Proposed Rule2022-01306
Amendments to the Marketing Order of Grapes Grown in a Southeastern California
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
January 25, 2022
Issuing agencies
Agriculture DepartmentAgricultural Marketing Service
Abstract
This rulemaking proposes amendments to Marketing Order No. 925, which regulates the handling of grapes grown in a designated area of southeastern California. The proposed amendments would change the California Desert Grape Administrative Committee's (Committee) size, and its quorum and voting requirements.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 16 (Tuesday, January 25, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 25, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3699-3702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01306]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2022 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 3699]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 925
[Doc. No.: AMS-SC-21-0049; SC21-925-2]
Amendments to the Marketing Order of Grapes Grown in a
Southeastern California
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), Department of Agriculture
(USDA).
ACTION: Proposed rule and referendum order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rulemaking proposes amendments to Marketing Order No.
925, which regulates the handling of grapes grown in a designated area
of southeastern California. The proposed amendments would change the
California Desert Grape Administrative Committee's (Committee) size,
and its quorum and voting requirements.
DATES: The referendum will be conducted from February 14 through March
4, 2022. The representative period for the referendum is January 1
through December 31, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons with questions and comments are invited
to submit written questions and comments to the Docket Clerk, Market
Development Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; or
Telephone: (202) 720-2491.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pushpa Kathir, Marketing Specialist,
or Matthew Pavone, Rulemaking Services Branch Chief, Market Development
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW, Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, or
Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#500025233820317e1b312438392210252334317e373f26"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95c5e0e6fde5f4bbdef4e1fdfce7d5e0e6f1f4bbf2fae3">[email protected]</span></a> or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a1ecc0d5d5c9c4d68ff1c0d7cecfc4e1d4d2c5c08fc6ced7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7b361a0f0f131e0c552b1a0d14151e3b0e081f1a551c140d">[email protected]</span></a>.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Market Development Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop
0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, or Email:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0c5e656f646d7e682240637b697e4c797f686d226b637a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="adffc4cec5ccdfc983e1c2dac8dfedd8dec9cc83cac2db">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, proposes
amendments to regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as
defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j) are proposed. This proposal is issued under
Marketing Order No. 925, as amended (7 CFR part 925), regulating the
handling of grapes grown in a designated area of southeastern
California. Part 925 (referred to as the ``Order'') is effective under
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C.
601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The Committee locally
administers the Order and is comprised of grape producers and handlers
operating within the area of production, and a public member.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this proposed rule
in conformance with Executive Orders 12866 and 13563. Executive Orders
12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to
select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects,
distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs,
harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. This action falls within
a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review.
In addition, this proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive
Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, which requires agencies to consider whether their
rulemaking actions would have tribal implications. The Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has determined this proposed rule is unlikely
to have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
This proposal has also been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive
effect. This rule shall not be deemed to preclude, preempt, or
supersede any State program covering grapes grown in a designated area
of southeastern California.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 8c(15)(A) of the
Act (7 U.S.C. 608 (15)(A)), any handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the
order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in
accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be
exempted therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition.
The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her
principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling
on the petition, provided an action is filed no later than 20 days
after the date of entry of the ruling.
Section 1504 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
(2008 Farm Bill) (Pub. L. 110-246) amended section 8c(17) of the Act,
which in turn required the addition of supplemental rules of practice
to 7 CFR part 900 (73 FR 49307; August 21, 2008). The amendment of
section 8c(17) of the Act and supplemental rules of practice authorize
the use of informal rulemaking (5 U.S.C. 553) to amend Federal fruit,
vegetable, and nut marketing agreements and orders. USDA may use
informal rulemaking to amend marketing orders depending upon the nature
and complexity of the proposed amendments, potential regulatory and
economic impacts on affected entities, and any other relevant matters.
AMS has considered these factors and has determined that the
amendments proposed herein are not unduly complex and the nature of the
proposed amendments is appropriate for utilizing the informal
rulemaking process to amend the Order.
