Notice2022-01973
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Reduce Phlx's Options Regulatory Fee
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
February 1, 2022
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 21 (Tuesday, February 1, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 1, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5548-5552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01973]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-94065; File No. SR-Phlx-2022-03]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Reduce Phlx's
Options Regulatory Fee
January 26, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on January 20, 2022, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Phlx's Pricing Schedule at Options
7, Section 6, Part D to reduce the Phlx Options Regulatory Fee or
``ORF''.
While the changes proposed herein are effective upon filing, the
Exchange has designated the amendments become operative on February 1,
2022.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/
[[Page 5549]]
rulebook/phlx/rules, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Phlx previously filed to waive its ORF from October 1, 2021 through
January 31, 2022.\3\ The Waiver Filing provided that Phlx would
continue monitoring the amount of revenue collected from the ORF to
determine if regulatory revenues would exceed regulatory costs when it
recommenced assessing ORF on February 1, 2022. If so, the Exchange
committed to adjust its ORF.\4\ At this time, after a review of its
regulatory revenues and regulatory costs, the Exchange proposes to
reduce the ORF from $0.0042 (the amount of the ORF prior to the waiver)
to $0.0034 per contract side as of February 1, 2022, to ensure that
revenue collected from the ORF, in combination with other regulatory
fees and fines, does not exceed the Exchange's total regulatory costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92585 (August 5,
2021), 86 FR 44096 (August 11, 2021) (SR-Phlx-2021-39) (Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Amend
Phlx's Options Regulatory Fee) (``Waiver Filing'').
\4\ Id. at 44098.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The options industry continues to experience high options trading
volumes and volatility. At this time, Phlx believes that the options
volume it experienced in the second half of 2021 is likely to persist
into 2022. The anticipated options volume would impact Phlx's ORF
collection which, in turn, has caused Phlx to propose reducing the ORF
to ensure that revenue collected from the ORF, in combination with
other regulatory fees and fines, would not exceed the Exchange's total
regulatory costs.
Collection of ORF
Upon recommencement of the ORF on February 1, 2022,\5\ Phlx will
assess its ORF for each customer option transaction that is either: (1)
Executed by a member organization \6\ on Phlx; or (2) cleared by a Phlx
member organization at The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') in
the customer range,\7\ even if the transaction was executed by a non-
member organization of Phlx, regardless of the exchange on which the
transaction occurs.\8\ If the OCC clearing member is a Phlx member
organization, ORF will be assessed and collected on all cleared
customer contracts (after adjustment for CMTA \9\); and (2) if the OCC
clearing member is not a Phlx member organization, ORF will be
collected only on the cleared customer contracts executed at Phlx,
taking into account any CMTA instructions which may result in
collecting the ORF from a non-member organization.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Prior to the Waiver Filing, the Exchange similarly collected
ORF as described herein.
\6\ The term ``member organization'' means a corporation,
partnership (general or limited), limited liability partnership,
limited liability company, business trust or similar organization,
transacting business as a broker or a dealer in securities and which
has the status of a member organization by virtue of (i) admission
to membership given to it by the Membership Department pursuant to
the provisions of General 3, Sections 5 and 10 or the By-Laws or
(ii) the transitional rules adopted by the Exchange pursuant to
Section 6-4 of the By-Laws. References herein to officer or partner,
when used in the context of a member organization, shall include any
person holding a similar position in any organization other than a
corporation or partnership that has the status of a member
organization. See General 1, Section 1(17).
\7\ Participants must record the appropriate account origin code
on all orders at the time of entry of the order. The Exchange
represents that it has surveillances in place to verify that member
organizations mark orders with the correct account origin code.
\8\ The Exchange uses reports from OCC when assessing and
collecting the ORF.
\9\ CMTA or Clearing Member Trade Assignment is a form of
``give-up'' whereby the position will be assigned to a specific
clearing firm at OCC.
\10\ By way of example, if Broker A, a Phlx member organization,
routes a customer order to CBOE and the transaction executes on CBOE
and clears in Broker A's OCC Clearing account, ORF will be collected
by Phlx from Broker A's clearing account at OCC via direct debit.
While this transaction was executed on a market other than Phlx, it
was cleared by a Phlx member organization in the member
organization's OCC clearing account in the customer range, therefore
there is a regulatory nexus between Phlx and the transaction. If
Broker A was not a Phlx member organization, then no ORF should be
assessed and collected because there is no nexus; the transaction
did not execute on Phlx nor was it cleared by a Phlx member
organization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case where a member organization both executes a transaction
and clears the transaction, the ORF will be assessed to and collected
from that member organization. In the case where a member organization
executes a transaction and a different member organization clears the
transaction, the ORF will be assessed to and collected from the member
organization who clears the transaction and not the member organization
who executes the transaction. In the case where a non-member
organization executes a transaction at an away market and a member
organization clears the transaction, the ORF will be assessed to and
collected from the member organization who clears the transaction. In
the case where a member executes a transaction on Phlx and a non-member
organization clears the transaction, the ORF will be assessed to the
member organization that executed the transaction on Phlx and collected
from the non-member organization who cleared the transaction. In the
case where a member organization executes a transaction at an away
market and a non-member organization clears the transaction, the ORF
will not be assessed to the member organization who executed the
transaction or collected from the non-member organization who cleared
the transaction because the Exchange does not have access to the data
to make absolutely certain that ORF should apply. Further, the data
does not allow the Exchange to identify the member organization
executing the trade at an away market.
