Notice2021-27927
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Amend Rule 904 (Position Limits)
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
December 27, 2021
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 245 (Monday, December 27, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 245 (Monday, December 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73391-73396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-27927]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-93835; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2021-45]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Amend
Rule 904 (Position Limits)
December 20, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that on December 6, 2021, NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I
and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 904 (Position Limits) to
increase position limits for options on certain exchange-traded funds.
The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website at
<a href="http://www.nyse.com">www.nyse.com</a>, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 904 (Position Limits) to
increase position limits for options on certain exchange-traded funds
(``ETFs''). This is a competitive filing that is based on a proposal
recently submitted by Cboe Exchange, Inc. (``Cboe'') and approved by
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 93525 (November 4,
2021), 86 FR 62584 (November 10, 2021) (Notice of Filing of
Amendment Nos. 2 and 3 and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of
SR-CBOE-2021-029).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Position limits are designed to address potential manipulative
schemes and adverse market impacts surrounding the use of options, such
as disrupting the market in the security underlying the options. While
position limits should address and discourage the potential for
manipulative schemes and adverse market impact, if such limits are set
too low, participation in the options market may be discouraged. The
Exchange believes that position limits must therefore be balanced
between mitigating concerns of any potential manipulation and the cost
of inhibiting potential hedging activity that could be used for
legitimate economic purposes.
[[Page 73392]]
In its filing, Cboe states that it has observed an ongoing increase
in demand, for both trading and hedging purposes, in options on the
following ETFs: (1) iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
(``LQD'') and (2) VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (``GDX''). Though the
demand for these options appears to have increased, position limits for
options on LQD and GDX have remained the same. The Exchange believes
these unchanged position limits may have impeded, and may continue to
impede, trading activity and strategies of investors, such as use of
effective hedging vehicles or income generating strategies (e.g., buy-
write or put-write), and the ability of Market Makers to make liquid
markets with tighter spreads in these options resulting in the transfer
of volume to over-the-counter (``OTC'') markets. OTC transactions occur
through bilateral agreements, the terms of which are not publicly
disclosed to the marketplace. As such, OTC transactions do not
contribute to the price discovery process on a public exchange or other
lit markets. Therefore, the Exchange believes that the proposed
increases in position limits for options on LQD and GDX may enable
liquidity providers to provide additional liquidity to the Exchange and
other market participants to transfer their liquidity demands from OTC
markets to the Exchange. As described in further detail below, the
Exchange believes that the continuously increasing market
capitalization of LQD and GDX, including ETF components, as well as the
highly liquid markets for each, reduces the concerns for potential
market manipulation and/or disruption in the underlying markets upon
increasing position limits, while the rising demand for trading options
on LQD and GDX for legitimate economic purposes compels an increase in
position limits.
Proposed Position Limits for Options on LQD and GDX
Position limits for options on ETFs are determined pursuant to Rule
904 and vary according to the number of outstanding shares and the
trading volumes of the underlying equity security (which includes ETFs)
over the past six months. Pursuant to Rule 904, the largest in
capitalization and the most frequently traded stocks and ETFs have an
option position limit of 250,000 contracts (with adjustments for
splits, re-capitalizations, etc.) on the same side of the market; and
smaller capitalization stocks and ETFs have position limits of 200,000,
75,000, 50,000 or 25,000 contracts (with adjustments for splits, re-
capitalizations, etc.) on the same side of the market. Options on LQD
and GDX are currently subject to the standard position limit of 250,000
contracts as set forth in Rule 904. Commentary .07(f) to Rule 904 sets
forth separate, higher position limits for specific equity options
(including options on specific ETFs).\5\ The Exchange proposes to amend
Commentary .07(f) to Rule 904 to increase the position limits and, as a
result, exercise limits, for options on LQD and GDX.\6\ The table below
represents the current, and proposed, position limits for options on
the ETFs subject to this proposal:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Adjusted option series, in which one option contract in the
series represents the delivery of other than 100 shares of the
underlying security as a result of a corporate action by the issuer
of the security underlying such option series, do not impact the
notional value of the underlying security represented by those
options. When an underlying security undergoes a corporate action
resulting in adjusted series, the Exchange lists new standard option
series across all appropriate expiration months the day after the
existing series are adjusted. The adjusted series are generally
actively traded for a short period of time following adjustment, but
orders to open options positions in the underlying security are
almost exclusively placed in the new standard option series
contracts.
