Proposed Rule2022-00467
Air Plan Approval; Indiana, Ohio; Definition of Chemical Process Plants Under State Prevention of Significant Deterioration Regulations and Operating Permit Programs
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
January 19, 2022
Issuing agencies
Environmental Protection Agency
Abstract
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Indiana and revisions to the Operating Permit Program for Ohio. The proposed revisions incorporate changes to the definition of "chemical process plants" under Indiana's Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) regulations and under Ohio's operating permit program. EPA is also providing an opportunity for public comment on similar changes to the definition of "major stationary source" in Ohio's PSD regulations that were approved into the SIP on October 28, 2014. This opportunity is being provided because these revisions were not explicitly discussed in the corresponding Federal Register action. The changes to the state rules described below are approvable because they are consistent with EPA regulations governing state PSD and title V programs and will not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress (as defined in section 171 of the Clean Air Act (CAA)), or any other applicable requirement of the CAA.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2022)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 2731-2735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00467]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 70
[EPA-R05-OAR-2008-0138; EPA-R05-OAR-2011-0827; FRL-9397-01-R5]
Air Plan Approval; Indiana, Ohio; Definition of Chemical Process
Plants Under State Prevention of Significant Deterioration Regulations
and Operating Permit Programs
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Indiana
and revisions to the Operating Permit Program for Ohio. The proposed
revisions incorporate changes to the definition of ``chemical process
plants'' under Indiana's Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)
regulations and under Ohio's operating permit program. EPA is also
providing an opportunity for public comment on similar changes to the
definition of ``major stationary source'' in Ohio's PSD regulations
that were approved into the SIP on October 28, 2014. This opportunity
is being provided because these revisions were not explicitly discussed
in the corresponding Federal Register action. The changes to the state
rules described below are approvable because they are consistent with
EPA regulations governing state PSD and title V
[[Page 2732]]
programs and will not interfere with any applicable requirement
concerning attainment and reasonable further progress (as defined in
section 171 of the Clean Air Act (CAA)), or any other applicable
requirement of the CAA.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 18, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2011-0827 (Indiana) or EPA-R05-OAR-2008-0138 (Ohio) at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, or via email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0662676b6f65692861636863706f6370634663766728616970"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c8aca9a5a1aba7e6afada6adbea1adbead88adb8a9e6afa7be">[email protected]</span></a>. For
comments submitted at <a href="http://Regulations.gov">Regulations.gov</a>, follow the online instructions
for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or
removed from <a href="http://Regulations.gov">Regulations.gov</a>. For either manner of submission, EPA may
publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish
to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents
located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI
or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit <a href="https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets">https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets</a>.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information regarding Indiana's
PSD permit program: Michael Langman, Physical Scientist, Air Permit
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312)
886-6867, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c9a5a8a7aea4a8a7e7a4a0aaa1a8aca589acb9a8e7aea6bf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fe929f9099939f90d093979d969f9b92be9b8e9fd0999188">[email protected]</span></a>. For information regarding Ohio's
title V operating permit or PSD permit programs: Mari Gonz[aacute]lez,
Environmental Engineer, Air Permit Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6175,
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8deae2e3f7ece1e8f7a3e0ecffe4cde8fdeca3eae2fb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95f2fafbeff4f9f0efbbf8f4e7fcd5f0e5f4bbf2fae3">[email protected]</span></a>. The EPA Region 5 office is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays and
facility closures due to COVID-19.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Background
A. PSD Permitting Thresholds for Chemical Process Plants Prior
to the 2007 Ethanol Rule
B. Title V Permitting Thresholds for Chemical Process Plants
Prior to the 2007 Ethanol Rule
C. Ethanol Rule
D. Petitions for Review and Reconsideration of the 2007 Ethanol
Rule
III. What revisions to the Indiana SIP is EPA proposing to approve?
IV. What revisions are being proposed by EPA in Ohio?
V. What action is EPA taking?
VI. Incorporation by Reference
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is being addressed in this document?