ORF Revenue and Monitoring of ORF
The Exchange monitors the amount of revenue collected from the ORF
to ensure that it, in combination with other regulatory fees and fines,
does not exceed regulatory costs. In determining whether an expense is
considered a regulatory cost, the Exchange reviews all costs and makes
determinations if there is a nexus between the expense and a regulatory
function. The Exchange notes that fines collected by the Exchange in
connection with a disciplinary matter offset ORF.
Revenue generated from ORF, when combined with all of the
Exchange's other regulatory fees and fines, is designed to recover a
material portion of the regulatory costs to the Exchange of the
supervision and regulation of member \11\ and member organization
customer options business including
[[Page 5550]]
performing routine surveillances, investigations, examinations,
financial monitoring, and policy, rulemaking, interpretive, and
enforcement activities. Regulatory costs include direct regulatory
expenses and certain indirect expenses in support of the regulatory
function. The direct expenses include in-house and third-party service
provider costs to support the day-to-day regulatory work such as
surveillances, investigations and examinations. The indirect expenses
include support from such areas as Office of the General Counsel,
technology, and internal audit. Indirect expenses were approximately
38% of the total regulatory costs for 2021. Thus, direct expenses were
approximately 62% of total regulatory costs for 2021.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The term ``member'' means a permit holder which has not
been terminated in accordance with the By-Laws and these Rules of
the Exchange. A member is a natural person and must be a person
associated with a member organization. Any references in the rules
of the Exchange to the rights or obligations of an associated person
or person associated with a member organization also includes a
member. See General 1, Section 1(16).
\12\ The Exchange will set a 2022 Regulatory Budget in the first
quarter of 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ORF is designed to recover a material portion of the costs to
the Exchange of the supervision and regulation of its members and
member organizations, including performing routine surveillances,
investigations, examinations, financial monitoring, and policy,
rulemaking, interpretive, and enforcement activities.
Proposal
Based on the Exchange's most recent review, the Exchange is
proposing to reduce the amount of ORF that will be collected by the
Exchange from $0.0042 per contract side to $0.0034 per contract side.
The Exchange issued an Options Trader Alert on December 31, 2021
indicating the proposed rate change for February 1, 2022.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Options Trader Alert 2021-63.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed reduction is based on a sustained high level of
options volume in 2021. The below table displays average daily volume
for 2021.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ The OCC data from December 2021 numbers reflect only 13
trading days as this information is through December 17, 2021.
Volume data in the table represents numbers of contracts; each
contract has two sides.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN01FE22.000
To date, fourth quarter options average daily volume in 2021 has
been higher than options average daily volume in any of the prior three
quarters of 2021. With respect to customer options volume across the
industry, total customer options contract average daily volume, to
date, in 2021 is 36,565,398 as compared to total customer options
contract average daily volume in 2020 which was 27,002,511.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See data from OCC at: <a href="https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Volume-by-Account-Type">https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Volume-by-Account-Type</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There can be no assurance that the Exchange's costs for 2022 will
not differ materially from these expectations and prior practice, nor
can the Exchange predict with certainty whether options volume will
remain at the current level going forward. The Exchange notes however,
that when combined with regulatory fees and fines, the revenue that may
be generated utilizing an ORF rate of $0.0042 per contract side may
result in revenue which exceeds the Exchange's estimated regulatory
costs for 2022 if options volume persists. In 2021, options volume
remained high, due in large part to the extreme volatility in the
marketplace as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Exchange
therefore proposes to reduce its ORF to $0.0034 per contract side to
ensure that revenue does not exceed the Exchange's estimated regulatory
costs in 2022. Particularly, the Exchange believes that reducing the
ORF when combined with all of the Exchange's other regulatory fees and
fines, would allow the Exchange to continue covering a material portion
of its regulatory costs, while lessening the potential for generating
excess revenue that may otherwise occur using the rate of $0.0042 per
contract side.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ The Exchange notes that its regulatory responsibilities
with respect to member and member organization compliance with
options sales practice rules have largely been allocated to FINRA
under a 17d-2 agreement. The ORF is not designed to cover the cost
of that options sales practice regulation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange will continue to monitor the amount of revenue
collected from the ORF to ensure that it, in combination with its other
regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed regulatory costs. If the
Exchange determines regulatory revenues exceed regulatory costs, the
Exchange will adjust the ORF by submitting a fee change filing to the
Commission and notifying \17\ its members and member organizations via
an Options Trader Alert.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ The Exchange will provide members and member organizations
with such notice at least 30 calendar days prior to the effective
date of the change.