\6\ By virtue of Rule 905 (Exercise Limits), which is not being
amended by this filing, the exercise limits for LQD and GDX options
would be similarly increased, because Rule 905 provides that the
exercise limits for index options and ETF options, respectively, are
equivalent to their position limits.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current Proposal
Product position position
limit limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LQD..................................... 250,000 500,000
GDX..................................... 250,000 500,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange notes that the proposed position limit for options on
LQD and GDX are consistent with current position limits for options on
the iShares MSCI Brazil Capped ETF (``EWZ''), iShares 20+ Year Treasury
Bond Fund ETF (``TLT''), iShares MSCI Japan ETF (``EWJ''), and iShares
iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (``HYG''). The Exchange represents
that LQD and GDX qualify for either (1) the initial listing criteria
set forth in Rule 915, Commentary .06 for ETFs holding non-U.S.
component securities, or (2) the generic listing standards for series
of portfolio depository receipts and index fund shares based on
international or global indexes under which a comprehensive
surveillance agreement (``CSA'') is not required, as well as (3) the
continued listing criteria in Rule 916 (for ETFs).\7\ In compliance
with its listing rules, the Exchange also represents that non-U.S.
component securities that are not subject to a CSA do not, in the
aggregate, represent more than more than 50% of the weight of LQD and
GDX.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The Exchange notes that the initial listing criteria for
options on ETFs that hold non-U.S. component securities are more
stringent than the maintenance listing criteria for those same ETF
options. See Rule 915, Commentary .06(a) (ii) and Rule 916,
Commentary .07.
\8\ See Rule 915, Commentary .06(a) (ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Composition and Growth Analysis for LQD and GDX
As stated above, position (and exercise) limits are intended to
prevent the establishment of options positions that can be used to or
potentially create incentives to manipulate the underlying market so as
to benefit options positions. The Commission has recognized that these
limits are designed to minimize the potential for mini-manipulations
and for corners or squeezes of the underlying market, as well as serve
to reduce the possibility for disruption of the options market itself,
especially in illiquid classes.\9\ LQD and GDX, as well as the ETF
components, are highly liquid and are based on a broad set of highly
liquid securities and other reference assets, as demonstrated through
the trading statistics presented in this proposal. To support the
proposed position limit increases, Cboe considered the liquidity of LQD
and GDX, the value of LQD and GDX, their components and the relevant
marketplace, the share and option volume for LQD and GDX, and, where
applicable, the availability or comparison of economically equivalent
products to options on LQD and GDX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67672 (August 15,
2012), 77 FR 50750 (August 22, 2012) (SR-NYSEAmex-2012-29).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cboe collected the following trading statistics regarding shares of
and options on LQD and GDX and the values of LQD and GDX and their
components:
[[Page 73393]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shares Fund market
ADV 10 (ETF ADV (option outstanding cap (USD) Share Value
Product shares) contracts) (millions) 11 (millions) 12 (USD)
(millions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LQD............................. 14.1 30,300 308.1 54,113.7 130.13 (NAV)
GDX............................. 39.4 166,000 419.8 16,170.5 33.80 (NAV)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cboe also collected the same trading statistics, where applicable,
as above regarding a sample of other ETFs, as well as the current
position limits for options on such ETFs, to draw comparisons in
support of proposed position limit increases for options on LQD and GDX
(see further discussion below):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Average daily volume (ADV) data for ETF shares and option
contracts, as well as for ETF shares and options on the comparative
ETFs presented below, are for all of 2020. Additionally, reference
to ADV in ETF shares and ETF options, and indexes herein this
proposal are for all of calendar year 2020, unless otherwise
indicated.
\11\ Shares Outstanding and Net Asset Values (``NAV''), as well
as for the comparative ETFs presented below, are as of April 5, 2021
for all ETFs.
