Rule2021-27448
Paroling, Recommitting, and Supervising Federal Prisoners: Prisoners Serving Sentences Under the United States and District of Columbia Codes
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
December 20, 2021
Effective
December 20, 2021
Issuing agencies
Justice DepartmentParole Commission
Abstract
The United States Parole Commission is revising its regulations to eliminate a policy of imposing the maximum permissible term of supervised release as a consequence of the revocation of an earlier supervised release term for offenders sentenced under the D.C. Code.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 241 (Monday, December 20, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 241 (Monday, December 20, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 71828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-27448]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Parole Commission
28 CFR Part 2
[Docket No. USPC-2021-01]
Paroling, Recommitting, and Supervising Federal Prisoners:
Prisoners Serving Sentences Under the United States and District of
Columbia Codes
AGENCY: United States Parole Commission, Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Parole Commission is revising its
regulations to eliminate a policy of imposing the maximum permissible
term of supervised release as a consequence of the revocation of an
earlier supervised release term for offenders sentenced under the D.C.
Code.
DATES: This final rule is effective December 20, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helen H. Krapels, General Counsel,
U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE, Third Floor, Washington, DC
20530, telephone (202) 346-7030. Questions about this publication are
welcome, but inquiries concerning individual cases cannot be answered
over the telephone.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Based upon its experience with D.C. Code
sentenced supervised releasees for over 20 years, the Commission is
repealing its policy, codified at 28 CFR 2.218(e), of imposing the
maximum permissible term of supervised release after revoking an
earlier term of supervised release. On August 17, 2021, the Parole
Commission published an interim rule with request for comments. 86 FR
45861. The Parole Commission has not received any comments and is
publishing the final rule with no changes to the interim rule.
Under the revised regulation the Commission will retain the
discretion to impose the maximum permissible term when it finds that
the offender would benefit from a lengthier period of supervision, but
there will no longer be a policy guiding that decision.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
This regulation has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulation Planning and Review,'' section
1(b), Principles of Regulation, and in accordance with Executive Order
13565, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' section 1(b),
General Principles of Regulation. The Commission has determined that
this rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review, and
accordingly this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Under Executive Order 13132, this rule does not
have sufficient federalism implications requiring a Federalism
Assessment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant economic impact upon a
substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not cause State, local, or tribal governments, or
the private sector, to spend $100,000,000 or more in any one year, and
they will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. No
action under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 is necessary.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Subtitle
E--Congressional Review Act)
This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by Section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 Subtitle E-
Congressional Review Act, now codified at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule
will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on the ability of United States-based companies to compete with
foreign-based companies. Moreover, this is a rule of agency practice or
procedure that does not substantially affect the rights or obligations
of non-agency parties, and does not come within the meaning of the term
``rule'' as used in Section 804(3)(C), now codified at 5 U.S.C.
804(3)(C). Therefore, the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does
not apply.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 2
Administrative practice and procedure, Prisoners, Probation and
parole.
The Final Rule
0
Accordingly, the U.S. Parole Commission adopts the interim rule
amending 28 CFR part 2, which was published at 86 FR 45861 on August
17, 2021, as final without change.
Patricia K. Cushwa,
Chairman (Acting), U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-27448 Filed 12-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on December 20, 2021.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.