Notice2022-01968
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Reduce ISE's Options Regulatory Fee
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
February 1, 2022
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 21 (Tuesday, February 1, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 1, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5524-5527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01968]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-94070; File No. SR-ISE-2022-02]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Reduce ISE's
Options Regulatory Fee
January 26, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on January 20, 2022, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II, below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend ISE's Pricing Schedule at Options 7,
Section 9, Part C, to reduce the ISE Options Regulatory Fee or ``ORF''.
While the changes proposed herein are effective upon filing, the
Exchange has designated the amendments become operative on February 1,
2022.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at <a href="https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/ise/rules">https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/ise/rules</a>, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
ISE previously filed to waive its ORF from October 1, 2021 through
January 31, 2022.\3\ The Waiver Filing provided that ISE would continue
monitoring the amount of revenue collected from the ORF to determine if
regulatory revenues would exceed regulatory costs when it recommenced
assessing ORF on February 1, 2022. If so, the Exchange committed to
adjust its ORF.\4\ At this time, after a review of its regulatory
revenues and regulatory costs, the Exchange proposes to reduce the ORF
from $0.0018 (the amount of the ORF prior to the waiver) to $0.0014 per
contract side as of February 1, 2022, to ensure that revenue collected
from the ORF, in combination with other regulatory fees and fines, does
not exceed the Exchange's total regulatory costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92577 (August 5,
2021), 86 FR 44092 (August 11, 2021) (SR-ISE-2021-16) (Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Amend
ISE's Options Regulatory Fee) (``Waiver Filing'').
\4\ Id. at 44094.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The options industry continues to experience high options trading
volumes and volatility. At this time, ISE believes that the options
volume it experienced in the second half of 2021 is likely to persist
into 2022. The anticipated options volume would impact ISE's ORF
collection which, in turn, has caused ISE to propose reducing the ORF
to ensure that revenue collected from the ORF, in combination with
other regulatory fees and fines, would not exceed the Exchange's total
regulatory costs.
Collection of ORF
Upon recommencement of the ORF on February 1, 2022,\5\ ISE will
assess its ORF for each customer option transaction that is either: (1)
Executed by a Member on ISE; or (2) cleared by an ISE Member at The
Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') in the customer range,\6\ even
if the transaction was executed by a non-Member of ISE, regardless of
the exchange on which the transaction occurs.\7\ If the OCC clearing
member is a ISE Member, ORF is assessed and collected on all cleared
customer contracts (after adjustment for CMTA \8\); and (2) if the OCC
clearing member is not a ISE Member, ORF is collected only on the
cleared customer contracts executed at ISE, taking into account any
CMTA instructions which may result in collecting the ORF from a non-
Member.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Prior to the Waiver Filing, the Exchange similarly collected
ORF as described herein.
\6\ Participants must record the appropriate account origin code
on all orders at the time of entry of the order. The Exchange
represents that it has surveillances in place to verify that members
mark orders with the correct account origin code.
\7\ The Exchange uses reports from OCC when assessing and
collecting the ORF.
\8\ CMTA or Clearing Member Trade Assignment is a form of
``give-up'' whereby the position will be assigned to a specific
clearing firm at OCC.
\9\ By way of example, if Broker A, an ISE Member, routes a
customer order to CBOE and the transaction executes on CBOE and
clears in Broker A's OCC Clearing account, ORF will be collected by
ISE from Broker A's clearing account at OCC via direct debit. While
this transaction was executed on a market other than ISE, it was
cleared by an ISE Member in the member's OCC clearing account in the
customer range, therefore there is a regulatory nexus between ISE
and the transaction. If Broker A was not an ISE Member, then no ORF
should be assessed and collected because there is no nexus; the
transaction did not execute on ISE nor was it cleared by an ISE
Member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case where a Member both executes a transaction and clears
the transaction, the ORF will be assessed to and collected from that
Member. In the case where a Member executes a transaction and a
different Member
[[Page 5525]]
clears the transaction, the ORF will be assessed to and collected from
the Member who clears the transaction and not the Member who executes
the transaction. In the case where a non-Member executes a transaction
at an away market and a Member clears the transaction, the ORF will be
assessed to and collected from the Member who clears the transaction.
In the case where a Member executes a transaction on ISE and a non-
Member clears the transaction, the ORF will be assessed to the Member
that executed the transaction on ISE and collected from the non-Member
who cleared the transaction. In the case where a Member executes a
transaction at an away market and a non-Member clears the transaction,
the ORF will not be assessed to the Member who executed the transaction
or collected from the non-Member who cleared the transaction because
the Exchange does not have access to the data to make absolutely
certain that ORF should apply. Further, the data does not allow the
Exchange to identify the Member executing the trade at an away market.