\12\ Fund Market Capitalization data, as well as for the
comparative ETFs presented below, are as of January 14, 2021.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADV (ETF Shares Fund market Current
Product shares) ADV (option outstanding cap (USD) Share value position
(millions) contracts) (millions) (millions) (USD) limits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EWZ..................................................... 29.2 139,400 173.8 6,506.8 33.71 (NAV) 500,000
TLT..................................................... 11.5 111,800 103.7 17,121.3 136.85 (NAV) 500,000
EWJ..................................................... 8.2 15,500 185.3 13,860.7 69.72 (NAV) 500,000
HYG..................................................... 30.5 261,600 254.5 24,067.5 86.86 (NAV) 500,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that, overall, the liquidity in the shares of
LQD and GDX and in their overlying options, the larger market
capitalizations for each LQD and GDX, and the overall market landscape
relevant to each LQD and GDX support the proposal to increase the
position limits for each option class. Given the robust liquidity in
and value of LQD and GDX and their components, the Exchange does not
anticipate that the proposed increase in position limits would create
significant price movements as the relevant markets are large enough to
adequately absorb potential price movements that may be caused by
larger trades.
LQD tracks the performance of the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid
Investment Grade (``IBOXIG'') Index, which is an index designed as a
subset of the broader U.S. dollar-denominated corporate bond market
which can be used as a basis for tradable products, such as ETFs, and
is comprised of over 8,000 bonds.\13\ The Exchange notes that from 2019
through 2020, ADV has grown significantly in shares of LQD and in
options on LQD, from approximately 9.7 million shares in 2019 to 14.1
million through 2020, and from approximately 8,200 option contracts in
2019 to 30,300 through 2020. LQD also continued to experience
significant growth in ADV in the first quarter of 2021 with an ADV of
approximately 140,200 option contracts. Further, LQD generally
experiences higher ADV in shares than both TLT (11.5 million shares)
and EWJ (8.2 million shares) and almost double the ADV in option
contracts than EWJ (15,500 option contracts). Options on each EWZ, TLT
and EWJ are currently subject to a position limit of 500,000
contracts--the proposed limit for options on LQD. The NAV of LQD is
also higher than, or comparable to, that of the NAV of the ETFs
underlying the options that are currently subject to a position limit
of 500,000 option contracts (as presented in the table above), which is
indicative that the total value of its underlying components is
generally higher or comparable. Per the tables above, LQD's total
market capitalization of approximately $54.1 billion is also higher
than or comparable to the total market capitalization of the ETFs
underlying the options currently subject to a position limit of
5000,000 [sic] contracts. In addition to this, the Exchange notes that,
although there are currently no options listed for trading on the
IBOXIG Index, the components \14\ of the IBOXIG Index, which can be
used in creating a basket of securities that equate to the LQD ETF, are
made up of over 8,000 bonds for which the outstanding face value of
each must be greater than or equal to $2 billion.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index,
available at <a href="https://cdn.ihsmarkit.com/www/pdf/MKT-iBoxx-USD-Liquid-Investment-Grade-Index-factsheet.pdf">https://cdn.ihsmarkit.com/www/pdf/MKT-iBoxx-USD-Liquid-Investment-Grade-Index-factsheet.pdf</a> (January 14, 2021).
\14\ Investment grade corporate bonds.
\15\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the total value of the bonds in the
IBOXIG Index, coupled with LQD's share and option volume, total market
capitalization, and NAV price indicates that the market is large enough
to absorb potential price movements caused by a large trade in LQD.
Also, as evidenced above, trading volume in LQD shares has increased
over the past few years and the Exchange understands that market
participants' need for options have continued to grow alongside the
ETF. Particularly, the Exchange notes that in the last year, market
participants have sought more cost-effective hedging strategies through
the use of LQD options as a result of the borrow on other fixed income
ETFs, such as HYG. Therefore, the Exchange believes that because LQD
options are being increasingly utilized as an alternative to similar
products, such as HYG options, then it is appropriate that options on
LQD be subject to the same 500,000 contract position limit that
currently exists for options on HYG.