EPA is proposing to approve revisions to a SIP submission received
from Indiana on September 21, 2011. EPA is also proposing to approve
revisions to the Ohio Title V Operating Permit Program and providing an
opportunity for the public to provide comments on related revisions to
Ohio's PSD regulations that were approved on October 28, 2014 (79 FR
64119). These revisions address changes made to EPA regulations that
are reflected in EPA's final rule entitled ``Prevention of Significant
Deterioration, Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR), and Title V:
Treatment of Certain Ethanol Production Facilities Under the `Major
Emitting Facility' Definition'' (hereinafter referred to as the ``2007
Ethanol Rule'') as published in the Federal Register on May 1, 2007 (72
FR 24059). The 2007 Ethanol Rule amended the PSD definition of ``major
stationary source'' in the Federal PSD regulations (40 CFR 51.166
paragraphs (b)(1)(i)(a), (b)(1)(iii)(t) and (i)(1)(ii)(t)) to exclude
certain ethanol facilities from the ``chemical process plant'' source
category. In doing so, it established the PSD major source threshold
for ethanol production facilities at 250 tons per year (tpy) rather
than 100 tpy. The 2007 Ethanol Rule also removes the requirement to
include fugitive emissions when determining if an ethanol production
facility is major for PSD and title V permitting.
On October 21, 2019, EPA responded to a petition for
reconsideration of the 2007 Ethanol Rule, denying the petition with
respect to the revisions of the PSD regulations reflected in that rule
(as described in more detail below). EPA is now proposing to approve
revisions to Indiana's SIP and Ohio's operating permit program that are
based on a part of the 2007 Ethanol Rule.
II. Background
A. PSD Permitting Thresholds for Chemical Process Plants Prior to the
2007 Ethanol Rule
Under the CAA, there are two potential thresholds for determining
whether a source is a major emitting facility that is potentially
subject to the construction permitting requirements under the PSD
program. One threshold is 100 tpy per pollutant, and the other is 250
tpy per pollutant. Section 169(1) of the CAA lists twenty-eight source
categories that qualify as major emitting facilities if their emissions
exceed the 100 tpy threshold. If the source does not fall within one of
twenty-eight source categories listed in section 169, then the 250 tpy
threshold is applicable.
One of the source categories in the list of twenty-eight source
categories to which the 100 tpy threshold applies is chemical process
plants. Since the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code for
chemical process plants includes facilities primarily engaged in
manufacturing ethanol fuel, the EPA and states had previously
considered such facilities to be subject to the 100 tpy thresholds.
As a result of this classification, pursuant to the EPA regulations
adopted under section 302(j) of the CAA, chemical process plants were
also required to include fugitive emissions for determining the
potential emissions of such sources. Thus, prior to promulgation of the
2007 Ethanol Rule, the classification of fuel and industrial ethanol
facilities as chemical process plants had the effect of requiring these
plants to include fugitive emissions of criteria pollutants when
determining whether their emissions exceed the applicability thresholds
for the PSD and non-attainment NSR permit programs.
B. Title V Permitting Thresholds for Chemical Process Plants Prior to
the 2007 Ethanol Rule
The CAA also establishes requirements for determining applicability
for the title V operating permit program. All title V major sources
must obtain a title V permit. Section 501(2) of the CAA defines major
source for the purposes of the title V program as a major source as
defined by section 112 of the CAA or a major stationary source as
defined in section 302 or part D of title I of the CAA. Under the
general definition of ``major stationary source'' in section 302(j) of
the CAA, the major source threshold for
[[Page 2733]]
any air pollutant is 100 tons per year. Under the NSR requirements of
Part D of title I of the CAA, lower thresholds for major sources can
apply dependent upon the pollutant and the severity of the
nonattainment classification. Major source thresholds for hazardous air
pollutants (HAP) under section 112 of the CAA are 10 tpy of a single
HAP or 25 tpy for any combination of HAPs. A source with emissions that
exceed one of these thresholds is required to obtain a title V
operating permit.