The Committee unanimously recommended the amendments following
deliberations at a public meeting on April 13, 2021. This proposal
would amend the Order by
[[Page 3700]]
changing the Committee's size, and its quorum and voting requirements.
A proposed rule soliciting comments on the proposed amendments was
published in the Federal Register on August 13, 2021 (86 FR 44644). Two
comments were received in support of the proposed amendments, so no
changes will be made to the proposed amendments.
AMS will conduct a producer referendum to determine support for the
proposed amendments. If appropriate, a final rule will then be issued
to effectuate the amendments, if they are favored by producers in the
referendum.
Proposal 1--Reduce Committee Size
Sec. 925.20 provides that the Committee consists of 12 members
and, for each member of the Committee, there must be an alternate who
has the same qualifications as the member. This proposal would amend
Sec. 925.20 by reducing the size of the Committee from 12 to 10
members. The requirement that each member has an alternate with the
same qualifications as the member would remain unchanged. Four members
and their alternates would be producers or officers or employees of
producers (producer members). Four members and their alternates would
be handlers or officers or employees of handlers (handler members). One
member and alternate would be either a producer or handler or officer
or employee thereof. One member and alternate would represent the
public.
Since promulgation of the Order in 1980, the California table grape
industry has seen reductions of about 55 percent of its producers and
58 percent of its registered handlers, which makes it difficult to find
eligible members to fill all positions on the Committee. Industry
consolidation and land development pressure due to conversion of lands
for residential and commercial uses have contributed to this decline.
Decreasing the Committee's size from 12 members to 10 members would
make Committee membership more reflective of today's industry and
enable the Committee to fill all its member positions without
difficulty.
Proposal 2--Revise Quorum and Voting Requirements
Currently, Sec. 925.30 states that eight members of the Committee
shall constitute a quorum, and any action of the committee shall
require at least eight concurring votes.
The proposed change would modify Sec. 925.30 to allow six members
to constitute a quorum including, at a minimum, one producer member and
one handler member, with six concurring votes required to pass any
motion or approve any Committee action.
The Committee is experiencing difficulties filling member seats and
obtaining a quorum at meetings to conduct business activities.
Adjusting current requirements would enable the Committee to operate
fully, mitigating the risk of not establishing a quorum during
scheduled meetings and not having the required votes to pass any
action. These changes would help to streamline the Committee's
operations and increase its effectiveness.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the economic impact of
this proposed rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared
this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Small agricultural producers have been defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual
receipts of no more than $1,000,000. Small agricultural service firms
(handlers) are defined as those with annual receipts of no more than
$30,000,000.
Proposed amendments to the Order would reduce the number of members
and alternates seats on the Committee from 12 to 10 and reduce the
quorum and voting requirements from 8 to 6 members. These amendments
are necessary to reflect the industry's consolidation. Since
promulgation of the Order in 1980, the California table grape industry
has lost roughly 55 percent of its producers and 58 percent of its
registered handlers.
Committee reports that there are 21 producers and 10 handlers of
table grapes in the production region. Committee packout reports show
that average annual packout for 2018 through 2020 was 3.2127 million
18-pound containers, equivalent to 28,914 tons. The 3-year average of
California fresh table grape prices was $1,267 per ton. Multiplying
quantity by price yields an annual average crop value estimate of
$36.634 million. Dividing the average crop value estimate by the number
of producers (21) yields an average crop value per producer of $1.744
million, moderately larger than the SBA small farm size threshold of
$1,000,000. Therefore, using the estimated prices, packout volume, and
number of producers and assuming a normal bell-curve distribution of
receipts among producers, AMS estimates the majority of producers would
qualify as large businesses under the SBA definition.
Dividing the average crop value of $36.634 million by the number of
handers (10) yields a per-handler estimate of $3.663 million, well
below the SBA small business threshold of $30,000,000 in annual
receipts. However, that computation measures handler annual receipts
using producer-level crop value data, since AMS is unable to locate an
estimate of a handler margin. A range of handler margin estimates would
be 30 to 40 percent above the grower price. Applying those two
percentages, a range of handler annual receipts estimates would be $4.8
to $5.1 million, still well below $30,000,000. Therefore, using these
estimated prices, utilization volume, handler margin estimates and
number of handlers, AMS estimates that the majority of handlers would
meet the SBA definition of small businesses.