GDX seeks to replicate as closely as possible the price and yield
performance of the NYSE Arca Gold Miners (``GDMNTR'') Index, which is
intended to track the overall performance of companies involved in the
gold mining industry.\16\ ADV in GDX options has increased from 2019
through 2020, with an ADV of
[[Page 73394]]
approximately 117,400 option contracts in 2019 to an ADV of
approximately 166,000 option contracts in 2020. The Exchange notes that
ADV in GDX shares did not increase from 2019 to 2020. GDX options also
experienced an ADV of approximately 287,800 option contracts in the
first quarter of 2021. The Exchange notes that the ADV in GDX shares
(39.4 million) and options on GDX (166,000 option contracts) are
greater than the ADV in EWZ (29.2 million shares and 139,300 option
contracts), TLT (11.5 million shares and 111,800 option contracts), EWJ
(8.2 million shares and 15,500 option contracts) and HYG (30.5 million
shares and 261,600 option contracts), each of which is currently
subject to a position limit of 500,000 option contracts--the proposed
limit for options on GDX. GDX also experiences a comparable, or higher,
market capitalization (approximately $16.2 billion) than EWZ, TLT and
EWZ. The Exchange particularly notes that many of the Brazil-based gold
mining constituents included in GDX are also included in EWZ, which
tracks the investment results of an index composed of Brazilian
equities, and that the Exchange has not identified any issues with the
continued listing and trading of EWZ options or any adverse market
impact on EWZ in connection with the current 500,000 position limit in
place for EWZ options. Additionally, like that of LQD above, there is
currently no index option analogue for the GDX ETF on the GDMNTR Index
approved for options trading, however, the components of the GDMNTR
Index, which can be used to create the GDX ETF, currently must each
have a market capitalization greater than $750 million, an ADV of at
least 50,000 shares, and an average daily value traded of at least $1
million in order to be eligible for inclusion in the GDMNTR Index. The
Exchange believes that the GDMNTR Index component inclusion
requirements, as well as GDX's share and option volume and total market
capitalization, indicate that the GDX market is sufficiently large and
liquid enough to absorb price movements as a result of potentially
oversized trades.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF, available at https://
www.vaneck.com/library/vaneck-vectors-etfs/gdx-fact-sheet-pdf\
(January14, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Creation and Redemption for ETFs
The Exchange believes that the creation and redemption process for
the ETFs subject to this proposal will lessen the potential for
manipulative activity with options on LQD and GDX. When an ETF provider
wants to create more shares, it looks to an Authorized Participant
(``AP'') (generally a Market Maker or other large financial
institution) to acquire the underlying components the ETF is to hold.
For instance, when an ETF is designed to track the performance of an
index, the AP can purchase all the constituent securities in the exact
same weight as the index, then deliver those shares to the ETF
provider. In exchange, the ETF provider gives the AP a block of equally
valued ETF shares, on a one-for-one fair value basis. The price is
based on the NAV, not the market value at which the ETF is trading. The
creation of new ETF units can be conducted during an entire trading day
and is not subject to position limits. This process works in reverse
where the ETF provider seeks to decrease the number of shares that are
available to trade. The creation and redemption processes for LQD and
GDX creates a direct link to the underlying components of the ETF and
serves to mitigate potential price impact of the ETF shares that might
otherwise result from increased position limits for the options on LQD
and GDX.
The Exchange understands that the ETF creation and redemption
processes seek to keep an ETF's share price trading in line with the
product's underlying net asset value. Because an ETF trades like a
stock, its share price will fluctuate during the trading day, due to
simple supply and demand. If demand to buy an ETF is high, for
instance, an ETF's share price might rise above the value of its
underlying components. When this happens, the AP or issuer believes the
ETF may now be overpriced, so it may buy shares of the component
securities or assets and then sell ETF shares in the open market. This
may drive the ETF's share price back toward the underlying net asset
value. Likewise, if an ETF share price starts trading at a discount to
the component securities or assets it holds, the AP or issuer can buy
shares of the ETF and redeem them for the underlying components. Buying
undervalued ETF shares may drive the share price of an ETF back toward
fair value. This arbitrage process helps to keep an ETF's share price
in line with the value of its underlying portfolio.