Section 502 of the CAA and EPA regulations provide that sources
that belong to one of 28 categories listed in 40 CFR 70.2 must include
fugitive emissions in determining applicability. The list of 28 source
categories may also be included in approved state operating permit
regulations.
C. Ethanol Rule
On May 1, 2007, EPA published the 2007 Ethanol Rule in the Federal
Register (72 FR 24060). This final rule amended the PSD and NA NSR
regulations to exclude ethanol manufacturing facilities that produce
ethanol by natural fermentation processes from the ``chemical process
plants'' category under the regulatory definition of ``major stationary
source.''
This change to the NSR regulations affected the threshold used to
determine PSD applicability for these ethanol production facilities,
clarifying that such facilities were subject to the 250 ton per year
major source threshold. The 2007 Ethanol Rule also changed how fugitive
emissions are considered for affected ethanol production facilities.
Because they would no longer be considered as part of the ``chemical
process plants'' category, ethanol facilities would no longer be
required to include fugitive emissions when determining major source
status under PSD, NA NSR, and Title V.
D. Petitions for Review and Reconsideration of the 2007 Ethanol Rule
On July 2, 2007, the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC)
petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (D.C.
Circuit) to review the 2007 Ethanol Rule. On that same day, EPA
received a petition for administrative reconsideration and request for
stay of the 2007 Ethanol Rule from NRDC. On March 27, 2008, the EPA
denied NRDC's 2007 administrative petition for reconsideration.
On March 2, 2009, EPA received a second petition for
reconsideration and a request for stay from NRDC. In 2009, NRDC also
filed a petition for judicial review challenging EPA's March 27, 2008,
denial of NRDC's 2007 administrative petition in the D.C. Circuit. This
challenge was consolidated with NRDC's challenge to the 2007 Ethanol
Rule. In August of 2009, the D.C. Circuit granted a joint motion to
hold the case in abeyance, and the case has remained in abeyance.
On October 21, 2019, EPA partially granted and partially denied
NRDC's 2009 administrative petition for reconsideration. Specifically,
EPA granted the request for reconsideration with regard to NRDC's claim
that the 2007 Ethanol Rule did not appropriately address the CAA
section 193 antibacksliding requirements for nonattainment areas.
III. What revisions to the Indiana SIP is EPA proposing to approve?
On September 21, 2011, EPA received a request from Indiana to
revise its SIP. More specifically, Indiana requested EPA to approve its
PSD rules at 326 Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 2-2-1 and NA NSR
program rules at 326 IAC 2-3-2 to exclude ethanol production facilities
that produce ethanol by natural fermentation from the chemical process
plant source category.
In this action, EPA is proposing to approve the revisions to
Indiana's PSD program at 326 IAC 2-2-1 related to the 2007 Ethanol
Rule. EPA is taking no action at this time on Indiana's request to
revise its NA NSR program at 326 IAC 2-3-2. Although Indiana also
amended its Title V program at 326 IAC 2-7, EPA is not taking action
with respect to Indiana's Title V operating permit program because
Indiana did not request such a revision.
Pursuant to 40 CFR part 51 appendix V section 1.2, Indiana's
September 2011 SIP submission was deemed complete by operation of law
on March 21, 2012, six months after receipt of the request. The
submission includes a formal signed and dated letter requesting
approval of the revision to Indiana's PSD rules, a copy of the actual
regulation, evidence showing that the state followed all procedural
requirements, evidence that public notice was given of the proposed
change, and certification that public hearings were held. IDEM adopted
the revised PSD rules on May 4, 2011, after receiving no comments
during the public comment period. The revised PSD rules became
effective on August 20, 2011.
The state rule submitted for approval revised the PSD definition of
``major stationary source'' at 326 IAC 2-2-1(ff) to exclude certain
ethanol production facilities that produce ethanol by natural
fermentation from the chemical process plant source category. As a
result of this revision, an ethanol production facility is subject to
the 250 tpy PSD major stationary source threshold and is no longer
required to consider fugitive emissions when determining its PSD major
stationary source applicability. The ethanol production plants excluded
from the chemical process plant source category at 326 IAC 2-2-1(ff)
are identified by NAICS codes--these codes are the same as those
identified in the 2007 Ethanol Rule and as identified at 40 CFR
51.166(b)(1)(i)(a).