\18\ The Exchange notes that in connection with this proposal,
it provided the Commission confidential details regarding the
Exchange's projected regulatory revenue, including projected revenue
from ORF, along with a projected regulatory expenses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\19\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with Section
6(b)(4) of the Act \20\, which provides that Exchange rules may provide
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among its
[[Page 5551]]
members, member organizations, and other persons using its facilities.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \21\ requirement that the rules of
an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed fee change is reasonable because
customer transactions will be subject to a lower ORF fee than the rate
that would otherwise be in effect on February 1, 2022. Moreover, the
proposed reduction is necessary for the Exchange to avoid collecting
revenue, in combination with other regulatory fees and fines, that
would be in excess of its anticipated regulatory costs which is
consistent with the Exchange's practices.
The Exchange had designed the ORF to generate revenues that would
be less than the amount of the Exchange's regulatory costs to ensure
that it, in combination with its other regulatory fees and fines, does
not exceed regulatory costs, which is consistent with the view of the
Commission that regulatory fees be used for regulatory purposes and not
to support the Exchange's business operations. As discussed above,
however, after review of its regulatory costs and regulatory revenues,
which includes revenues from ORF and other regulatory fees and fines,
the Exchange determined that absent a reduction in ORF, it may collect
revenue which would exceed its regulatory costs. Indeed, the Exchange
notes that when taking into account the potential that recent options
volume persists, it estimates the ORF may generate revenues that would
cover more than the approximated Exchange's projected regulatory costs.
As such, the Exchange believes it's reasonable and appropriate to
reduce the ORF amount from $0.0042 to $0.0034 per contract side.
The Exchange also believes the proposed fee change is equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory in that it is charged to all member
organizations on all their transactions that clear in the customer
range at OCC.\22\ The Exchange believes the ORF ensures fairness by
assessing higher fees to those member organizations that require more
Exchange regulatory services based on the amount of customer options
business they conduct. Regulating customer trading activity is much
more labor intensive and requires greater expenditure of human and
technical resources than regulating non-customer trading activity,
which tends to be more automated and less labor-intensive. For example,
there are costs associated with main office and branch office
examinations (e.g., staff expenses), as well as investigations into
customer complaints and the terminations of registered persons. As a
result, the costs associated with administering the customer component
of the Exchange's overall regulatory program are materially higher than
the costs associated with administering the non-customer component
(e.g., member and member organization proprietary transactions) of its
regulatory program. Moreover, the Exchange notes that it has broad
regulatory responsibilities with respect to activities of its members
and member organizations, irrespective of where their transactions take
place. Many of the Exchange's surveillance programs for customer
trading activity may require the Exchange to look at activity across
all markets, such as reviews related to position limit violations and
manipulation. Indeed, the Exchange cannot effectively review for such
conduct without looking at and evaluating activity regardless of where
it transpires. In addition to its own surveillance programs, the
Exchange also works with other SROs and exchanges on intermarket
surveillance related issues. Through its participation in the
Intermarket Surveillance Group (``ISG'') \23\ the Exchange shares
information and coordinates inquiries and investigations with other
exchanges designed to address potential intermarket manipulation and
trading abuses. Accordingly, there is a strong nexus between the ORF
and the Exchange's regulatory activities with respect to customer
trading activity of its members and member organizations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ If the OCC clearing member is a Phlx member organization,
ORF will be assessed and collected on all cleared customer contracts
(after adjustment for CMTA); and (2) if the OCC clearing member is
not a Phlx member organization, ORF will be collected only on the
cleared customer contracts executed at Phlx, taking into account any
CMTA instructions which may result in collecting the ORF from a non-
member organization.
\23\ ISG is an industry organization formed in 1983 to
coordinate intermarket surveillance among the SROs by cooperatively
sharing regulatory information pursuant to a written agreement
between the parties. The goal of the ISG's information sharing is to
coordinate regulatory efforts to address potential intermarket
trading abuses and manipulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. This proposal does not create
an unnecessary or inappropriate intra-market burden on competition
because the ORF applies to all customer activity, thereby raising
regulatory revenue to offset regulatory expenses. It also supplements
the regulatory revenue derived from non-customer activity. The Exchange
notes, however, the proposed change is not designed to address any
competitive issues. Indeed, this proposal does not create an
unnecessary or inappropriate inter-market burden on competition because
it is a regulatory fee that supports regulation in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. The Exchange is obligated to ensure that the
amount of regulatory revenue collected from the ORF, in combination
with its other regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed regulatory
costs.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \24\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \25\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\25\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \26\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
[[Page 5552]]
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ceee9f0f9b1fff3f1f1f9f2e8efdceff9ffb2fbf3ea"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a787f666f27696567676f647e794a796f69246d657c">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
File No. SR-Phlx-2022-03 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-2022-03. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-2022-03, and should be submitted on or
before February 22, 2022.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-01973 Filed 1-31-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on February 1, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.