ORF Revenue and Monitoring of ORF
The Exchange monitors the amount of revenue collected from the ORF
to ensure that it, in combination with other regulatory fees and fines,
does not exceed regulatory costs. In determining whether an expense is
considered a regulatory cost, the Exchange reviews all costs and makes
determinations if there is a nexus between the expense and a regulatory
function. The Exchange notes that fines collected by the Exchange in
connection with a disciplinary matter offset ORF.
Revenue generated from ORF, when combined with all of the
Exchange's other regulatory fees and fines, is designed to recover a
material portion of the regulatory costs to the Exchange of the
supervision and regulation of member customer options business
including performing routine surveillances, investigations,
examinations, financial monitoring, and policy, rulemaking,
interpretive, and enforcement activities. Regulatory costs include
direct regulatory expenses and certain indirect expenses in support of
the regulatory function. The direct expenses include in-house and
third-party service provider costs to support the day-to-day regulatory
work such as surveillances, investigations and examinations. The
indirect expenses include support from such areas as Office of the
General Counsel, technology, and internal audit. Indirect expenses were
approximately 38% of the total regulatory costs for 2021. Thus, direct
expenses were approximately 62% of total regulatory costs for 2021.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The Exchange will set a 2022 Regulatory Budget in the first
quarter of 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ORF is designed to recover a material portion of the costs to
the Exchange of the supervision and regulation of its Members,
including performing routine surveillances, investigations,
examinations, financial monitoring, and policy, rulemaking,
interpretive, and enforcement activities.
Proposal
Based on the Exchange's most recent review, the Exchange is
proposing to reduce the amount of ORF that will be collected by the
Exchange from $0.0018 per contract side to $0.0014 per contract side.
The Exchange issued an Options Trader Alert on December 31, 2021
indicating the proposed rate change for February 1, 2022.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Options Trader Alert 2021-63.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed reduction is based on a sustained high level of
options volume in 2021. The below table displays average daily volume
for 2021.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The OCC data from December 2021 numbers reflect only 13
trading days as this information is through December 17, 2021.
Volume data in the table represents numbers of contracts; each
contract has two sides.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN01FE22.003
To date, fourth quarter options average daily volume in 2021 has been
higher than options average daily volume in any of the prior three
quarters of 2021. With respect to customer options volume across the
industry, total customer options contract average daily volume, to
date, in 2021 is 36,565,398 as compared to total customer options
contract average daily volume in 2020 which was 27,002,511.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See data from OCC at: <a href="https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Volume-by-Account-Type">https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Volume-by-Account-Type</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There can be no assurance that the Exchange's costs for 2022 will
not differ materially from these expectations and prior practice, nor
can the Exchange predict with certainty whether options volume will
remain at the current level going forward. The Exchange notes however,
that when combined with regulatory fees and fines, the revenue that may
be generated utilizing an ORF rate of $0.0018 per contract side may
result in revenue which exceeds the Exchange's estimated regulatory
costs for 2022 if options volume persists. In 2021, options volume
remained high, due in large part to the extreme volatility in the
marketplace as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Exchange
therefore proposes to reduce its ORF to $0.0014 per contract side to
ensure that revenue does not exceed the Exchange's estimated regulatory
costs in 2022. Particularly, the Exchange believes that reducing the
ORF when
[[Page 5526]]
combined with all of the Exchange's other regulatory fees and fines,
would allow the Exchange to continue covering a material portion of its
regulatory costs, while lessening the potential for generating excess
revenue that may otherwise occur using the rate of $0.0018 per contract
side.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ The Exchange notes that its regulatory responsibilities
with respect to Member compliance with options sales practice rules
have largely been allocated to FINRA under a 17d-2 agreement. The
ORF is not designed to cover the cost of that options sales practice
regulation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange will continue to monitor the amount of revenue
collected from the ORF to ensure that it, in combination with its other
regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed regulatory costs. If the
Exchange determines regulatory revenues exceed regulatory costs, the
Exchange will adjust the ORF by submitting a fee change filing to the
Commission and notifying \15\ its Members via an Options Trader
Alert.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ The Exchange will provide Members with such notice at least
30 calendar days prior to the effective date of the change.