EPA is proposing to approve the 2011 changes to 326 IAC 2-2-1(ff)
into the Indiana SIP. Because sources in NAICS codes 325193 and 312140
that produce ethanol by natural fermentation are being excluded from
the chemical process plant source category, EPA has determined that the
requested changes to Indiana's PSD rules are consistent with the
current PSD requirements at 40 CFR 51.166. 40 CFR 51.166(b)(1)(i)(a)
excludes ethanol production facilities that produce ethanol by natural
fermentation included in NAICS codes 325193 or 312140 from the chemical
process plant source category.
EPA has determined that the proposed revision will not interfere
with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable
further progress, or any other applicable requirement of the CAA as
required by section 110(l) of the CAA. Our determination is based on an
analysis of Indiana's ethanol production trends, existing ethanol
production permit requirements and locations with respect to ambient
air monitoring, Indiana's statewide emissions inventory, Indiana's air
quality design value trends, and representative photochemical modeling
results for ozone and secondary fine particulate (PM<INF>2.5</INF>)
formation. Our analysis is included in the docket for this rulemaking.
Our analysis shows that Indiana's existing ethanol production
facilities contribute 2% or less of each criteria pollutant when
compared to statewide facility emissions. Indiana's total ethanol
production has increased since 2007 but the state's air quality has
steadily improved in general. Photochemical modeling of hypothetical
sources representative of ethanol production facilities shows that
ozone formation as a result of oxides of nitrogen (NO<INF>X</INF>) and
volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions and secondary
PM<INF>2.5</INF> formation as a result of NO<INF>X</INF> and sulfur
dioxide (SO<INF>2</INF>) emissions will not themselves cause or
contribute
[[Page 2734]]
to a violation of the ozone or PM<INF>2.5</INF> National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS). In addition, the applicability of Federal and
state requirements to ethanol production facilities in Indiana, such as
New Source Performance Standards at 40 CFR part 60 and National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants at 40 CFR parts 61 and
63, will remain unaffected by this action.
IV. What revisions are being proposed by EPA in Ohio?
On February 7, 2008, EPA received a request from Ohio EPA to revise
its SIP. This submittal included changes to the definition of ``major
stationary source'' under Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) chapters 3745-
31-01 and 3745-77-01, which incorporate into Ohio regulations the
changes EPA made to Federal PSD and title V regulations in the 2007
Ethanol Rule. The changes to the definition of ``major stationary
source'' in the PSD regulations in OAC chapter 3745-31-01 were approved
into the SIP on October 28, 2014, but these changes were not explicitly
discussed in the final rulemaking action that was published in the
Federal Register (79 FR 64119). Therefore, the technical support
document (TSD) that is available as part of this docket was developed
to demonstrate that the changes which were approved into Ohio's SIP in
2014 related to the Ethanol Rule and the corresponding title V
revisions will not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning
attainment and reasonable further progress or any other applicable CAA
requirement. In this action, EPA is proposing to approve the title V
changes in OAC 3745-77-01 relating to the 2007 Ethanol Rule and
providing an opportunity for public comment on those changes, as well
as the changes to the PSD program in OAC 3745-31-01 relating to the
2007 Ethanol Rule that were approved into Ohio's SIP in 2014.
The changes to the PSD program that EPA approved in 2014 are
revisions under the definition of ``major stationary source'' for
stationary sources located in an attainment area that emit or have the
potential to emit 100 tpy or more of any regulated NSR pollutant.
Ethanol facilities that produce ethanol through natural fermentation
were excluded from the definition of ``chemical process plants.''