AMS has determined that the proposed amendments would not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small businesses. Both
large and small entities would be expected to benefit from the
Committee's improved ability to address important issues on a timely
basis. The proposed reduction in the number of seats on the Committee,
and the reduced quorum and voting requirements, would not require any
significant changes in producer or handler business operations, and no
significant industry educational effort would be needed. Producers and
handlers, large and small would incur no additional costs. No small
businesses would be unduly or disproportionately burdened.
The Committee unanimously recommended the proposed amendments at a
public meeting on April 13, 2021. If these proposals are approved in a
referendum, there would be no direct financial effects on producers or
handlers. However, these proposed changes would have indirect financial
effects--decreased administrative costs to producers and Committee
staff stemming from fewer resources required to the annual preparation
of multiple nomination notices and meetings, and reduced travel
expenses associated with carrying out annual duties.
Since 1980, the number of producers and handlers operating in the
industry has decreased, which makes it difficult to find enough members
to fill positions on the Committee. Decreasing the Committee's size
would make it more reflective of today's industry. No
[[Page 3701]]
economic impact is expected if the proposed amendments are approved
because they would not establish any new regulatory requirements on
handlers, nor would they have any assessment or funding implications.
There would be no change in financial costs associated with reporting
or recordkeeping requirements if this proposal is approved.
Alternatives to this proposal, including making no changes at this
time, were considered by the Committee. Due to changes in the industry,
AMS believes the proposals are justified and necessary to ensure the
Committee's ability to locally administer the program. Reducing the
size of the Committee would enable it to satisfy membership, and quorum
and voting requirements fully, thereby ensuring a more efficient and
orderly flow of business.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0189, Fruit Crops.
No changes in those requirements are necessary because of this action.
Should any changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for
approval.
This proposed rule would impose no additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large California table
grape handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports
and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements
and duplication by industry and public-sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this action.
The Committee's meetings are widely publicized throughout the
southeastern California table grape production area. All interested
persons are invited to attend the meetings, whether held virtually or
in-person, and encouraged to participate in Committee deliberations on
all issues. As with all Committee meetings, the April 13, 2021, meeting
was public, and all entities, both large and small, were encouraged to
express their views on the proposed amendments.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on August 13, 2021 (86 FR 44644). A copy of the rule was sent
via email to the Committee Manager for disposal to all Committee
members and California table grape handlers. Finally, the proposed rule
was made available by USDA through the internet and the office of the
Federal Register. A 60-day comment period ending October 12, 2021, was
provided to allow interested persons to respond to the proposal. Two
comments were received during the comment period, both of which were in
support of the proposed amendments. However, one commentor was
concerned that the restructure of the Committee might limit the
participation of interested parties in the industry. Further, the
commentor suggested adding a requirement for periodic review of the
Committee structure to the regulations.
USDA and the Committee encourage the participation of all eligible
interested parties in the administration of the Order. The proposed
restructuring of the Committee is not intended to limit the
participation of individuals on the Committee, but rather to reflect
the current industry demographic and to facilitate the ability of the
Committee to function moving forward. Furthermore, the Committee has
the ability to recommend changes to the Committee structure when it is
deemed appropriate, and the addition of a regulatory review requirement
is not necessary. As such, no changes will be made to the amendments as
proposed.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at:
<a href="https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses">https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses</a>. Any
questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at
the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Findings and Conclusions
The findings and conclusions, and general findings and
determinations included in the proposed rule set forth in the August
13, 2021, issue of the Federal Register are hereby approved and
adopted.
Marketing Order
Annexed hereto and made a part hereof is the document entitled
``Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Grapes Grown in a
Designated Area of Southeastern California.'' This document has been
decided upon as the detailed and appropriate means of effectuating the
foregoing findings and conclusions. It is hereby ordered that this
entire proposed rule be published in the Federal Register.