Surveillance and Reporting Requirements
The Exchange believes that increasing the position limits for the
options on LQD and GDX would lead to a more liquid and competitive
market environment for these options, which will benefit customers
interested in trading these products. The reporting requirement for the
options on LQD and GDX would remain unchanged. Thus, the Exchange would
still require that each Member \17\ that maintains positions in the
options on the same side of the market, for its own account or for the
account of a customer, report certain information to the Exchange. This
information would include, but would not be limited to, the options'
positions, whether such positions are hedged and, if so, a description
of the hedge(s). Market Makers would continue to be exempt from this
reporting requirement, however, the Exchange may access Market-Maker
position information.\18\ Moreover, the Exchange's requirement that
Members file reports with the Exchange for any customer who held
aggregate large long or short positions on the same side of the market
of 200 or more option contracts of any single class for the previous
day will remain at this level for the options subject to this proposal
and will continue to serve as an important part of the Exchange's
surveillance efforts.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ The term ``Member'' means an individual or organization
approved to exercise the trading rights associated with an ATP. ATP
Holders are deemed ``members'' under the Exchange Act. See Rule
900.2NY(5).
\18\ The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') through the
Large option Position Reporting (``LOPR'') system acts as a
centralized service provider for Member compliance with position
reporting requirements by collecting data from each Member,
consolidating the information, and ultimately providing detailed
listings of each Member's report to the Exchange, as well as
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA''), acting as
its agent pursuant to a regulatory services agreement (``RSA'').
\19\ See Rule 906 for reporting requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the existing surveillance procedures and
reporting requirements at the Exchange and other SROs are capable of
properly identifying disruptive and/or manipulative trading activity.
The Exchange also represents that it has adequate surveillances in
place to detect potential manipulation, as well as reviews in place to
identify potential changes in composition of LQD and GDX and continued
compliance with the Exchange's listing standards. These procedures
utilize daily monitoring of market activity via automated surveillance
techniques to identify unusual activity in both options and the
underlyings, as applicable.\20\ The Exchange also notes that large
stock holdings must be disclosed to the Commission by way of Schedules
13D or 13G,\21\ which are used to report ownership of stock which
exceeds 5% of a company's total stock issue and may assist in providing
information in
[[Page 73395]]
monitoring for any potential manipulative schemes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ The Exchange believes these procedures have been effective
for the surveillance of trading the options subject to this proposal
and will continue to employ them.
\21\ 17 CFR 240.13d-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the current financial requirements
imposed by the Exchange and by the Commission adequately address
concerns regarding potentially large, unhedged positions in the options
on LQD and GDX. Current margin and risk-based haircut methodologies
serve to limit the size of positions maintained by any one account by
increasing the margin and/or capital that a Member must maintain for a
large position held by itself or by its customer.\22\ In addition, Rule
15c3-1 \23\ imposes a capital charge on Members to the extent of any
margin deficiency resulting from the higher margin requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See Exchange Rules, Section 9 for a description of margin
requirements.
\23\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Substantive Changes
The Exchange also proposes to make two non-substantive changes to
remove the quotation marks around HYG and Financial Select Sector SPDR
Fund (``XLF''), which would add internal consistency to the rule making
it easier to navigate to the benefit of market participants.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See proposed Commentary .07(f) to Rule 904.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act \25\ in general, and furthers the objectives of
Sections 6(b)(5) of the Act,\26\ in that it is designed to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system
and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \27\ requirement that the rules of
an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\26\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\27\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed increase in position limits
for options on LQD and GDX will remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, protect investors and the public interest, because it will
provide market participants with the ability to more effectively
execute their trading and hedging activities. The proposed increases
will allow market participants to more fully implement hedging
strategies in related derivative products and to further use options to
achieve investment strategies (e.g., there are other exchange-traded
products (``ETPs'') that use options on the ETFs subject to this
proposal as part of their investment strategy, and the applicable
position limits as they stand today may inhibit these other ETPs in
achieving their investment objectives, to the detriment of investors).
Also, increasing the applicable position limits may allow Market Makers
to provide the markets for these options with more liquidity in amounts
commensurate with increased consumer demand in such markets. The
proposed position limit increases may also encourage other liquidity
providers to shift liquidity, as well as encourage consumers to shift
demand, from OTC markets onto the Exchange, which will enhance the
process of price discovery conducted on the Exchange through increased
order flow.