\16\ The Exchange notes that in connection with this proposal,
it provided the Commission confidential details regarding the
Exchange's projected regulatory revenue, including projected revenue
from ORF, along with a projected regulatory expenses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\17\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with Section
6(b)(4) of the Act \18\, which provides that Exchange rules may provide
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among its members, and other persons using its facilities.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \19\ requirement that the rules of
an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed fee change is reasonable because
customer transactions will be subject to a lower ORF fee than the rate
that would otherwise be in effect on February 1, 2022. Moreover, the
proposed reduction is necessary for the Exchange to avoid collecting
revenue, in combination with other regulatory fees and fines, that
would be in excess of its anticipated regulatory costs which is
consistent with the Exchange's practices.
The Exchange designed the ORF to generate revenues that would be
less than the amount of the Exchange's regulatory costs to ensure that
it, in combination with its other regulatory fees and fines, does not
exceed regulatory costs, which is consistent with the view of the
Commission that regulatory fees be used for regulatory purposes and not
to support the Exchange's business operations. As discussed above,
however, after review of its regulatory costs and regulatory revenues,
which includes revenues from ORF and other regulatory fees and fines,
the Exchange determined that absent a reduction in ORF, it may collect
revenue which would exceed its regulatory costs. Indeed, the Exchange
notes that when taking into account the potential that recent options
volume persists, it estimates the ORF may generate revenues that would
cover more than the approximated Exchange's projected regulatory costs.
As such, the Exchange believes it's reasonable and appropriate to
reduce the ORF amount from $0.0018 to $0.0014 per contract side.
The Exchange also believes the proposed fee change is equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory in that it is charged to all Members on all
their transactions that clear in the customer range at OCC.\20\ The
Exchange believes the ORF ensures fairness by assessing higher fees to
those Members that require more Exchange regulatory services based on
the amount of customer options business they conduct. Regulating
customer trading activity is much more labor intensive and requires
greater expenditure of human and technical resources than regulating
non-customer trading activity, which tends to be more automated and
less labor-intensive. For example, there are costs associated with main
office and branch office examinations (e.g., staff expenses), as well
as investigations into customer complaints and the terminations of
registered persons. As a result, the costs associated with
administering the customer component of the Exchange's overall
regulatory program are materially higher than the costs associated with
administering the non-customer component (e.g., Member proprietary
transactions) of its regulatory program. Moreover, the Exchange notes
that it has broad regulatory responsibilities with respect to
activities of its Members, irrespective of where their transactions
take place. Many of the Exchange's surveillance programs for customer
trading activity may require the Exchange to look at activity across
all markets, such as reviews related to position limit violations and
manipulation. Indeed, the Exchange cannot effectively review for such
conduct without looking at and evaluating activity regardless of where
it transpires. In addition to its own surveillance programs, the
Exchange also works with other SROs and exchanges on intermarket
surveillance related issues. Through its participation in the
Intermarket Surveillance Group (``ISG'') \21\ the Exchange shares
information and coordinates inquiries and investigations with other
exchanges designed to address potential intermarket manipulation and
trading abuses. Accordingly, there is a strong nexus between the ORF
and the Exchange's regulatory activities with respect to customer
trading activity of its Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ If the OCC clearing member is an ISE member, ORF is
assessed and collected on all cleared customer contracts (after
adjustment for CMTA); and (2) if the OCC clearing member is not an
ISE member, ORF is collected only on the cleared customer contracts
executed at ISE, taking into account any CMTA instructions which may
result in collecting the ORF from a non-member.
\21\ ISG is an industry organization formed in 1983 to
coordinate intermarket surveillance among the SROs by cooperatively
sharing regulatory information pursuant to a written agreement
between the parties. The goal of the ISG's information sharing is to
coordinate regulatory efforts to address potential intermarket
trading abuses and manipulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. This proposal does not create
an unnecessary or inappropriate intra-market burden on competition
because the ORF applies to all customer activity, thereby raising
regulatory revenue to offset regulatory expenses. It also supplements
the regulatory revenue derived from non-customer activity. The Exchange
notes, however, the proposed change is not designed to address any
competitive issues. Indeed, this proposal does not create an
unnecessary or inappropriate inter-market burden on competition because
it is a regulatory fee that supports regulation in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. The Exchange is obligated to ensure that the
amount of regulatory revenue collected from the ORF, in combination
with its other regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed regulatory
costs.
[[Page 5527]]
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \22\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \23\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\23\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \24\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8daddc4cd85cbc7c5c5cdc6dcdbe8dbcdcb86cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="295b5c454c044a4644444c475d5a695a4c4a074e465f">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
File No. SR-ISE-2022-02 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File No. SR-ISE-2022-02. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File No. SR-ISE-2022-02, and should be submitted on or
before February 22, 2022.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-01968 Filed 1-31-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on February 1, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.