Referendum Order
It is hereby directed that a referendum be conducted in accordance
with the procedure for the conduct of referenda (7 CFR 900.400 through
900.407) to determine whether the annexed order amending the Order
regulating the handling of grapes grown in a designated area of
southeastern California is approved by growers, as defined under the
terms of the Order, who during the representative period were engaged
in the production of grapes in the production area. The representative
period for the conduct of such referendum is hereby determined to be
January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021.
The agents designated by the Secretary to conduct the referendum
are Jeffery Rymer and Gary D. Olsen, Western Region Branch, Market
Development Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone:
(559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fcb6999a9a998e85d2ae8591998ebc898f989dd29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c68ca3a0a0a3b4bfe894bfaba3b486b3b5a2a7e8a1a9b0">[email protected]</span></a>
or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4d0a2c3f34096302213e28230d383e292c632a223b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a7e0c6d5dee389e8cbd4c2c9e7d2d4c3c689c0c8d1">[email protected]</span></a>, respectively.
Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Grapes Grown in a
Designated Area of Southeastern California <SUP>1</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This order shall not become effective unless and until the
requirements of Sec. 900.14 of the rules of practice and procedure
governing proceedings to formulate marketing agreements and
marketing orders have been met.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Findings and Determinations
The findings hereinafter set forth are supplementary to the
findings and determinations which were previously made in connection
with the issuance of Marketing Order 925; and all said previous
findings and determinations are hereby ratified and affirmed, except
insofar as such findings and determinations may be in conflict with the
findings and determinations set forth herein.
1. Marketing Order 925 as hereby proposed to be amended and all the
terms and conditions thereof, would tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act;
2. Marketing Order 925 as hereby proposed to be amended regulates
the handling of grapes grown in a designated area of southeastern
California and is applicable only to persons in the respective classes
of commercial and industrial activity specified in the Order;
3. Marketing Order 925 as hereby proposed to be amended is limited
in
[[Page 3702]]
application to the smallest regional production area which is
practicable, consistent with carrying out the declared policy of the
Act, and the issuance of several marketing orders applicable to
subdivisions of the production area would not effectively carry out the
declared policy of the Act;
4. Marketing Order 925 as hereby proposed to be amended prescribes,
insofar as practicable, such different terms applicable to different
parts of the production area as are necessary to give due recognition
to the differences in the production and marketing of grapes produced
or packed in the production area; and
5. All handling of grapes produced or packed in the production area
as defined in Marketing Order 925 is in the current of interstate or
foreign commerce or directly burdens, obstructs, or affects such
commerce.
Order Relative to Handling
It is therefore ordered, that on and after the effective date
hereof, all handling of grapes grown in a designated area of
southeastern California shall be in conformity to, and in compliance
with, the terms and conditions of the said Order as hereby proposed to
be amended as follows:
The provisions of the proposed marketing order amending the Order
contained in the proposed rule issued by the Administrator and
published in the Federal Register (86 FR 44644) on August 13, 2021,
will be and are the terms and provisions of this order amending the
Order and are set forth in full herein.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 925
Grapes, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural
Marketing Service proposes to amend 7 CFR part 925 as follows:
PART 925--GRAPES GROWN IN A DESIGNATED AREA OF SOUTHEASTERN
CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 925 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. In Sec. 925.20, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 925.20 Establishment and membership.
(a) There is hereby established a California Desert Grape Committee
consisting of 10 members, each of whom shall have an alternate who
shall have the same qualifications as the member. Four of the members
and their alternates shall be producers, or officers or employees of
producers (producer members). Four of the members and their alternates
shall be handlers, or officers or employees of handlers (handler
members). One member and alternate shall be either a producer or
handler, or an officer or employee thereof. One member and alternate
shall represent the public.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 925.30, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 925.30 Procedure.
(a) Six members of the committee shall constitute a quorum,
including at a minimum one producer member and one handler member, and
any action of the committee shall require at least six concurring
votes.
* * * * *
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-01306 Filed 1-24-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on January 25, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.