In addition, the Exchange believes that the structure of LQD and
GDX, the considerable market capitalization of the funds and underlying
components, and the liquidity of the markets for the applicable options
and underlying components will mitigate concerns regarding potential
manipulation of the products and/or disruption of the underlying
markets upon increasing the relevant position limits. As a general
principle, increases in market capitalizations, active trading volume,
and deep liquidity of the underlying components do not lead to
manipulation and/or disruption. This general principle applies to the
recently observed increased levels of market capitalization and trading
volume and liquidity in shares of and options on LQD and GDX (as
described above), and, as a result, the Exchange does not believe that
the options markets or underlying markets would become susceptible to
manipulation and/or disruption as a result of the proposed position
limit increases. Indeed, the Commission has previously expressed the
belief that not just increasing, but removing, position and exercise
limits may bring additional depth and liquidity to the options markets
without increasing concerns regarding intermarket manipulation or
disruption of the options or the underlying securities.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62147 (October 28,
2005) (SR-CBOE-2005-41), at 62149.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, the Exchange notes that the proposed rule change to
increase position limits for select actively traded options is not
novel and the Commission has approved similar proposed rule changes to
increase position limits for options on similar, highly liquid and
actively traded ETPs.\29\ Furthermore, the Exchange again notes that
that the proposed position limits for options on LQD and GDX are
consistent with existing position limits for options on other ETFs in
Rule 904, Commentary .07(f). The Exchange's surveillance and reporting
safeguards continue to be designed to deter and detect possible
manipulative behavior that might arise from increasing or eliminating
position and exercise limits in certain classes. The Exchange believes
that the current financial requirements imposed by the Exchange and by
the Commission adequately address concerns regarding potentially large,
unhedged position in the options on LQD and GDX, further promoting just
and equitable principles of trading, the maintenance of a fair and
orderly market, and the protection of investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 88768 (April 29,
2020), 85 FR 26736 (May 5, 2020) (SR-CBOE-2020-015); 83415 (June 12,
2018), 83 FR 28274 (June 18, 2018) (SR-CBOE-2018-042); and 68086
(October 23, 2012), 77 FR 65600 (October 29, 2012) (SR-CBOE-2012-
066).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange also proposes to make two non-substantive
changes to remove the quotation marks around HYG and XLF, which would
add internal consistency to the rule making it easier to navigate to
the benefit of market participants.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ See proposed Commentary .07(f) to Rule 904.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In this regard and as
indicated above, the Exchange notes that the rule change is being
proposed as a competitive response to a filing submitted by Cboe.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ See supra note 4 (approval of Cboe filing).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange does not believe the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the
increased position limits (and exercise limits) will be available to
all market participants and apply to each in the same manner. The
Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will provide additional
opportunities for market participants to more efficiently achieve their
investment and trading objectives.
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the Act. On the contrary,
[[Page 73396]]
the Exchange believes the proposal promotes competition because it may
attract additional order flow from the OTC market to exchanges, which
would in turn compete amongst each other for those orders. The Exchange
believes market participants would benefit from being able to trade
options with increased position limits in an exchange environment in
several ways, including but not limited to the following: (1) Enhanced
efficiency in initiating and closing out positions; (2) increased
market transparency; and (3) heightened contra-party creditworthiness
due to the role of OCC as issuer and guarantor. The Exchange notes that
other options exchanges may choose to file similar proposals with the
Commission to increase position limits on options on LQD and GDX.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \32\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\33\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \34\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \35\ permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposed rule change may become operative upon filing. The Exchange
states that waiver of the operative delay would be consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest because it will ensure
fair competition among the exchanges by allowing the Exchange to
immediately increase the relevant position limits, which will provide
consistency for Exchange Members that are also members at Cboe where
these increased position limits are currently in place. The Commission
notes that the Exchange's corresponding exercise limits for the options
covered by this proposal also would be increased, consistent with the
increased exercise limits for these options already in place at Cboe.
For these reasons, the Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day
operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby waives the operative
delay and designates the proposal as operative upon filing.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\35\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\36\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission also has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ccbeb9a0a9e1afa3a1a1a9a2b8bf8cbfa9afe2aba3ba"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c0b2b5aca5eda3afadada5aeb4b380b3a5a3eea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2021-45 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2021-45. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2021-45, and should be
submitted on or before January 18, 2022.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-27927 Filed 12-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on December 27, 2021.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.