment
fitting from service.
(2) If there is wear or corrosion that exceeds allowable limits,
before further flight, remove the affected forward root fitting and
the affected aft attachment fitting from service.
(3) If there is wear or corrosion within allowable limits,
before further flight, treat for corrosion in accordance with FAA
approved procedures.
(E) Inspect for loose or working fasteners. If there is a loose
or working fastener, before further flight, remove the fastener from
service.
(iii) As an alternative means to inspect for cracks in
paragraphs (g)(3)(i) and (ii) of this AD, perform a florescent
penetrate inspection (FPI).
(iv) Visually inspect each forward and aft attachment fitting
mating surface for wear of the abrasion-resistant Teflon coating and
degradation. For the purposes of this inspection, degradation may be
indicated by fretting. Refer to Figure 204, of S-92 Maintenance
Manual, SA S92A-AMM-000, Temporary Revision 55-33, Task 55-11-01-
210-004, dated March 24, 2020 (TR 55-33), for a depiction of the
area to be inspected. For the purposes of this inspection, wear may
be indicated by less than 100% coverage of the abrasion-resistant
Teflon coating. If there is wear to the abrasion-resistant Teflon
coating or degradation, before further flight:
(A) Chemically strip the abrasion-resistant Teflon coating from
the entire mounting pad in accordance with paragraph 7.A.(7)(a) of
TR 55-33.
(B) FPI or eddy current inspect for a crack. If there is a
crack, before further flight, remove the stabilizer assembly from
service.
(C) If there is no crack, treat the affected area by applying
alodine or equivalent. Apply abrasion-resistant Teflon coating in
accordance with paragraphs 7.A.(7)(d) through (e) of TR 55-33.
(4) Installing stabilizer strut fitting P/N 92209-07404-041 is a
terminating action for the requirements in paragraph (g)(2) of this
AD.
(5) As of the effective date of this AD, do not install
stabilizer assembly P/N 92205-07400-043, 92205-07400-045, or 92205-
07400-047 on any helicopter.

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

(1) The Manager, Boston ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in Related Information.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

[[Page 10119]]

(i) Related Information

(1) For more information about this AD, contact Dorie Resnik,
Aerospace Engineer, Boston ACO Branch, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, Massachusetts 01803; telephone 781-238-7693; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#467f6b0710156b070f146b040705096b0509150620272768212930">[email&#160;protected]</a>.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Sikorsky's Engineering Group Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, 124
Quarry Road, Trumbell, CT, 06611, United States; phone: (800) 946-
4337; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#502733230f332523240f233522263933350f353e377e37227d23393b103c3d333f7e333f3d">[email&#160;protected]</a>; website:
<a href="http://www.sikorsky360.com">www.sikorsky360.com</a>. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest
Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(817) 222-5110.

Issued on February 16, 2022.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-03769 Filed 2-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>

View on FederalRegister.gov →Plain-text source

Indexed from Federal Register on February 23, 2022.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.