EPA has determined that these changes are consistent with the
current PSD requirements at 40 CFR 51.166 and that the 2014 revisions
will not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning
attainment and reasonable further progress, or any other applicable
requirement of the CAA. This determination is based on EPA's 110(l)
analysis provided in the accompanying TSD for Ohio which includes
ethanol production trends in the state, an analysis of air quality
design value trends, an examination of Ohio's statewide emissions
inventory, photochemical modeling for ozone and secondary
PM<INF>2.5</INF> formation, maps of existing ethanol facilities and
ambient air monitors, and existing ethanol facility permit
requirements. The analysis demonstrates that emissions from ethanol
production facilities account for less than 1.5% of total point source
emissions for five criteria pollutants examined in Ohio. While ethanol
production has steadily increased in Ohio since 2007, in general, air
quality has improved throughout the state as demonstrated by the
downward trend in design values for criteria pollutants. Photochemical
modeling for ozone based on NO<INF>X</INF> and VOC emissions and
secondary PM<INF>2.5</INF> formation based on NO<INF>X</INF> and
SO<INF>2</INF> emissions from hypothetical ethanol sources demonstrates
that that new ethanol sources and major modifications at existing
sources would not likely cause a violation of the NAAQS. The analysis
also includes a discussion of existing Federal requirements that limit
emissions to which Ohio's ethanol facilities are subject.
The regulations that EPA approved under the PSD program and is
proposing to approve under Ohio's title V program adopt language that
is the same as or consistent with the language of EPA's 2007 Ethanol
Rule. The state regulations that EPA is proposing to approve under the
title V program similarly exclude production facilities that produce
ethanol by natural fermentation from the ``chemical process plants''
category. These revisions clarify that an ethanol facility need not
include fugitive emissions when determining major source applicability
under title V.
EPA is proposing to approve the revision to the Ohio title V
Operating Permit Program under the definition of ``Major source'' for a
major stationary source of air pollutants that directly emits or has
the potential to emit 100 tpy or more of any pollutants. EPA has
determined that these changes are consistent with the current
requirements for title V under 40 CFR part 70.
Based on the 110(l) analysis provided in the Ohio TSD that is
available as part of this docket, EPA concludes that the changes which
were approved into Ohio's PSD SIP in 2014 related to the Ethanol Rule
and the corresponding title V revisions will not interfere with any
applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further
progress or any other applicable CAA requirement.
V. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Indiana SIP in 40 CFR
52.770. EPA is also proposing to approve revisions to the Ohio title V
Operating Permit Program in 40 CFR 70 appendix A, and providing an
opportunity for public comment on the 2014 revisions to the Ohio PSD
SIP in 40 CFR 52.1870 related to the 2007 Ethanol Rule. The revisions
that EPA is proposing to approve change the definition of ``major
stationary source'' under Indiana's PSD regulations and Ohio's
Operating Permit Program. EPA is not taking action on changes related
to NA NSR in this action. This action would approve changes to the
state regulations that establish that the PSD applicability threshold
for certain ethanol plants is 250 tpy and remove the requirement to
include fugitive emissions when determining if an ethanol plant is
subject to major source requirements under PSD and the title V
Operating Permit Programs. EPA has determined that these revisions are
consistent with EPA's PSD and title V regulations and that approval of
these revisions is consistent with the requirements of CAA section
110(l) and will not adversely impact air quality.
VI. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference for Indiana rule 326 IAC 2-2-1(ff), effective August 20,
2011. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
generally available through <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> and at the EPA Region 5
Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission and state Title V program submissions that comply with the
provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C.
7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a); 42 U.S.C. 7661a(d); 40 CFR 70.1(c), 70.4(i).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions and Title V program revision
submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they
meet the criteria of
[[Page 2735]]
the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
<bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
<bullet> Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
<bullet> Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
<bullet> Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
<bullet> Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
<bullet> Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
<bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
<bullet> Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
<bullet> Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
40 CFR Part 70
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hazardous
substances, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: January 6, 2022.
Debra Shore,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2022-00467 Filed 1-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on January 19, 2022.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.